Comparing the symptom experience of cancer patients and non-cancer patients
Symptom burden is an established concept in oncology encompassing the presence and severity of symptoms experienced by cancer patients. Few studies have examined differences in symptom burden between cancer patients and non-cancer patients. This study seeks to examine the differences in symptom burden between cancer patients (CP) and non-cancer patients (NCP) in order to better understand symptom burden in both populations.
Two groups of patients completed the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale: 301 patients from a general medical clinic and 558 cancer patients from a cancer tumor registry. Participants provided demographic information—age, race/ethnicity, and sex and completed the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale. Medical comorbidity was also measured.
Most symptoms were more common in CP, except for pain, which was more prevalent in the NCP (45% of CP vs. 54% of NCP, p < .05). There was no difference in prevalence for the following symptoms: dry mouth, mouth sores, feeling nervous, worry, cough, and dizziness. The CP had greater mean MSAS Total scores (0.53 vs. 0.43, p < .01), number of symptoms (9.11 vs. 6.13, p < .01), and psychological subscale scores (0.77 vs. 0.64, p < .05). There was no difference by group in the physical nor the GDI subscale scores.
The results of this study support the perception that cancer patients have greater symptom burden. There were some unexpected results, particularly in terms of pain, which was more common in NCP and other symptoms that were experienced equally in both patient populations.
KeywordsMemorial symptom assessment scale Symptom prevalence Pain Cancer Non-cancer patients
The authors wish to thank Cara Jacobsen and Nebu Kolenchery for their contributions to this project and Dr. Raymond Tait for his editorial assistance with the manuscript. There was no support from any organization for the submitted work; no financial relationships with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous 3 years; and no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
- 1.American Cancer Society (2016) Cancer Facts & Figures 2016. American Cancer Society, AtlantaGoogle Scholar
- 2.Institute of Medicine and National Research Council (2006) From cancer patient to cancer survivor: lost in transition. National Academies Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- 19.Piccirillo JF, Creech CM, Zequeira R (1999) Anderson S, Johnston AS. Inclusion of comorbidity into oncology data registries. J Registry Manag 26(2):66–70Google Scholar
- 35.Perkins A (1994) Saving money by reducing stress. Harvard Bus Rev 72:12Google Scholar
- 37.Integrating Primary Care and Behavioral Health Services: A Compass and a Horizon (2015) Bureau of Primary Health Care: Mountain view Consulting Group, Inc. http://www.apa.org/rural/strosahl.pdf. Accessed April 10 2015
- 38.American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer. Cancer Program Standards 2012 Version 1.2.1:ensuringpatient-centeredcare. https://www.facs.org/quality-programs/cancer/coc/standards. Accessed August 26 2015