Abstract
Purpose
Carmustine (BCNU) is used in the conditioning regimens BEAM and CBV for autologous stem cell transplantation. Carmustine-related infusion reactions, while not described in the BEAM literature, occurred in 95 % of patients who received CBV. The most common symptoms include flushing, facial pain, headache, and hypotension. These reactions have been attributed to the absolute ethanol that is used in the reconstitution process or alternatively by a direct effect of carmustine. It is currently recommended that carmustine 300 mg/m2 be infused over at least 100 min (3–5 mg/m2/min). Prior to October 2014, carmustine infusions were given over 90 min but were changed to 120 min based on the above recommendation. We compared the two infusion rates in patients receiving BEAM to see if lengthening the infusion decreased the frequency of reactions.
Methods
Overall, 100 patients received BCNU as part of BEAM or Zevalin BEAM and were equally divided between 90 and 120 min infusion times. The primary outcome was the incidence of infusion-related reactions which were graded based on CTCAE 4.03 descriptions of flushing and infusion-related reactions. We also evaluated the impact of premedication as well as the efficacy of medications used to treat infusion reactions.
Results
Between the years 2013–2016, there were 50 patients who received BCNU over 90 min and 50 patients over 120 min. There were no significant differences observed for diagnosis, age and gender between the two groups. Twenty-eight (56 %) in the 90-min and 26 (52 %) in the 120-min infusion intervals developed a reaction (p = 0.6882). Of the patients that developed a reaction, 19 patients (67 %) in the 90-min and all 26 patients (100 %) in the 120-min infusion were given premedications predominately acetaminophen, in addition to dexamethasone. Among reacting patients, 57 % of the 90-min and 65 % of the 120-min groups received additional intervention (p = 0.53).
Conclusion
Infusion reactions during high-dose BCNU are common and are not clearly reduced by modestly extending the duration of infusion or giving premedications.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Jagannath S, Dicke KA, Armitage JO et al (1986) High-dose cyclophosphamide, carmustine, and etoposide and autologous bone marrow transplantation for relapsed Hodgkin’s disease. Ann Intern Med 104:163–168
Gribben JG, Linch DC, Singer CR, McMillan AK, Jarrett M, Goldstone AH (1989) Successful treatment of refractory Hodgkin’s disease by high-dose combination chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow transplantation. Blood 73:340–344
Shimoni A, Zwas ST, Oksman Y et al (2007) Yttrium-90-ibritumomab tiuxetan (Zevalin) combined with high-dose BEAM chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation for chemo-refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Exp Hematol 35:534–540
Chen YB, Lane AA, Logan BR et al (2015) Impact of conditioning regimen on outcomes for patients with lymphoma undergoing high-dose therapy with autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 21:1046–1053
Janson B, Van Koeverden P, Yip SW, Thakerar A, Mellor JD (2012) Carmustine infusion reactions are more common with rapid administration. Support Care Cancer 20:2531–2535
Woo MH, Ippoliti C, Bruton J, Mehra R, Champlin R, Przepiorka D (1997) Headache, circumoral paresthesia, and facial flushing associated with high-dose carmustine infusion. Bone Marrow Transplant 19:845–847
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Perreault, S., Baker, J., Medoff, E. et al. Infusion reactions are common after high-dose carmustine in BEAM chemotherapy and are not reduced by lengthening the time of administration. Support Care Cancer 25, 205–208 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-016-3399-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-016-3399-4