Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A nurse-led protocol improves the time to first dose intravenous antibiotics in septic patients post chemotherapy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Neutropenic sepsis is a time-dependent emergency with early interventions shown to improve outcomes. Broad spectrum intravenous antibiotic administration is the initial therapy in patients with suspected neutropenic sepsis. Compliance with early antibiotic administration in febrile neutropenia patients is poor. Innovations have been trialled to improve the time to first dose intravenous antibiotics in patients with suspected neutropenic sepsis. Consideration of extending first dose intravenous antibiotic prescribing to trained nursing staff may improve performance in this key standard.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed at a specialist oncology hospital in the North West of England from January 1st 2015 to January 31st 2016. The nurses on the Medical Admissions Unit (MAU) have been given the responsibility of assessing patients presenting with fever post chemotherapy including prescribing and administering the first dose of intravenous antibiotics with the aim of improving the speed of this intervention.

Results

During the study period, 697 patients presented to the MAU with suspected sepsis post chemotherapy. Six hundred seventy-two (96.4 %) patients received their first dose of intravenous antibiotics within 60 min of presentation to the MAU. Of this group, 323 (48.1 %) were administered antibiotics within 15 min of arrival. Of the 25 (3.6 %) patients who did not receive antibiotics within 1 h, root cause analysis revealed the reason in 23 (92 %) patients was an inability to ascertain intravenous access.

Conclusion

Nurse-led protocols are an effective, safe, and sustainable method for achieving early antibiotic administration in patients with suspected febrile neutropenia. This is a key component of ensuring improved outcomes for this cohort of patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Angus D, van der Poll T (2013) Severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med 369:840–851

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dellinger R, Levy M, Rhodes A, et al. (2013) Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012. Crit Care Med 41(2):580–637

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Daniels R (2011) Surviving the first hours in sepsis: getting the basics right. J Antimicrob Chemother 66:ii11–ii23

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Klastersky J, Paesmans M, Rubenstein E, et al. (2000) The Multinational Association for Supportive Care in cancer risk index: a multinational scoring system for identifying low-risk febrile neutropenic cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 18:3038–3051

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Klastersky J, Paesmans M (2013) The Multinational Association for Supportive Care in cancer (MASCC) risk score: 10 years of use for identifying low risk neutropenic cancer patients. Support Care Cancer 21:1487–1495

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cooksley T, Holland M, Klastersky J (2015) Ambulatory outpatient management of patients with low risk febrile neutropaenia. Acute Med 14(4):178–181

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 2012 NICE Guideline. Neutropenic sepsis: prevention and management of neutropenic sepsis in cancer patients

  8. Flowers C, Seidenfeld J, Bow E, et al. (2013) Antimicrobial prophylaxis and outpatient management of fever and neutropenia in adults treated for malignancy: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline. J Clin Onc 31:794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rosa R, Goldani L (2014) Cohort study of the impact of time to antibiotic administration on mortality in patients with febrile neutropenia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58(7):3799–3803

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Perron T, Emara M, Ahmed S (2014) Time to antibiotics and outcomes in cancer patients with febrile neutropenia. BMC Health Serv Res 14:162

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Friefeld A, Bow E, Sepkowitz K, et al. (2011) Clinical practice guideline for the use of antimicrobial agents in neutropenic patients with cancer: 2010 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 52:e56–e93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Nirenberg A, Mulhearn L, Lin S, Larson E (2004) Emergency department waiting times for patients with cancer with febrile neutropenia. Oncol Nurs Forum 31(4):711–715

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Clarke R, Warnick J, Stretton K, Littlewood T (2011) Improving the immediate management of neutropenic sepsis in the UK: lessons from a national audit. Br J Haematol 153:773–779

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Keng M, Thallner E, Elson P, Ajon C, Sekeres J, et al. (2015) Reducing time to antibiotic administration for febrile neutropenia in the emergency department. J Oncol Pract 11(6):4505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Meisenberg B, Clemons J, Ness J, Faust N, Clance M (2015) Improving hospital performance in the treatment of febrile neutropenia. Support Care Cancer 23:371–375

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Szwajcer D, Czaykowski P, Turner D (2011) Assessment and management of febrile neutropenia in emergency departments within a regional health authority—a benchmark analysis. Curr Oncol 16:280–284

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sammut S, Mazhar D (2012) Management of febrile neutropenia in an acute oncology service. QJM 105:327–336

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Parish B, Cooksley T, Haji-Michael P (2013) Effectiveness of early antibiotic administration in septic patients with cancer. Acute Med 12(4):196–200

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Burry E, Punnet A, Mehta A, Thull-Freedman J, et al. (2012) Identification of educational and infrastructural barriers to prompt antibiotic delivery in febrile neutropenia: a quality improvement initiative. Pediatr Blood Cancer 59:431–435

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Best J, Frith K, Anderson F, Rapp C, et al. (2011) Implementation of an evidence based order set to impact initial antibiotic time intervals in adult febrile neutropenia. Oncol Nurs Forum 38:661–668

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the nurses on the MAU at The Christie for their continued work in making the PGD a success story.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Acute Medicine and Critical Care, The Christie, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, M20 4BX, UK

    Graeme Mattison, Matthew Bilney, Phil Haji-Michael & Tim Cooksley

Authors
  1. Graeme Mattison
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Matthew Bilney
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Phil Haji-Michael
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Tim Cooksley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tim Cooksley.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mattison, G., Bilney, M., Haji-Michael, P. et al. A nurse-led protocol improves the time to first dose intravenous antibiotics in septic patients post chemotherapy. Support Care Cancer 24, 5001–5005 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-016-3362-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-016-3362-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation