Satisfaction with cancer care among American Indian and Alaska Natives in Oregon and Washington State: a qualitative study of survivor and caregiver perspectives
- 327 Downloads
To better understand satisfaction with care among American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) persons with cancer, we explored dimensions of the provider relationship that contributed to satisfaction among caregivers and survivors who received cancer treatment in Oregon and Washington State.
Between November 2011 and April 2013, the project team interviewed 11 caregivers and 71 AI/AN cancer survivors residing in Oregon and Washington State. Interview questions aimed to elicit participant experiences with care providers and factors associated with cancer care satisfaction. Interviews were analyzed using an inductive content analysis approach in which concepts were identified and themes derived from interview data.
Three overarching themes, each with two sub-themes, emerged from the data: (1) universal factors: bolstering understanding, involvement, and empathy in care; (2) minority-specific factors: incorporating culture and community into care; and (3) AI/AN-unique factors: interacting with Indian health clinics and Indian Health Service (IHS).
The results of our study suggest that satisfaction with care among survivors and their caregivers must be examined within the context of culture and community, particularly among minority patients. Our study demonstrates providers’ critical role in ensuring AI/AN patients emerge satisfied with cancer treatment by honoring their AI/AN-specific needs, such as respect for integration of traditional healing modalities and navigation of specialty care coordination.
KeywordsRace/ethnicity Satisfaction with care Cancer health disparities Patient-provider relationship Cultural competence Survivorship
American Indian/Alaska Native
Cancer among American Indians: A Multi-State Study
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Hutchinson Center for Cancer Outcomes Research
Indian Health Service
Northwest Portland Area Indian Health Board
The authors would like to thank the staff and investigators at all collaborating institutions: the FHCRC Hutchinson Institute for Cancer Outcomes Research (HICOR); the Northwest Portland Area Indian Health Board; and the AIMS Advisory Board, Oregon State Cancer Registry. We would also like to extend our gratitude to the study participants and community members, who provided insight and perspective, and without whom this work would not be possible.
Compliance with ethical standards
The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of NIH, NCI, FHCRC, HICOR, NPAIHB, University of Illinois-Chicago, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, or the University of Washington. The authors have full access to all primary data. Given the ethical standards and protocols with this vulnerable population, primary data may be shared upon approval by the Portland Area Indian Health Service Institutional Review Board and the Northwest Portland Area Indian Health Board.
This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Cancer Institute (NCI) (R01 CA125231 to S. Ramsey).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
- 1.National Center for Health Statistics (2012) Health, United States, 2011: with special feature on socioeconomic status and healthGoogle Scholar
- 2.Reuben SH (2003) Facing cancer in Indian country: the Yakama Nation and Pacific Northwest Tribes: President’s Cancer Panel 2002 Annual Report., US Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute Google Scholar
- 7.J. J. Guidry, A. Greisinger, L. A. Aday, R. J. Winn, S. Vernon, and T. A. Throckmorton, "Barriers to cancer treatment: a review of published research," in Oncology nursing forum, 1996, pp. 1393–1398.Google Scholar
- 8.S. H. Javid, T. K. Varghese, A. M. Morris, M. P. Porter, H. He, D. Buchwald, et al., "Guideline-concordant cancer care and survival among American Indian/Alaskan Native patients," Cancer, 2014Google Scholar
- 14.R. Royak-Schaler, S. R. Passmore, S. Gadalla, M. K. Hoy, M. Zhan, K. Tkaczuk, et al., "Exploring patient-physician communication in breast cancer care for African American women following primary treatment," in Oncology nursing forum, 2008, pp. 836–843.Google Scholar
- 19.Mack N, Woodsong C, MacQueen KM, Guest G, Namey E (2005) Qualitative research methods: a data collectors field guideGoogle Scholar
- 20.J. Corbin and A. Strauss, Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory: Sage Publications, Incorporated, 2007Google Scholar
- 23.Noe TD, Manson SM, Croy C, McGough H, Henderson JA, Buchwald DS (2006) The influence of community-based participatory research principles on the likelihood of participation in health research in American Indian communities. Ethnicity & Disease 17:S6–14Google Scholar
- 24.Burhansstipanov L, Schumacher SCSA (2005) Lessons learned from community-based participatory research in Indian country. Cancer control: journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center 12:70Google Scholar
- 31.L. U. Krebs, L. Burhansstipanov, S. Watanabe-Galloway, N. L. Pingatore, D. G. Petereit, and D. Isham, "Navigation as an intervention to eliminate disparities in American Indian communities," in Seminars in oncology nursing, 2013, pp. 118–127.Google Scholar
- 36.Indian Health Service. (October 28, 2015). Contract health services. Available: https://www.ihs.gov/forpatients/index.cfm/chs/