Thyroid cancer survivors’ perceptions of survivorship care follow-up options: a cross-sectional, mixed-methods survey
- 319 Downloads
This study investigated thyroid cancer (TC) survivors’ perceived satisfaction with and perceptions of survivorship care follow-up options.
Well-differentiated TC (WDTC) patients receiving follow-up care at an academic cancer centre completed a questionnaire assessing perceived satisfaction with follow-up care involving different clinicians and mediated by the Internet (email or videoconference) and their perceptions of these follow-up options. We examined associations between patient characteristics and perceived satisfaction with follow-up care options. Qualitative responses were analysed using conventional content analysis.
Two hundred and two respondents completed the questionnaire (80 % response rate). The majority strongly agreed or agreed that they would be satisfied with specialist (surgeon, oncologist, or endocrinologist) follow-up (90.6 %) or a shared-care model that integrates specialists with primary care (67.5 %). One third (32 %) would be satisfied with video-based and 26 % with email-based specialist follow-up, 15 % with primary care alone. Longer time since diagnosis and health-related Internet use were associated with higher perceived satisfaction with Internet-based follow-up. Younger age was associated with higher perceived satisfaction with primary care follow-up. Qualitative responses (n = 145) revealed that survivors need reassurance they are receiving adequate care, regardless of the model or medium. Enablers to primary care and Internet-based follow-up are discussed.
WDTC survivors want specialists involved in their follow-up. A specialist/primary care shared-care approach appears to be a suitable alternative to specialist-led follow-up for TC survivors. Internet-based visits could address some aspects of follow-up care for some WDTC survivors. Future work should examine patient and provider requirements for shared, multi-modal survivorship care.
KeywordsThyroid cancer Survivorship Follow-up Technology Internet
Angel Duggan, Barbara Athil, Darlene Dale, and the PM Cancer Registry are acknowledged.
Compliance with ethical standards
This study was approved by the institution’s Research Ethics Board.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Consent to participate
All study respondents gave signed informed consent.
- 1.Canadian Cancer Society (2014) Canadian Cancer Statistics 2014, Provincial/Territorial Cancer Registries, Public Health Agency of Canada. 2014. http://www.cancer.ca. Accessed 19 Jan 2015
- 3.Cancer Research UK (2008) CancerStats: Cancer Statistics for the UK 2008. 12/2013 update. (2008). http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/cancer-info/cancerstats/types/thyroid/incidence/. Accessed 19 Jan 2015.
- 5.Hewitt M, Greenfield S, Stovall E et al (eds) (2005) From cancer patient to cancer survivor: lost in transition. Institute of Medicine. The National Academies Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- 6.Halpern MT, Viswanathan M, Evans TS, Birken SA, Basch E, Mayer DK (2014) Models of cancer survivorship care: overview and summary of current evidence. J Oncol Pract. Sept 9 [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
- 13.Deloitte (2013) eVisits: the 21st century housecall. http://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/global/Documents/Technology-Media-Telecommunications/gx-tmt-2014prediction-evisits.pdf. Accessed 19 Jan 2015
- 14.PWC (2014) Making care mobile: shifting perspectives on the virtualization of health care. http://www.pwc.com/ca/virtualcare. Accessed 19 Jan 2015.
- 16.Statistics Canada (2012) Canadian Internet Use Survey, 2012. http://www.statcan.gc.ca/daily-quotidien/131126/dq131126d-eng.htm. Accessed Jan 19 2015
- 24.Creswell JW (2003) Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed method approaches. Sage Publications, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
- 26.Bender JL (2011) The web of support: a multi-method study examining the role of online communities as a source or peer-to-peer supportive care for breast cancer survivors. Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of TorontoGoogle Scholar
- 29.Wiljer D, Bender JL, Masino C, Alkazaz N, Brierley J (2012) Alternative methods of sustainable survivorship care. International Association for the Development of the Information Society (IADIS) eHealth Conference. Lisbon, Portugal.Google Scholar
- 31.Rojas MP, Telaro E, Russo A, Moschetti I, Coe L, Fossati R et al (2005) Follow-up strategies for women treated for early breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1, CD001768Google Scholar
- 39.Statistics Canada (2010) Canada Internet Use Survey. The Daily. http://www.statcan.gc.ca/daily-quotidien/100510/dq100510a-eng.htm. Accessed 15 Jan 2015