Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Enhancing the experience of carers in the chemotherapy outpatient setting: an exploratory randomised controlled trial to test impact, acceptability and feasibility of a complex intervention co-designed by carers and staff

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Supporting someone through chemotherapy can be emotionally and physically demanding. However, research has yet to establish the type of support carers require or the best way to provide this. This study tested the feasibility and acceptability of a complex intervention for carers that was co-designed by staff and carers of patients starting chemotherapy.

Methods

Forty-seven carers were recruited, randomised between the intervention (n = 24) and control (n = 23) groups. A questionnaire was completed pre- and post-intervention measuring knowledge of chemotherapy and its side effects, experience of care, satisfaction with outpatient services, coping and emotional wellbeing. The intervention process was evaluated by carers and healthcare professionals (HCPs) in focus groups.

Results

Recruitment to the study was unproblematic and attrition from it was low, suggesting the intervention and study processes were acceptable to patients and carers. Carers in receipt of the ‘Take Care’ intervention reported statistically significantly better understanding of symptoms and side effects and their information needs being more frequently met than carers in the control. Confidence in coping improved between baseline and follow-up for the intervention group and declined for the control although differences were insufficient to achieve statistical significance. There was no significant difference between the two groups’ emotional wellbeing. HCP and carer focus groups confirmed the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention.

Conclusions

The ‘Take Care’ intervention proved acceptable to carers and HCPs and demonstrates considerable promise and utility in practice. Study findings support the conduct of a fully powered RCT to determine the intervention’s effectiveness and cost-effectiveness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wiseman T, Verity R, Ream E, Alderman E, Richardson A (2005) Exploring the work of nurses who administer chemotherapy: a multi-method study. King’s College London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  2. McIlfatrick S, Sullivan K, McKenna H (2006) What about the carers?: exploring the experience of caregivers in a chemotherapy day hospital setting. Eur J Oncol Nurs 10(4):294–303

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mitchell T (2007) The social and emotional toll of chemotherapy—patients’ perspectives. Eur J Cancer Care 16:39–47

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Stenberg U, Ruland CM, Miaskowski C (2009) Review of the literature on the effects of caring for a patient with cancer. Psycho-Oncology. doi:10.1002/pon.1670

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ream E, Pedersen VH, Oakley C, Richardson A, Taylor C, Verity R (2013) Informal carers’ experiences and needs when supporting patients through chemotherapy: a mixed method study. Eur J Cancer Care 22(6):797–806

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Northouse L, Williams A, Given B, McCorkle R (2012) Psychosocial care for family caregivers of patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol 30(11):1227–1234

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. NICE (2004) Guidance on cancer services: improving supportive and palliative care for adults. London. National Institute for Clinical Excellence, London

    Google Scholar 

  8. Adler NE, Page AEK (2008) Cancer care for the whole patient: meeting psychosocial health needs. Washington (DC) National Academies Press, USA

    Google Scholar 

  9. Turnbull Macdonald GC, Baldassarre F, Brown P, Hatton-Bauer J, Green E, Lebel S (2012) Psychosocial care for cancer: a framework to guide practice and actionable recommendations for Ontario. Curr Oncol 19(4):209–216

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. National Health and Medical Research Council [NHMRC] (2003) Clinical practice guidelines for the psychosocial care of adults with cancer. National Breast Cancer Centre, Camperdown, NSW: http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/guidelines/publications/cp90 accessed 5/11/14

  11. Surbone A, Baider L, Weitzman TS, Brames MJ, Rittenberg CN, Johnson J (2009) Psychosocial care for patients and their families is integral to supportive care in cancer: MASCC position statement. Support Cancer Care 18:255–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. NHS England (2013) Cancer patient experience survey 2013 national report. Quality Health

  13. McCarthy B (2011) Family members of patients with cancer: what they know, how they know and what they want to know. Eur J Oncol Nurs 15(5):428–441

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nijboer C, Triemstra M, Tempelaar R, Sanderman R, van den Bos GAM (1999) Determinants of caregiving experiences and mental health of partners of cancer patients. Cancer 86(4):577–588

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Grinyer A (2006) Caring for a young adult with cancer: the impact on mothers’ health. Health Social Care Community 14(4):311–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Macmillan (2006) Worried sick: the emotional impact of cancer. Macmillan Cancer Support, London

    Google Scholar 

  17. Thomas C, Morris SM, Soothill K, McIllmurray M, Francis B, Harman J (2001) What are the psychosocial needs of cancer patients and their main carers? A study of user experience of cancer services with particular reference to psychosocial need. The Institute of for Health Research, Lancaster University

  18. Isaksen AS, Thuen F, Hanestad B (2003) Patients with cancer and their close relatives: experiences with treatment, care, and support. Cancer Nurs 26(1):68–74

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Honea NJ, Britnall RA, Given B, Sherwood P, Colao DB, Somers SC, Northouse LL (2008) Putting evidence into practice: nursing assessment and interventions to reduce family caregiver strain and burden. Clin J Oncol Nurs 12(3):507–516

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Caress AL, Chalmers K, Luker K (2009) A narrative review of interventions to support family carers who provide physical care to family members with cancer. Int J Nurs Stud 46(11):1516–1527

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ussher JM, Perz J, Hawkins Y, Brack M (2009) Evaluating the efficacy of psycho-social interventions for informal carers of cancer patients: a systematic review of the research literature. Health Psychol Rev 3(1):85–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hudson PL, Aranda S, Hayman-White K (2005) A psycho-educational intervention for family caregivers of patients receiving palliative care: a randomized controlled trial. J Pain Symptom Manag 30(4):329–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. McMillan SC, Small BJ, Weitzner M, Schonwetter R, Tittle M, Moody L, Hayley WE (2006) Impact of coping skills intervention with family caregivers of hospice patients with cancer. Cancer 106(1):214–222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. O’Hara RE, Hull JG, Lyons KD, Bakitas M, Hegel MT, Li Z et al (2010) Impact on caregiver burden of a patient-focused palliative care intervention for patients with advanced cancer. Palliat Support Care 8(04):395–404

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hudson P, Thomas T, Quinn K, Cockayne M, Braithwaite M (2009) Teaching family carers about home-based palliative care: final results from a group education program. J Pain Symptom Manag 38(2):299–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Schildmann EK, Higginson IJ (2011) Evaluating psycho-educational interventions for informal carers of patients receiving cancer care or palliative care: strengths and limitations of different study designs. Palliat Med 25(4):345–356

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Carey M, Lambert S, Smits R, Paul C, Sanson-Fisher R, Clinton-McHarg T (2012) The unfulfilled promise: a systematic review of interventions to reduce the unmet supportive care needs of cancer patients. Support Care Cancer 20(2):207–219

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Northouse LL, Katapodi MC, Song L, Zhang L, Mood DW (2010) Interventions with family caregivers of cancer patients: meta-analysis of randomized trials. A Cancer J Clin 60(5):317–339

    Google Scholar 

  29. Medical Research Council (2008) Developing and evaluating complex interventions: new guidance. Medical Research Council, London

    Google Scholar 

  30. Bate S, Robert G (2007) Bringing user experience to health care improvement: the concepts, methods and practices of experience-based design. Radcliffe Publishing, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  31. Donetto S, Tsianakas V, Robert G (2014) Using experience-based co-design (EBCD) to improve the quality of healthcare: mapping where we are now and establishing future directions. King’s College London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  32. Julious S (2005) Sample size of 12 per group rule of thumb for a pilot study. Pharm Stat 4:287–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Sim J, Lewis M (2012) The size of a pilot study for a clinical trial should be calculated in relation to considerations of precision and efficiency. J Clin Epidemiol 65:301–308

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Ervik M, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, Parkin DM, Forman D, Bray (2013) F GLOBOCAN 2012 v1.0, Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: IARC CancerBase No. 11 [Internet] Lyon France. International Agency for Research on Cancer. http://globocan.iarc.fr. Accessed on 4th June 2007

  35. Girgis A, Lambert S, Lecathelinais C (2011) The supportive care needs survey for partners and caregivers of cancer survivors: development and psychometric evaluation. Psycho-Oncology 20(4):387–393

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Schwarzer R, Fuchs R (1996) Self-efficacy and health behaviors. In: Connor M, Norman P (eds) Predicting health behavior: research and practice with social cognition models. Open University Press, Buckingham, pp 163–196

    Google Scholar 

  37. Goldberg DP, Williams P (1988) A user’s guide to the general health questionnaire. NFER-Nelson, Windsor

    Google Scholar 

  38. Ritchie J, Lewis J (2003) Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. Sage Publications Ltd, Windsor

    Google Scholar 

  39. Vodermaier A, Wolfgang L, Christopher S (2009) Screening for emotional distress in cancer patients: a systematic review of assessment instruments. J Natl Cancer Inst 101:1464–1488

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Henriksson A, Andershed B, Benzein E, Årestedt K (2012) Adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the preparedness for caregiving scale, caregiver competence scale and rewards of caregiving scale in a sample of Swedish family members of patients with life-threatening illness. Palliat Med 26:930

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was funded by Dimbleby Cancer Care.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, King’s College London, 57 Waterloo Road, London, SE1 8WA, UK

    V. Tsianakas & R. Verity

  2. National Nursing Research Unit, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, King’s College London, 57 Waterloo Road, London, SE1 8WA, UK

    G. Robert & T. Murrells

  3. Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Highfield, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK

    A. Richardson

  4. Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, Guy’s Hospital, Level 4 Bermondsey Wing, London, SE1 9RT, UK

    C. Oakley & M. Flynn

  5. School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Duke of Kent Building, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7TE, UK

    E. Ream

Authors
  1. V. Tsianakas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. G. Robert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. A. Richardson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. R. Verity
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. C. Oakley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. T. Murrells
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. M. Flynn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. E. Ream
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Ream.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tsianakas, V., Robert, G., Richardson, A. et al. Enhancing the experience of carers in the chemotherapy outpatient setting: an exploratory randomised controlled trial to test impact, acceptability and feasibility of a complex intervention co-designed by carers and staff. Support Care Cancer 23, 3069–3080 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-015-2677-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-015-2677-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation