Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Health-related physical fitness assessment in a community-based cancer rehabilitation setting

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Assessment of physical fitness is important in order to set goals, appropriately prescribe exercise, and monitor change over time. This study aimed to determine the utility of a standardized physical fitness assessment for use in cancer-specific, community-based exercise programs.

Methods

Tests anticipated to be feasible and suitable for a community setting and a wide range of ages and physical function were chosen to measure body composition, aerobic fitness, strength, flexibility, and balance. Cancer Exercise Trainers/Specialists at cancer-specific, community-based exercise programs assessed new clients (n = 60) at enrollment, designed individualized exercise programs, and then performed a re-assessment 3–6 months later (n = 34).

Results

Resting heart rate, blood pressure, body mass index, waist circumference, handgrip strength, chair stands, sit-and-reach, back scratch, single-leg standing, and timed up-and-go tests were considered suitable and feasible tests/measures, as they were performed in most (≥88 %) participants. The ability to capture change was also noted for resting blood pressure (−7/−5 mmHg, p = 0.02), chair stands (+4, p < 0.01), handgrip strength (+2 kg, p < 0.01), and sit-and-reach (+3 cm, p = 0.03). While the submaximal treadmill test captured a meaningful improvement in aerobic fitness (+62 s, p = 0.17), it was not completed in 33 % of participants. Change in mobility, using the timed up-and-go was nominal and was not performed in 27 %.

Conclusion

Submaximal treadmill testing, handgrip dynamometry, chair stands, and sit-and-reach tests were feasible, suitable, and provided meaningful physical fitness information in a cancer-specific, community-based, exercise program setting. However, a shorter treadmill protocol and more sensitive balance and upper body flexibility tests should be investigated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schmitz KH, Courneya K, Matthews C et al (2010) American College of Sports Medicine roundtable on exercise guidelines for cancer survivors. Med Sci Sports Exerc 42:1409–1426. doi:10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181e0c112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Courneya KS (2009) Physical activity in cancer survivors: a field in motion. Psychooncology 18:337–342. doi:10.1002/pon.1546

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. American College of Sports Medicine (2013) ACSM/ACS Certified Cancer Exercise TrainerSM. American College of Sports Medicine. http://certification.acsm.org/acsm-cancer-exercise-trainer. Accessed 12 Nov 2014

  4. Canadian Physiotherapy Association (2014) Oncology Physiotherapy. Canadian Physiotherapy Association. http://www.physiotherapy.ca/Divisions/Oncology. Accessed 12 Nov 2014

  5. American Physical Therapy Association (2014) Oncology Section, American Physical Therapy Association. American Physical Therapy Association. http://www.oncologypt.org. Accessed 12 Nov 2014

  6. Noble M, Russell C, Kraemer L, Sharratt M (2012) UW WELL-FIT: the impact of supervised exercise programs on physical capacity and quality of life in individuals receiving treatment for cancer. Support Care Cancer 20:865–873. doi:10.1007/s00520-011-1175-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rajotte EJ, Yi JC, Baker KS et al (2012) Community-based exercise program effectiveness and safety for cancer survivors. J Cancer Surviv 6:219–228. doi:10.1007/s11764-011-0213-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Thompson WR, Gordon NF, Pescatello LS (2010) ACSM’s guidelines for exercise testing and prescription, 8th edn. Wolters Kluwer Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadephia

    Google Scholar 

  9. Van Londen GJ, Livesey KM, Lemberskey BC (2012) Breast cancer: never too young for a functional assessment? Oncology 26:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hayward R (2014) Rocky Mountain Cancer Exercise Specialist Workshop. University of Northern Colorado. http://www.unco.edu/rmcri/cancer_ex_spec_workshop.html. Accessed 12 Nov 2014

  11. Pescatello LS, Arena R, Riebe D, Thompson PD (2014) ACSM’s guidelines for exercise testing and prescription, 9th edn. Wolters Kluwer Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  12. Baruth M, Wilcox S, Wegley S et al (2011) Changes in physical functioning in the Active Living Every Day program of the Active for Life Initiative®. Int J Behav Med 18:199–208. doi:10.1007/s12529-010-9108-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bohannon RW, Peolsson A, Massy-Westropp N et al (2006) Reference values for adult grip strength measured with a Jamar dynamometer: a descriptive meta-analysis. Physiotherapy 92:11–15. doi:10.1016/j.physio.2005.05.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ostchega Y, Porter KS, Hughes J, Dillon CF, Nwankwo T (2011) Resting pulse rate reference data for children, adolescents, and adults: United States, 1999–2008. Natl Health Stat Report 41:1–16

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rikli RE (1999) Functional fitness normative scores for community residing older adults ages 60–94. J Aging Phys Act 7:162–181

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bohannon RW, Larkin PA, Cook AC et al (1984) Decrease in timed balance test scores with aging. Phys Ther 64:1067–1070

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Swain DP (2014) ACSM’s resource manual for guidelines for exercise testing and prescription, 9th edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gellish RL, Goslin BR, Olson RE et al (2007) Longitudinal modeling of the relationship between age and maximal heart rate. Med Sci Sports Exerc 39:822–829. doi:10.1097/mss.0b013e31803349c6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Karvonen M, Kentala E, Mustala O (1957) The effects of training on heart rate: a longitudinal study. Ann Med Exp Biol Fenn 35:307–315

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Cole CR, Foody JM, Blackstone EH, Lauer MS (2000) Heart rate recovery after submaximal exercise testing as a predictor of mortality in a cardiovascularly healthy cohort. Ann Intern Med 132:552–555

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Jones CJ, Rikli RE, Beam WC (1999) A 30-s chair-stand test as a measure of lower body strength in community-residing older adults. Res Q Exerc Sport 70:113–119. doi:10.1080/02701367.1999.10608028

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Jones CJ, Rikli RE (2002) Measuring functional fitness in older adults. J Act Aging 1:24–30

    Google Scholar 

  23. Stamler J, Rose G, Stamler R et al (1989) INTERSALT study findings. Public health and medical care implications. Hypertension 14:570–577. doi:10.1161/01.HYP.14.5.570

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Viniegra M, Marchetti M, Losso M et al (1990) Cardiovascular autonomic function in anthracycline-treated breast cancer patients. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 26:227–231

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Stone CA, Kenny RA, Nolan B, Lawlor PG (2012) Autonomic dysfunction in patients with advancedcancer; prevalence, clinical correlates andchallenges in assessment. BMC Palliat Care 11:3. doi:10.1186/1472-684X-11-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Blair SN, Kohl HW, Barlow CE et al (1995) Changes in physical fitness and all-cause mortality: a prospective study of healthy and unhealthy men. JAMA 273:1093–1098

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Wright AA, Cook CE, Baxter GD et al (2011) A comparison of 3 methodological approaches to defining major clinically important improvement of 4 performance measures in patients with hip osteoarthritis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 41:319–327. doi:10.2519/jospt.2011.3515

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Nitschke JE, McMeeken JM, Burry HC, Matyas TA (1999) When is a change a genuine change?: a clinically meaningful interpretation of grip strength measurements in healthy and disabled women. J Hand Ther 12:25–30

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lang CE, Edwards DF, Birkenmeier RL, Dromerick AW (2008) Estimating minimal clinically important differences of upper-extremity measures early after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 89:1693–1700. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2008.02.022

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Bohannon RW (2001) Dynamometer measurements of hand-grip strength predict multiple outcomes. Percept Mot Skills 93:323–328

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Triffitt PD (1998) The relationship between motion of the shoulder and the stated ability to perform activities of daily living. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80:41–46

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Jones CJ, Rikli RE, Max J, Noffal G (1998) The reliability and validity of a chair sit-and-reach test as a measure of hamstring flexibility in older adults. Res Q Exerc Sport 69:338–343. doi:10.1080/02701367.1998.10607708

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Rikli RE, Jones CJ (1999) Development and validation of a functional fitness test for community-residing older adults. J Aging Phys Act 7:129–161

    Google Scholar 

  34. Idland G, Engedal K, Bergland A (2013) Physical performance and 13.5-year mortality in elderly women. Scand J Public Health 41:102–108. doi:10.1177/1403494812466460

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Lin MR, Hwang HF, Hu MH et al (2004) Psychometric comparisons of the timed up and go, one-leg stand, functional reach, and Tinetti balance measures in community-dwelling older people. J Am Geriatr Soc 52:1343–1348

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Flansbjer U-B, Holmbäck AM, Downham D, Patten C, Lexell J (2005) Reliability of gait performance tests in men and women with hemiparesis after stroke. J Rehabil Med 37(2):75–82. doi:10.1080/16501970410017215

  37. Michikawa T, Nishiwaki Y, Takebayashi T, Toyama Y (2009) One-leg standing test for elderly populations. J Orthop Sci 14:675–685. doi:10.1007/s00776-009-1371-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Cooper R, Strand BH, Hardy R et al (2014) Physical capability in mid-life and survival over 13 years of follow-up: British birth cohort study. BMJ 348:g2219. doi:10.1136/bmj.g2219

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Amy Kirkham and Sarah Neil-Sztramko are supported by Canada Graduate Scholarship Doctoral Awards from the Canadian Institute of Health Research.

Conflict of interest

Joanne Morgan and Sara Hodson are the respective owners of Back on Track Fitness and Live Well Exercise Clinic, which were the two centers included in this study. They were involved in study design and data collection and reviewed the manuscript but were not involved in data analysis, interpretation, or reporting of results.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Rehabilitation Sciences, University of British Columbia, 212-2177 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, Canada, V6T 1Z3

    Amy A. Kirkham & Kristin L. Campbell

  2. School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, 212-2177 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, Canada, V6T 1Z3

    Sarah E. Neil-Sztramko & Kristin L. Campbell

  3. Back on Track Fitness, 731 W 16th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, Canada, V5Z 1S8

    Joanne Morgan & Sarah Weller

  4. Live Well Exercise Clinic, 306-1676 Martin Drive, White Rock, BC, Canada, V4A 6E7

    Sara Hodson & Tasha McRae

  5. Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, 212-2177 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, Canada, V6T 1Z3

    Kristin L. Campbell

Authors
  1. Amy A. Kirkham
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sarah E. Neil-Sztramko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Joanne Morgan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sara Hodson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Sarah Weller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Tasha McRae
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Kristin L. Campbell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kristin L. Campbell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kirkham, A.A., Neil-Sztramko, S.E., Morgan, J. et al. Health-related physical fitness assessment in a community-based cancer rehabilitation setting. Support Care Cancer 23, 2525–2533 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-014-2599-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-014-2599-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation