Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Oral-health-related quality of life in patients with cancer: cultural adaptation and the psychometric testing of the Persian version of EORTC QLQ-OH17

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the validity, reliability, responsiveness to treatment, and gender invariance of the Persian version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Oral Health Questionnaire (QLQ-OH17) among Iranian cancer patients.

Methods

Cancer patients (n = 729) from three oncology centers in Tehran and Qazvin were recruited. A forward and backward translation procedure was performed to develop a culturally acceptable version of Persian QLQ-OH17. Internal consistency and test–retest reliability of the QLQ-OH17 was assessed. In addition, convergent and discriminant validity, concurrent validity, construct validity, and known-groups validity were evaluated. The factor structure of the questionnaire was examined by exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Responsiveness to change was measured in an independent sample of patients with head and neck cancer undergoing radiotherapy. Finally, factorial invariance of the QLQ-OH17 was assessed across gender.

Results

The Persian version of QLQ-OH17 showed good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha coefficients of 0.71–0.83) and reliability on repeated administration (intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.85–0.94). Persian QLQ-OH17 exhibited the original four-factor structure. Patients who perceived good oral health and satisfaction with their mouth reported significantly better oral-health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) than those who perceived poor oral health and dissatisfied with their mouth. Similarly, those who perceived a need for dental treatment reported significantly poorer OHRQoL than those who have not perceived any treatment need. Older patients, females, and those experiencing greater caries had poorer QoL than their comparative counterparts. All QLQ-OH17 subscales were correlated with QLQ-C30 subscales and global QoL. Both male and female patients with cancer interpreted items on the QLQ-OH17 in a similar manner. The QLQ-OH17 was found to be responsive to treatment in a sample of head and neck cancer patients.

Conclusions

The Persian version of QLQ-OH17 is a valid and reliable questionnaire for assessing OHRQoL in Iranian patients with various cancers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stewart BW, Wild CP (2014) World cancer report 2014. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon

    Google Scholar 

  2. Forouzanfar MH, Sepanlou SG, Shahraz S, Dicker D, Naghavi P, Pourmalek F, Mokdad A, Lozano R, Vos T, Asadi-Lari M, Sayyari AA, Murray CJ, Naghavi M (2014) Evaluating causes of death and morbidity in Iran, global burden of diseases, injuries, and risk factors study 2010. Arch Iran Med 17(5):304–320

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Study protocol for the World Health Organization project to develop a Quality of Life assessment instrument (WHOQOL) (1993). Qual Life Res 2(2):153–159

  4. Robb C, Haley WE, Balducci L, Extermann M, Perkins EA, Small BJ, Mortimer J (2007) Impact of breast cancer survivorship on quality of life in older women. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 62(1):84–91. doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2006.11.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Heydarnejad MS, Hassanpour DA, Solati DK (2011) Factors affecting quality of life in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. Afr Health Sci 11(2):266–270

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Repetto L, Ausili-Cefaro G, Gallo C, Rossi A, Manzione L (2001) Quality of life in elderly cancer patients. Ann Oncol 12(Suppl 3):S49–S52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Zimmermann C, Burman D, Swami N, Krzyzanowska MK, Leighl N, Moore M, Rodin G, Tannock I (2011) Determinants of quality of life in patients with advanced cancer. Support Care Cancer 19(5):621–629. doi:10.1007/s00520-010-0866-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ferrell BR, Dow KH, Grant M (1995) Measurement of the quality of life in cancer survivors. Qual Life Res 4(6):523–531

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Osoba D (2011) Health-related quality of life and cancer clinical trials. Ther Adv Med Oncol 3(2):57–71. doi:10.1177/1758834010395342

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Epstein JB, Thariat J, Bensadoun RJ, Barasch A, Murphy BA, Kolnick L, Popplewell L, Maghami E (2012) Oral complications of cancer and cancer therapy: from cancer treatment to survivorship. CA Cancer J Clin 62(6):400–422. doi:10.3322/caac.21157

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hall WH (1990) Oral complications of cancer therapies. J Neurosurg 72(5):831–832

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Allen G, Logan R, Gue S (2010) Oral manifestations of cancer treatment in children: a review of the literature. Clin J Oncol Nurs 14(4):481–490. doi:10.1188/10.CJON.481-490

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, Duez NJ, Filiberti A, Flechtner H, Fleishman SB, de Haes JC et al (1993) The European organization for research and treatment of cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 85(5):365–376

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Velikova G, Bottomley A (2012) Looking back at 30 years of progress from methodological developments to making a real impact on oncology practice. EORTC Quality of Life Group, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hjermstad MJ, Bergenmar M, Fisher SE, Montel S, Nicolatou-Galitis O, Raber-Durlacher J, Singer S, Verdonck-de Leeuw I, Weis J, Yarom N, Herlofson BB (2012) The EORTC QLQ-OH17: a supplementary module to the EORTC QLQ-C30 for assessment of oral health and quality of life in cancer patients. Eur J Cancer 48(14):2203–2211

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Harding G, Coyne KS, Thompson CL, Spies JB (2008) The responsiveness of the uterine fibroid symptom and health-related quality of life questionnaire (UFS-QOL). Health Qual Life Outcomes 6:99. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-6-99

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fayers P, Aaronson NK, Bjordal K, Curran D, Groenvold M (2001) EORTC QLQ-C30 scoring manual, 3rd edn. EORTC Quality of Life Group, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  18. Montazeri A, Harirchi I, Vahdani M, Khaleghi F, Jarvandi S, Ebrahimi M, Haji-Mahmoodi M (1999) The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30): translation and validation study of the Iranian version. Support Care Cancer 7(6):400–406

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Dewolf L, Koller M, Velikova G, Johnson C, Scott N, Bottomley A (2009) EORTC Quality of Life Group translation procedure, 3rd edn. EORTC Quality of Life Group, Brussels, Belgium

  20. Klein H, Palmer CE, Knutson JW (1938) Following reference “Klein H PC, Knutson JW. Studies on dental caries. I. Dental status and dental needs of elementary school children. Public Health Rep 53:751–765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. World Health Organization (2013) Oral health surveys: basic methods. World Health Organization, France

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pakpour AH, Yekaninejad MS, Zarei F, Hashemi F, Steele MM, Varni JW (2011) The PedsQL Oral Health Scale in Iranian children: reliability and validity. Int J Paediatr Dent 21(5):342–352

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hays R, Revicki DA (2005) Reliability and validity (including responsiveness). In: Fayers P, Hays R (eds) Assessing quality of life in clinical trials. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  24. Fayers PM, Machin D (2000) Quality of life: assessment, analysis and interpretation. John Wiley, Chichester

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. Hays RD, Hayashi T, Carson S, Ware JE (1988) User’s guide for the multitrait analysis program (MAP). The Rand Corp, Santa Monica

    Google Scholar 

  26. Santos JRA (1999) Cronbach’s alpha: a tool for assessing the reliability of scales. J Extension 37(2)

  27. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33(1):159–174

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lukacs JR (2011) Gender differences in oral health in south Asia: metadata imply multifactorial biological and cultural causes. Am J Hum Biol 23(3):398–411

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Tada A, Hanada N (2004) Sexual differences in oral health behaviour and factors associated with oral health behaviour in Japanese young adults. Public Health 118(2):104–109

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Memetovic J, Ratner PA, Richardson CG (2014) Gender-based measurement invariance of the substance use risk profile scale. Addict Behav 39(3):690–694. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.10.016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Arraras JI, Manterola A, Hernandez B, Arias de la Vega F, Martinez M, Vila M, Eito C, Vera R, Dominguez MA (2011) The EORTC information questionnaire, EORTC QLQ-INFO25. Validation study for Spanish patients. Clin Transl Oncol 13(6):401–410. doi:10.1007/s12094-011-0674-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Fang FM, Tsai WL, Chien CY, Chiu HC, Wang CJ (2004) Health-related quality of life outcome for oral cancer survivors after surgery and postoperative radiotherapy. Jpn J Clin Oncol 34(11):641–646. doi:10.1093/jjco/hyh118

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hammerlid E, Taft C (2001) Health-related quality of life in long-term head and neck cancer survivors: a comparison with general population norms. Br J Cancer 84(2):149–156. doi:10.1054/bjoc.2000.1576

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Lawrence HP, Thomson WM, Broadbent JM, Poulton R (2008) Oral health-related quality of life in a birth cohort of 32-year olds. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 36(4):305–316. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0528.2007.00395.x

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Dahl KE, Wang NJ, Holst D, Ohrn K (2011) Oral health-related quality of life among adults 68–77 years old in Nord-Trondelag, Norway. Int J Dent Hyg 9(1):87–92. doi:10.1111/j.1601-5037.2010.00445.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Oscarson N, Kallestal C, Lindholm L (2007) A pilot study of the use of oral health-related quality of life measures as an outcome for analysing the impact of caries disease among Swedish 19-year-olds. Caries Res 41(2):85–92. doi:10.1159/000098040

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Fitzpatrick R, Ziebland S, Jenkinson C, Mowat A, Mowat A (1992) Importance of sensitivity to change as a criterion for selecting health status measures. Qual Health Care 1(2):89–93

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Klein J, Livergant J, Ringash J (2014) Health related quality of life in head and neck cancer treated with radiation therapy with or without chemotherapy: a systematic review. Oral Oncol 50(4):254–262. doi:10.1016/j.oraloncology.2014.01.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Ohrn KE, Sjoden PO, Wahlin YB, Elf M (2001) Oral health and quality of life among patients with head and neck cancer or haematological malignancies. Support Care Cancer 9(7):528–538

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Vissink A, Jansma J, Spijkervet FK, Burlage FR, Coppes RP (2003) Oral sequelae of head and neck radiotherapy. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 14(3):199–212

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Sciubba JJ, Goldenberg D (2006) Oral complications of radiotherapy. Lancet Oncol 7(2):175–183. doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(06)70580-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

All authors declared no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amir H. Pakpour.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yekaninejad, M.S., Pakpour, A.H., Tadakamadla, J. et al. Oral-health-related quality of life in patients with cancer: cultural adaptation and the psychometric testing of the Persian version of EORTC QLQ-OH17. Support Care Cancer 23, 1215–1224 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-014-2468-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-014-2468-9

Keywords

Navigation