Supportive Care in Cancer

, Volume 23, Issue 4, pp 1063–1071 | Cite as

Comparison of the acceptability and benefits of two mindfulness-based interventions in women with breast or gynecologic cancer: a pilot study

  • Lesley Stafford
  • Naomi Thomas
  • Elizabeth Foley
  • Fiona Judd
  • Penny Gibson
  • Angela Komiti
  • Jeremy Couper
  • Litza Kiropoulos
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to compare the relative benefits and acceptability of two different group-based mindfulness psychotherapy interventions among women with breast and gynecologic cancer.

Methods

Data from 42 women who completed an 8-week mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) program comprising 22 contact hours were compared to data from 24 women who completed a 6-week mindfulness meditation program (MMP) comprising 9 contact hours. Distress, quality of life (QOL), and mindfulness were evaluated pre- (T1) and post-intervention (T2). ANCOVA was used to analyse the relationship between intervention type and T1 score on outcome variable change scores. Participants’ perceptions of benefit and acceptability were assessed.

Results

The participants did not differ on clinical or demographic variables other than MBCT participants were more likely than MMP participants to have a past history of anxiety or depression (p = .01). Scores on distress, QOL, and mindfulness improved from T1 to T2 with medium to large effect sizes for the MMP (p = .002, d = .07; p = .001, d = .08; p = .005, d = .06, respectively) and MBCT (p < .001, d = .06; p = .008, d = .04; p < .001, d = .09, respectively) interventions. ANCOVA showed no main effect for intervention type on outcome change scores and no interaction between intervention type and respective T1 score. Distress and mindfulness scores at T1 had a main effect on respective change scores (p = .02, ηp 2 = .87; p = .01, ηp 2 = .80, respectively). Both programs were perceived as beneficial and acceptable with no differences between the intervention types.

Conclusions

Within the limits of a small, non-randomized study, these findings provide preliminary support for the utility of a brief mindfulness intervention for improving distress and QOL in a heterogeneous group of women with cancer. Abbreviated interventions are less resource intensive and may be attractive to very unwell patients.

Keywords

Oncology Cancer Mindfulness Distress Quality of life Cognitive therapy 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by funding from the Collier Charitable Foundation and the Preston and Loui Geduld Trust. The Centre for Women’s Mental Health is supported by the Pratt Foundation. The authors acknowledge Dr Enza de Pino’s contribution to the development of the first six-session mindfulness intervention.

Conflict of interest

The authors do not have a financial relationship with the Pratt Foundation, the Collier Charitable Trust or the Preston and Loui Geduld Trust. The authors have full control of all primary data and agree to allow the journal to review these data if requested.

References

  1. 1.
    Arndt V, Merx H, Stegmaier C, Ziegler H, Brenner H (2005) Persistence of restrictions in quality of life from the first to the third year after diagnosis in women with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 23:4945–4953CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2010) Cancer in Australia 2010: an overview. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Carmody J, Baer RA (2009) How long does a mindfulness-based stress reduction program need to be? A review of class contact sizes for psychological distress. J Clin Psychol 65:627–638CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cella DF, Tulsky DS, Gray G, Serafian B, Lloyd S, Linn E, Harris J (1993) The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) Scale: Development and validation of the general measure. J Clin Oncol 11:570–579PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Henry JD, Crawford JR (2005) The short-form version of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS-21): Construct validity and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. Br J Clin Psychol 44:227–239CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hoffman KE, McCarthy EP, Recklitis CJ, Ng AK (2009) Psychological distress in long-term survivors of adult-onset cancer: Results from a national survey. Arch Intern Med 169:1274–1281CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kabat-Zinn J (1990) Full catastrophe living: Using the wisdom of your body and mind to face stress, pain and illness. Delacorte, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kabat-Zinn J (1994) Wherever you go, there you are: Mindfulness meditation in everyday life. Hyperion, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ledesma D, Kumano H (2009) Mindfulness-based stress reduction and cancer: a meta-analysis. Psychooncology 18:571–579CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mols F, Vingerhoets AJ, Coebergh JW, van de Poll-Franse LV (2005) Quality of life among long-term breast cancer survivors: a systematic review. Eur J Cancer 41:2613–2619CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Segal ZV, Williams JMG, Teasdale JD (2002) Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for depression: a new approach to preventing relapse. Guilford Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shennan C, Payne S, Fenlon D (2011) What is the evidence for the use of mindfulness-based interventions in cancer care? A review. Psychooncology 20:681–697CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Speca M, Carlson LE, Goody E, Angen M (2000) A randomized, wait-list controlled clinical trial: the effect of a mindfulness meditation-based stress reduction program on mood and symptoms of stress in cancer outpatients. Psychosom Med 62:613–622CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Stafford L, Foley E, Judd F, Gibson P, Kiropoulos L, Couper J (2013) Mindfulness-based cognitive group therapy for women with breast and gynecologic cancer: a pilot study to determine effectiveness and feasibility. Support Care Cancer 21:3009–3019CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Thomsen DK (2006) The association between rumination and negative affect: a review. Cogn Emot 20:1216–1235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Walach H, Buchheld N, Buttenmuller V, Kleinknecht N, Schmidt S (2006) Measuring mindfulness: the Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory (FMI). Personal Individ Differ 40:1543–1555CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lesley Stafford
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Naomi Thomas
    • 1
    • 3
  • Elizabeth Foley
    • 4
  • Fiona Judd
    • 1
    • 3
  • Penny Gibson
    • 1
  • Angela Komiti
    • 1
    • 3
  • Jeremy Couper
    • 5
    • 6
  • Litza Kiropoulos
    • 2
    • 7
  1. 1.Centre for Women’s Mental HealthRoyal Women’s HospitalParkvilleAustralia
  2. 2.Melbourne School of Psychological SciencesUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia
  3. 3.Department of PsychiatryUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia
  4. 4.Mind Potential, Shop 2CaringbahAustralia
  5. 5.Department of Psychiatry, Psycho-Oncology Research UnitPeter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneAustralia
  6. 6.Department of PsychiatryUniversity of Melbourne, St Vincent’s HospitalMelbourneAustralia
  7. 7.Psychology DepartmentRoyal Melbourne HospitalParkvilleAustralia

Personalised recommendations