Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Framework for timing of the discussion about forgoing cancer-specific treatment based on a qualitative study with oncologists

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Many patients with advanced cancer receive aggressive chemotherapy close to death and are referred too late to palliative or hospice care.

Aim

The aim of this study was to investigate oncologists’ and oncology nurses’ perceptions of the optimal timing for discussions about forgoing cancer-specific therapy at the End-of-Life (EOL) and the reasons that might hinder them.

Design

Qualitative in-depth interviews with oncologists and oncology nurses  were carried out. The empirical data were evaluated from a normative perspective.

Setting/participants

Twenty-nine physicians and nurses working at the Department of Hematology and Oncology of a German university hospital were interviewed.

Results

Health-care professionals differed considerably in their understanding of when to initiate discussions about forgoing cancer-specific therapy at the EOL. However, their views could be consolidated into three approaches: (1) preparing patients gradually throughout the course of disease (anticipatory approach) which is best suited to empower patient self-determination in decision-making, (2) waiting until the patient him/herself starts the discussion about forgoing cancer-specific treatment, and (3) waiting until all tumor-specific therapeutic options are exhausted.

Conclusion

The empirically informed ethical analysis clearly favors an approach that prepares patients for forgoing cancer-specific therapy throughout the course of disease. Since the last two approaches often preclude advance care planning, these approaches may be less ethically acceptable. The proposed framework could serve as a starting point for the development of concrete recommendations on the optimal timing for EOL discussions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Russell BJ, Ward AM (2011) Deciding what information is necessary: do patients with advanced cancer want to know all the details? Cancer Manag Res 3:191–199

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Back AL, Michaelsen K, Alexander S et al (2010) How oncology fellows discuss transitions in goals of care: a snapshot of approaches used prior to training. J Palliat Med 13:395–400

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wright AA, Zhang B, Ray A et al (2008) Associations between end-of-life discussions, patient mental health, medical care near death, and caregiver bereavement adjustment. JAMA 300:1665–1673

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gordon EJ, Daugherty CK (2003) ‘Hitting you over the head’: oncologists’ disclosure of prognosis to advanced cancer patients. Bioethics 17:142–168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Matsuyama R, Reddy S, Smith TJ (2006) Why do patients choose chemotherapy near the end of life? A review of the perspective of those facing death from cancer. J Clin Oncol 24:3490–3496

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Snyder S, Hazelett S, Allen K, Radwany S (2013) Physician knowledge, attitude, and experience with advance care planning, palliative care, and hospice: results of a primary care survey. Am J Hosp Palliat Care 30:419–424

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hui D, Mori M, Parsons HA et al (2012) The lack of standard definitions in the supportive and palliative oncology literature. J Pain Symptom Manage 43:582–592

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gaertner J, Wolf J, Voltz R (2012) Early palliative care for patients with metastatic cancer. Curr Opin Oncol 24:357–362

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Curtis JR, Patrick DL, Caldwell ES, Collier AC (2000) Why don’t patients and physicians talk about end-of-life care? Barriers to communication for patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and their primary care clinicians. Arch Intern Med 160:1690–1696

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kissane DW, Bylund CL, Banerjee SC et al (2012) Communication skills training for oncology professionals. J Clin Oncol 30:1242–1247

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Brown RF, Bylund CL (2008) Communication skills training: describing a new conceptual model. Acad Med 83:37–44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hagerty RG, Butow PN, Ellis PA et al (2004) Cancer patient preferences for communication of prognosis in the metastatic setting. J Clin Oncol 22:1721–1730

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Clayton JM, Hancock K, Parker S et al (2008) Sustaining hope when communicating with terminally ill patients and their families: a systematic review. Psychooncology 17:641–659

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Butow PN, Dowsett S, Hagerty R, Tattersall MH (2002) Communicating prognosis to patients with metastatic disease: what do they really want to know? Support Care Cancer 10:161–168

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Schofield PE, Beeney LJ, Thompson JF et al (2001) Hearing the bad news of a cancer diagnosis: the Australian melanoma patient’s perspective. Ann Oncol 12:365–371

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Clayton JM, Butow PN, Tattersall MH (2005) When and how to initiate discussion about prognosis and end-of-life issues with terminally ill patients. J Pain Symptom Manage 30:132–144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Keating NL, Landrum MB, Rogers SO Jr et al (2010) Physician factors associated with discussions about end-of-life care. Cancer 116:998–1006

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Schofield P, Carey M, Love A et al (2006) ‘Would you like to talk about your future treatment options’? Discussing the transition from curative cancer treatment to palliative care. Palliat Med 20:397–406

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Quill TE (2000) Perspectives on care at the close of life. Initiating end-of-life discussions with seriously ill patients: addressing the “elephant in the room”. JAMA 284:2502–2507

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gott M, Ingleton C, Bennett MI, Gardiner C (2011) Transitions to palliative care in acute hospitals in England: qualitative study. BMJ 342:d1773

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Friedman BT, Harwood MK, Shields M (2002) Barriers and enablers to hospice referrals: an expert overview. J Palliat Med 5:73–84

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Coyne IT (1997) Sampling in qualitative research. Purposeful and theoretical sampling; merging or clear boundaries? J Adv Nurs 26:623–630

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Glaser BG, Strauss AL (1967) The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. de Gruyter, New York

    Google Scholar 

  24. Charmaz K (2010) Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis. Los Angeles, Calif. [u.a.]: Sage

  25. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF (2009) Principles of biomedical ethics. Oxford University Press, Incorporated

    Google Scholar 

  26. Mack JW, Smith TJ (2012) Reasons why physicians do not have discussions about poor prognosis, why it matters, and what can be improved. J Clin Oncol 30:2715–2717

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Leydon GM, Boulton M, Moynihan C et al (2000) Cancer patients’ information needs and information seeking behaviour: in depth interview study. BMJ 320:909–913

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Fried TR, Bradley EH, O’Leary J (2003) Prognosis communication in serious illness: perceptions of older patients, caregivers, and clinicians. J Am Geriatr Soc 51:1398–1403

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Voogt E, van der Heide A, Rietjens JA et al (2005) Attitudes of patients with incurable cancer toward medical treatment in the last phase of life. J Clin Oncol 23:2012–2019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Winkler EC, Reiter-Theil S, Lange-Riess D et al (2009) Patient involvement in decisions to limit treatment: the crucial role of agreement between physician and patient. J Clin Oncol 27:2225–2230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Temel JS, Greer JA, Muzikansky A et al (2010) Early palliative care for patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 363:733–742

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by research grant no. 109658 of the Deutsche Krebshilfe (German Cancer Aid). We thank Dr. Carola Christ for the administrative support and all the participants interviewed for this study. We wish to thank our anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments.

Conflict of interest

No competing financial interests exist.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Laryionava.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Laryionava, K., Heußner, P., Hiddemann, W. et al. Framework for timing of the discussion about forgoing cancer-specific treatment based on a qualitative study with oncologists. Support Care Cancer 23, 715–721 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-014-2416-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-014-2416-8

Keywords

Navigation