Unmet psychosocial needs in haematological cancer: a systematic review
- 1.1k Downloads
Psychosocial need implies a desire or requirement for support that underlies a person’s psychological, social and emotional wellbeing. This is not a new concept in the wider cancer literature, yet remains a relatively unexplored area in relation to haematological malignancies. The well-recognised differences between haematological and other types of cancer diagnosis warrant further investigation to try and highlight the potential differences in the needs of this patient group.
A systematic review of key online databases and psycho-oncology journals was conducted to identify papers that formally assessed unmet psychosocial needs in adults with a diagnosis of haematological cancer. The breadth of methodologies of included studies made a meta-analytical approach unfeasible, therefore studies were analysed using a narrative synthesis approach.
Eighteen studies were found to be relevant and a specific focus was placed on those papers that looked solely at participants with a haematological diagnosis. The key areas of need identified were: psychological need, notably fear of recurrence; information needs; and needs relating to both family and healthcare professionals. Fear of recurrence was the most commonly identified psychosocial need within this literature.
The clinical implications of these findings highlight the need for more widespread access to psychological support for haematology patients and for more to be done to tackle patients’ fears and concerns throughout the course of their illness. Assessment and identification of unmet needs is an important step enabling the development of clinical services that support and maintain psychological wellbeing through treatment and into survivorship.
KeywordsReview Needs Psychosocial Cancer Haematology Wellbeing
Conflict of interests
There are no conflicts of interest to declare. The authors have full control of all primary data and consent for the journal to request this data if required.
- 19.Macmillan, Cancer clinical nurse specialists: an evidence review. 2011Google Scholar
- 20.Kmet, L., Lee, R. & Cook, L (2004) Standard quality assessment criteria for evaluating primary research papers from a variety of fields. HTA Initiative 13. http://www.ihe.ca/documents/HTA-FR13.pdf. Accessed 1 Dec 2013
- 39.Department of Health (2012) Quality of life of cancer survivors in England: report on a pilot survey using patient reported outcome measures (PROMS). National Institute for Health Research: UKGoogle Scholar
- 43.Vitinius F et al (2012) Psychosocial strain and information needs of patients with prostate cancer—a systematic review. J Psychosom Res 72(6):507–508Google Scholar
- 45.Kazimierczak KA, Skea ZC, Dixon-Woods M, Entwistle VA, Feldman-Stewart D, N’dow JM, MacLennan SJ (2012) Provision of cancer information as a “support for navigating the knowledge landscape”: findings from a critical interpretive literature synthesis. Eur J Oncol Nurs 17(3):1–10Google Scholar