Patients’ and professionals’ evaluations of quality of care in oncology outpatient clinics
- 479 Downloads
The purpose of this study is to compare patients' and professionals' evaluations of the quality of care in oncology outpatient clinics.
The data were drawn from a 2011 survey of 1,379 patients and 155 professionals conducted in 15 % of oncology outpatient clinics in Quebec, Canada. Respondents completed self-administered questionnaires that addressed the aspects of timeliness (TIM), patient-centred care (PCC), communication (COM), quality of the physical environment (QPE), and continuity (CONT). Patients’ and professionals’ mean scores (maximum = 4) for each aspect were compared using mixed model analysis.
Patients’ and professionals’ perceptions of quality of care were largely positive, with mean scores for all items of 3.66 and 3.37, respectively. However, for the majority of aspects of quality, the professionals' scores were lower than those of patients. The aspects rated most positively by both groups were PCC, COM and CONT. Timeliness was the least positively evaluated, with mean scores of 3.34 for patients and 3.16 for professionals.
In many respects, cancer patients and professionals share relatively common views about the most and least positive aspects of the quality of care, although professionals tend to be more critical. Aspects evaluated less favourably by both groups and those on which opinions differ are good candidates for improvements. Some ideas for solutions are proposed. Positive patient feedback is especially important in cancer care, where attraction and retention of professionals is a key concern.
KeywordsQuality cancer care Patients' evaluations Professionals' evaluations Oncology outpatient clinics
This study was funded by the Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute (Grant # 020072) and the Ministry of Health and Social Services of Quebec.
Ethical approval for this study was granted by the Research Ethics Committee of Charles-LeMoyne Hospital.
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that they have no relationship with the organization that sponsored the research. The authors have full control of all primary data.
- 1.Canadian Partnership Against Cancer (2012) Sustaining action toward a shared vision. http://www.partnershipagainstcancer.ca/wp-content/uploads/Sustaining-Action-Toward-A-Shared-Vision_web.pdf. Accessed 13 December 2012
- 2.Clinical Oncological Society of Australia, Cancer Council Australia, National Cancer Control Initiative (2003) Optimising cancer care in Australia: a consultative report prepared by the Clinical Oncological Society of Australia, The Cancer Council Australia and the National Cancer Control Initiative. http://www.canceraustralia.gov.au/sites/default/files/publications/optim_cancer_care1_504af01f9d05e.pdf. Accessed 13 December 2012
- 3.Oncosuisse (2011) Programme national contre le cancer pour la Suisse 2011–2015. http://www4.ti.ch/fileadmin/DSS/DSP/ICP/RCT/pdf/Pubblicazioni/2011/NKP_11_15_Vollversion_f.pdf. Accessed 13 December 2012
- 4.Ministere des Affaires sociales et de la Santé (2009) Plan cancer 2009–2013. http://www.sante.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/Plan_cancer_2009-2013.pdf. Accessed 13 December 2012
- 5.Ministère de la Santé et des Services sociaux du Québec (2007) Orientations prioritaires 2007–2012 du Programme québécois de lutte contre le cancer. http://publications.msss.gouv.qc.ca/acrobat/f/documentation/2007/07-902-03.pdf. Accessed 13 December 2012
- 6.Department of Health (2011) Improving outcomes: a strategy for cancer. https://webgate.ec.europa.eu/sanco/heidi/images/4/40/UK_Improving_Outcomes_A_Strategy_for_Cancer_2011_English.pdf. Accessed 13 December 2012
- 7.Durieux P, Bissery A, Dubois S, Gasquet I, Coste J (2004) Comparison of health care professionals' self-assessments of standards of care and patients' opinions on the care they received in hospital: observational study. Qual Saf Health Care 13:198–202. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2003.007336 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Palmer RH (1991) Considerations in defining quality of health care. In: Palmer RH, Donabedian A, Povar GJ (eds) Striving for quality in health care: an inquiry into policy and practice. Health Administration Press, Ann Arbor, pp 1–58Google Scholar
- 11.Pilligrimiene Z, Buciuniene I (2008) Different perspectives on health care quality: is the consensus possible? Eng Econ 56:104–110Google Scholar
- 16.Coulter A, Fitzpatrick R, Cornwell J (2009) The point of care measures of patients' experience in hospital: purpose, methods and uses. http://www.clahrc-northwestlondon.nihr.ac.uk/inc/files/documents/ppi-resources/measuring_patient_experience_kf.pdf. Accessed 13 December 2012
- 23.Haddad S, Roberge D, Pineault R (1997) Comprendre la qualité: en reconnaître la complexité. Ruptures, revue transdisciplinaire en santé 4(1):59–78Google Scholar
- 25.Ministère de la Santé et des Services sociaux (1997) Programme québécois de lutte contre le cancer: Pour lutter efficacement contre le cancer, formons équipe. http://publications.msss.gouv.qc.ca/acrobat/f/documentation/1997/97-729-5.pdf. Accessed 13 December 2012
- 26.Gouvernement du Québec (2012) Orientations prioritaires 2007–2012 du Programme québécois de lutte contre le cancer: Bilan des réalisations. http://publications.msss.gouv.qc.ca/acrobat/f/documentation/2011/11-902-16.pdf. Accessed 13 December 2012
- 27.Valentine NB, Lavallée R, Bao L, Bonsel GJ, Murray CJL (2003) Classical psychometric assessment of the responsiveness instrument in the WHO multi-country survey study on health and responsiveness 2000–2001. In: Murray CJL, Evans DB (eds) Health systems performance assessment: debates, methods and empiricism. World Health Organization, Geneva, pp 597–630Google Scholar
- 28.Tremblay D (2008) La traduction d'une innovation organisationnelle dans les pratiques professionnelles de réseau: l'infirmière pivot en oncologie. Dissertation, Université de Montréal, MontrealGoogle Scholar
- 31.Dillman DA, Smyth JD, Christian LM (2009) Internet, mail and mixed-mode surveys: the tailored design method. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
- 36.National Institute for Clinical Excellence (2004) Improving supportive and palliative care for adults with cancer. http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/live/10893/28816/28816.pdf. Accessed 13 December 2012
- 42.Frampton S, Guastello S, Brady C, Hale M, Horowitz S, Smith SB, Stone S (2008) Patient-centred care improvement guide. http://planetree.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Patient-Centered-Care-Improvement-Guide-10-28-09-Final.pdf. Accessed 13 December 2012