Understanding how cancer patients actualise, relinquish, and reject advance care planning: implications for practice
Although advance care planning (ACP) is recognised as integral to quality cancer care, it remains poorly integrated in many settings. Given cancer patients’ unpredictable disease trajectories and equivocal treatment options, a disease-specific ACP model may be necessary. This study examines how Australian cancer patients consider ACP. Responses will inform the development of an Australian Cancer Centre’s ACP programme.
A constructivist research approach with grounded theory design was applied. Eighteen adults from lung and gastro-intestinal tumour streams participated. Participants first described their initial understanding of ACP, received ACP information, and finally completed a semi-structured interview assisted by the vignette technique. Qualitative inter-rater reliability was integrated.
Participants initially had scant knowledge of ACP. On obtaining further information, their responses indicated that: For cancer patients, ACP is an individualised, dynamic, and shared process characterised by myriad variations in choices to actualise, relinquish, and/or reject its individual components (medical enduring power of attorney, statement of choices, refusal of treatment certificate, and advanced directive). Actualisation of each component involves considering, possibly conversing about, planning, and communicating a decision, usually iteratively. Reactions can change over time and are informed by values, memories, personalities, health perceptions, appreciation of prognoses, and trust or doubts in their substitute decision makers.
Findings endorse the value of routinely, though sensitively, discussing ACP with cancer patients at various time points across their disease trajectory. Nonetheless, ACP may also be relinquished or rejected and ongoing offers for ACP in some patients may be offensive to their value system.
KeywordsAdvance care planning Cancer Adults Advance directives
- 1.Canadian Hospice Palliative Care Association (2009) Advance care planning in Canada: a national framework and implementation. National roundtable proceedings. Advance Care Planning in Canada: National Roundtable Proceedings, CanadaGoogle Scholar
- 2.Office of the Public Adocate (2012) Promoting the rights, interests and dignity of people with a disability. Victoria, Australia. http://www.publicadvocate.vic.gov.au/. Accessed 6 October 2012
- 3.Respecting Patient Choices (2012) http://www.respectingpatientchoices.org.au/. Accessed 6 October 2012
- 8.Detering KM, Hancock AD, Reade MC, Silvester W (2010) The impact of advance care planning on end of life care in elderly patients: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. doi:10.1136/bmj.c1345
- 26.Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M (2006) Developing and evaluating complex interventions: new guidance. Medical Research Council.www.mrc.ac.uk/complexinterventionsguidance. Accessed 6 October 2012
- 28.Corbin J, Strauss A (2008) Basics of qualitative research 3e: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage Publications, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
- 31.ATLAS (2009) ATLAS V.5.5.9. ATLAS.ti Scientific Software Development, BerlinGoogle Scholar