Theory-based predictors of follow-up exercise behavior after a supervised exercise intervention in older breast cancer survivors
- 835 Downloads
Supervised exercise interventions can elicit numerous positive health outcomes in older breast cancer survivors. However, to maintain these benefits, regular exercise needs to be maintained long after the supervised program. This may be difficult, as in this transitional period (i.e., time period immediately following a supervised exercise program), breast cancer survivors are in the absence of on-site direct supervision from a trained exercise specialist. The purpose of the present study was to identify key determinants of regular exercise participation during a 6-month follow-up period after a 12-month supervised exercise program among women aged 65+ years who had completed adjuvant treatment for breast cancer.
At the conclusion of a supervised exercise program and 6 months later, 69 breast cancer survivors completed surveys examining their exercise behavior and key constructs from the Transtheoretical Model.
After adjusting for weight status and physical activity at the transition point, breast cancer survivors with higher self-efficacy at the point of transition were more likely to be active 6 months after leaving the supervised exercise program (odds ratio [95% confidence interval, 1.10 [1.01–1.18]). Similarly, breast cancer survivors with higher behavioral processes of change use at the point of transition were more likely to be active (odds ratio [95% confidence interval], 1.13 [1.02–1.26]).
These findings suggest that self-efficacy and the behavioral processes of change, in particular, play an important role in exercise participation during the transition from a supervised to a home-based program among older breast cancer survivors.
KeywordsBehavior Cancer Determinants Oncology Physical activity
This study was made possible through Grant No. 5RO1CA120123-03, “Comparison of aerobic and resistance exercise in older breast cancer survivors,” National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, awarded to Kerri M. Winters-Stone, Ph.D., Principal Investigator.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest and have full control of all primary data and agree to allow the journal to review the data if requested.
- 2.Ibrahim EMAl-Homaidh A (2010) Physical activity and survival after breast cancer diagnosis: meta-analysis of published studies. Med Oncol.Google Scholar
- 10.Denmark-Wahnefried W, Peterson BL, Winer EP (2001) Changes in weight, body composition, and factors influencing energy balance among premenopausal breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 19:2381–2389Google Scholar
- 16.Cardinal BJ, Engels HJ, Smouter J (2001) Changes in preadolescents' stage of change for exercise behavior following “Health Kids 2000-Get With It”. Am J Med Sport 3:272–278Google Scholar
- 17.Cardinal BJ, Engels HJ, Zhu W (1998) Application of the Transtheoretical Model of behavior change to preadolescents' physical activity and exercise behavior. Ped Exerc Sci 10:69–80Google Scholar
- 19.Cardinal BJ, Lee J, Kim Y (2010) Predictors of transitional shifts in college students' physical activity behavior. International Journal of Applied Sports Sciences 22:24–32Google Scholar
- 22.Cardinal BJ (2002) Facilitating physical activity and health behavior change among older adults. Contemporary Psychology, APA Review of Books 49:15–17Google Scholar
- 27.Courneya KS, Friedenreich CM, Sela RA, Quinney HA, Rhodes RE (2002) Correlates of adherence and contamination in a randomized controlled trial of exercise in cancer survivors: an application of the Theory of Planned Behavior and the five factor model of personality. Ann Behav Med 24:257–268PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.Nigg CR, Riebe D (2002) The Transtheoretical Model: research review of exercise behavior and older adults. In: Burbank PM, Riebe D (eds) Promoting exercise and behavior change in older adults: interventions with the Transtheoretical Model. Springer, New York, pp 147–180Google Scholar
- 43.Montano DE Kasprzyk D (2008) Theory of reasoned action, theory of planned behavior, and the integrated behavioral model. In: Glanz K, Rimer, BK, Viswanath, (ed.) Health behavior and health education: theory, research, and practice, 4th edition. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass :67-96Google Scholar
- 47.Reed GR (1999) Adherence to exercise and the Transtheoretical Model of behavior change. In: Bull SS (ed) Adherences issues in sport and exercise. Wiley, New York, pp 19–46Google Scholar
- 48.Jordan PJ Nigg CR (2002) Applying the Transtheoretical Model: tailoring interventions to stages of change. Promoting exercise and behavior change in older adults: Interventions with the Transtheoretical Model. Springer, New York, pp 181–234Google Scholar
- 49.Biddle S, Nigg CR (2000) Theories of exercise behavior. International Journal of Sport Psychology 31:290–304Google Scholar