Skip to main content
Log in

Adherence of stem cell transplant recipients receiving glucocorticoid therapy to an exercise-based rehabilitation program

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The high acuity of hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients receiving glucocorticoid (GC) therapy for acute graft vs. host disease (aGVHD) may limit their adherence to an exercise-based rehabilitation program and hence, slow their recovery. To make this determination, the medical records of 59 subacute outpatient stem cell transplant recipients receiving methylprednisolone (MP) were reviewed for demographic, anthropometric and medical information. Performance on the repeated sit-to-stand, 50-ft walk and 6-min walk tests were determined before and after completing a 4-week progressive exercise rehabilitation program and outcomes were compared by a paired t-test (P < 0.05). Thirty-two patients (54%) finished a treatment plan (adherent group), completing 80% of the prescribed sessions and were reevaluated. Twenty-seven patients (46%) did not complete the rehabilitation program (nonadherent group), primarily because of readmission to the hospital (18 patients, 62%). The adherent group did not significantly improve their physical performance (p > 0.05). However, a subgroup of 40% of these patients did experience clinically significant improvements in their physical performance.These findings 1) support the feasibility of having HSCT recipients receiving GC therapy to participate in an exercise-based rehabilitation program and 2) suggest that to do so can result in clinically significant improvements in functional capacity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wiskemann J, Huber H (2008) Physical exercise as adjuvant therapy for patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 41:321–329

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Somerfield MR, Rizzo JD (2010) Can a modest exercise program really improve physical functioningand quality of life among recipients of hematopoietic SCT? Bone Marrow Transplant 45:217–218

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Barton-Burke M, Dwinell DM, Kafkas L, Lavalley C, Hillary S, Proctor C (2008) Graft-versus-host disease: a complex long-term side effect of hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Oncology (Willison Park) 22(11):31–45

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lee HJ, Oran B, Saliba RM, Couriel DM, Shin K, Massey P et al (2006) Steroid myopathy in patients with acute graft-versus-host disease treated with high-dose steroid therapy. Bone Marrow Transplant 38:299–303

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. MacMillan ML, DeFor TE, Weisdorf DJ (2010) The best endpoint for acute GVHD treatment trials. Blood 115:5412–5417

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hench PS, Kendall EC, Slocumb CH, Polley HF (1950) Effects of cortisone acetate and pituitary ACTH on rheumatoid arthritis, rheumatic fever and certain other conditions. Arch Intern Med 85:545–666

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Courneya KS, Segal RJ, Reid RD, Jones LW (2004) Three independent factors predicted adherence in a randomized controlled trial of resistance exercise training among prostate cancer survivors. J Clin Epidem 57:571–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Temel JS, Greer JA, Goldberg S, Vogel PD, Sullivan M et al (2009) A structured exercise program for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 4:595–601

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Peddle CJ, Jones LW, Eves ND, Reiman T et al (2009) Correlates of adherence to supervised exercise in patients awaiting surgical removal of malignant lung lesions: results of a pilot study. Oncol Nurs Forum 36:287–295

    Google Scholar 

  10. Simmonds MJ (2002) Physical function in patients with cancer: psychometric characteristics and clinical usefulness of a physical performance test battery. J Pain Symptom Manage 24:404–414

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Morris GS, Brueilly KE, Scheetz JS, Brannan EA (2010) Functional performance status of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients in the sub-acute phase of recovery. Bone Marrow Transplant 45:755–761

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. American College of Sports Medicine (2009) Guidelines for exercise testing and prescription, 8th edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cain MJ, Fan X, Moe ST (2002) Criterion-related validity of the Borg ratings of perceived exertion scale in healthy individuals: a meta-analysis. J Sports Sci 20:873–899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Couriel A, Caldera H, Champlin R, Komanduri K (2004) Acute graft versus host disease: pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, and management. Cancer 101:1936–1946

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. James MC (1987) Physical therapy for patients after bone marrow transplantation. Phys Ther 67:946–952

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. LaPier TK (1997) Glucocorticoid-induced muscle atrophy. The role of exercise in treatment and prevention. J Cardiopulmon Rehab 17:768–774

    Google Scholar 

  17. Oldridge NB (1988) Cardiac rehabilitation exercise programme. Compliance and compliance-enhancing strategies. Sports Med 6:42–55

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Leon AS, Franklin BA, Costa F, Balady GJ, Berra KA, Stewart KJ et al (2005) Cardiac rehabilitation and secondary prevention of coronary heart disease: an American Heart Association scientific statement from the Council on Clinical Cardiology (Subcommittee on Exercise, Cardiac Rehabilitation, and Prevention) and the Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism (Subcommittee on Physical Activity), in collaboration with the American association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation. Circulation 111:369–376

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Singh SJ, Smith DL, Hyland ME, Morgan MD (1998) A short outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation programme: immediate and longer-term effects on exercise performance and quality of life. Respir Med 92:1146–1154

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. DeFor TE, Burns LJ, Gold EMA, Weisdorf DJ (2007) A randomized trial of the effect of a walking regimen on the functional status of 100 adult allogeneic donor hematopoietic cell transplant patients. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 13:948–955

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Courneya KS, Keats MR, Turner AR (2000) Physical exercise and quality of life in cancer patients following high dose chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow transplantation. Psychooncology 9:127–136

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Dimeo F, Fetscher S, Lange W, Mertelsmann R, Keul J (1997) Effects of aerobic exercise on the physical performance and incidence of treatment-related complications after high-dose chemotherapy. Blood 90:3390–3394

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Schwartz AL (2008) Physical activity. Semin Oncol Nurs 24:164–170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Nieman DC (2003) Current perspective on exercise immunology. Curr Sports Med Rep 2:239–242

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Topp KS, Painter PL, Walcott S, Krasnoff JB, Adey D, Sakkas et al (2003) Alterations in skeletal muscle structure are minimized with steroid withdrawal following renal transplantation. Transplantation 76:667–673

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Baumann FT, Kraut L, Schüle K, Bloch W, Fauser AA (2010) A controlled randomized study examining the effects of exercise therapy on patients undergoing haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 45:355–362

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Guyatt GH, Sullivan MJ, Thompson PJ, Fallen EL, Pugsley SO, Taylor DW et al (1985) The 6-minute walk: a new measure of exercise capacity in patients with chronic heart failure. Can Med Assoc J 132:919–923

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Redelmeier DA, Bayoumi AM, Goldstein RS, Guyatt GH (1997) Interpreting small differences in functional status: the six minute walk test in chronic lung disease patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 155:1278–1282

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Perera S, Mody SH, Woodman RC, Studenski S (2006) Meaningful change and responsiveness in common physical performance measures in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 54:743–749

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Robinett CS, Vondran MA (1988) Functional ambulation velocity and distance requirements in rural and urban communities. Phys Ther 68:1371–1373

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the time, effort and commitment of these patients as they worked to recover. No HSCT study could be completed without the involvement of the patients' caregivers and to this group we express our profound appreciation. The authors would also like to thank Nancy Paddison, PTA, BA, for providing invaluable editorial assistance and excellent patient care and to Naghma A. Ahmed, MSPT, ShammiVenkatachalam, MSPT and B.J. Jackson for providing excellent patient care.

Conflict of interest

The authors of this manuscript have no financial or other conflicts of interest to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Stephen Morris.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Morris, G.S., Brueilly, K.E., Scheetz, J.S. et al. Adherence of stem cell transplant recipients receiving glucocorticoid therapy to an exercise-based rehabilitation program. Support Care Cancer 20, 2391–2398 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-011-1352-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-011-1352-0

Keywords

Navigation