Skip to main content

A randomised pilot of a self-help workbook intervention for breast cancer survivors

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of a self-help workbook for improving adjustment for breast cancer survivors.

Methods

An RCT compared the workbook (n = 20) with no-workbook controls (n = 20). Coping, traumatic stress and quality of life were measured at baseline, then 3 and 6 months later.

Results

No interactions were found. A significant group main effect was found for venting coping; controls used less venting coping than workbook participants (p = 0.034). A significant time main effect was obtained for cognitive functioning (p = 0.003). Reliable change indices showed a trend towards a protective effect across all coping measures for workbook participants compared to controls. Qualitative feedback suggested that participants felt well supported by the intervention, but would have preferred receiving it during treatment.

Conclusions

While trends showed some promise for improving coping, endorsement for the workbook was not obtained. The difficulties encountered in recruiting survivors and the resulting implications regarding the feasibility of offering self-help resources to this population are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Beatty L, Oxlad M, Koczwara B, Wade T (2008) The psychosocial concerns and needs of women recently diagnosed with breast cancer: a qualitative study of patient, nurse and volunteer perspectives. Health Expect 11:331–342

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bleiker EMA, Pouwer F, Van der Ploeg HM, Leer JWH, Ader HJ (2000) Psychological distress two years after diagnosis of breast cancer: frequency and prediction. Patient Educ Couns 40:209–217

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wade TD, Lee C (2005) The impact of breast cancer on the lives of middle-aged women: results from the Australian longitudinal study of women's health. Health Psychol 24:246–251

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wade TD, Nehmy T, Koczwara B (2005) Predicting worries about health after breast cancer surgery. Psychooncology 14:503–509

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zimmermann T, Heinrichs N, Baucom DH (2007) "Does One Size Fit All?" Moderators in psychosocial interventions for breast cancer patients: a meta-analysis. Ann Behav Med 34:225–239

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Stiegelis HE, Hagedoorn M, Sanderman R, Bennenbroek FTC, Buunk BP, Van den Bergh ACM et al (2004) The impact of an informational self-management intervention on the association between control and illness uncertainty before and psychological distress after radiotherapy. Psychooncology 13:248–259

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Stanton AL, Danoff-Burg S, Cameron CL, Bishop M, Collins CA, Kirk SB et al (2000) Emotionally expressive coping predicts psychological and physical adjustment to breast cancer. J Consult Clin Psychol 68:875–882

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Angell KL, Kreshka MA, McCoy R, Donnelly P, Turner-Cobb JM, Graddy K et al (2003) Psychosocial intervention for rural women with breast cancer: the Sierra Stanford partnership. J Gen Intern Med 18:499–507

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Oxlad M, Wade TD, Hallsworth L, Koczwara B (2008) "I'm living with a chronic illness, not…dying with cancer": a focus group study of Australian women's self-identified needs and concerns following primary treatment for breast cancer. Eur J Cancer Care 17:157–166

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Foa EB, Riggs DS, Dancu CV, Rothbaum BO (1993) Reliability and validity of a brief instrument for assessing posttraumatic stress disorder. J Trauma Stress 6:459–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Klee M, Groenvold M, Machin D (1997) Quality of life of Danish women: population-based norms for the EORTC QLQ-C30. Qual Life Res 6:27–34

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Thiels C, Schmidt U, Troop N, Treasure J, Garthe R (2001) Compliance with a self-care manual in guided self-change for bulimia nervosa. Eur Eat Disord Rev 9:115–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Norusis MJ (2007) SPSS 15.0 advanced statistical procedures companion. Prentice Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wilksch SM, Wade TD (2009) Reduction of shape and weight concern in young adolescents: a 30-month controlled evaluation of a media literacy program. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psych 48:652–661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jacobson NS, Truax P (1991) Clinical significance: a statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. J Consult Clin Psychol 59:12–19

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Carver CS, Scheier MF, Weintraub JK (1989) Assessing coping strategies: a theoretically based approach. J Pers Soc Psychol 56:267–283

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Morris BA, Shakespeare-Finch J, Scott JL (2007) Coping processes and dimensions of posttraumatic growth. Aust J Disaster Trauma Stud 2007–1:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  18. Stanton AL, Kirk SB, Cameron CL, Danoff-Burg S (2000) Coping through emotional approach: scale construction and validation. J Pers Soc Psychol 78:1150–1169

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Stewart A, Bielajew C, Collins B, Parkinson M, Tomiak E (2006) A meta-analysis of the neuropsychological effects of adjuvant chemotherapy treatment in women treated for breast cancer. Clin Neuropsychol 20:76–89

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Schulz, K., Altman, D., & Moher, D., for the CONSORT Group (2010) CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ 340:698–702

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Clinical Trials Nurse Alison Richards and staff at Flinders Medical Centre Department of Medical Oncology for your assistance with recruitment. Thank you also to all the women who participated in this study. This project was supported by the Flinders Medical Centre Foundation ‘Blokes for Breast Cancer’ grant. Lisa Beatty was supported by an Australian Postgraduate Award and the Flinders Medical Centre Foundation Helen Wrigley Award. This trial is registered on the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry.

Presented at the 42nd Australian Psychological Society annual conference, Brisbane, Australia, 25–29 September 2007; and the 34th Clinical Oncology Society of Australia Annual Scientific Meeting, Adelaide, Australia, November 14–16 2007.

Conflict of interest

The authors do not have a financial relationship with the organisation that sponsored this research. The authors have full control of all primary data and agree to allow the journal to review our data if requested.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lisa Beatty.

Additional information

Submitted to: Supportive Care in Cancer

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Beatty, L., Oxlad, M., Koczwara, B. et al. A randomised pilot of a self-help workbook intervention for breast cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer 18, 1597–1603 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-010-0962-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-010-0962-2

Keywords

  • Breast cancer
  • Psychosocial adjustment
  • Self-help workbook
  • Survivorship