Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of risk factors predictive of nausea and vomiting with current standard-of-care antiemetic treatment: analysis of phase 3 trial of aprepitant in patients receiving adriamycin–cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy

Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Goals of work

A number of prognostic factors have been identified as risk factors for chemotherapy-induced emesis. This post-hoc analysis addressed whether: (1) these prognostic factors can identify a low-risk group for whom ondansetron plus dexamethasone alone provide a high level of protection (≥80% no emesis); (2) the NK1 receptor antagonist aprepitant improves antiemetic outcome regardless of emetic risk.

Patients and methods

Breast cancer patients in a phase III double-blind, placebo-controlled trial were randomized to antiemetic regimens including ondansetron and dexamethasone, or aprepitant, ondansetron, and dexamethasone. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to assess the impact on emesis (but not nausea) of the regimen with aprepitant, and previously reported risk factors, including age (<55 and ≥55 years), ethanol use (0–4 or ≥5 drinks/week), history of pregnancy-related morning sickness, and history of motion sickness, using a modified intent-to-treat approach.

Results

Treatment with aprepitant (P < 0.0001), older age (P = 0.006), ethanol use (P = 0.0048), and no history of morning sickness (P = 0.0007) were all significantly associated with reduced likelihood of emesis. The proportion of patients with one, two, or three risk factors who remained emesis free was significantly higher with the aprepitant-containing regimen than with the active control (70.2–82.8% vs. 38.6–66.4%, respectively).

Conclusions

Aprepitant markedly improved control of emesis in patients with one or more risk factors. This analysis did not support using risk factors for modifying the antiemetic approach. A low-risk group with zero risk factors for whom aprepitant provided little benefit was of questionable clinical utility, since they comprised less than 3% of patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (France)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  1. Osoba D, Zee B, Pater J, Warr D, Latreille J, Kaizer L (1997) Determinants of postchemotherapy nausea and vomiting in patients with cancer. Quality of Life and Symptom Control Committees of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. J Clin Oncol 15(1):116–123

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Tonato M, Roila F, Del Favero A (1991) Methodology of antiemetic trials: a review. Ann Oncol 2:107–114

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. D′Acquisto R, Tyson LB, Gralla RJ (1986) The influence of a chronic high alcohol intake on chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. In: The influence of a chronic high alcohol intake on chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 5:257

  4. Hesketh PJ, Plagge P, Bryson JC (1992) Single-dose ondansetron for prevention of acute cisplatin-induced emesis: analysis of efficacy and prognostic factors. In: Bianchi AL, Grelot L, Miller AD (eds) Mechanisms and control of emesis. Libbey, London

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pollera CF, Giannarelli D (1989) Prognostic factors influencing cisplatin-induced emesis. Definition and validation of a predictive logistic model. Cancer 64(5):1117–1122

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Booth CM, Clemons M, Dranitsaris G, Joy A, Young S, Callaghan W et al (2007) Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in breast cancer patients: a prospective observational study. J Support Oncol 5(8):374–380

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Schwartzberg LS (2007) Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: clinician and patient perspectives. J Support Oncol 5(2 Suppl 1):5–12

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jordan K, Grothey A, Pelz T, Lautenschlager C, Franke U, Schober C et al (2009) Impact of quality of life parameters and coping strategies on postchemotherapy nausea and vomiting. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) (in press)

  9. Hesketh PJ, Grunberg SM, Gralla RJ, Warr DG, Roila F, de Wit R et al (2003) The oral neurokinin-1 antagonist aprepitant for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: a multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in patients receiving high-dose cisplatin—the Aprepitant Protocol 052 Study Group. J Clin Oncol 21(22):4112–4119

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Poli-Bigelli S, Rodrigues-Pereira J, Carides AD, Julie Ma G, Eldridge K, Hipple A et al (2003) Addition of the neurokinin 1 receptor antagonist aprepitant to standard antiemetic therapy improves control of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in Latin America. Cancer 97(12):3090–3098

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Herrstedt J, Muss HB, Warr DG, Hesketh PJ, Eisenberg PD, Raftopoulos H et al (2005) Efficacy and tolerability of aprepitant for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and emesis over multiple cycles of moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. Cancer 104(7):1548–1555

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Warr DG, Hesketh PJ, Gralla RJ, Muss HB, Herrstedt J, Eisenberg PD et al (2005) Efficacy and tolerability of aprepitant for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients with breast cancer after moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 23(12):2822–2830

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hesketh PJ, Aapro M, Street JC, Carides AD (2009) Evaluation of risk factors predictive of nausea and vomiting with current standard-of-care antiemetic treatment: analysis of two phase 3 trials of aprepitant in patients receiving cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Support Care Cancer (in press)

  14. Prevention of chemotherapy- and radiotherapy-induced emesis: results of Perugia Consensus Conference (1998) Antiemetic Subcommittee of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC). Ann Oncol 9(8):811–819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology—V.3.2009: antiemesis. Available at www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/PDF/antiemesis.pdf. Accessed January 31, 2009.

  16. Kris MG, Hesketh PJ, Somerfield MR, Feyer P, Clark-Snow R, Koeller JM et al (2006) American Society of Clinical Oncology guideline for antiemetics in oncology: update 2006. J Clin Oncol 24(18):2932–2947

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Herrstedt J, Roila F (2008) Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: ESMO clinical recommendations for prophylaxis. Ann Oncol 19(Suppl 2):i110–i112

    Google Scholar 

  18. Quality Oncology Practice Initiative Registration Surpasses 250 Oncology Practices: Spring 2007 Data Collection Provides Data to Drive Practitioner-Led Improvement (2009) J Oncol Pract 5:271–273

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jonge ME, Huitema ADR, Holtkamp MJ, van Dam SM, Beijnen J, Rodenhuis S (2005) Aprepitant inhibits cyclophosphamide bioactivation and thiotepa metabolism. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 56:370–378

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Walko CM, Yu YA, Bhushan S, Spasojevic I, Carey L, Collichio F et al (2009) Effect of aprepitant (AP) on cyclophosphamide (CPA) pharmacokinetics (PK) in early breast cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 27(15S May 20 Suppl)):588

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hesketh PJ, Kris MG, Grunberg SM, Beck T, Hainsworth JD, Harker G et al (1997) Proposal for classifying the acute emetogenicity of cancer chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 15(1):103–109

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ballatori E, Roila F (2003) Impact of nausea and vomiting on quality of life in cancer patients during chemotherapy. Health Qual Life Outcomes 1:46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Osoba D, Zee B, Warr D, Latreille J, Kaizer L, Pater J (1997) Effect of postchemotherapy nausea and vomiting on health-related quality of life. The Quality of Life and Symptom Control Committees of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. Support Care Cancer 5(4):307–313

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Aapro MS, Molassiotis A, Olver I (2005) Anticipatory nausea and vomiting. Support Care Cancer 13(2):117–121

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Tina Shih YC, Xu Y, Elting LS (2007) Costs of uncontrolled chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting among working-age cancer patients receiving highly or moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. Cancer 110(3):678–685

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Roila F, Hesketh PJ, Herrstedt J (2006) Prevention of chemotherapy- and radiotherapy-induced emesis: results of the 2004 Perugia International Antiemetic Consensus Conference. Ann Oncol 17(1):20–28

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Herrstedt J, Aapro MS, Roila F, Kataja VV (2005) ESMO minimum clinical recommendations for prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (NV). Ann Oncol 16(Suppl 1):i77–i79

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

DGW is a consultant to Merck & Co.

JCS is a paid consultant to Merck & Co.

ADC is an employee of Merck & Co.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David G. Warr.

Additional information

Reagent is a medical communication company under contract with Merck & Co., Inc.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Warr, D.G., Street, J.C. & Carides, A.D. Evaluation of risk factors predictive of nausea and vomiting with current standard-of-care antiemetic treatment: analysis of phase 3 trial of aprepitant in patients receiving adriamycin–cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy. Support Care Cancer 19, 807–813 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-010-0899-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-010-0899-5

Keywords

Navigation