Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Radiodermatitis prevention with sucralfate in breast cancer: fundamental and clinical studies

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Acute radiodermatitis induced by radiotherapy may affect the quality of life and in some cases requires withholding treatment. The present study concerns the protective effect of a 1% sucralfate lotion. We propose joint fundamental and clinical points of view.

Methods

The free radical scavenging capacity of sucralfate was measured with electron spin resonance and was supported by theoretical calculations. The clinical effects of sucralfate lotion were evaluated on 21 women treated for breast cancer. Breast skin response was evaluated at 0, 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 Gy, according to (1) the radiation therapy oncology group (RTOG) acute toxicity scale and (2) spectrophotometry data obtained with X-Rite SP60.

Results and conclusions

Sucralfate appeared as a relatively poor free radical scavenger (compared to reference compounds such as vitamin E). The sucralfate-containing lotion used in the present study did not provide systematic radiodermatitis prevention. Spectrophotometric evaluation of the skin response to irradiation appeared to be a very effective and more sensitive technique than the RTOG scale. Its use should be recommended to study cutaneous radioprotective action.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hymes SR, Strom EA, Fife C (2006) Radiation dermatitis: clinical presentation, pathophysiology, and treatment 2006. J Am Acad Dermatol 54:28–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ang KK, Wilder RB (2003) The skin. In: Cox JD, Ang KK (eds) Radiation oncology: rationale, technique, results, 8th edn. Mosby, St Louis, pp 127–143

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tucker S, Turesson I, Thames H (1992) Evidence of individual differences in the radiosensitivity of human skin. Eur J Cancer 28A:1782–1791

    Google Scholar 

  4. Porock D, Krisjanson L, Nikoletti S et al (1998) Predicting the severity of radiation skin reactions in women with breast cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum 25:1019–1029

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fernet M, Hall J (2004) Genetic biomarkers of therapeutic radiation sensitivity. DNA Repair (Amst) 3(8–9):1237–1243

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Spittle MT (1992) Radiotherapy and reactions to ionizing radiation. In: Champion RH, Burton JL, Ebling FJC (eds) Rook, Wilkinson, Ebling textbook of dermatology, 5th edn. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, p 3089

    Google Scholar 

  7. Turesson I, Notter G (1975) Skin reactions after different fractionation schedules giving the same cumulative radiation effect. Acta Radiol Ther Phys Biol 14:475–484

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hansen O, Overgaard J, Hansen HS et al (1997) Importance of overall treatment time for the outcome of radiotherapy of advanced head and neck carcinoma; dependency on tumour differentiation. Radiother Oncol 43:47–51

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bataini JP, Bernier J, Asselain B et al (1988) Primary radiotherapy of squamous cell carcinomas of the oropharynx and pharyngolarynx: tentative multivariate modelling system to predict the radiocurability of neck nodes. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 14:635–642

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Campbell IR, Illingworth MH (1992) Can patients wash during radiotherapy to the breast or chest wall? A randomized controlled trial. Clin Oncol 4:78–82

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Roy I, Fortin A, Larochelle M (2001) The impact of skin washing with water and soap during breast irradiation: a randomized study. Radiother Oncol 58:333–339

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lavery BA (1995) Skin care during radiotherapy: a survey of UK practice. Clin Oncol 7:184–187

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Faithfull S (2001) Management of acute radiotherapy induced skin reactions: a literature review. Eur J Oncol Nurs 5(4):221–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Halperin EC, Gaspar L, George S et al (1993) A double-blind, randomized, prospective trial to evaluate topical vitamin C solution for the prevention of radiation dermatitis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 26:413–416

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Liguori V, Guillemin C, Pesce GF et al (1997) Double-blind, randomized clinical study comparing hyaluronic acid cream to placebo in patients treated with radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 42:155–161

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fenig E, Brenner B, Katz A et al (2001) Topical biafine and lipiderm for the prevention of radiation dermatitis: a randomized prospective trial. Oncol Rep 8:305–309

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fisher J, Scott C, Stevens R et al (2000) Randomized phase III study comparing best supportive care to biafine as a prophylactic agent for radiation-induced skin toxicity for women undergoing breast irradiation: radiation therapy oncology group (RTOG) 97–13. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 48:1307–1310

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Boström A, Lindman H, Swartling C et al (2001) Potent corticosteroid cream (mometasone furoate) significantly reduces acute radiation dermatitis: results from a double-blind randomized study. Radiother Oncol 59:257–265

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Williams MS, Burk M, Loprinzi CL et al (1996) Phase III double-blind evaluation of an aloe vera gel as a prophylactic agent for radiation-induced skin toxicity. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 36:345–349

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Heggie S, Bryant GP, Tripcony L et al (2002) Phase III study on the efficacy of topical aloe vera gel on irradiated breast tissue. Cancer Nurs 25:442–451

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Maiche A, Gröhn P, Mäki-Hokkonen H (1991) Effect of chamomile cream and almond ointment on acute radiation skin reaction. Acta Oncol 30:395–396

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Løkkevik E, Skovlund E, Reitan JB et al (1996) Skin treatment with bepanthen cream versus no cream during radiotherapy—a randomized controlled trial. Acta Oncol 35(8):1021–1026

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Maiche A, Isokangas O, Gröhn P (1994) Skin protection by sucralfate cream during electron beam therapy. Acta Oncol 33:201–203

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ochi K (1995) Chemistry of sucralfate. In: Hollander D, Tytgat GNJ (eds) Sucralfate from basic science to the bedside. Plenum medical, New York, pp 47–57

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ishimori A (1995) History of the development of sucralfate. In: Hollander D, Tytgat GNJ (eds) Sucralfate from basic science to the bedside. Plenum medical, New York, pp 35–44

    Google Scholar 

  26. Szabo S, Hollander D (1989) Pathways of gastrointestinal protection and repair: mechanisms of action of sucralfate. Am J Med 86:23–31

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Romano M, Razandi M, Ivey K (1990) Effect of sucralfate and its components on taurocholate-induced damage to rat gastric mucosal cells in tissue culture. Dig Dis Sci 35:467–474

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Konturek SJ, Brozozowski T, Bielanski W et al (1989) Epidermal growth factor in the gastroprotective and ulcer healing actions of sucralfate in rats. Am J Med 86:32–37

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Henriksson R, Franzen L, Littbrand B (1987) Does sucralfate reduce radiation-induced diarrhea. Acta Oncol 26:76–77

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Henriksson R, Franzen L, Littbrand B (1992) Effects of sucralfate on acute and late bowel discomfort following radiotherapy of pelvic cancer. J Clin Oncol 10:969–975

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Henriksson R, Franzén L, Littbrand B (1991) Prevention of irradiation-induced bowel discomfort by sucralfate: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study when treating localized pelvic cancer. Am J Med 91(2A):151S–157S

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kochhar R, Sharma SC, Gupta BB et al (1988) Rectal sucralfate in radiation proctitis. Lancet 2(8607):400

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Pfeiffer P, Madsen E, Hansen O et al (1990) Effect of prophylactic sucralfate suspension on stomatitis induced by cancer chemotherapy. A randomized, double-blind, cross-over study. Acta Oncol 29:171–173

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Makkonen TA, Bostrom P, Vilja P et al (1994) Sucralfate mouth washing in the prevention of radiation-induced mucositis: a placebo-controlled double-blind study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 30:177–182

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Meredith R, Salter M, Kim R et al (1997) Sucralfate for radiation mucositis: results of a double-blind randomized trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 37:275–279

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Wells M, Macmillan M, Raab G et al (2004) Does aqueous or sucralfate cream affect the severity of erythematous radiation skin reactions? A randomised controlled trial. Radiother Oncol 73(2):153–162

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Priyadarsini KI, Maity DK, Naik GH et al (2003) Role of phenolic O-H and methylene hydrogen on the free radical reactions and antioxidant activity of curcumin. Free Radical Bio Med 35(5):475–484

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Wang M, Jin Y, Ho CT (1999) Evaluation of resveratrol derivatives as potential antioxidants and identification of a reaction product of resveratrol and 2, 2-diphenyl-1-picryhydrazyl radical. J Agric Food Chem 47(10):3974–3977

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Froment DH, Buddington B, Miller NL et al (1989) Effect of solubility on the gastrointestinal absorption of aluminum from various aluminum compounds in the rat. J Lab Clin Med 114:237–242

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Kozlowski D, Trouillas P, Calliste C et al (2007) Density functional theory study of the conformational, electronic, and antioxidant properties of natural chalcones. J Phys Chem A 111(6):1138–1145

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Frisch MJ, Trucks GW, Schlegel HB et al (2004) Gaussian 03, Revision C.02. Gaussian, Wallingford

    Google Scholar 

  42. Sitton E (1992) Early and late radiation-induced skin alterations Part I: mechanisms of skin changes. Oncol Nurs Forum 19:801–807

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Delanian S, Martin M, Housset M (1993) La fibrose iatrogénique en cancérologie (1ère partie): aspects descriptifs et physiopathologiques. Bull Cancer 80:192–201

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Delanian S (1995) Aspects physiopathologiques de la fibrose radio-induite. Bull Cancer/Radiother 82:88–93

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Fitzpatrick TB (1988) The validity and practicality of sun-reactive skin type I through VI, Arch. Dermatol 124:869–871

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Roberts WE (2009) Skin type classification systems old and new. Dermatol Clin 27:529–533

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the “Conseil Régional du Limousin” for financial support and IDRIS (Institut du Développement et des Ressources Informatiques Scientifiques, Orsay, Paris) and CALI (CAlcul en LImousin) for computing facilities. The authors are grateful to Sylvie Gautier, Jeanne Cook-Moreau and Alain Simon for helpful discussions that have helped to improve the quality of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick Trouillas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Falkowski, S., Trouillas, P., Duroux, JL. et al. Radiodermatitis prevention with sucralfate in breast cancer: fundamental and clinical studies. Support Care Cancer 19, 57–65 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-009-0788-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-009-0788-y

Keywords

Navigation