Abstract
Goals of work
The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) is a tool for self-reporting of symptom intensity, initially developed for advanced cancer patients. It consists of numerical rating scales for nine common symptoms, with the option of adding a tenth. Despite its widespread use in palliative care, few studies have focused on its psychometric properties, with none involving patient perspectives. The purpose of this study was to gather validity evidence for the ESAS, by examining patients’ cognitive processes while completing the ESAS, understanding of terminology and numerical ratings, and opinions of the ESAS as a self-reporting tool.
Materials and methods
English-speaking advanced cancer patients, referred to a Pain and Symptom Control Consultation Service in a cancer centre, were recruited. Using a qualitative “think aloud” study design, patients completed the ESAS independently while being prompted to verbalize their thoughts. They then answered a structured questionnaire to elicit their opinions of the ESAS. Transcripts of audio-taped sessions were coded and analyzed.
Main results
Twenty patients were evaluable. Symptom ratings were influenced by current symptom profiles, temporal changes, symptom experience history and individual perceptions. Symptom interpretation and numerical rating assignments varied. Difficult terminology included tiredness versus drowsiness, depression, anxiety, appetite, and well-being. Most patients agreed with the item order and thought that the ESAS was easy to complete, with a health care professional present. Patients expressed a need to emphasize the timeframe as “now”.
Conclusion
Modification of the tool and administration process may be warranted, but further study in other populations is needed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bruera E, Kuehn N, Miller MJ, Selmser P, Macmillan K (1991) The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS): a simple method for the assessment of palliative care patients. J Palliat Care 7:6–9
Guidelines for using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System: Regional Palliative Care Program in Edmonton Alberta. http://www.palliative.org.
Watanabe S, McKinnon S, Macmillan K, Hanson J (2006) Palliative care nurses’ perception of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale: a pilot survey. Int J Palliat Nurs 12:111–114
Garyali A, Palmer JL, Yennurajalingam S, Zhang T, Pace EA, Bruera E (2006) Errors in symptom intensity self-assessment by patients receiving outpatient palliative care. J Palliat Med 9:1059–1065. doi:10.1089/jpm.2006.9.1059
Heedman PA, Strang P (2001) Symptom assessment in advanced palliative home care for cancer patients using the ESAS: clinical aspects. Anticancer Res 21:4077–4082
Chow E, Davis L, Holden L, Tsao M, Danjoux C (2005) Prospective assessment of patient-rated symptoms following whole brain radiotherapy for brain metastases. J Pain Symptom Manage 30:18–23. doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2005.02.009
Dudgeon DJ, Harlos M, Clinch JJ (1999) The Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) as an audit tool. J Palliat Care 15:14–19
Porzio G, Ricevuto E, Aielli F, Verna L, Cannita K, Pollice R, Aloisi P, Porto C, Marchetti P, Ficorella C (2005) The Supportive Care Task Force at the University of L’Aquila: 2-years experience. Support Care Cancer 13:351–355. doi:10.1007/s00520-004-0772-5
Nekolaichuk C, Watanabe S, Beaumont C (2008) The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System: A 15-year retrospective review of validation studies (1991–2006). Palliat Med 22:111–122. doi:10.1177/0269216307087659
Nekolaichuk CL, Bruera E, Spachynski K, MacEachern T, Hanson J, Maguire TO (1999) A comparison of patient and proxy symptom assessments in advanced cancer patients. Palliat Med 13:311–323. doi:10.1191/026921699675854885
Nekolaichuk CL, Maguire TO, Suarez-Almazor M, Rogers WT, Bruera E (1999) Assessing the reliability of patient, nurse, and family caregivers symptom ratings in hospitalized advanced cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 17:3621–3630
Pautex S, Berger A, Chatelain C, Hermann F, Zulian GB (2003) Symptom assessment in elderly cancer patients receiving palliative care. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 47:281–286. doi:10.1016/S1040-8428(03)00043-X
Davison SN, Jhangri GS, Johnson JA (2006) Cross-sectional validity of a modified Edmonton symptom assessment system in dialysis patients: A simple assessment of symptom burden. Kidney Int 69:1621–1625. doi:10.1038/sj.ki.5000184
Chang VT, Hwang SS, Feuerman M (2000) Validation of the Edmonton symptom assessment scale. Cancer 88:2164–2171. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(20000501)88:9<2164::AID-CNCR24>3.0.CO;2-5
Moro C, Brunelli C, Miccinesi G, Fallai M, Morino P, Piazza M, Labianca R, Ripamonti C (2006) Edmonton symptom assessment scale: Italian validation in two palliative care settings. Support Care Cancer 14:30–37. doi:10.1007/s00520-005-0834-3
Bruera E, MacDonald S (2003) Audit methods: The Edmonton symptom assessment system. in: clinical audit in palliative care. Radcliffe Medical, Oxford, pp 61–77
Stromgren AS, Groenvold M, Pedersen L, Olsen AK, Sjogren P (2002) Symptomatology of cancer patients in palliative care: content validation of self-assessment questionnaires against medical records. Eur J Cancer 38:788–794. doi:10.1016/S0959-8049(01)00470-1
Philip J, Smith WB, Craft P, Lickiss N (1998) Concurrent validity of the modified Edmonton symptom assessment system with the Rotterdam symptom checklist and the brief pain inventory. Support Care Cancer 6:539–541. doi:10.1007/s005200050212
Davison SN, Jhangri GS, Johnson JA (2006) Longitudinal validation of a modified Edmonton symptom assessment system (ESAS) in haemodialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 21:3189–3195. doi:10.1093/ndt/gfl380
Vignaroli E, Pace EA, Willey J, Palmer JL, Zhang T, Bruera E (2006) The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System as a screening tool for depression and anxiety. J Palliat Med 9:296–303. doi:10.1089/jpm.2006.9.296
Fonteyn ME, Kuipers B, Grobe SJ (1993) A description of Think Aloud method and protocol analysis. Qual Health Res 3:430–441. doi:10.1177/104973239300300403
Patton MQ (2002) Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Sage, Thousand Oaks
Anderson F, Downing GM, Hill J, Casorso L, Lerch N (1996) Palliative Performance Scale (PPS): a new tool. J Palliat Care 12:5–11
Folstein MF, Folstein S, McHugh PR (1975) ‘Mini-mental state’: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psych Res 12:189–198. doi:10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6
Crum RM, Anthony JC, Bassett SS, Folstein MF (1993) Population-based norms for the mini-mental state examination by age and educational level. JAMA 269:2386–2391. doi:10.1001/jama.269.18.2386
Fainsinger RL, Nekolaichuk CL, Lawlor PG, Neumann CM, Hanson J, Vigano A (2005) A multicenter study of the revised Edmonton staging system for classifying cancer pain in advanced cancer patients. J Pain Symptom Manage 29:224–237. doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2004.05.008
Messick S (1989) Validity. In: Educational measurement (3rd ed.). Oryx, Phoenix, pp 13–103
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to acknowledge funding from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research New Emerging Team for Difficult Pain Problems, and to thank the patients, their families, Mary Michaud, RN, Jennifer Dutka, BScPharm, and Pat Borgersen, RN, for their assistance with this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Watanabe, S., Nekolaichuk, C., Beaumont, C. et al. The Edmonton symptom assessment system—what do patients think?. Support Care Cancer 17, 675–683 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-008-0522-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-008-0522-1