Skip to main content
Log in

Wide variation in content of inpatient do-not-resuscitate order forms used at National Cancer Institute-designated cancer centers in the United States

  • Supportive Care International
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Goals of work

Determining resuscitation status (RS) for inpatients with advanced cancer is emotionally charged and often conflictual. Available data suggest that clinicians have inconsistent practices when establishing and documenting do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders. Lack of standardization may contribute to ineffective and unclear discussions regarding RS. To inform revisions of DNR order forms used at one comprehensive cancer center, we surveyed National Cancer Institute-designated cancer centers (NCICCs) to determine if a standardized approach to documenting inpatient DNR orders exists.

Materials and methods

Over a 12-week period in 2002–2003, the 50 NCICCs providing inpatient care were contacted regarding participation in this Institutional Review Board-approved study. Using a 69-item database, inpatient DNR order forms were analyzed for content and elements of process used to establish and document RS. Each form was evaluated by two raters to assess inter-rater reliability. Analysis was descriptive; inter-rater agreement was summarized using the kappa statistic.

Main results

Sixty percent (30 out of 50) of NCICCs participated. Eighty percent of responding sites confined the order process exclusively to cardiopulmonary resuscitation and did not include other interventions for possible limitation. Two thirds of responding sites used preformatted order forms specific for establishing inpatient RS; forms varied widely in content and elements of process used to establish and document DNR orders.

Conclusions

NCICCs do not have a standardized approach to establishing and documenting DNR orders. Lack of standardization may reflect the absence of a common understanding of these difficult issues which may contribute to unclear and ineffective communication when addressing RS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. The SUPPORT Principal Investigators (1995) A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients. The study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments (SUPPORT). JAMA 274:1591–1598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. American Medical Association Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs Report B-I-87. http://www.ama-ssn.org/ama/noindex/category/11760.html [accessed June 2008]

  3. Bedell SE, Delbanco TL, Cook EF, Epstein FH (1983) Survival after cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the hospital. N Engl J Med 309:569–576

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Committee on Care at the End of Life Approaching Death: Improving Care at the End of Life. Chapter 1. Washington: Institute of Medicine National Academy Press 1997

  5. Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, American Medical Association (1991) Guidelines for the appropriate use of the do-not-resuscitate orders. JAMA 265:1868–1871, doi:10.1001/jama.265.14.1868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Covinsky KE, Fuller JD, Yaffe K, Johnston CB, Hamel MB, Lynn J et al (2000) Communication and decision-making in seriously ill patients: findings of the SUPPORT project. Study Understand Prognoses Preferences Outcomes Risks Treatments. J Am Geriatr Soc 48:S187–S193

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cummins RO, Sanders A, Mancini E, Hazinski MF (1997) In-hospital resuscitation: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association Emergency Cardiac Care Committee and the Advanced Cardiac Life Support. Basic Life Support Pediatr Resuscitation Program Adm Subcommittees Circ 95:2211–2212

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ewer MS, Kish SK, Martin CG, Price KJ, Feeley TW (2001) Characteristics of cardiac arrest in cancer patients as a predictor of survival after cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Cancer 92:1905–1912 doi:10.1002/1097-0142(20011001)92:7<1905::AID-CNCR1708>3.0.CO;2-6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fins JJ, Maltby BS, Friedmann E, Greene MG, Norris K, Adelman R et al (2005) Contracts, covenants and advance care planning: an empirical study of the moral obligations of patient and proxy. J Pain Symptom Manage 29:55–68, doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2004.07.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kelly CA, Watson DM, Hutchinson CM, Pole JM (1986) Prognostic factors in cardiac arrest occurring in a district general hospital. Br J Clin Pract 40:251–253

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lamont EB, Christakis NA (2001) Prognostic disclosure to patients with cancer near the end of life. Ann Intern Med 134:1096–1105

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:671–679, doi:10.2307/2529465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Landry FJ, Parker JM, Phillips YY (1992) Outcome of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the intensive care setting. Arch Intern Med 152:2305–2308, doi:10.1001/archinte.152.11.2305

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. National Cancer Institute NCI-designated Cancer Centers (P30): Cancer Centers Listed by State. http://www3.cancer.gov/cancercenters/centerslist.html [accessed February 2008]

  15. Phipps E, True G, Harris D, Chong U, Tester W, Chavin SI et al (2003) Approaching the end of life: attitudes, preferences, and behaviors of African-American and white patients and their family caregivers. J Clin Oncol 21:549–554, doi:10.1200/JCO.2003.12.080

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rabkin MT, Gillerman G, Rice NR (1976) Orders not to resuscitate. N Engl J Med 295:364–366

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Snyder LLC, Ethics and Human Rights Committee (2005) American College of Physicians. Ehtics Manual. Ann Intern Med

  18. Vitelli CE, Cooper K, Rogatko A, Brennan MF (1991) Cardiopulmonary resuscitation and the patient with cancer. J Clin Oncol 9:111–115

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Wallace SK, Ewer MS, Price KJ, Feeley TW (2002) Outcome and cost implications of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the medical intensive care unit of a comprehensive cancer center. Support Care Cancer 10:425–429, doi:10.1007/s00520-002-0353-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Weeks JC, Cook EF, O’Day SJ, Peterson LM, Wenger N, Reding D et al (1998) Relationship between cancer patients’ predictions of prognosis and their treatment preferences. JAMA 279:1709–1714, doi:10.1001/jama.279.21.1709

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Cheryl Cooley, Senior Administrative Assistant, Department of Palliative Care and Rehabilitation Medicine for her expert administrative support of this manuscript; Marilyn Greer, PhD, Director of Institutional Research, and Robert Armand, MS, Systems Analysts III of the Department of Institutional Research for their design of the data entry forms and the summary of results; and Dr. Eduardo Bruera, Chair of the Department of Palliative Care and Rehabilitation Medicine, for his critical review of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Donna S. Zhukovsky.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 3 Study variables and inter-rater agreementa,b,c

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhukovsky, D.S., Hwang, J.P., Palmer, J.L. et al. Wide variation in content of inpatient do-not-resuscitate order forms used at National Cancer Institute-designated cancer centers in the United States. Support Care Cancer 17, 109–115 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-008-0490-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-008-0490-5

Keywords

Navigation