Skip to main content
Log in

The rapid access palliative radiotherapy program: blueprint for initiation of a one-stop multidisciplinary bone metastases clinic

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Goals of work

Radiotherapy (RT) for palliation of pain due to bone metastases (BM) is effective but underutilized likely due to the traditional practice of separate clinic visits for consultation, treatment planning, and RT delivery. However, recent evidence proves one RT treatment is as effective as multiple for analgesia, enabling investigation of an alternative model of RT delivery, the rapid access palliative radiotherapy program (RAPRP).

Materials and methods

Prior to the start of the program, needs assessment was performed to determine the composition of the optimal team. Screening tools were implemented to streamline holistic, multidisciplinary assessment. An advertising strategy, treatment and research protocols, and mechanisms for patient feedback were established. After RAPRP implementation, patient outcomes such as symptom relief were tracked.

Main results

Eighty-six patients with painful BM were referred over the 25-week pilot. Median age was 69.9 years; 64% had prostate cancer, and median performance status was 70. Patient-rated pain was on average 6.1/10 at baseline, improving to 2.6/10 by week 4 post-RT. On average, 6.2 symptoms were reported (baseline) compared to 5.2 (week 4). Team members assessed 10–100% of patients and were successful in stabilizing or improving all symptoms in >75% contacted at week 4. One hundred percent of patients surveyed were satisfied with their experience.

Conclusions

Early needs assessment was advantageous in determining the optimal team and methods of assessment for our ‘one-stop’ BM clinic. This approach was successful in improving pain and other symptoms, and the convenience of seeing multiple providers on 1 day was appreciated by the patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderson F, Downing G, Hill J, Casorso L, Lerch N (1996) Palliative performance scale: a new tool. J Palliat Care 12(1):5–11

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Andersson L, Sousa P (1998) An innovative way of caring: palliative radiation therapy rapid response clinic. Can Oncol Nurse J 8(2):146–147

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bradley N, Davis L, Chow E (2005) Symptom distress in patients attending an outpatient palliative radiotherapy clinic. J Pain Symptom Manage 30(2):123–131

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bruera E, Kuehn N, Miller MJ, Selmser P, Macmillan K (1991) The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS): a simple method of assessment of palliative care patients. J Pall Care 7:6–9

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Chow E, Harris K, Fan G, Tsao M, Sze W (2007) Palliative radiotherapy trials for bone metastases: a systematic review. J Clin Oncol 25(11):1423–1436

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chow E, Fung K, Bradley N, Davis L, Holden L, Danjoux C (2005) Review of telephone follow-up experience at the rapid response radiotherapy program. Support Care Cancer 13(7):549–553

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chow E, Wong R, Connolly R, Hruby G, Franssen E, Fung K, Vachon M, Andersson L, Pope J, Holden L, Szumacher E, Schueller T, Stefaniuk K, Finkelstein J, Hayter C, Danjoux C (2001) Prospective assessment of symptom palliation for patients attending a rapid response radiotherapy program: feasibility of telephone follow-up. J Pain Symptom Manage 22(2):649–656

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Chow E, Wong R, Vachon M, Connolly R, Andersson L, Szumacher E, Franssen E, Danjoux C (2000) Referring physicians’ satisfaction with the rapid response radiotherapy programme. Survey results at the Toronto—Sunnybrook Regional Cancer Centre. Support Care Cancer 8(5):405–409

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Danjoux C, Chow E, Drossos A, Holden L, Hayter C, Tsao M, Barnes T, Sinclair E, Farhadian M (2006) An innovative rapid response radiotherapy program to reduce waiting time for palliative radiotherapy. Support Care Cancer 14(1):38–43

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fainsinger R, Nekolaichuk C, Lawlor P, Neuman C, Hanson J, Vigano A (2005) A multicentre validation study of the revised Edmonton Staging System for classifying cancer pain in advanced cancer patients. J Pain Symptom Manage 29(3):224–237

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fairchild A, Ghosh S, Yip E, Bates J, Poon W, Severin D (2007) Patient satisfaction with the palliative radiotherapy process. Support Care Cancer 15(6):744–745 Abstr

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fitzgibbon E, Samant R, Meng J, Graham I (2006) Awareness and use of the Rapid Palliative Radiotherapy Program by family physicians in Eastern Ontario: a survey. Curr Oncol 13(1):27–32

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Haddad P, Wilson P, Wong R, Williams D, Sharma N, Soban F, McLean M, Levin W, Bezjak A (2003) The success of data collection in the palliative setting—telephone or clinic follow-up? Support Care Cancer 11(9):555–559

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Huang J, Zhou S, Groome P, Tyldesley S, Zhang-Solomans J, Mackillop W (2001) Factors affecting the use of palliative radiotherapy in Ontario. J Clin Oncol 19(1):137–144

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kirkbride P, Barton R (1999) Palliative radiation therapy. J Pall Med 2(1):87–97

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mackillop W (1996) The principles of palliative radiotherapy: a radiation oncologist’s perspective. Can J Oncol 6(1):5–11

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mackillop W, Zhou Y, Quirt CF (1995) A comparison of delays in treatment of cancer with radiation in Canada and the United States. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 32(2):531–539

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ottery F (1996) Definition of standardized nutritional assessment and interventional pathways in oncology. Nutrition 12(1 Suppl):S15–S19

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Samant R (2006) How should we describe the benefits of palliative radiotherapy? Curr Oncol 13(6):230–234

    Google Scholar 

  20. Schag CC, Heinrich RL, Ganz PA (1984) Karnofsky performance status revisited: reliability, validity, and guidelines. J Clin Oncol 2:187–193

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Wu J, Monk G, Clark T, Robinson J, Eigl B, Hagen N (2006) Palliative radiotherapy improves pain and reduces functional interference in patients with painful bone metastases: a quality assurance study. Clin Oncol 18(7):539–544

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to acknowledge Dr M Parliament, S Eberle, E Yip, W Poon, and J Bates for assistance in the RAPRP clinic implementation, as well as all referring physicians for their support.

Presented in part in poster form at the Canadian Hospice Palliative Care Association meeting, Nov 4–7, 2007, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Fairchild.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fairchild, A., Pituskin, E., Rose, B. et al. The rapid access palliative radiotherapy program: blueprint for initiation of a one-stop multidisciplinary bone metastases clinic. Support Care Cancer 17, 163–170 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-008-0468-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-008-0468-3

Keywords

Navigation