Skip to main content
Log in

A mixed-method evaluation of nurse-led community-based supportive cancer care

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Goals of work

The study purpose was to evaluate a nurse-led supportive care clinical case management program in the community using multi-methods to delineate care processes prior to outcome evaluation.

Materials and methods

Multiple data sources including program service records, chart reviews and interviews with nurses and key interdisciplinary informants were used to identify population served (coverage and reach), processes of care (implementation), and providers’ perceptions of the effectiveness of the nurse-led program (reaction).

Main results

The program provided care to over 700 cancer patients in a 1-year period. Nurse-led support interventions were focused on direct care inclusive of teaching/coaching for symptom management, counseling and support, and mobilization of services through system navigation based on an initial comprehensive assessment of supportive care needs.

Conclusions

Nurse-led models of supportive care have the potential to reduce unmet supportive care needs, improve continuity of care, and overall health-related quality of life that should be tested in future trials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fitch M (2003) Supportive care: rebalancing efforts. In: Sullivan T, Evans W, Angus H, Hudson A (eds) Strengthening the quality of cancer services in Ontario. Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto Ontario, pp 141–163

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sanson-Fisher R, Girgis A, Boyes A et al (2000) The unmet supportive care needs of patients with cancer. Cancer 88:226–237

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ashbury FD, Findlay H, Reynolds B, McKerralehen K (1998) A Canadian survey of cancer patients’ experiences: are their needs being met? J Pain Symptom Manage 6:298–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Canadian Cancer Society (CCS) (2003) The needs of Ontario cancer patients: an assessment. Canadian Cancer Society (CCS), Toront

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jacobson PB, Donavan KA, Trask PC, Fleishman SB, Zabora J, Baker F, Holland JC (2005) Screening for psychologic distress in ambulatory cancer patients. American Cancer Society. Published online February 2005 in Wiley Interscience (http://www.interscience.wiley.com)

  6. Carlson LE, Angen M, Cullum J et al (2004) High levels of untreated distress and fatigue in cancer patients. Br J Cancer 90:2297–2304

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Zabora J, BrintzenhofeSzoc K, Curbow H, Hooker C, Piantadosi S (2001) The prevalence of psychological distress by cancer site. Psycho-Oncol 10:19–28

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fitch M (1994) Provincial Cancer Network Supportive Care Work Group: report and recommendations, Submission to Cancer Care Ontario: Toronto

  9. Canadian Strategy for Cancer Control (2001) Canadian Strategy for Cancer Control Draft Synthesis, Report 10. Ottawa, ON. Canada

  10. Brazil K, Whelan T, O’Brien MA, Sussman J, Pyette N, Bainbridge D et al (2003). Coordinating supportive care in the community. Prepared for the Research Divisions, Ontario Ministry of Health and Long Term Care

  11. Provincial Cancer Network Committee (1995) Recommendations on cancer care in Ontario. Submitted to Ontario Ministry of Health. Provincial Cancer Network Committee, Toronto

  12. Doll R, Stephen J, Barroetavena MC, Linden W, Poole G, Ng E, Fyles G, Habra M (2003) Patient navigation in cancer care: program delivery and research in British Columbia. Can Oncol Nurs J 13(3):193

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Goodwin JS, Sattish S, Anderson ET, Nattinger AB, Freeman JL (2003) Effect of nurse case management on the treatment of older women with breast cancer. J Am Geriatr Soc 51:1252–1259

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Whelan T, Grunfeld E, Sussman J, Abelson J, Willan A, Selleck S et al (2003) An evaluation of continuity of cancer care through Regional Supportive Care Networks. Canadian Health Services Research Foundation

  15. Farber JM, Deschamps M, Cameron R (2002) Investigation and Assessment of the Navigator Role in Meeting the Informational Needs of Women with Breast Cancer in Canada. Ottawa: Canadian Breast Cancer Initiative, Centre for Chronic Disease Prevention and Control, Health Canada 2002

  16. Canadian Association of Nurses in Oncology (CANO/ACIO) (2001) Standards of care, roles in oncology nursing and role competencies. Canadian Association of Nurses in Oncology (CANO/ACIO), Toronto

  17. Douglas HR, Halliday D, Normand C, Corner J, Bath P, Beech N (2003) Economic evaluation of specialist cancer and palliative nursing: Macmillan evaluation study findings. Int J Palliat Nurs 9(10):429–438

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sussman J, Howell D, O’Brien MA, Whelan T (2004) An evaluation of the effectiveness of a specialized nurse case management model in coordinating supportive cancer care in the community. Submitted to the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long Term Care, May 14, 2004

  19. Howell D, Fitch M, Caldwell B (2002) The impact of Interlink Community Cancer Nurses on the experience of living with cancer. Onc Nurs Forum 29(4):715–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Howell D, Jackson J (1998) Making cancer bearable: the Interlink Community Cancer Nurses program. Can Oncol Nurs J 8(4):222–228

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Bunn F (1988) An explanatory study of the role of the Macmillan nurse. King’s College, University of London (unpublished study)

  22. Skilbeck J, Seymour J (2002) Meeting complex needs: an analysis of Macmillan nurses’ work with patients. Int J Palliat Nurs 8:574–582

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rossi PH, Freeman HE (1993) Evaluation: a systematic approach, 5th edn. Sage, Newbury Park

    Google Scholar 

  24. Flanagan JC (1954) The critical incident technique. Psychol Bull 51:327–358

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Norusis MJ (2002) SPSS 11.0 guide to data analysis. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  26. Neuendorf KA (2001) The content analysis handbook. Cleveland State University, Cleveland, USA

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lincoln YS, Guba EG (1985) Naturalistic inquiry. Sage, Beverly Hills, CA:

    Google Scholar 

  28. Glaser BG, Strauss AL (1967) Discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Aldine, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  29. Delbecq AL, VandeVen AH (1971) A group process model for problem identification and program planning. J Appl Behav Sci 8:466–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Alter C, Murty S (1997) Logic modeling: a tool for teaching critical thinking in social work practice. J Soc Work Educ 33:85–102

    Google Scholar 

  31. Skarstein J, Aass N, Fossa SD, Skovland E, Dahl AA (2000) Anxiety and depression in cancer patients: relation between the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire. J Psychosom Res 49:27–34

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Wen KY, Gustafson DH (2004) Needs assessment for cancer patients and their families. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2:11–23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Simpson JSA, Carlson LE, Trew M (2001) Impact of a group psychosocial intervention on health care utilization by breast cancer patients. Cancer Pract 9(1):19–26

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Chiles JA, Lambert MJ, Hatch AL (1999) The impact of psychological interventions on medical cost offset: a meta-analytic review. Clin Psychol: Sci Practice 6(2):204–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Canadian Cancer Control Strategy, ReBalance Focus Action Group Mission and Mandate, Public Health Agency of Canada, 2005

  36. Hollander M, Prince M (2002) The third way: a framework for organizing health related services for individuals with ongoing care needs and their families. Home Care and Pharmaceutical Division, Health Policy and Communications Branch, Health Canada, Ottawa

  37. Stewart S, Pearson S, Horowitz JD (1998) Effects of a home-based intervention among congestive heart failure patients discharged from acute hospital care. Arch Intern Med 158:1067–1072

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Rich MW, Beckham V, Wittenberg C et al (1995) A multidisciplinary intervention to prevent the readmission of elderly patients with congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med 333:1190–1195

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Moore S, Corner J, Haviland et al (2002) Following patients with advanced cancer: satisfaction with nurse-led care. BMJ 325:1145–51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Faithfull S, Corner J, Leyer L, Huddart R, Dearnaley D (2001) Evaluation of nurse-led follow-up for patients undergoing pelvic radiotherapy. Br J Cancer 85:1853–1864

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. McCorkle R, Benoliel JQ, Georgiadou F, Moinpour C, Goodell B (1989a) A randomized clinical trial of home nursing care for lung cancer patients. Cancer 64:1375–1382

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. McCorkle R, Strumpf NE, Nuamah IF, Adler DC, Cooley ME, Jepson C et al (2000) A specialized home care intervention improves survival among older post-surgical cancer patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 48:1701–1713

    Google Scholar 

  43. Suhonen R, Valimaki M, Leino-Kilpi H (2005) Individualized care, quality of life and satisfaction with nursing care. J Adv Nurs 50(3):283–292

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Stewart M, Brown JB, Donner A, McWhinney IR et al (2000) The impact of patient-centered care on outcomes. J Fam Pract 49:796–780

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Clayton MF, Mishel MH, Belyea M (2006) Testing a model of symptoms, communication, uncertainty, and well-being in older breast cancer survivors. Res Nurs Health 29:18–39

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Haggerty J, Reid RJ, Freeman GK, Starfield BH, Adair CE, McKendry R (2003) Continuity of care: a multidisciplinary review. BMJ 327:1219–1221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Dumont I, Dumont S, Turgeon J (2005) Continuity of care for advanced cancer patients. J Palliat Care 21(1):49–57

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Ministry of Health and Long Term Care in Ontario, Canada through the Supportive Care Research Unit, Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Ontario. We also acknowledge the time provided by the ICCN nurses and other participants who contributed to our understanding of the ICCN model of care.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. M. Howell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Howell, D.M., Sussman, J., Wiernikowski, J. et al. A mixed-method evaluation of nurse-led community-based supportive cancer care. Support Care Cancer 16, 1343–1352 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-008-0416-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-008-0416-2

Keywords

Navigation