Skip to main content
Log in

When morphine does not work

  • Speial Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 29 May 2008

Abstract

Up to 70% of patients with cancer should be expected to experience pain during the cancer illness. This is clearly more likely as disease progresses. The World Health Organisation (WHO) cancer pain guidelines remain the key to following a simple and systematic approach to cancer pain control in approximately 80% of patients. This approach was never intended to be used in isolation of various non-pharmacological approaches, including tumouricidal therapies. However, lateral thought when managing challenging cancer-related pain becomes even more critical. This paper reviews the approach to the approximately 20% of patients who do not respond to the standard WHO three-step analgesic ladder approach and of course, by definition this means in practice those patients with severe pain which is not controlled by morphine or alternative strong opioids. Such cancer pain can be broadly categorised as opioid irrelevant pain, opioid partially responsive pain, opioid unresponsive pain or pain resulting from excess opioid.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Carr DB, Goudas L, Balk E et al (2004) Evidence report on the treatment of pain in cancer patients. JNCI 32:23–31

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cherny N, Ripamonti C, Fallon MT et al (2001) Strategies to manage the adverse effects of oral morphine: the evidence. J Clin Oncol 19(9):2542–2554

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Colvin L, Forbes K, Fallon MT (2006) Difficult pain. BMJ 332:1081–1083 6 May

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Colvin L, Walley J, Duncan S, Fallon M (2006) Alterations in evoked sensory responses in cancer-induced bone pain (CIBP). British Pain Association, Harrogate Abstract 71

    Google Scholar 

  5. Donovan-Rodriguez T, Dickenson A, Urch C (2005) Gabapentin normalizes spinal neuronal responses that correlate with behaviour in a rat model of cancer-pain and regional anaesthesia. Anesthesiology 102(1):132–140

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fallon MT, Hanks G, Cherny N (2006) Principles of control of cancer pain. BMJ 332:1022–1024 29 April

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fallon MT, McConnell S (2006) The principles of cancer pain management. Clinical Medicine 6(2):136–139 March/April

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fallon MT (2005) The current situation with cancer pain. In: Justins D (ed) Pain 2005—an updated review. IASP, Seattle

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fallon MT (1997) Opioid rotation—does it have a role? Palliat Med 11(3):176–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fallon MT, Hanks GWC (1993) Opioid-resistant pain: sense or nonsense? Pain Clin 6:205–206

    Google Scholar 

  11. Walley J, Colvin L Fallon M (2006) Characterisation of malignant bone pain. In NCRI Conference, Birmingham, Abstract A62 http://www.ncri.org.uk/ncriconference/abstract/pdf/pdfs/NCRI2006_0544.pdf

  12. WHO Guidelines (1996) Cancer pain relief, 2nd edn. World Health Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wong R, Wiffen PJ (2002) Bisphosphonates for the relief of pain secondary to bone metastasis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2), DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD002068

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marie Fallon.

Additional information

An erratum to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-008-0458-5

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fallon, M. When morphine does not work. Support Care Cancer 16, 771–775 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-008-0402-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-008-0402-8

Keywords

Navigation