Abstract
Objective
The objective of this study was to evaluate the utility of participating in two benchmarking exercises to assess the care delivered to patients in the dying phase using the Liverpool Care Pathway for the Dying Patient (LCP).
Design
The study uses questionnaire evaluation of the benchmarking process assessing the quality/usefulness of: sector feedback reports, individual feedback reports and the workshop element.
Setting
Healthcare professionals representing hospital, hospice and community settings.
Participants
Sixty-two out of 75 potential participants (83%) returned completed questionnaires.
Main outcome measure
A study-specific questionnaire was administered as part of the final workshop element of the benchmarking exercise. The questionnaire contained a mixture of ‘Likert’-type responses and open-ended questions.
Results
Participants from all sectors reported that the feedback reports contained the right amount and level of data (82–100%), that they were easy to understand (77–92%) and that they were useful to the organisation (94–100%). Respondents particularly valued the opportunity to discuss more fully the results of the benchmark and to network and share elements of good practice with other attendees in the workshops. Participants from the hospital sector identified changes in practice that had occurred as a result of participation.
Conclusions
Using comparative audit data that are readily available from the LCP and using workshops to discuss the findings and plan future care was perceived as a valuable way in which to explore the care delivered to dying patients in a variety of settings.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ellershaw J, Smith C, Overill S, Walker SE, Aldridge J (2001) Care of the dying: setting standards for symptom control in the last 48 hours of life. J Pain Symptom Manage 21(1):12–17
Ellershaw J and Wilkinson S (eds) (2003) Care of the dying—a pathway to excellence. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Berwick DM (1996) A primer on leading the improvement of systems. BMJ 312:619–622
Graham NO (1995) Quality in health care: theory, application, and evolution. Aspen Publications, New York
Rinck GC, van den Bos GA, Kleijnen J, de Haes HJ, Schade E, Veenhof CH (1997) Methodologic issues in effectiveness research on palliative cancer care: a systematic review. J Clin Oncol 15(4):1697–1707
Westcombe AM, Gambles MA, Wilkinson SM, Barnes K, Fellows D, Maher EJ, Young T, Love SB, Lucy RA, Cubbin S, Ramirez AJ (2003) Learning the hard way! Setting up an RCT of aromatherapy massage for patients with advanced cancer. Palliat Med 17(4):300–307
Ellis J (1995) Using benchmarking to improve practice. Nurs Stand 9(35):25–28
Ellis J (2000) Sharing the evidence: clinical practice benchmarking to improve continuously the quality of care. J Adv Nurs l32(1):215–225
Matykiewicz L, Ashton D (2005) Essence of Care benchmarking: putting it into practice. Benchmarking: An International Journal 12(15):467–481
Northcott D (2005) Benchmarking in UK health: a gap between policy and practice? Benchmarking: An International Journal 12(17):419–435
Gambles M, Stirzaker S, Jack B, Ellershaw J (2006) The Liverpool Care Pathway in hospices: an exploratory study of doctor and nurse perceptions. Int J Palliat Nurs 12(9):414–421
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ellershaw, J., Gambles, M. & McGlinchey, T. Benchmarking: a useful tool for informing and improving care of the dying?. Support Care Cancer 16, 813–819 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-007-0353-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-007-0353-5