Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Clinical validity of the Japanese version of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Anemia Scale

  • Supportive Care International
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Goals of work

The purpose of this study was to reveal the clinical validity of the Japanese version of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Anemia scale (FACT-An) in relation to hemoglobin level. We also analyzed patients’ scores for the related FACT-General scale (FACT-G), the FACT Anemia subscale, and the FACT Trial Outcome Index-Anemia scale (FACT TOI-An) to determine which was the most sensitive to anemia measurements.

Materials and methods

Throughout Japan, we recruited 227 patients (mean±SD, 59±12.1 years old) diagnosed with a variety of cancers. We correlated the severity of anemia, as measured by hemoglobin levels, to scores on the FACT-An and on the other scales at baseline and at 3 months.

Main results

The questionnaire completion rate was more than 98% at both time points. The FACT-An had high internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha coefficient >0.8). FACT-An scores were significantly and positively correlated with hemoglobin levels both at baseline (r=0.24; 95% CI=0.12 to 0.36; n=225) and at 3 months (r=0.24; 95% CI=0.10 to 0.36; n=204). FACT-G, FACT Anemia subscale, and FACT TOI-An scores also successfully discriminated between patients with lower (Hb <11.0 g/dl) and higher (Hb ≥11.0 g/dl) hemoglobin levels. Moreover, the changes of these FACT scores over 3-months could discriminate changes in hemoglobin level.

Conclusion

The Japanese version of the FACT-An has higher clinical validity and can be used to appropriately assess health-related quality of life among Japanese cancer patients with anemia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cella D (1997) The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Anemia (FACT-An) scale: a new tool for the assessment of outcomes in cancer anemia and fatigue. Semin Hematol 34(3 Suppl 2):13–19

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cella DF, Tulsky DS, Gray G, Sarafian B et al (1993) The Functional Assessment Of Cancer Therapy scale: development and validation of the general measure. J Clin Oncol 11(3):570–579

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cella DF, Bonmi AE, Lloyd SR et al (1995) Reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L) quality of life instrument. Lung Cancer 12(3):199–220

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cella D, Zagari MJ, Vandoros C et al (2003) Epoetin alfa treatment results in clinically significant improvements in quality of life in anemic cancer patients when referenced to the general population. J Clin Oncol 21(2):366–373

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Crawford J, Cella D, Cleeland CS et al (2002) Relationship between changes in hemoglobin level and quality of life during chemotherapy in anemic cancer patients receiving epoetin alfa therapy. Cancer 95(4):888–895

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fumimoto H, Kobayashi K, Chang CH et al (2001) Cross-cultural validation of an international questionnaire, the general measure of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale (FACT-G), for Japanese. Qual Life Res 10(8):701–709

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Littlewood TJ, Bajetta E, Nortier W et al (2001) Effects of epoetin alfa on hematologic parameters and QOL in cancer patients receiving nonplatinum chemotherapy: results of a randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 19(11):2865–2874

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Noguchi W, Ohno T, Morita S et al (2004) Reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual (FACIT-Sp) for Japanese patients with cancer. Support Care Cancer 12(4):240–245

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Witzig TE, Silberstein PT, Loprinzi CL et al (2005) Phase III, randomized, double-blind study of epoetin alfa compared with placebo in anemic patients receiving chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 23(12):2606–2617

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Yoshimura A, Kobayashi K, Fumimoto H et al (2004) Cross-cultural validation of the Japanese Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Anemia (FACT-An). J Nippon Med Sch Nihon Ika Daigaku Zasshi 71(5):314–322

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was part of the Health Outcomes Research (HOR) project (HOR 04) established in 2003 by the Comprehensive Support Project for Oncology Research of Breast Cancer (CSPOR-BC) and was supported by a grant from the CSPOR-BC. We thank Tomoko Shishida, Shitomi Kudo, Narikazu Boku, Shozo Ohsumi, Morihiko Kimura, Takashi Seto, Yoshiaki Ogawa, Masaru Kuranami, Hiroshi Isobe, Masato Koseki, and others who helped us in patient recruitment. We also thank Ann C. Tang and Tom Lang for their assistance in preparing the manuscript. Finally, we are grateful to all patients who participated in the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kojiro Shimozuma.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kurita, M., Shimozuma, K., Morita, S. et al. Clinical validity of the Japanese version of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Anemia Scale. Support Care Cancer 15, 1–6 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-006-0138-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-006-0138-2

Keywords

Navigation