Skip to main content

Placing quality of life assessments on oncologists’ agenda

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Rowland J (1997) Outcomes assessment: cancer-specific quality-of-life measures: beyond the research setting. American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Educational Book, 33rd Annual Meeting, May 1997

  2. Gunnars B, Nygren P, Glimelius B, SBU-group (2001) Assessment of quality of life during chemotherapy (review). Acta Oncol 40:175–184

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jacobsen PB, Davis K, Cella D (2002) Assessing quality of life in research and clinical practice. Oncology 16(9 suppl):133–139

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B et al (1993) The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-30: a quality of life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 85:365–376

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cella DF, Tulsky DS, Gray G et al (1993) The functional assessment of cancer therapy scale: development and validation of the general measure. J Clin Oncol 11:570–579

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Stewart A, Hays R, Ware J (1988) The MOS short-form general health survey. Reliability and validity in a patient population. Med Care 26:724–735

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Davis K, Cella D (2002) Assessing quality of life in Oncology clinical practice: a review of barriers and critical success factors. J Clin Outcomes Manage 9:327–332

    Google Scholar 

  8. Keibert G, Wait S, Bernhard J et al (2001) Practice and policy of measuring quality of life and health economics in cancer clinical trials: a survey among co-operative trial groups. Qual Life Res 9:1080–1973

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sloan JA, Cella D, Frost M et al (2002) Assessing clinical significance in measuring oncology patients quality of life: introduction to the symposium, content overview, and definition of terms. Mayo Clin Proc 77:367–370

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Guyatt GH, Osoba D, Wu AW et al (2002) Methods to explain the clinical significance of health status measures. Mayo Clin Proc 77:371–383

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cella D, Bullinger M, Scott C et al (2002) Group versus individual approaches to understanding the clinical significance of differences or changes in quality of life. Mayo Clin Proc 77:384–392

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sloan JA, Aaronson N, Cappelleri JC (2002) Assessing the clinical significance of single items relative to summated scores. Mayo Clin Proc 77:479–487

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Frost MH, Bonomi AE, Ferrans CE et al (2002) Patient, clinician, and population perspectives on determining the clinical significance of quality-of-life scores. Mayo Clin Proc 77:488–494

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sprangers MAG, Moinpour CM, Moynihan TJ et al (2002) Assessing meaningful change in quality of life over time: a user’s guide for clinicians. Mayo Clin Proc 77:561–571

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Symonds T, Berzon R, Marquis P et al (2002) The clinical significance of quality-of-life results: practical considerations for specific audiences. Mayo Clin Proc 77:572–583

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Detmar SB et al (2002) Health-related quality-of-life assessments and patient–physician communication. A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 288:3027–3034

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Grassi L, Travado L, Gil F, Campos R, Lluch P, Baile W (2005) A communication intervention for training southern European oncologists to recognize psychosocial morbidity in cancer patients. I. development of the model and preliminary results on physicians’ satisfaction. J Cancer Educ 20:79–84

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luzia Travado.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Travado, L. Placing quality of life assessments on oncologists’ agenda. Support Care Cancer 14, 979 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-006-0130-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-006-0130-x