Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Emetic potential of daily oral etoposide

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Chemotherapeutic agents are classified by their degree of emetogenicity. Highly and moderately emetogenic agents require antiemetic prophylaxis for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Intravenous etoposide is listed as having low emetic potential. However, oral etoposide is categorized as having moderate emetogenicity. Daily oral etoposide is used in refractory germ cell cancer patients. We prospectively evaluated the emetic potential of oral etoposide in this patient population.

Materials and methods

Between August 2003 and February 2006, 16 patients with refractory germ cell cancer received single-agent, daily oral etoposide 50 mg/M2 for 21 consecutive days every 4 weeks. All patients had progressed after cisplatin combination chemotherapy and had received high-dose chemotherapy with carboplatin plus etoposide (intravenously) with peripheral blood stem cell transplant. No patient received prophylactic antiemetics. Patients completed a six-question Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) antiemetic tool during each day of etoposide during the first 21-day course. Nausea intensity and duration were recorded. Number of emetic episodes and any antiemetic medications were recorded.

Results

All 16 patients completed the six-question MASCC form. Eleven of 16 had no nausea or vomiting and two other patients had only minimal nausea, despite absence of any prophylactic antiemetics. Only two patients required antiemetic support. Two patients experienced emesis for a single episode. One patient had nausea on days 9–20 with a MASCC rating of 3–6, and one patient had continued mild nausea (MASCC rating 1–3) for all 21 days.

Conclusions

Daily oral etoposide has a low probability of producing chemotherapy-induced nausea and/or vomiting and, in our opinion, does not require prophylactic antiemetics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Bhatia S, Abonour R, Porcu P et al (2000) High dose chemotherapy as initial salvage chemotherapy in patients with relapsed testicular cancer. J Clin Oncol 18:3346–3351

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cooper MA, Einhorn LH (1995) Maintenance chemotherapy with daily oral etoposide following salvage therapy in patients with germ cell tumors. J Clin Oncol 13:1167–1169

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Einhorn LH (1990) Ondansetron: a new antiemetic for patients receiving cisplatin chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 8:731–735

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Einhorn LH (2002) Curing cancer: testicular cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:4592–4595

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gralla RJ, Osoba D, Kris MG et al (1999) Recommendations for the use of antiemetics evidence-based, clinical practice guidelines. J Clin Oncol 17:2971–2994

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Grunberg SM, Osoba D, Hesketh PJ et al (2005) Evaluation of new antiemetic agents and definition of antineoplastic agent emetogenicity—an update. Support Care Cancer 13:80–84

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Herrstedt J, Koeller JM, Roila F et al (2005) Acute emesis: moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. Support Care Cancer 13:97–103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hesketh PJ, Kris MG, Grunberg SM et al (1997) Proposal for classifying the acute emetogenicity of cancer chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 15:103–109

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Miller JC, Einhorn LH (1990) Phase II study of daily oral etoposide is refractory germ cell tumors. Semin Oncol 17:36–39

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Roila F, Warr D, Clark-Snow RA et al (2005) Delayed emesis: moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. Support Care Cancer 13:104–108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ross W, Rowe T, Glisson B et al (1984) Role of topoisomerase II in mediating epipodophyllotoxin-induced DNA cleavage. Cancer Res 44:5857–5860

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Vardy JL, Chiew K, Galica J, Pond GR, Tannock IF (2005) Side effects associated with the use of dexamethasone for prophylaxis of delayed emesis after moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. Br J Cancer 94(7):1011–1015

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lawrence H. Einhorn.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Einhorn, L.H., Brames, M.J. Emetic potential of daily oral etoposide. Support Care Cancer 14, 1262–1265 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-006-0106-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-006-0106-x

Keywords

Navigation