Skip to main content

Decision making in palliative radiation therapy: reframing hope in caregivers and patients with brain metastases

Abstract

Goals of work

To explore the major factors important in decision making for whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) for patients with brain metastases and their caregivers.

Patients and methods

Two parallel qualitative studies, one for patients and one for caregivers of patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases, were conducted. Semistructured interviews were conducted and audiotaped with each participant. Content analysis and theme extraction of the transcripts were undertaken to identify recurring themes and relational patterns.

Results

Twenty patients and 19 caregivers (including eight patient and caregiver pairs) were recruited into the study. Four major factors were identified to influence decision making of whole-brain radiation: hope, knowledge, expectations of radiation therapy, and current symptoms. Analysis reveals that patients generally focus on current informational needs, while caregivers want more information about the future (e.g., life expectancy and anticipated symptoms). Caregivers expressed frustration when unable to explore future needs because patients were unprepared to discuss prognostic issues. Participants expressed substantial relief when offered WBRT after the diagnosis, but WBRT is often considered the only available plan rather than an informed choice.

Conclusions

Given the importance of caregivers in the care of patients with brain metastases, fulfilling their unique informational needs appears to require more attention. The blurred boundary between hopes and expectations for WBRT creates unique challenges in joint treatment decision making for patients with brain metastases and their caregivers.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Benzein E, Norberg A, Saveman BI (2001) The meaning of the lived experience of hope in patients with cancer in palliative home care. Palliat Med 15:117–126

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Borgelt B, Gelber R, Larson M et al (1981) Ultra-rapid high dose irradiation schedules for the palliation of brain metastases: final results of the first two studies by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 7:1633–1638

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Borgelt BB, Gelber R, Brady LW et al (1981) The palliation of hepatic metastases: results of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group pilot study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 7:587–591

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Breitbart W, Bruera E, Choichinov H et al (1995) Neuropsychiatric syndromes and psychological symptoms in patients with advanced cancer. J Pain Symptom Manage 10:131–141

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Brody JD (2003) Hope for the best, and prepare for the worst. Ann Intern Med 139:791–792

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Calman KC (1984) Quality of life in cancer patients—an hypothesis. J Med Ethics 10:124–127

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Casarett DJ (2003) Assessing decision-making capacity in the setting of palliative care research. J Pain Symptom Manage 25:S6–S13

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chatani M, Matayoshi Y, Masaki N et al (1994) Radiation therapy for brain metastases from lung carcinoma. Prospective randomized trial according to the level of lactate dehydrogenase. Strahlenther Onkol 170:155–161

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Degner LF, Kristjanson LJ, Bowman D (1997) Information needs and decisional preferences in women with breast cancer. JAMA 277:1485–1492

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dufault K, Martocchio BC (1985) Hope: its spheres and dimensions. Nurs Clin North Am 20:379–391

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gaspar L, Scott C, Rotman M et al (1997) Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) of prognostic factors in three Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) brain metastases trials. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 37:745–751

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gaspar LE, Scott C, Murray K et al (2000) Validation of the RTOG recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) classification of brain metastases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 47:1001–1006

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gaston CM, Mitchell G (2005) Information giving and decision-making in patients with advanced cancer: a systematic review. Soc Sci Med 61:2252–2264

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gattelari M, Butow P, Tattersall MH (2001) Sharing decisions in cancer care. Soc Sci Med 52:1865–1878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Grandinetti D (1999) “Ethical hope”—a lifeline for sick patients. Med Econ 76:118, 121–122, 127–128

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Haie-Meder C, Pellae-Cosset B, Laplanche A et al (1993) Results of a randomized clinical trial comparing two radiation schedules in the palliative treatment of brain metastases. Radiother Oncol 26:111–116

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Harwood AR, Simpson WJ (1977) Radiation therapy of cerebral metastases: a randomized prospective clinical trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2:1091–1094

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hileman JW, Lackery NR (1990) Self identified needs of patients with cancer at home and their home caregivers: a descriptive study. Oncol Nurs Forum 17:907–913

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Jones J, Nyhof-Young J, Friedman A et al (2001) More than just a pamphlet: development of an innovative computer-based education program for cancer patients. Patient Educ Couns 44:271–281

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kirk P, Kirk I, Kristjanson LJ (2004) What do patients receiving palliative care for cancer and their families want to be told? BMJ 328:1343

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Koedoot N, de Haes H (2003) Patient centered decision making in palliative cancer treatment: a world of paradoxes. Patient Educ Couns 50:43–49

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kondziolka D, Patel A, Lunsford LD et al (1999) Stereotactic radiosurgery plus whole brain radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone for patients with multiple brain metastases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 45:427–434

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kramer J, Links M (1994) Breaking bad news: realistic versus unrealistic hopes. Support Care Cancer 2:91–93

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kurtz JM, Gelber R, Brady LW et al (1981) The palliation of brain metastases in a favorable patient population: a randomized clinical trial by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 7:891–895

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Lantz C, Fox S (1998) The brain tumor experience and quality of life: a qualitative study. J Neurosci Nurs 30:245–252

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Leavitt M, Lamb S, Voss B (1996) Brain tumor support group: content theme and mechanisms of support. Oncol Nurs Forum 23:1247–1256

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Lincoln YS, Guba EG (1994) Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (eds) Handbook of qualitative research. Sage, Newbury Park, pp 105–117

    Google Scholar 

  28. Links M, Kramer J (1994) Breaking bad news: realistic versus unrealistic hopes. Support Care Cancer 2:91–93

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Massie MJ, Holland J, Glass E (1983) Delirium in terminally ill cancer patients. Am J Psychiatry 140:1048–1050

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Mintz AH, Kestle J, Rathbone MP et al (1996) A randomized trial to assess the efficacy of surgery in addition to radiotherapy in patients with a single cerebral metastasis. Cancer 78:1470–1476

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Mok E, Martinson I, Wong TK (2004) Individual empowerment among Chinese cancer patients in Hong Kong. West J Nurs Res 26:59–75

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Murray KJ, Scott C, Greenberg HM et al (1997) A randomized phase III study of accelerated hyperinfractionation versus standard in patients with unresected brain metastases: a report of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 9104. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 39:571–574

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Noordijk EM, Vecht CJ, Haaxma-Reiche H et al (1994) The choice of treatment of single brain metastasis should be based on extracranial tumor activity and age. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 29:711–717

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Patchell RA, Tibbs PA, Regine WF et al (1998) Postoperative radiotherapy in the treatment of single metastases to the brain: a randomized trial. JAMA 280:1485–1489

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Patchell RA, Tibbs PA, Walsh JW et al (1990) A randomized trial of surgery in the treatment of single metastases to the brain. N Engl J Med 322(8):494–500

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Pereira J, Hanson J, Bruera E (1997) The frequency and clinical course of cognitive impairment in patients with terminal cancer. Cancer 79:835–842

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Popp F, Sauer R (1988) Dealing with cancer—conversations with radiotherapy patients. Strahlenther Onkol 408–414:164

    Google Scholar 

  38. Priestman TJ, Dunn J, Brada M et al (1996) Final results of the Royal College of Radiologists’ trial comparing two different radiotherapy schedules in the treatment of cerebral metastases. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 8:308–315

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Sandelowski M (1994) Notes on transcription. Res Nurs Health 17:311–314

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Sculco L, Coyle N (2003) Communication and the patient/physician relationship: a phenomenological inquiry. J Support Oncol 1:206–215

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Sperduto PW (2003) A review of stereotactic radiosurgery in the management of brain metastases. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2:105–110

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Twycross RG, Lack SA (1990) Therapeutics in terminal cancer, 2nd edn. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  43. Young B, Johnson JD (1996) Demographics of brain metastasis. Neurosurg Clin N Am 7(3):337–344

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This study was generously supported by the Allan Kerbel Fund in Symptom Control.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rebecca K. S. Wong.

Additional information

The content of this manuscript has been presented in part at the 16th International Symposium Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sze, J., Marisette, S., Williams, D. et al. Decision making in palliative radiation therapy: reframing hope in caregivers and patients with brain metastases. Support Care Cancer 14, 1055–1063 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-006-0032-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-006-0032-y

Keywords

  • Decision making
  • Radiation oncology
  • Brain neoplasms
  • Caregivers
  • Hope