Skip to main content

Long-term use of peripherally inserted central venous catheters for cancer chemotherapy in children

Supportive Care in Cancer volume 14, pages 153–160 (2006)Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICCs) have been increasingly used in pediatric patients. However, little is known about the incidence and risk of complications when using this device in children with cancer. The purposes of this study are to assess the feasibility of PICCs and to determine the risk factors for PICC-related complications in pediatric patients with various types of malignancies.

Patients and methods

We attempted to place PICCs in 53 patients with a median age of 5 years ranging from 2 months to 20 years. PICCs were used to administer fluid, parenteral nutrition, anticancer agents, antibiotics, and blood products and also for the through-line blood sampling. The duration of catheterization and the incidence of PICC-related complications requiring removal were retrospectively evaluated in association with the diagnosis, sex, age and body weight of the patients, size, insertion site and tip location of the catheters, type of treatment, and duration of leukopenia.

Results

PICCs were successfully placed in 109 of 112 attempts (97.3%) in 53 patients, and they were followed for a total of 11,797 catheter days (median placement, 87 days; range, 3 to 512 days). Fifty five PICCs (50.5%) were removed as a result of PICC-related complications with a rate of 4.66 per 1,000 catheter days. The most common reasons for catheter removal were occlusion (n=18), breakage/leakage (15), and infection (10). More than 70% of such complications occurred more than 30 days after placement. The catheter tip location in the superior vena cava or the right atrium might decrease the risk of complications. Other parameters did not influence the incidence of complications.

Conclusions

PICCs were found to provide a reliable access for prolonged intravenous administration and blood sampling in children intensively treated for hematologic and solid malignancies, thus leading to a reduction of physical pain and psychological stress in such patients. However, the long-term placement of PICCs may also be related to an increased risk of complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Brown-Smith JK, Stoner MH, Barley ZA (1990) Tunneled catheter thrombosis: factors related to incidence. Oncol Nurs Forum 17:543–549

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cardella JF, Cardella K, Bacci N, Fox PS, Post JH (1996) Cumulative experience with 1,273 peripherally inserted central catheters at a single institution. J Vasc Interv Radiol 7:5–13

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cesaro S, Pettenazzo A, Meneghini L (2004) Peripherally inserted central venous catheter in pediatric hematological patients. Support Care Cancer 12:813–814

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chait PG, Ingram J, Phillips-Gordon C, Farrell H, Kuhn C (1995) Peripherally inserted central catheters in children. Radiology 197:775–778

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cheong K, Perry D, Karapetis C, Koczwara B (2004) High rate of complications associated with peripherally inserted central venous catheters in patients with solid tumours. Intern Med J 34:234–238

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chow LM, Friedman JN, Macarthur C, Restrepo R, Temple M, Chait PG, Connolly B (2003) Peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) fracture and embolization in the pediatric population. J Pediatr 142:141–144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chung DH, Ziegler MM (1998) Central venous catheter access. Nutrition 14:119–123

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Connolly B, Mawson JB, MacDonald CE, Chait P, Mikailian H (2000) Fluoroscopic landmark for SVC-RA junction for central venous catheter placement in children. Pediatr Radiol 30:692–695

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cortelezzia A, Fracchiolla NS, Maisonneuve P, Moia M, Luchesini C, Ranzi ML, Monni P, Pasquini MC, Lambertenghi-Deliliers G (2003) Central venous catheter-related complications in patients with hematological malignancies: a retrospective analysis of risk factors and prophylactic measures. Leuk Lymphoma 44:1495–1501

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Crowley JJ (2003) Vascular access. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 6:176–181

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Crowley JJ, Pereira JK, Harris LS, Becker CJ (1997) Peripherally inserted central catheters: experience in 523 children. Radiology 204:617–621

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Crowley JJ, Pereira JK, Harris LS, Becker CJ (1998) Radiologic placement of long-term subcutaneous venous access ports in children. Am J Roentgenol 171:257–260

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Dolcourt JL, Bose CL (1982) Percutaneous insertion of silastic central venous catheters in newborn infants. Pediatrics 70:484–486

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Donaldson JS, Morello FP, Junewick JJ, O’Donovan JC, Lim-Dunham J (1995) Peripherally inserted central venous catheters: US-guided vascular access in pediatric patients. Radiology 197:542–544

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Frey AM (1995) Pediatric peripherally inserted central catheter program report: a summary of 4,536 catheter days. J Intraven Nurs 18:280–291

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Harter C, Ostendorf T, Bach A, Egerer G, Goldschmidt H, Ho AD (2003) Peripherally inserted central venous catheters for autologous blood progenitor cell transplantation in patients with haematological malignancies. Support Care Cancer 11:790–794

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. James L, Bledsoe L, Hadaway LC (1993) A retrospective look at tip location and complications of peripherally inserted central catheter lines. J Intraven Nurs 16:104–109

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kearns PJ, Coleman S, Wehner JH (1996) Complications of long arm-catheters: a randomized trial of central vs. peripheral tip location. J Parenter Enteral Nutr 20:20–24

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kyle KS, Myers JS (1990) Peripherally inserted central catheters. Development of a hospital-based program. J Intraven Nurs 13:287–290

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lam S, Scannell R, Roessler D, Smith MA (1994) Peripherally inserted central catheters in an acute-care hospital. Arch Intern Med 154:1833–1837

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Loughran SC, Borzatta M (1995) Peripherally inserted central catheters: a report of 2506 catheter days. J Parenter Enteral Nutr 19:133–136

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Maraqa NF, Gomez MM, Rathore MH (2002) Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy in osteoarticular infections in children. J Pediatr Orthop 22:506–510

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Markel S, Reynen K (1990) Impact on patient care. 2652 PIC catheter days in the alternative setting. J Intraven Nurs 13:347–351

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Merrell SW, Peatross BG, Grossman MD, Sullivan JJ, Harker WG (1994) Peripherally inserted central venous catheters. Low-risk alternatives for ongoing venous access. West J Med 160:25–30

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ng PK, Ault MJ, Ellrodt AG, Maldonado L (1997) Peripherally inserted central catheters in general medicine. Mayo Clin Proc 72:225–233

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Pettit J (2003) Assessment of infants with peripherally inserted central catheters: part 2. Detecting less frequently occurring complications. Adv Neonatal Care 3:14–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Puntis JW (1986) Percutaneous insertion of central venous feeding catheters. Arch Dis Child 61:1138–1140

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Racadio JM, Doellman DA, Johnson ND, Bean JA, Jacobs BR (2001) Pediatric peripherally inserted central catheters: complication rates related to catheter tip location. Pediatrics 107:E28

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Randolph AG, Cook DJ, Gonzales CA, Andrew M (1998) Benefit of heparin in peripheral venous and arterial catheters: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 316:969–975

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Roth RR, James WD (1988) Microbial ecology of the skin. Annu Rev Microbiol 42:441–464

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ryder MA (1995) Peripheral access options. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 4:395–427

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Shepherd R, Ong TH (1980) Evaluation of percutaneously inserted peripheral silicone catheters for parenteral nutrition in infants and children. Aust Paediat J 16:181–184

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Skiest DJ, Abbott M, Keiser P (2000) Peripherally inserted central catheters in patients with AIDS are associated with a low infection rate. Clin Infect Dis 30:949–952

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Smith JR, Friedell ML, Cheatham ML, Martin SP, Cohen MJ, Horowitz JD (1998) Peripherally inserted central catheters revisited. Am J Surg 176:208–211

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Strahilevitz J, Lossos IS, Verstandig A, Sasson T, Kori Y, Gillis S (2001) Vascular access via peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICCs): experience in 40 patients with acute myeloid leukemia at a single institute. Leuk Lymphoma 40:365–371

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Thiagarajan RR, Ramamoorthy C, Gettmann T, Bratton SL (1997) Survey of the use of peripherally inserted central venous catheters in children. Pediatrics 99:E4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Tokars JI, Cookson ST, McArthur MA, Boyer CL, McGeer AJ, Jarvis WR (1999) Prospective evaluation of risk factors for bloodstream infection in patients receiving home infusion therapy. Ann Intern Med 131:340–347

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Walshe LJ, Malak SF, Eagan J, Sepkowitz KA (2002) Complication rates among cancer patients with peripherally inserted central catheters. J Clin Oncol 20:3276–3281

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Division of Child Health, School of Health Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan

    Akinobu Matsuzaki

  2. Department of Pediatrics, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan

    Akinobu Matsuzaki, Aiko Suminoe, Yuhki Koga, Miho Hatano, Sagano Hattori & Toshiro Hara

Authors
  1. Akinobu Matsuzaki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Aiko Suminoe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yuhki Koga
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Miho Hatano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Sagano Hattori
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Toshiro Hara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Akinobu Matsuzaki.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Matsuzaki, A., Suminoe, A., Koga, Y. et al. Long-term use of peripherally inserted central venous catheters for cancer chemotherapy in children. Support Care Cancer 14, 153–160 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-005-0848-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-005-0848-x

Keywords

  • Peripherally inserted central venous catheters
  • PICC
  • Child
  • Cancer
  • Complication