Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Catheter tip position as a risk factor for thrombosis associated with the use of subcutaneous infusion ports

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aims

The use of subcutaneous infusion ports has become standard practice to provide a long-term venous access in oncological patients. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the different complications of infusion ports in our population and to identify predisposing factors.

Patients and methods

We reviewed the medical records of 437 patients who were followed at the Oncology/Haematology Department of our hospital. Of these patients, there were 370 (84.4%) with solid tumours and 58 (13.2%) with haematological disease. The position of the catheter tip was evaluated by reviewing the available chest radiographs or phlebographies.

Main results

Analysis of the records showed that 346 patients (79.17%) had no complications. The most common complications after implantation were thrombosis (8.46%), catheter dysfunction (4.8%) and infections (4.4%). Univariate and multivariate analysis showed that catheter tip positioning was the most important predisposing risk factor for thrombosis. Catheter tips positioned in the brachiocephalic vein or in the cranial part of the superior vena cava were associated with a high risk of thrombosis. Other significant risk factors were gender and initial diagnosis. Female patients and patients with lung cancer also had an elevated risk of developing a thrombosis.

Conclusions

Compared to other reports, we noted a higher rate of thrombosis and port dysfunction. Since catheter tip position was a predisposing factor for developing a thrombosis, correct catheter position has to be ensured during placement. Prophylactic antithrombotic treatment might be beneficial in the event of failure to position the catheter correctly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CRT:

Catheter-related thrombosis

CVC:

Central venous catheter

SVC:

Superior vena cava

LMWH:

Low-molecular-weight heparin

References

  1. Anderson AJ, Krasnow SH, Boyer MW, Cutler DJ, Jones BD, Citron ML, Ortega LG, Cohen MH (1989) Thrombosis: the major Hickman catheter complication in patients with solid tumor. Chest 95:71–75

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Barrios CH, Zuke JE, Blaes B, Hirsch JD, Lyss AP (1992) Evaluation of an implantable venous access system in a general oncology population. Oncology 49:474–478

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bern MM, Lokich JJ, Wallach SR, Bothe A Jr, Benotti PN, Arkin CF, Greco FA, Huberman M, Moore C (1990) Very low doses of warfarin can prevent thrombosis in central venous catheters. Ann Intern Med 112:423–428

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Biffi R, de Braud F, Orsi F, Pozzi S, Mauri S, Goldhirsch A, Nole F, Andreoni B (1998) Totally implantable venous access ports for long term chemotherapy. Ann Oncol 9:767–773

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Boraks P, Seale J, Price J, Bass G, Ethell M, Keeling D, Mahendra P, Baglin T, Marcus R (1998) Prevention of central venous catheter associated thrombosis using minidose warfarin in patients with haematological malignancies. Br J Haematol 101:483–486

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Brown-Smith JK, Stoner MH, Barley ZA (1990) Tunnelled catheter thrombosis: factors related to incidence. Oncol Nurs Forum 17:543–549

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chevrel JP, Destable MD, Breau JL, Dilin C (1988) Boitiers de perfusion implantables. Presse Med 17:17–20

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. De Cicco M, Matovic M, Balestreri L, De Angelis V, Fracasso A, Morassut S, Coran F, Babare R, Buonadonna A, Testa V (1995) Antithrombin III deficiency as a risk factor for catheter-related central vein thrombosis in cancer patients. Thromb Res 78:127–137

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. De Cicco M, Matovic M, Balestreri L, Panarello G, Fantin D, Morassut S, Testa V (1997) Central venous thrombosis: an early and frequent complication in cancer patients bearing long term silastic catheter. A prospective study. Thromb Res 86:101–113

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Debets JM, Wils JA, Schlangen JT (1995) A rare complication of implanted central venous access devices: catheter fracture and embolization. Support Care Cancer 3:432–434

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Devie-Hubert I, Carlier M, Pozzo Di Borgo C (1996) Les thromboses veineuses sur catheter central en cancerologie. Rev Med Interne 17:821–825

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Eastridge BJ, Lefor AT (1995) Complications of indwelling venous access devices in cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 13:233–238

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Guenier C, Nogaret JM, Ferreira J, Lorent I, Pector JC (1990) Voies d’abord veineux en oncologie par chambe implantable. Ann Chir 44:388–391

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Horne MK 3rd, May DJ, Alexander HR, Steinhaus EP, Whitman ED, Chang RC, Doppman JL (1995) Venographic surveillance of tunnelled venous access devices in adult oncology patients. Ann Surg Oncol 2:174–178

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kock HJ, Pietsch M, Krause U, Wilke H, Eigler FW (1998) Implantable vascular access systems: experience in 1500 patients with totally implanted central venous port systems. World J Surg 22:12–16

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lagro SW, Verdonck LF, Borel Rinkes IH, Dekker AW (2000) No effect of nadroparin prophylaxis in the prevention of central venous catheter (CVC)-associated thrombosis in bone marrow transplant recipients. Bone Marrow Transplant 26:1103–1106

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Licciardello JT, Moake JL, Rudy CK, Karp DD, Hong WK (1985) Elevated plasma von Willebrand factor levels and arterial occlusive complications associated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Oncology 42:296–300

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lokich JJ, Becker B (1983) Subclavian vein thrombosis in patients treated with infusion chemotherapy for advanced malignancy. Cancer 52:1586–1589

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Massicotte P, Julian JA, Gent M, Shields K, Marzinotto V, Szechtman B, Chan AK, Andrew M (2003) An open-label randomized controlled trial of low molecular weight heparin for the prevention of central venous line-related thrombotic complications in children: the PROTEKT trial. Thromb Res 109:101–108

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mismetti P, Mille D, Laporte S, Charlet V, Buchmuller-Cordier A, Jacquin JP, Fournel P, Dutrey-Dupagne C, Decousus H; CIP Study Group (2003) Low-molecular-weight heparin (nadroparin) and very low doses of warfarin in the prevention of upper extremity thrombosis in cancer patients with indwelling long-term central venous catheters: a pilot randomized trial. Haematologica 88:67–73

    Google Scholar 

  21. Monreal M, Lafoz E, Ruiz J, Valls R, Alastrue A (1991) Upper-extremity deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. A prospective study. Chest 99:280–283

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Monreal M, Raventos A, Lerma R, Ruiz J, Lafoz E, Alastrue A, Llamazares JF (1994) Pulmonary embolism in patients with upper extremity DVT associated to venous central lines—a prospective study. Thromb Haemost 72:548–550

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Monreal M, Alastrue A, Rull M, Mira X, Muxart J, Rosell R, Abad A (1996) Upper extremity deep venous thrombosis in cancer patients with venous access devices—prophylaxis with a low molecular weight heparin (Fragmin). Thromb Haemost 75:251–253

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Niederhuber JE, Ensminger W, Gyves JW, Liepman M, Doan K, Cozzi E (1982) Totally implanted venous and arterial access system to replace external catheters in cancer treatment. Surgery 92:706–712

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Pector JC (1998) Vascular access problems. Support Care Cancer 6:20–22

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Puel V, Caudry M, Le Metayer P, Baste JC, Midy D, Marsault C, Demeaux H, Maire JP (1993) Superior vena cava thrombosis related to catheter malposition in cancer chemotherapy given through implanted ports. Cancer 72:2248–2252

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Puig-la Calle J Jr, Lopez Sanchez S, Piedrafita Serra E, Allende Honorato L, Artigas Raventos V, Puig la Calle J (1996) Totally implanted device for long-term intravenous chemotherapy: experience in 123 adult patients with solid neoplasms. J Surg Oncol 62:273–278

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Schwarz RE, Groeger JS, Coit DG (1997) Subcutaneously implanted central venous access devices in cancer patients: a prospective analysis. Cancer 79:1635–1640

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Stas M (1998) Positionering van katheter en poort, Poorten en Katheters voor langdurige I.V. therapie. Universitaire pers Leuven, Leuven

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jo Caers.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Caers, J., Fontaine, C., Vinh-Hung, V. et al. Catheter tip position as a risk factor for thrombosis associated with the use of subcutaneous infusion ports. Support Care Cancer 13, 325–331 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-004-0723-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-004-0723-1

Keywords

Navigation