Abstract
Goals
The rapid response radiotherapy program (RRRP) at Toronto-Sunnybrook Regional Cancer Center (TSRCC) provides quick access to palliative radiotherapy for patients with a life expectancy of less than 12 months. Patients then return to their referring physician for continued oncologic management. After the initial RRRP consultation, we fax an interim consultation report to the referring physician. The purpose of this study was to assess how useful referring physicians perceive this interim report and whether this report needs to be modified to meet their information needs.
Methods
Physicians who referred patients to the RRRP and who were faxed an interim consultation report were identified over a 4-month period. These physicians were then faxed a questionnaire that asked how useful the interim report was in patient management, about their satisfaction with the information provided, to critique the report format, and whether the RRRP physician and nurse were easily accessible by telephone.
Main results
Forty physicians referred patients to the RRRP clinic over the 4-month study period. The response rate to our survey was 58% (23/40). The vast majority of physicians (95%) stated that the interim consultation report was useful in patient management. They felt that treatment details were adequately discussed in the report. The report format was perceived to be clear and concise. Referring physicians wished to be informed about any medication changes. RRRP physicians and nurse were perceived to be easily accessible by telephone if needed.
Conclusions
Results showed that referring physicians found the faxed interim consultation report useful in patient management. Suggestions were made on how to improve the report, and they will be used to further enhance physician communication and ultimately patient care.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barnes EA, Hanson J, Neumann CM, Nekolaichuk C, Bruera E (2000) Communication Between Primary Care Physicians and Radiation Oncologists Regarding Patients with Cancer Treated with Palliative Radiotherapy. J Clin Oncol 18:2902–2907
Bourguet C, Gilchrist V, McCord G (1998) The consultation and referral process. A report from NEON. Northeastern Ohio Network Research Group. J Fam Pract 46:47–53
Chow E, Wong R, Vachon M, et al (1999) Referring physicians’ satisfaction with the rapid response radiotherapy programme. Support Care Cancer 8:405–409
Chow E, Connolly R, Franssen E, et al (2001) Prevalence of under-dosage of analgesics for cancer bone pain in patients referred for palliative radiotherapy, and its potential implications in radiotherapy trials. Annals RCPSC 34:217–222
Haddad P, Soban F, Williams D, et al (2003 How helpful is prompt communication about a palliative radiotherapy visit? A survey on our interim consultation report. Support Care Cancer 11:422 (abstract)
Paterson JM, Allega RL (1999) Improving communication between hospital and community physicians. Feasibility study of a handwritten, faxed hospital discharge summary. Discharge Summary Study Group. Can Fam Physician 45:2893–9
Stalhammar J, Holmberg L, Svardsudd K, et al (1998) Written communication from specialists to general practitioners in cancer care: What are the expectations and how are they met? Scand J Prim Health Care 16:154–9
Tattersall MHN, Griffin A, Dunn SM et al (1995) Writing to referring doctors after a new patient consultation: What is wanted and what was contained in letters from one medical oncologist? Aust N Z J Med 25:479–482
Wood ML (1993) Communication between cancer specialists and family doctors. Can Fam Physician 39:49–57
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Barnes, E.A., Chow, E., Andersson, L. et al. Communication with referring physicians in a palliative radiotherapy clinic. Support Care Cancer 12, 669–673 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-004-0643-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-004-0643-0