Skip to main content
Log in

Multicenter, randomized trial of ramosetron plus dexamethasone versus ramosetron alone in controlling cisplatin-induced emesis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Goals

To establish whether the combination of a corticosteroid (dexamethasone) and the newer serotonin-3 (5-HT3) receptor antagonist ramosetron is superior to ramosetron alone in controlling cisplatin-induced emesis.

Patients and methods

A total of 283 patients aged 18–75 years with confirmed malignant disease who were scheduled to receive cisplatin ≥50 mg/m2 with or without other antineoplastic agents were randomized to intravenous treatment with either ramosetron 300 μg plus dexamethasone 20 mg (n=149) or ramosetron 300 μg alone (n=134) given 30 min prior to cisplatin infusion. If vomiting occurred in the following 24 h, patients in both groups received an intravenous rescue dose of ramosetron 300 μg. Subsequently, on days 2 and 3, treatment was continued orally with either ramosetron 100 μg once daily plus dexamethasone 8 mg twice daily, or ramosetron 100 μg once daily.

Main results

During the first 24 h after cisplatin infusion, significantly more patients receiving combination therapy had a complete response (no nausea or vomiting or requirement for rescue therapy) than those receiving ramosetron alone (68% vs 54%, respectively; P=0.034), and significantly fewer patients needed a rescue dose of ramosetron (22% vs 34%, respectively; P=0.032). In addition, the percentages of patients with no nausea and no vomiting were significantly greater in the ramosetron plus dexamethasone group than in the ramosetron-alone group at both 24 h and 72 h after cisplatin administration.

Conclusions

The antiemetic efficacy of ramosetron in cancer patients receiving highly emetogenic cisplatin chemotherapy is significantly enhanced by its use in combination with dexamethasone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2a, b

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aapro MS (1991) Controlling emesis related to cancer chemotherapy. Eur J Cancer 27:256–261

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Carmichael J, Bessell EM, Harris AL, Hutcheon AW, Dawes PJ, Daniels S, et al (1994) Comparison of granisetron alone and granisetron plus dexamethasone in the prophylaxis of cytotoxic-induced emesis. Br J Cancer 70:1161–1164

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ettinger DS, Eisenberg PD, Fitts D, Friedman C, Wilson-Lynch K, Yocom K (1996) A double-blind comparison of the efficacy of two dose regimens of oral granisetron in preventing acute emesis in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. Cancer 78:144–151

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Feng FY, Zhang P, He YJ, Li YH, Zhou MZ, Cheng G, et al (2000) Comparison of the selective serotonin3 antagonists ramosetron and granisetron in treating acute chemotherapy-induced emesis, nausea, and anorexia: a single-blind, randomized, crossover study. Curr Ther Res 61:901–909

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gralla RJ, Osoba D, Kris MG, Kirkbride P, Hesketh PJ, Chinnery LW, et al (1999) Recommendations for the use of antiemetics: evidence-based, clinical practice guidelines. American Society of Clinical Oncology. J Clin Oncol 17:2971–2994

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hainsworth JD (1992) The use of ondansetron in patients receiving multiple-day cisplatin regimens. Semin Oncol 19:48–52

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Harman GS, Omura GA, Ryan K, Hainsworth JD, Cramer MB, Hahne WF (1996) A randomized, double-blind comparison of single-dose and divided multiple-dose dolasetron for cisplatin-induced emesis. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 38:323–328

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Heron JF, Goedhals L, Jordaan JP, Cunningham J, Cedar E (1994) Oral granisetron alone and in combination with dexamethasone: a double-blind randomized comparison against high-dose metoclopramide plus dexamethasone in prevention of cisplatin-induced emesis. The Granisetron Study Group. Ann Oncol 5:579–584

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hesketh PJ, Gandara DR (1991) Serotonin antagonists: a new class of antiemetic agents. J Natl Cancer Inst 83:613–620

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hesketh PJ, Harvey WH, Harker WG, Beck TM, Ryan T, Bricker LJ, et al (1994) A randomized, double-blind comparison of intravenous ondansetron alone and in combination with intravenous dexamethasone in the prevention of high-dose cisplatin-induced emesis. J Clin Oncol 12:596–600

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kaizer L, Warr D, Hoskins P, Latreille J, Lofters W, Yau J, et al (1994) Effect of schedule and maintenance on the antiemetic efficacy of ondansetron combined with dexamethasone in acute and delayed nausea and emesis in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy: a phase III trial by the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. J Clin Oncol 12:1050–1057

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kamato T, Miyata K, Ito H, Yuki H, Yamano M, Honda K (1991) Antiemetic effects of YM060, a potent and selective serotonin (5HT)3-receptor antagonist, in ferrets and dogs. Jpn J Pharmacol 57:387–395

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kleisbauer JP, Garcia-Giron C, Antimi M, Azevedo MC, Balmes H, Massuti-Sureda B, et al (1998) Granisetron plus methylprednisolone for the control of high-dose cisplatin-induced emesis. Anticancer Drugs 9:387–392

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Laszlo J (1983) Nausea and vomiting as major complications of cancer chemotherapy. Drugs 25 [Suppl 1]:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  15. Love RR, Leventhal H, Easterling DV, Nerenz DR (1989) Side effects and emotional distress during cancer chemotherapy. Cancer 63:604–612

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Noda K, Ikeda M, Yoshida O, Yano S, Taguchi T, Shimoyama T, et al (1994) Clinical evaluation of YM060 in the treatment of nausea and vomiting induced by anticancer drugs: a phase II dose-finding study. Jpn J Clin Exp Med 71:2753–2764

    Google Scholar 

  17. Noda K, Ikeda M, Taguchi T, Kanamaru R, Ichijo M, Okada K, et al (1996) Clinical evaluation of YM060 oral preparation in the treatment of nausea and vomiting induced by the anticancer drug cisplatin: a phase III double-blind comparative study with ondansetron hydrochloride. J New Rem Clin 45:1445–1462

    Google Scholar 

  18. Roila F, Tonato M, Cognetti F, Cortesi E, Favalli G, Marangolo M, et al (1991) Prevention of cisplatin-induced emesis: a double-blind multicenter randomized crossover study comparing ondansetron and ondansetron plus dexamethasone. J Clin Oncol 9:675–678

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sorbe B, Hogberg T, Himmelmann A, Schmidt M, Raisanen I, Stockmeyer M, et al (1994) Efficacy and tolerability of tropisetron in comparison with a combination of tropisetron and dexamethasone in the control of nausea and vomiting induced by cisplatin-containing chemotherapy. Eur J Cancer 30A:629–634

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Taketani Y, Yoshikawa H, Ueda K, Sonoda T, Hasumi K, Matsuzawa M, et al (1994) Clinical evaluation of YM060 injection in the treatment of nausea and vomiting induced by anticancer drugs—a phase III clinical trial subject to patients with gynecological malignant tumor. Obstet Gynecol 61:1759–1770

    Google Scholar 

  21. The Italian Group for Antiemetic Research (1995) Ondansetron versus granisetron, both combined with dexamethasone, in the prevention of cisplatin-induced emesis. Ann Oncol 6:805–810

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ueda S (1994) Clinical evaluation of YM060 in the treatment of nausea and vomiting induced by anticancer drugs and study on pharmacokinetics (phase III clinical trial). Nishinihon J Urol 56:1445–1456

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This study was supported by Yamanouchi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonio Villalon.

Additional information

This work is presented on behalf of the Philippines Nasea Study Group whose members are listed in the Appendix.

Appendix

Appendix

Members of the Philippine Nasea Study Group

University of the Philippines—Philippine General Hospital: Maria Estrella, S. Puddoc-Santos, Jhade Lotus Peneyra, Maria Karla Malanyaon, Marina Chua, Ellie May Villegas, Joel Tayo, Pauline So-Kaw, Noel Pingoy, Emmanuel Glorioso, Ma. Luisa Tiambeng, Marigold Majarucon, Susie Ponce-Lim, Erly Samson, MD; Jose Reyes Memorial Medical Center: Juanita Lu-Lim, Dennis Dulay, Joselito Maano, Myrna Deresas, Eva Borromeo-Daclan; Manila Doctor’s Hospital: Antonio Villalon; Veterans Memorial Medical Center: Valorie Fullon-Chan; St. Luke’s Medical Center: Gloria Cristal-Luna, Roberto Bolinas Jr, Charity Gorospe, Louella Grace Roces; Bulacan Provincial Hospital: Ferdinand Dacumos; Angeles Medical Center: Apolonio Pasion; Mary Johnson Hospital: Jose Garcia Jr; Rizal Medical Center: Divina Esteban; East Avenue Medical Center: Conrad Lola; AFP Medical Center: Edgardo Castro; New Era General Hospital: Leilani Dantes; Jose Lingad Hospital: Ermelinda Batac; Fatima Medical Center: Leo Marbella; Baguio Provincial Hospital: Jasmin Igama; Region I Medical Center: Luisa Ordono; Pangasinan Medical Center: Rosario Pitarque; Perpetual Help Medical Center: Yolanda Gonzales.

Other institutes involved in this study

Quezon Institute, De los Santos Medical Center, Sta. Teresita General Hospital, Specialist Group Hospital, V. Luna Hospital, Victor Potencio Medical Center, Armando Garcia Hospital, Specialist Group Hospital and Trauma Center, Quezon City Medical Center, Philippine Heart Center, JF Cotton Hospital, St Louie University Hospital, and San Fernando Hospital.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Villalon, A., Chan, V. Multicenter, randomized trial of ramosetron plus dexamethasone versus ramosetron alone in controlling cisplatin-induced emesis. Support Care Cancer 12, 58–63 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-003-0528-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-003-0528-7

Keywords

Navigation