Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Factors related to patient's mental adjustment to breast cancer: patient characteristics and family functioning

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous studies have suggested that patients who adopted a coping response characterized as helplessness or hopelessness reported higher levels of psychological distress than patients who adopted a response characterized as fighting spirit. There are also studies suggesting a relationship between family functioning and psychological well-being of cancer patients and their family members. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to investigate the relationship between breast cancer patients' coping response to the diagnosis of cancer and family functioning. A total of 46 postoperative ambulatory female breast cancer patients and their husbands participated in this study. Patients and husbands completed the Family Assessment Device (FAD), and patients also completed the Mental Adjustment to Cancer (MAC) scale. They filled in these self-report questionnaires at home. The results of multiple regression analysis showed that patients' perception of poor family functioning in the area of Communication measured by the FAD correlated with high Helplessness/Hopelessness score of the MAC, whereas high education in the patients was correlated with low Fighting Spirit score on the MAC. The results suggested a link between a patient's attitude of helplessness or hopelessness in the face of cancer and inappropriate communication among family members. Consequently, health care professionals should devote attention not only to the patient but also to other family members and intervene to promote appropriate communication patterns among the family members.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Akechi T, Okumura H, Yamawaki S, Uchitomi Y (1998) Predictors of patients' mental adjustment to cancer: patient characteristics and social support. Br J Cancer 77:2381–2385

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Akechi T, Fukue-Saeki M, Kugaya A, Okamura H, Nishiwaki Y, Yamawaki S, Uchitomi Y (2000) Psychometric properties of the Japanese version of the Mental Adjustment to Cancer (MAC) scale. Psychooncology 9:395–401

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barker P (1992) Basic family therapy, 3rd edn. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford

  4. Epstein NB, Bishop DS, Levin S (1978) The McMaster model of family functioning. J Marriage Fam Counseling 4:19–31

    Google Scholar 

  5. Epstein NB, Baldwin LM, Bishop DS (1983) The McMaster Family Assessment Device. J Marital Fam Ther 9:171–180

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ferrero J, Barreto MP, Toledo M (1994) Mental adjustment to cancer and quality of life in breast cancer patients: an exploratory study. Psychooncology 3:223–232

    Google Scholar 

  7. Giese-Davis J, Hermanson K, Koopman C, Weibel D, Spiegel D (2000) Quality of couples' relationship and adjustment to metastatic breast cancer. J Fam Psychol 14:251–266

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Grassi L, Rosti G, Lasalvia A, Marangolo M (1993) Psychosocial variables associated with mental adjustment to cancer. Psychooncology 2:11–20

    Google Scholar 

  9. Greer S, Watson M (1987) Mental adjustment to cancer: its measurement and prognostic importance. Cancer Surv 6:439–453

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Greer S, Moorey S, Watson M (1989) Patients' adjustment to cancer: the mental adjustment to cancer (MAC) scale vs clinical rating. J Psychosom Res 33:373–377

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lichtman R, Taylor S, Wood J (1987) Social support and marital adjustment after breast cancer. J Psychosoc Oncol 5:47–65

    Google Scholar 

  12. Miller IW, Epstein NB, Bishop DS, Keitner GI (1985) The McMaster Family Assessment Device: Reliability and validity. J Marital Fam Ther 11:345–356

    Google Scholar 

  13. Miller IW, Ryan CE, Keitner GI, Bishop DS, Epstein NB (2000) The McMaster approach to families: theory, assessment, treatment and research. J Fam Ther 22:168–189

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nijboer C, Triemstra M, Tempelaar R, Sandderman R, van den Bos GAM (1999) Determinants of caregiving experiences and mental health of partners of cancer patients. Cancer 86:577–588

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nordin K, Glimelius B (1998) Reactions to gastrointestinal cancer—variation in mental adjustment and emotional well-being over time in patients with different prognoses. Psychooncology 7:413–423

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Northouse LL (1994) Breast cancer in younger women: effects on interpersonal and family relations. Monogr Natl Cancer Inst 16:183–190

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Northouse LL (1995) The impact of cancer in women on the family. Cancer Pract 3:134–142

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Okamura H, Watanabe T, Narabayashi M, Katsumata N, Ando M, Adachi I, Akechi T, Uchitomi Y (2000) Psychological distress following first recurrence of disease in patients with breast cancer: prevalence and risk factors. Breast Cancer Res Treat 61:131–137

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Saeki T, Asukai N, Miyake Y, Miguchi M, Yamawaki S (1997) Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Family Assessment Device (in Japanese with an English abstract). Arch Psychiatr Diagn Clin Evaluation 8:181–192

    Google Scholar 

  20. Schnoll RA, Harlow LL, Stolbach LL, Brandt U (1998) A structural model of the relationships among stage of disease, age, coping, and psychological adjustment in women with breast cancer. Psychooncology 7:69–77

    Google Scholar 

  21. Vess J, Moreland J, Schwebel A, Knaut E (1988) Psychosocial needs of cancer patients: learning from patients and their spouses. J Psychosoc Oncol 6:31–51

    Google Scholar 

  22. Watson M, Greer S, Young J, Inayat Q, Burgess C, Robertson B (1988) Development of a questionnaire measure of adjustment to cancer: the MAC scale. Psychol Med 18:203–209

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Watson M, Greer S, Rowden L, Gorman C, Robertson B, Bliss JM, Tunmore R (1991) Relationships between emotional control, adjustment to cancer and depression and anxiety in breast cancer patients. Psychol Med 21:51–57

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Watson M, Haviland JS, Greer S, Davidson J, Bliss JM (1999) Influence of psychological response on survival in breast cancer: a population-based cohort study. Lancet 354:1331–1336

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Weisman AD, Worden JW (1976--1977) The existential plight in cancer: significance of the first 100 days. Int J Psychiatry Med 7:1–15

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements.

The authors are grateful to all the patients and their husbands for so willingly giving of their time. The authors would also like to acknowledge the collaborative support from the surgeons, especially Tsuyoshi Kataoka M.D., Ph.D., and from the nursing staff of the Mammary Gland Dispensary in Hiroshima University Hospital. We also thank Minako Daino, R.N. for her dedicated assistance with the research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shigeto Yamawaki.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Inoue, S., Saeki, T., Mantani, T. et al. Factors related to patient's mental adjustment to breast cancer: patient characteristics and family functioning. Support Care Cancer 11, 178–184 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-002-0417-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-002-0417-5

Keywords

Navigation