Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prognostic factors in non-metastatic HER2 ‘low’ and HER2 ‘negative’ breast cancer: single institute experience

  • original article
  • Published:
Wiener klinische Wochenschrift Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Aim

Comparison of prognosis and survival in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low and HER2-negative patients with early stage or locally advanced, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer.

Material and methods

In a retrospective single center study, the patients with early stage or locally advanced stage, hormone receptor (HR)-positive [estrogen receptor (ER) ≥ 1% and/or progesterone receptor (PR) ≥ 1%] and HER2 negative or HER2 low invasive breast cancer diagnosis were included. A total of 444 patients were included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups: HER2 negative and HER2 low. There were 235 (53%) patients in the HER2 negative group and 209 (47%) patients in the HER2 low group.

Results

The HER2 low group had significantly longer 5‑year disease-free survival (DFS) than the HER2 negative group. The patients with lower Ki67 (< 20%) also had a longer 5‑year DFS.

Conclusion

Nonmetastatic HR+/HER2 low breast cancer patients had better DFS than HR+/HER2 negative ones. The Ki67 level and HER2 low status were independent prognostic factors. Randomized clinical trials are needed in early stage HER2 low breast cancer patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

References

  1. DeSantis CE, Ma J, Gaudet MM, Newman LA, Miller KD, Goding Sauer A, et al. Breast cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019;69(6):438–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wolff AC, Hammond MEH, Allison KH, Harvey BE, Mangu PB, Bartlett JMS, et al. Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Testing in Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Clinical Practice Guideline Focused Update. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(20):2105–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fehrenbacher L, Cecchini RS, Geyer CE Jr., Rastogi P, Costantino JP, Atkins JN, et al. NSABP B‑47/NRG Oncology Phase III Randomized Trial Comparing Adjuvant Chemotherapy With or Without Trastuzumab in High-Risk Invasive Breast Cancer Negative for HER2 by FISH and With IHC 1+ or 2. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(5):444–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Modi S, Jacot W, Yamashita T, Sohn J, Vidal M, Tokunaga E, et al. Trastuzumab deruxtecan in previously treated HER2-low advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2022;387(1):9–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Ahn BC, Han YJ, Kim HR, Hong MH, Cho BC, Lim SM. Real World Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes of HER2-Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Detected by Next-Generation Sequencing. Cancer Res Treat. 2023;55(2):488–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fong C, Chau I. HER2 Inhibition in Gastric Cancer-Novel Therapeutic Approaches for an Established Target. Cancers (basel). 2022;14(15).

  7. Rosso C, Voutsadakis IA. Characteristics, Clinical Differences and Outcomes of Breast Cancer Patients with Negative or Low HER2 Expression. Clin Breast Cancer. 2022;22(4):391–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tashima R, Nishimura R, Osako T, Nishiyama Y, Okumura Y, Nakano M, et al. Evaluation of an Optimal Cut-Off Point for the Ki-67 Index as a Prognostic Factor in Primary Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Study. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(7):e119565.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Bustreo S, Osella-Abate S, Cassoni P, Donadio M, Airoldi M, Pedani F, et al. Optimal Ki67 cut-off for luminal breast cancer prognostic evaluation: a large case series study with a long-term follow-up. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016;157(2):363–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Li C, Yuan Q, Deng T, Xu G, Hou J, Zheng L, et al. Prognosis difference between HER2-low and HER2-zero breast cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast Cancer. 2023;30(6):965–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Abbasvandi F, Bayat M, Akbari A, Shojaeian F, Zandi A, Rahmani J, et al. Tumor characteristics and survival rate of HER2-low breast cancer patients: a retrospective cohort study. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):16719.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Rossi V, Sarotto I, Maggiorotto F, Berchialla P, Kubatzki F, Tomasi N, et al. Moderate immunohistochemical expression of HER‑2 (2+) without HER‑2 gene amplification is a negative prognostic factor in early breast cancer. Oncologist. 2012;17(11):1418–25.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Ignatov T, Eggemann H, Burger E, Fettke F, Costa SD, Ignatov A. Moderate level of HER2 expression and its prognostic significance in breast cancer with intermediate grade. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015;151(2):357–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Schettini F, Chic N, Braso-Maristany F, Pare L, Pascual T, Conte B, et al. Clinical, pathological, and PAM50 gene expression features of HER2-low breast cancer. NPJ. Breast Cancer. 2021;7(1):1.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Agostinetto E, Rediti M, Fimereli D, Debien V, Piccart M, Aftimos P, et al. HER2-Low Breast Cancer: Molecular Characteristics and Prognosis. Cancers (basel). 2021;13:11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Denkert C, Seither F, Schneeweiss A, Link T, Blohmer JU, Just M, et al. Clinical and molecular characteristics of HER2-low-positive breast cancer: pooled analysis of individual patient data from four prospective, neoadjuvant clinical trials. Lancet Oncol. 2021;22(8):1151–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kennecke H, et al. Metastatic behavior of breast cancer subtypes. J. Clin. Oncol. 2010;28(20):3271–7. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.9820.

  18. Guarneri V, Conte P. Metastatic breast cancer: therapeutic options according to molecular subtypes and prior adjuvant therapy. Oncologist 2009;14(7):645–56. https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2009-0078.

  19. Wei T, Wang D, Gao S, Wang X, Yue J, Kang Y, et al. Clinicopathologic characteristics and prognostic significance of HER2-low expression in patients with early breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Oncol. 2023;13:1100332.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Akagunduz YEGUB. Comparison of HER2-zero and HER2-low in terms of clinicopathological factors and survival in early-stage breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Treat Rev. 2023;.

  21. Gilcrease MZ, Woodward WA, Nicolas MM, Corley LJ, Fuller GN, Esteva FJ, et al. Even low-level HER2 expression may be associated with worse outcome in node-positive breast cancer. Am J Surg Pathol. 2009;33(5):759–67.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conception—Constructing the idea for the manuscript: A.T. and M.D. Design—Planning methodology to reach the conclusion: A.T., M.D. and E.S. Supervision—Organizing and supervising the course of the manuscript and taking the responsibility: M.D., C.K. and Ö.A. Literature review—Summarizing, synthesizing, and analyzing the literature: A.T., E.S. and S.Ç.I. Writing editing—Taking responsibility for the construction of the manuscript: A.T., M.D. and C.K. Critical review—Reviewing the article before submission not only for spelling and grammar but also for its intellectual content: A.T., M.D., C.K., Ö.A. and S.Ç.I. Final assessment—Final approval of the version to be published: A.T., M.D. and C.K.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alper Türkel.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

A. Türkel, M. Doğan, E. Sertesen, C. Karaçin, S.Ç. Irkkan and Ö. Ateş declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Türkel, A., Doğan, M., Sertesen, E. et al. Prognostic factors in non-metastatic HER2 ‘low’ and HER2 ‘negative’ breast cancer: single institute experience. Wien Klin Wochenschr 136, 340–346 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-023-02315-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-023-02315-z

Keywords

Navigation