Skip to main content

Impact of hemodialysis on liver stiffness measured with real-time two-dimensional shear wave elastography

Summary

Background and aims

The impact of hemodialysis on liver stiffness is still unclear. The aim of the study was to assess liver fibrosis by real-time two-dimensional shear wave elastography (RT 2D-SWE) and to quantify the influence of net fluid withdrawal on liver stiffness during one hemodialysis session. The second aim was to investigate the influence of systolic blood pressure and time spent on dialysis (in years) on liver stiffness measurements.

Methods

This before/after hemodialysis (HD) study in a group of end stage renal disease (ESRD) patients was carried out with patients on regular HD. Measurements of liver stiffness were done using RT 2D-SWE directly before and after a hemodialysis session.

Results

In this study 27 patients with mean age 69.4 ± 14.75 years were included. Mean net fluid withdrawal volume per session was 2874.07 ± 778.35 ml. Mean pre-HD and post-HD liver stiffness measurements were 8.15 kPa (95% confidence interval, CI 7.61–8.68) and 6.70 kPa (95% CI 6.10–7.30 kPa), respectively. Mean liver stiffness reduction was 1.448 ± 1.14 kPa. The amount of fluid removed correlated with the decline in liver stiffness values after HD (ρ = 0.523, P = 0.003). There was a positive but statistically not significant correlation between time spent in HD and liver stiffness (ρ = 0.151, P = 0.623)

Conclusion

Liver stiffness significantly declined after one session of HD. The change in liver stiffness was strongly correlated with the amount of net fluid withdrawal. Random liver stiffness measurements (LSM) by RT 2D-SWE does not precisely show the degree of fibrosis, Furthermore, it is presumed that postdialysis liver stiffness values likely reflect the real degree of liver fibrosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Schoolwerth AC, Engelgau MM, Hostetter TH, Rufo KH, Chianchiano D, McClellan WM, et al. Chronic kidney disease: a public health problem that needs a public health action plan. Prev Chronic Dis. 2006;3(2):A57.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Collins AJ, Foley RN, Chavers B, Gilbertson D, Herzog C, Ishani A, et al. US renal data system 2013 annual data report. Am J Kidney Dis. 2014;63(1):A7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Go AS, Chertow GM, Fan D, McCulloch CE, Hsu CY. Chronic kidney disease and the risks of death, cardiovascular events, and hospitalization. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(13):1296–305.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fabrizi F, Poordad FF, Martin P. Hepatitis C infection and the patient with end-stage renal disease. Hepatology. 2002;36(1):3–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Martin P, Fabrizi F. Hepatitis C virus and kidney disease. J Hepatol. 2008;49(4):613–24.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bravo AA, Sheth SG, Chopra S. Liver biopsy. N Engl J Med. 2001;344(7):495–500.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ozdogan M, Ozgur O, Boyacioglu S, Coskun M, Kart H, Ozdal S, et al. Percutaneous liver biopsy complications in patients with chronic renal failure. Nephron. 1996;74(2):442–3.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rockey DC, Caldwell SH, Goodman ZD, Nelson RC, Smith AD, American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Liver biopsy. Hepatology. 2009;49(3):1017–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. European Association for Study of Liver, Asociacion Latinoamericana para el Estudio del Higado. EASL-ALEH clinical practice guidelines: non-invasive tests for evaluation of liver disease severity and prognosis. J Hepatol. 2015;63(1):237–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bende F, Mulabecirovic A, Sporea I, Popescu A, Sirli R, Gilja OH, et al. Assessing liver stiffness by 2‑D shear wave elastography in a healthy cohort. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2018;44(2):332–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bende F, Sporea I, Sirli R, Popescu A, Mare R, Miutescu B, et al. Performance of 2D-SWE.GE for predicting different stages of liver fibrosis, using transient elastography as the reference method. Med Ultrason. 2017;19(2):143–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Grgurevic I, Puljiz Z, Brnic D, Bokun T, Heinzl R, Lukic A, et al. Liver and spleen stiffness and their ratio assessed by real-time two dimensional-shear wave elastography in patients with liver fibrosis and cirrhosis due to chronic viral hepatitis. Eur Radiol. 2015;25(11):3214–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dietrich CF, Bamber J, Berzigotti A, Bota S, Cantisani V, Castera L, et al. EFSUMB guidelines and recommendations on the clinical use of liver ultrasound elastography, update 2017 (long version). Ultraschall Med. 2017;38(4):e16–e47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sigrist RMS, Liau J, Kaffas AE, Chammas MC, Willmann JK. Ultrasound elastography: review of techniques and clinical applications. Theranostics. 2017;7(5):1303–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hermann E, de Ledinghen V, Cassinotto C, Chu WC, Leung VY, Ferraioli G, et al. Assessment of biopsy-proven liver fibrosis by two-dimensional shear wave elastography: an individual patient data-based meta-analysis. Hepatology. 2018;67(1):260–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Paul SB, Das P, Mahanta M, Sreenivas V, Kedia S, Kalra N, et al. Assessment of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis: comparison of shear wave elastography and transient elastography. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2017;42(12):2864–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Millonig G, Reimann FM, Friedrich S, Fonouni H, Mehrabi A, Buchler MW, et al. Extrahepatic cholestasis increases liver stiffness (FibroScan) irrespective of fibrosis. Hepatology. 2008;48(5):1718–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Coco B, Oliveri F, Maina AM, Ciccorossi P, Sacco R, Colombatto P, et al. Transient elastography: a new surrogate marker of liver fibrosis influenced by major changes of transaminases. J Viral Hepat. 2007;14(5):360–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Arena U, Vizzutti F, Corti G, Ambu S, Stasi C, Bresci S, et al. Acute viral hepatitis increases liver stiffness values measured by transient elastography. Hepatology. 2008;47(2):380–4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kellner P, Anadol E, Huneburg R, Hundt F, Bos D, Klein B, et al. The effect of hemodialysis on liver stiffness measurement: a single-center series. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;25(3):368–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Khunpakdee N, Jayanama K, Kaewdoung P, Promson K, Rattanasiri S, Warodomwichit D, et al. Transient elastography in end-stage renal disease patients on hemodialysis: the effect of net fluid withdrawal. Blood Purif. 2015;40(3):256–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Taneja S, Borkakoty A, Rathi S, Kumar V, Duseja A, Dhiman RK, et al. Assessment of liver fibrosis by transient elastography should be done after hemodialysis in end stage renal disease patients with liver disease. Dig Dis Sci. 2017;62(11):3186–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Colli A, Pozzoni P, Berzuini A, Gerosa A, Canovi C, Molteni EE, et al. Decompensated chronic heart failure: increased liver stiffness measured by means of transient elastography. Radiology. 2010;257(3):872–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Giallourakis CC, Rosenberg PM, Friedman LS. The liver in heart failure. Clin Liver Dis. 2002;6(4):947–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Piecha F, Peccerella T, Bruckner T, Seitz HK, Rausch V, Mueller S. Arterial pressure suffices to increase liver stiffness. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2016;311(5):G945–G53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Eipel C, Abshagen K, Vollmar B. Regulation of hepatic blood flow: the hepatic arterial buffer response revisited. World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16(48):6046–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lee H, Ainechi S, Singh M, Ells PF, Sheehan CE, Lin J. Histological spectrum of idiopathic noncirrhotic portal hypertension in liver biopsies from dialysis patients. Int J Surg Pathol. 2015;23(6):439–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Departmental sources.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ante Tonkic MD, PhD.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

D. Zjacic Puljiz, A. Mestrovic,I. Zaja, A. Tonkic, I. Grgurevic, D. Duplancic, I.K. Delic Jukic, D. Ljutic and Z. Puljiz declare that they have no competing interests. The results presented in this paper have not been published previously in whole or part, except in abstract format.

Ethical standards

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1975 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The study protocol was approved by the ethics committee of the University Hospital Centre Split. Prior to recruitment, informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zjacic Puljiz, D., Mestrovic, A., Zaja, I. et al. Impact of hemodialysis on liver stiffness measured with real-time two-dimensional shear wave elastography. Wien Klin Wochenschr 133, 96–101 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-019-01577-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-019-01577-w

Keywords

  • Dialysis
  • Liver fibrosis
  • Net fluid withdrawal
  • Chronic kidney disease
  • End stage renal disease