Advertisement

Wiener klinische Wochenschrift

, Volume 130, Supplement 3, pp 159–253 | Cite as

Medical Ethics in the 70 Years after the Nuremberg Code, 1947 to the Present

  • Herwig Czech
  • Christiane Druml
  • Paul Weindling
Open Access
history of medicine

References

  1. 1.
    Singer E, Druml C. Ethics in clinical research. In: Müller M, editor. Clinical pharmacology: current topics and case studies. 2nd ed. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2016.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Czech H, Weindling P, editors. Österreichische Ärzte und Ärztinnen im Nationalsozialismus. Wien: Dokumentationsarchiv des österreichischen Widerstandes; 2017.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Medawar J, Pyke D. Hitler’s gift. Scientists who fled Nazi Germany. London: Piatkus Publishers; 2000.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Müller M. Inauguration speech as rector of the Medical University of Vienna. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2016;128(1–2):2–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schütz W. The medical faculty of the university of Vienna 60 years following Austria’s annexation. Perspect Biol Med. 2000;43(3):389–96.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Druml W. The Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift from 1938 to 1945. On the 60th anniversary of its reappearance in 1946. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 1996;108(13):381–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hildebrandt S. How the Pernkopf controversy facilitated a historical and ethical analysis of the anatomical sciences in Austria and Germany: a recommendation for the continued use of the Pernkopf atlas. Clin Anat. 2006;19(2):91–100.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Angetter DC. Anatomical science at University of Vienna 1938–45. Senate Project of the University of Vienna. Lancet. 2000;355(9213):1454–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Polak J. After the Holocaust the bells still ring. Jerusalem: Urim publications; 2015.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Polak J. Vienna Protocol for when Jewish or possibly-Jewish human remains are discovered. Paper presented at a symposium at Yad Vashem. Jerusalem; 2017. Published in this volume.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hildebrandt S, Seidelman WE. Where do they come from? A call for complete transparency regarding the origin of human tissues in research. ESMO Open. 2017;2:e201.  https://doi.org/10.1136/esmoopen-2017-000201 . PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ladimar I, Newman R. Clinical investigation in medicine: legal, medical and moral aspects. Law-Medicine Research Institute Boston University, 116 “The Nuremberg Code”. 1993.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    The National Archives (TNA), London: WO 39/470.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Weindling P. John Thompson – psychiatrist in the shadow of the holocaust. Rochester: Rochester University Press; 2010.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    TNA: FO 371/57641, War Criminal Auschwitz, Dr. Klein. TNA: WO 309/484, Leo Gries statement on Klein and Rutenol, 15 Nov 1945.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    TNA: WO 309/468, John Thompson to War Crimes Branch, Judge Advocate, 29 Nov 1945.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Weindling P. Nazi medicine and the Nuremberg trials. Basingstoke: Palgrave; 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gaw A. Reality and revisionism: new evidence for Andrew C Ivy’s claim to authorship of the Nuremberg Code. J R Soc Med. 2014;107(4):138–43. Wellcome Library PP/MHP/C5 Ivy to Pappworth 6 April 1966.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Roelcke V. The use and abuse of medical research ethics: the German Richtlinien/guidelines for human subject research as an instrument for the protection of research subjects – and of medical science, ca. 1931–1961/64. In: Weindling P, editor. From clinic to concentration camp: reassessing Nazi medical and racial research, 1933–1945. Abingdon, New York: Routledge; 2017, pp. 33–56.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    JAMA (Journal of American Medical Association) Jan 11 1947;133:133–5.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Weindling P. “Unser eigener ‘österreichischer Weg’”: Die Meerwasser-Trinkexperimente in Dachau 1944. In: Czech H, Weindling P, editors. Österreichische Ärzte und Ärztinnen im Nationalsozialismus. Wien: Dokumentationsarchiv des österreichischen Widerstandes; 2017. pp. 133–77.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Weindling P. The origins of informed consent: the International Scientific Commission on Medical War Crimes, and the Nuremberg Code. Bull Hist Med. 2001;75:37–71. Cited from: University of Wyoming Ivy Papers, Ivy to Ladimar, 23 March 1964.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Archives de France BB/33/260, folder 4c Special Release no. 104, 23 January 1947.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Archives de France BB/35/268, documentation relative aux expériences médicales.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Archives de France BB/35/260.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    NMT Trial Transcripts p 11302 for 17 July 1947 cf http://nuremberg.law.harvard.edu/transcripts/1-transcript-for-nmt-1-medical-case?seq=11450&q=+type:transcripts . Accessed 24 May 2018
  27. 27.
    Alexander L. Ethics of human experimentation. Psychiatr J Univ Ott. 1977;1(1–2):40–6. Alexander Papers, Durham NC, box 1, file 9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Archives de France BB/35/260, Alexander to McHaney 23 November 1946Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals. Washington DC: US Government Printing Office; 1949. vol. 2, pp. 181–3.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mitscherlich A, Mielke F. Wissenschaft ohne Menschlichkeit. Medizinische und eugenische Irrwege unter Diktatur, Bürokratie und Krieg. Heidelberg: Verlag Lambert Schneider; 1949.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bayle F. Croix gammée contre caducée. Les expériences humaines en Allemagne pendant la deuxième guerre mondiale. Neustadt: Imprimerie Nationale; 1950.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Taylor T. In: Mitscherlich A, Mielke F, Doctors of Infamy. The Story of Nazi Medical Crimes. New York: Schuman; 1949. p. xxiii-xxv.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Perley S, Fluss S, Bankowski Z, Simon F. The Nuremberg Code: an international overview. In: Annas G, Grodin M, editors. The Nazi doctors and the Nuremberg Code. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1994. pp. 149–73.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    WHO Archives Geneva 400/1/1 World Medical Association resolution ‘Crimes de Guerre’, 17–20 September 1947.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
  36. 36.
    Freund F. Der Dachauer Mauthausenprozess. Jahrb Dokumentationsarch Österr Widerstandes. 2001:35–66.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Schwanninger F. Die “Sonderbehandlung 14 f 13” in den Konzentrationslagern Mauthausen und Gusen. Probleme und Perspektiven der Forschung. KZ-Gedenkstätte Mauthausen – Mauthausen Memorial Jahrb. 2011:55–67.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10. Washington DC: US Government Printing Office; 1949. Vol. 1, “The Medical Case”.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Tschofenig J. 1946. http://nuremberg.law.harvard.edu .
  40. 40.
    Documentation Centre of the Austrian Resistance (DÖW), 22848.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Anonymous, ‘Selbstmord Professor Eppingers’, in: Neues Österreich, 27 September 1946, 2Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Czech H. Beyond Spiegelgrund and Berkatit: human experimentation and coerced research at the Vienna School of Medicine, 1939 to 1945. In: Weindling P, editor. From clinic to concentration camp: Reassessing Nazi medical and racial research, 1933–1945. Abingdon, New York: Routledge; 2017. pp. 138–62.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Czech H. Nazi “Euthanasia” crimes in World War II Austria. Holocaust Hist Mem. 2012;5:51–73.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Garscha W. Euthanasie-Prozesse seit 1945 in Österreich und Deutschland. Gerichtsakten als Quelle zur Geschichte der NS-Euthanasie und zum Umgang der Nachkriegsgesellschaft mit Tätern und Opfern. In: Horn S, Malina P, editors. Medizin im Nationalsozialismus: Wege der Aufarbeitung. Wiener Gespräche zur Sozialgeschichte der Medizin. Wien: Pressestelle und Verlag der Österreichischen Ärztekammer; 2002. pp. 46–58.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Kepplinger B, Marckhgott G, Reese H, editors. Tötungsanstalt Hartheim. Linz: Oberösterreichisches Landesarchiv; 2008.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Klee E. Was sie taten – was sie wurden. Ärzte, Juristen und andere Beteiligte am Kranken- oder Judenmord. Frankfurt am Main: S. Fischer; 1986.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Friedlander H. The origins of Nazi genocide. From euthanasia to the final solution. Chapel Hill and London: The University of North Carolina Press; 1995.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Czech H. Jenseits von Hartheim. Dezentrale Krankenmorde in Österreich während der NS-Zeit. In: Arbeitskreis zur Erforschung der nationalsozialistischen Euthanasie und Zwangssterilisation, editor. NS-Euthanasie in der “Ostmark.” Fachtagung vom 17. bis 19. April 2009 im Lern- und Gedenkort Schloss Hartheim. Berichte des Arbeitskreises 8. Münster: Klemm&Oelschläger; 2012. pp. 37–60.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Vg Graz 18 Vr 907/45 (Senat Klagenfurt), verdict against Dr. Niedermoser et al., 4 Apr 1946 (copy in Documentation Centre of the Austrian Resistance, DÖW 20320).Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Stromberger H. Die Ärzte, die Schwestern, die SS und der Tod. Die Region Kärnten und das produzierte Sterben in der NS-Periode. Klagenfurt, Celovec: Drava; 1988.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Fürstauer D. Organisierter Anstaltsmord. In: Freidl W, editor. NS-Psychiatrie in Klagenfurt. Wien: facultas; 2016. pp. 110–65.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Fürstauer D, Lang M. “Zu Tode gepflegt” – Die dezentralen Anstaltsmorde. In: Freidl W, editor. NS-Psychiatrie in Klagenfurt. Wien: facultas; 2016. pp. 183–233.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Czech H. Von der “Aktion T4” zur “dezentralen Euthanasie”. Die niederösterreichischen Heil- und Pflegeanstalten Gugging, Mauer-Öhling und Ybbs. In: Jahrbuch des Dokumentationsarchivs des österreichischen Widerstandes. 2016. pp. 219–66.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Czech H. From “Action T4” to “decentralized euthanasia” in Lower Austria: the psychiatric hospitals at Gugging, Mauer-Öhling and Ybbs. 2016. http://www.memorialgugging.at . Accessed 16 Apr 2018. Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Gazdag G, Ungvari G, Czech H. Mass killing under the guise of ECT: the darkest chapter in the history of biological psychiatry. Hist Psychiatry. 2017:1–7.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0957154X17724037
  56. 56.
    Neugebauer W. Die Klinik “Am Spiegelgrund” 1940–1945. Eine "Kinderfachabteilung" im Rahmen der NS-“Euthanasie”. In: Studien zur Wiener Geschichte. Jahrbuch des Vereins für die Geschichte der Stadt Wien. 1996. pp. 289–305.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Dahl M. Endstation Spiegelgrund. Die Tötung behinderter Kinder während des Nationalsozialismus am Beispiel einer Kinderfachabteilung in Wien. Wien: Erasmus; 1998.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Czech H. Selektion und Kontrolle. Der “Spiegelgrund” als zentrale Institution der Wiener Jugendfürsorge zwischen 1940 und 1945. In: Gabriel E, Neugebauer W, editors. Von der Zwangssterilisierung zur Ermordung. Zur Geschichte der NS-Euthanasie in Wien Teil II. Wien, Köln, Weimar: Böhlau; 2002. pp. 165–87.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Czech H. Forschen ohne Skrupel. Die wissenschaftliche Verwertung von Opfern der NS-Psychiatriemorde in Wien. In: Gabriel E, Neugebauer W, editors. Von der Zwangssterilisierung zur Ermordung. Zur Geschichte der NS-Euthanasie in Wien Teil II. Wien, Köln, Weimar: Böhlau; 2002. pp. 143–63.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Hirschinger F. “Zur Ausmerzung freigegeben:” Halle und die Landesheilanstalt Altscherbitz 1933–1945. Köln, Weimar: Böhlau; 2001.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Weinberger RJ. Fertility experiments in Auschwitz-Birkenau: the perpetrators and their victims. Saarbruecken: Suedwestdeutscher Verlag für Hochschulschriften; 2009.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Hessisches Hauptstaatsarchiv Wiesbaden (HHStA) 631 a, Collection Horst Schumann Trial.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Ausgemustert. Der Spiegel. 1972; 51:58–60.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Raim E. Justiz zwischen Diktatur und Demokratie. Wiederaufbau und Ahndung von NS-Verbrechen in Westdeutschland 1945–1949. Oldernbourg: De Gruyter; 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Eichmüller A. Keine Generalamnestie: Die strafrechtliche Verfolgung von NS-Verbrechen in der frühen Bundesrepublik. München: Oldenburg; 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Pendas D. Retroactive law and proactive justice: debating crimes against humanity in Germany, 1945–1950. Cent Eur Hist. 2010;43(3):428–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Official Gazette of the Control Council for Germany. 30 November 1945.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Frei N, Golb J. Adenauer’s Germany and the Nazi past: the politics of amnesty and integration. New York: Colombia University Press; 2010.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Müller, I. Hitler’s Justice. The courts of the Third Reich. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1991.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Jarausch K. The unfree professions: German lawyers, teachers, and engineers 1900–1950. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1990.Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Wolff-Powęska A. Memory as burden and liberation: Germans and their Nazi past 1945–2010. Frankfurt: Peter Lang; 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Buscher F. “I know I also share the guilt”: A retrospective of the West German parliament’s 1965 debate on the statue of limitations for murder. Yad Vashem Bull. 2006;34:258.Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Wittmann R. The wheels of justice turn slowly: the pretrial investigation of the Frankfurt Auschwitz trial 1963–65. Cent Eur Hist. 2002;35:349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Wittmann R. Beyond justice: the Auschwitz trial. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 2012.Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Grodin MA. Historical origins of the Nuremberg Code. In: Michalczyk JJ, editor. Medicine, ethics and the Third Reich: historical and contemporary issues. Kansas: Sheed & Ward; 1994. pp. 169–94.Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Nagel T. Moral Luck. In: Statman D, editor. Moral luck. Albany: State University of New York Press; 1993. pp. 57–71.Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Offer M. White coats inside the ghetto: Jewish medicine in Poland during the Holocaust. Jerusalem: Yad Vashem; 2015. (In Hebrew). [English edition in press].Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Statman D. Moral dilemmas. Amsterdam: Rodopi; 1995.Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Roland CG. Courage under siege: starvation, disease and death in the Warsaw Ghetto. New York: Oxford University Press; 1992.Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Apfelbaum E, editor. Choroba Głodowa: Badania kliniczne nad głodem wykonane w getcie warszawskim z roku 1942. Warsaw: American Joint Distribution Committee; 1946.Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Apfelbaum E, editor. Maladie de famine: recherches cliniques sur la famine executees dans la Ghetto de Varsovie en 1942. Warsaw: American Joint Distribution Committee; 1946.Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Roland CG. An underground medical school in the Warsaw Ghetto, 1941–1942. Med Hist. 1989;33:399–419.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Offer M. Studying medicine and medical research in the ghettos: how and why was the underground medical school in the Warsaw Ghetto established? Bishvil Hazikaron. 2016;24:30–8. Hebrew.Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Gowans CW, editor. Moral dilemmas. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1987.Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Sinnott-Armstrong W. Moral dilemmas. Oxford: Blackwell; 1988.Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Offer M. Ethical dilemmas in the work of doctors and nurses in the Warsaw Ghetto. Polin: Stud Pol Jewry. 2013;25:467–92.Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Offer M. Medicine in the Shavli Ghetto in light of the diary of Dr. Aaron Pik. In: Grodin MA, editor. Jewish medical resistance in the Holocaust. New York, Oxford: Berghahn; 2014. pp. 164–72.Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Yitzhak Gruenbaum, ed., Encyclopaedia of the Jewish Diaspora, Warsaw, Vol. 6, pt. 2 (in Hebrew) (Jerusalem and Tel Aviv: Encyclopaedia of the Jewish Diaspora Co., 1959)Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Israel Medical Association position paper from May 2008. Ethical aspects of mass casualty incidents. Retrieved from: http://www.ima.org.il/MainSite/ViewCategory.aspx?CategoryId-1115 [accessed 16 April 2018]
  90. 90.
    Ringelblum E. Polish–Jewish relations during the Second World War. Evanston: Northwestern University Press; 1992.Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Lensky M. A physician inside the Warsaw Ghetto. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009.Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    Blady-Szwajger A. I remember nothing more. New York: Pantheon; 1991. p. 56.Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Negev A, Koren Y. Nisuyim bivnei adam. Yedioth Aharonot newspaper, Shiva Yamim; 25th April 2003; pp. 53–6.Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Grodin MA. Historical origins of the Nuremberg Code. In: Annas GJ, Grodin MA, editors. The Nazi doctors and the Nuremberg Code: human rights in human experimentation. Oxford, New York et al.: Oxford University Press; 1992. pp. 121–44.Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    Nadav DS. Medicine and Nazism. Jerusalem: The Hebrew University Magnes Press; 2009.Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    Annas GJ, Grodin MA, editors. The Nazi doctors and the Nuremberg Code. Human rights in human experimentation. New York: Oxford University Press; 1992.Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    Ferencz BB. Nurnberg trial procedure and the rights of the accused. J Crim Law Criminol. 1948;39(2):144–51.Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    Heller KJ. The Nuremberg military tribunals and the origins of international criminal law. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Trials of War Criminals Before the Nuernberg Military Tribunals Under Control Council Law No. 10, Vol 2, “The Medical Case”. Washington DC: US Government Printing Office; 1949. pp. 181–2. [ https://www.loc.gov/rr/frd/Military_Law/pdf/NT_war-criminals_Vol-II.pdf accessed 16 April 2018]
  100. 100.
    Katz J. The Nuremberg Code and the Nuremberg Trial. A reappraisal. JAMA. 1996;276(20):1662–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Katz J. Human sacrifice and human experimentation: reflections at Nuremberg. Yale J Int Law. 1997;22(2):401–18.Google Scholar
  102. 102.
    Burt R. Death is that man taking names: intersections of American medicine, law, and culture. London: University of California Press; 2002.Google Scholar
  103. 103.
    Shuster E. The Nuremberg Code: Hippocratic ethics and human rights. Lancet. 1998;351(9107):974–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Lenrow DA. The treating physician as researcher: is assuming this dual role a violation of the Nuremberg Code? Temp J Sci Tech Env L. 2006;25(1):15–48.Google Scholar
  105. 105.
    United States Constitution Preamble, Amend I, & Amend IV.Google Scholar
  106. 106.
    Annas GJ. Self experimentation and the Nuremberg Code. BMJ. 2010;341:c7103.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Wiesel E. Foreword. In: Annas GJ, Grodin MA, editors. The Nazi doctors and the Nuremberg Code: human rights in human experimentation. New York: Oxford University Press; 1992.Google Scholar
  108. 108.
    Shuster E. Fifty years later: the significance of the Nuremberg Code. N Eng J Med. 1997;337(20):1436–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    Annas GJ. The legacy of the Nuremberg doctors’ trial to American bioethics and human rights. Minn J Law Sci Technol. 2009;10(1):19–40.Google Scholar
  110. 110.
    Glantz LH. The influence of the Nuremberg Code on U.S. statutes and regulations. In: Annas GJ, Grodin MA, editors. The Nazi doctors and the Nuremberg Code: human rights in human experimentation. New York: Oxford University Press; 1992.Google Scholar
  111. 111.
    Timeline of laws related to the protection of human subjects. Office of History and Stetten Museum: National Institutes of Health (NIH); 2017. https://history.nih.gov/about/timelines_laws_human.html
  112. 112.
    Katz J. Statement by committee member Jay Katz: Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments (ACHRE). 1995. https://bioethicsarchive.georgetown.edu/achre/final/jay_katz.html . Accessed 30 May 2018. Google Scholar
  113. 113.
    Annas GJ. Informed consent to human experimentation. In: Glantz LH, Katz BF, editors. The subject’s dilemma. Cambridge: Ballinger Pub; 1977.Google Scholar
  114. 114.
    Annas GJ. The Nuremberg Code in U.S. courts: ethics versus expediency. In: Annas GJ, Grodin MA, editors. The Nazi doctors and the Nuremberg Code. Human rights in human experimentation. New York: Oxford University Press; 1992.Google Scholar
  115. 115.
    Moreno JD. Reassessing the influence of the Nuremberg Code on American medical ethics. J Contemp Health Law Policy. 1997;13(2):347–60.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  116. 116.
    Beecher HK. Ethics and clinical research. N Engl J Med. 1966;274(24):1354–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. 117.
    Rothman DJ. Were Tuskegee & Willowbrook ‘studies in nature’? Hastings Cent Rep. 1982;12(2):5–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. 118.
    Childress JF. Nuremberg’s legacy: some ethical reflections. Perspect Biol Med. 2000;43(3):347–61.  https://doi.org/10.1353/pbm.2000.0015 . PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. 119.
    The Lancet Infectious Diseases. Clearing the myths of time: Tuskegee revisited. 2005. p. 127. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(05)01286-7.Google Scholar
  120. 120.
    Faden RR, Beauchamp TL. A history and theory of informed consent. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1986.Google Scholar
  121. 121.
    Ericka Grimes v. Kennedy Krieger Institute, Inc. Myron Higgins, a minor, etc., et al. v. Kennedy Krieger Institute, Inc.: Court of Appeals Maryland; 2001.Google Scholar
  122. 122.
    Mastroianni AC, Kahn JP. Risk and responsibility: ethics, Grimes v. Kennedy Krieger, and public health research involving children. Am J Public Health. 2002;92(7):1073–6.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. 123.
    Brown E. The dilemmas of German bioethics. The New Atlantis – A Journal of Technology and Society. Spring 2004, 37–53. http://www.thenewatlantis.com/publications/the-dilemmas-of-german-bioethics . Accessed 30 Aug 2014. Google Scholar
  124. 124.
    Cohen J, Marcoux I, Bilsen J, et al. Trends in acceptance of euthanasia among the general public in 12 European countries. Eur J Public Health. 2006;16:663–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. 125.
    Stourton E. Germany’s eugenics controversy. BBC News World Edition. 2001. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/correspondent/europe/1272125.stm . Accessed 30 Aug 2014. Google Scholar
  126. 126.
    Kipke R. Schiefe-Bahn-Argumente in der Sterbehilfe-Debatte. Z Med Ethik. 2008;54:135–46.Google Scholar
  127. 127.
    Roelcke V, Lepicard E, Topp S, editors. Science, scapegoats, self-reflection: the shadow of Nazi medical crimes on medicine and bioethics. Göttingen: V & R unipress; 2014.Google Scholar
  128. 128.
    Topp S. Geschichte als Argument in der Nachkriegsmedizin: Formen der Vergegenwärtigung der nationalsozialistischen Euthanasie. Göttingen: V & R unipress; 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. 129.
    Gerst T. Ärztliche Standesorganisation und Standespolitik in Deutschland 1945–1955. Stuttgart: Steiner; 2004.Google Scholar
  130. 130.
    Roelcke V. Trauma or responsibility? Memories and historiographies of Nazi psychiatry in postwar Germany. In: Sarat A, Davidovich N, Alberstein M, editors. Trauma and memory. Stanford: Stanford University Press; 2007. pp. 225–42.Google Scholar
  131. 131.
    Weinke A. Judging medical crimes in divided Germany. In: Roelcke V, Topp S, Lepicard E, editors. Silence, scapegoats, self-reflection: the shadow of Nazi medical crimes on medicine and bioethics. Göttingen: V & R unipress; 2014. pp. 87–100.Google Scholar
  132. 132.
    Roelcke V. Between professional honor and self-reflection: the German Medical Association’s reluctance to address medical malpractice during the National Socialist era, ca. 1985–2012. In: Roelcke V, Topp S, Lepicard E, editors. Silence, scapegoats, self-reflection: the shadow of Nazi medical crimes on medicine and bioethics. Göttingen: V&R unipress; 2014. pp. 243–80.Google Scholar
  133. 133.
    Reis S. Reflections on the Nuremberg Declaration of the German Medical Assembly. Isr Med Assoc J. 2012;14:532–4.Google Scholar
  134. 134.
    Martini P. Methodenlehre der therapeutisch-klinischen Forschung. 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer; 1947.Google Scholar
  135. 135.
    Forsbach R. Die Medizinische Fakultät der Universität Bonn im “Dritten Reich”. München: Oldenbourg; 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. 136.
    Daemmrich A. Pharmacopolitics: drug regulation in the United States and Germany. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press; 2004.Google Scholar
  137. 137.
    Stapel U. Die Arzneimittelgesetze 1961 und 1976. Stuttgart: Deutscher Apotheker Verlag; 1988.Google Scholar
  138. 138.
    Regulations on Human Experimentations, Ordinance 4189; 11 Dec 1980.Google Scholar
  139. 139.
    Sus J. Our mourning and cry – on the destruction of our brothers in Europe. In: Mikhtave le-haver. 1942.Google Scholar
  140. 140.
    Michlesohn J. A Report from the International Conference of Physicians in London, 25–27 September 1946. Mikhtave le-haver. 1946;150:1319–20.Google Scholar
  141. 141.
    Bring Punishment to the German Physician – the Criminals of the Profession of Medicine, In: Mikhtave le-haver. 1945;120.Google Scholar
  142. 142.
    Mordechai E, Dvorjetski M. The man, the researcher and the teacher, Iyunim beTkufat haShoah. 1979. pp. 11–8.Google Scholar
  143. 143.
    Cohen B. Israeli Holocaust research: birth and evolution. London, New York: Routledge; 2013. pp. 126–32.Google Scholar
  144. 144.
    Dvorjetski M. On the crime of the German physicians and their punishment. Mikhtave le-haver. 1947;142.Google Scholar
  145. 145.
    The Struggle for life and death in the ghettos under the Nazi occupation, Dapim Refuyiim. 6 September 1946;61.Google Scholar
  146. 146.
    The Jerusalem Declaration on Medical Ethics. Dapim refuiyim. December 1952;11(4):329–32. [Reprinted in Etienne Lepicard’s contribution in this volume.]Google Scholar
  147. 147.
    Dvorjetski M. The skeleton collection from Strasburg. Dapim Refuiyim. 1950;9:93–103.Google Scholar
  148. 148.
    Caplan A, editor. When medicine went mad: bioethics and the Holocaust. Totowa: Humana Press; 1992.Google Scholar
  149. 149.
    Weitz Y. Political dimensions of Holocaust memory in Israel during the 1950s. Isr Aff. 1995;1(3):129–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  150. 150.
    Zertal I. Israel’s Holocaust and the politics of nationhood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  151. 151.
    Klar Y, Schori‐Eyal N. The “never again” state of Israel: the emergence of the Holocaust as a core feature of Israeli identity and its four incongruent voices. J Soc Issues. 2013;69(1):125–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  152. 152.
    Farfel Z. Medicine during the Holocaust in the light of medical literature of the 1990s. Harefuah. 2000;138(10):189–91.Google Scholar
  153. 153.
    Herzog R. Holocaust doctor survivors in Israel 1945–1952: from early positions to professional integration. Harefuah. 2017;156(4):204–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  154. 154.
    Spencer T. Medicine and the Holocaust: articles from “Harefuah” [and “Mikhtav le-haver”] (1946—2005), Ramat Gan: Israel Medical Association, 2007.Google Scholar
  155. 155.
    Raches A. Medical ethics: regulations and position papers. Ramat Gan: IMA, Ethics Department;2010Google Scholar
  156. 156.
    Davidovitch N, Seidelman R, Shifra S. Contested bodies: medicine, public health and mass immigration to Israel. Hagar. 2006;6(2):35–58.Google Scholar
  157. 157.
    Siegal Gil. Western bio-ethics: Israel between North America and Europe. Harefuah. 2204;143(2):142–6.Google Scholar
  158. 158.
    Prainsack B. Steitbare Zellen? Die Politik der Bioethik in Israel. Leviathan. 2005;33(1):69–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  159. 159.
    Borkan J, et al. A model of educating humanistic physicians in the 21st century: the new medicine, patient, and society course at Tel-Aviv University. Educ Health. 2000;13:346–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  160. 160.
    Nadav D. National Socialism and medicine. Tel-Aviv: Ministry of Defense; 2006.Google Scholar
  161. 161.
    Aly G. Forschen an Opfern. Das Kaiser-Wilhelm-Institut für Hirnforschung und die “T4”. In: Aly G, editor. Aktion T4 1939–1945. Die “Euthanasie”-Zentrale in der Tiergartenstrasse 4. Berlin: Edition Hentrich; 1988. pp. 153–9.Google Scholar
  162. 162.
    Aly G. Der saubere und der schmutzige Fortschritt. In: Aly G, editor. Reform und Gewissen: “Euthanasie” im Dienst des Fortschritts. Berlin: Rotbuch Verlag; 1985. pp. 9–78.Google Scholar
  163. 163.
    Dickman S. Brain sections to be buried? Nature. 1989;339:458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  164. 164.
    Dickman S. Memorial ceremony to be held. Nature. 1990;345:192.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  165. 165.
    Beck C. New questions raised by discovery in archives. History of the Max Planck Society. Max Planck Society. April 09, 2015. www.mg.de/9154722/discovery-archive . Accessed 6 Oct 2017. Google Scholar
  166. 166.
    Weindling P. “Cleansing” anatomical collections. The politics of removing specimens from German anatomical and medical collections 1988–92. Ann Anat. 2012;194(3):237–42.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  167. 167.
    Shevell M. Racial hygiene, active euthanasia, and Julius Hallervorden. Neurology. 1992;42:2214–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  168. 168.
    Harper PS. Naming of syndromes and unethical activities: the case of Hallervorden and Spatz. Lancet. 1996;348:1224–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  169. 169.
    Shevell M. Hallervorden and history. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(1):3–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  170. 170.
    Panush RS, Paraschiv D, Dorff EN. The tainted legacy of Hans Reiter. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2003;32(4):231–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  171. 171.
    Woywodt A, Haubitz M, Haller H, Matteson EL. Wegener’s granulomatosis. Lancet. 2006;367:1362–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  172. 172.
    Woynott A, Matteson E. Should eponyms be abandoned? Yes. No. BMJ. 2007;335:424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  173. 173.
    Whitworth JA. Should Eponyms be abandoned? No. BMJ. 2007;335:425.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  174. 174.
    Strous R, Edelman MC. Eponyms and the Nazi era: time to remember and time for change. IMAJ. 2007;9:207–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  175. 175.
    Kondziella D. Thirty neurological eponyms associated with the Nazi era. Eur Neurol. 2009;62:56–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  176. 176.
    Falk RJ, et al. Granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Wegener’s): an alternative name for Wegener’s granulomatosis. Arthritis Rheum. 2011;63(4):862–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  177. 177.
    Zaller R. Hans Reiter and the politics of remembrance. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2003;32(4):237–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  178. 178.
    Fox M. Preserving Medical Eponyms Memorializing Nazi War Criminals in the Face of Prevalent Spoliation of Evidence in the Corpus of Medical Literature. 2017. https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B605UL7AlLTZNGVTY3pQRDNOQkk/view?usp=sharing_eil&ts=596fd38b . Accessed 4 June 2018.
  179. 179.
    Weber MM. Psychiatric Research and science policy in Germany. The history of the Deutsche Forschungsanstalt für Psychiatrie (German Institute for Psychiatric Research) in Munich from 1917 to 1945. Hist Psychiatry. 2000;xi:235–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  180. 180.
    Goedert M, Ghetti B. Alois Alzheimer: his life and times. Brain Pathol. 2007;17(1):57–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  181. 181.
    Möller HJ, Graeber MB. The case described by Alois Alzheimer disease in 1911. Historical and conceptual perspectives based on the clinical record and neurohistological sections. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1998;248:111–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  182. 182.
    Hippius H, Müller M. The work of Emil Kraepelin and his Research Group in München. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2008;258(2):3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  183. 183.
    Lange BM. Walther Spielmeyer. In: Ashwal S, editor. The founders of child neurology. San Francisco: Norman Publishing in Association with Child Neurology Society; 1990. pp. 587–93.Google Scholar
  184. 184.
    Wässle H. A collection of brain specimens of “euthanasia” victims: the Series H of Julius Hallervorden. Endeavour. 2017;41(4):166–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  185. 185.
    Schmuhl HW. Brain research and the murder of the sick: The Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for brain research, 1937–1945. In: Heim S, Sachse C, Walke W, editors. The Kaiser Wilhelm Society under national socialism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009. pp. 99–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  186. 186.
    Haymaker W. Cecile and Oskar Vogt. On the occasion of her 75th and his 80th birthday. Neurology. 1951;1(1):179–204.Google Scholar
  187. 187.
    Roelcke V. Funding the scientific foundations of race policies: Ernst Rüdin and the impact of career resources on psychiatric genetics, ca 1910–1945. In: Eckart W, editor. Man, medicine, and the state: the human body as an object of government sponsored medical research in the 20th century. Stuttgart: Steiner; 2006.Google Scholar
  188. 188.
    Sachse C. What research, to what end? The Rockefeller foundation and the Max Planck Gesellschaft in the early Cold War. Cent Eur Hist. 2009;42:97–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  189. 189.
    Macrakis K. The Rockefeller Foundation and German physics under National Socialism. Minerva. 1989;27:33–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  190. 190.
    Peiffer J. Assessing neuropathological research carried out on victims of the ‘euthanasia’ programme. Med Hist J. 1999;34:339–56.Google Scholar
  191. 191.
    Müller-Hill B. Murderous science: elimination by scientific selection of Jews, Gypsies, and others, Germany 1933–1945. Oxford: Oxford; 1988.Google Scholar
  192. 192.
    Alexander L. Neuropathology and neurophysiology, including electroencephalography, in wartime Germany. Combined Intelligence Objectives Sub-Committee G-2 Division SHAEF (Rear) APO 413. July 20, 1945, Source: National Archives (USA).Google Scholar
  193. 193.
    Schmidt U. Justice at Nuremberg: Leo Alexander and the Nazi Doctors’ Trial. New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  194. 194.
    Peiffer J. Letter to W. Seidelman. April 2. 1998: personal archives of W. Seidelman.Google Scholar
  195. 195.
    Chernow R. The Warburgs: the twentieth century odyssey of a remarkable Jewish family. New York: Random House; 1993.Google Scholar
  196. 196.
    Stern K. The pillar of fire. New York: Harcourt, Brace; 1951.Google Scholar
  197. 197.
    Weindling P. Health, race and German politics between national unification and Nazism 1870–1945. Cambridge: Cambridge Unviversity Press; 1993.Google Scholar
  198. 198.
    Weber MM. Editorial: Ernst Rüdin, 1874–1952: a German psychiatrist and geneticist. Am J Med Genet. 1996;67:323–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  199. 199.
    Gottesman II, Bertelsen A. Legacy of German psychiatric genetics: hindsight is always 20/20. Am J Med Genet. 1996;67:317–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  200. 200.
    Zerbin-Rüdin E, Kendler KS. Ernst Rüdin (1874–1952) and his Genealogic-demographic department in Munich (1917–1986): an introduction to their family studies of schizophrenia. Am J Med Genet. 1996;67:332–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  201. 201.
    Kendler KS, Rüdin EZ. Abstract and Review of “Studien über Vererbung und Entstehung Geistiger Störungen. I. Zur Vererbung und Neuentstehung der Dementia praecox.” (Studies on the Inheritance and Origin of Mental Illness: I. To the Prolem of the Inheritance and Primary Origin of Dementia Praecox.). Am J Med Genet. 1996;67:338–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  202. 202.
    Kendler KS, Zerbin-Rüdin E. Abstract and Review of “Zur Erbpathologie der Schizophrenie” (Contribution to the Genetics of Schizophrenia). Am J Med Genet. 1996;67:343–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  203. 203.
    Ruter C. Presidential commission “History of the Kaiser Wilhelm Society in the National Socialist era”. 2000.Google Scholar
  204. 204.
    Max Planck Society. Symposium in Berlin. August 2001. Biomedical Sciences and Human Experimentation at Kaiser Wilhelm Institutes – The Auschwitz Connection. Max Planck Research supplement. 3/2001. 2001.Google Scholar
  205. 205.
    Zeidman L. Declining use of the Hallervorden-Spatz disease eponym in the last two decades. Neurology. 2012;78(1):Supplement P04.002.Google Scholar
  206. 206.
    Gannon M. Germany to probe Nazi-era medical science. Science Magazine. 2017. http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/01/germany-probe-nazi-era-medical-science . Accessed 5 Oct 2017. Google Scholar
  207. 207.
    Erdmann KD. Das Ende des Reiches und die Entstehung der Republik Österreich, der Bundesrepublik Deutschland und der Deutschen Demokratischen Republik. Stuttgart: Klett Verlag; 1976.Google Scholar
  208. 208.
    Birke A. Nation ohne Haus. Deutschland 1945–1961. Berlin: Siedler; 1989.Google Scholar
  209. 209.
    Kleßmann C. Die doppelte Staatsgründung. Deutsche Geschichte 1945–1955. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht; 1982.Google Scholar
  210. 210.
    Winkler HA. Deutsche Geschichte vom ‘Dritten Reich’ bis zur Wiedervereinigung. Der lange Weg nach Westen, Vol. 2. München: C.H.Beck; 2000.Google Scholar
  211. 211.
    Echternkamp J. Nach dem Krieg. Alltagsnot, Neuorientierung und die Last der Vergangenheit. Zürich: Pendo; 2003.Google Scholar
  212. 212.
    Raim E. Nazi crimes against Jews and German post-war justice. The West German judicial system during allied occupation (1945–1949). Berlin: De Gruyter; 2015.Google Scholar
  213. 213.
    de Mildt D, editor. Tatkomplex: NS-Euthanasie. Die ost- und westdeutschen Strafurteile seit 1945. Vol. 2. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press; 2009.Google Scholar
  214. 214.
    Tübingen 1 Js 85-87/47 = Ks 6/49, State Archive Sigmaringen Wü 29/3 T 1 Nr. 1752–1759.Google Scholar
  215. 215.
    Frankfurt 4a Js 3/46 = 4 KLs 7/47, Main State Archive Wiesbaden, Abt. 461, Nr. 32061/1–51; Abt. 461, Nr. 31898; Abt. 461, Nr. 30012a . Google Scholar
  216. 216.
    Frankfurt 4a Js 2/47 = 4 Ks 1/47, Main State Archive Wiesbaden, Abt. 461, Nr. 32061/45–50.Google Scholar
  217. 217.
    Raim E. Justiz zwischen Diktatur und Demokratie. Wiederaufbau und Ahndung von NS-Verbrechen in Westdeutschland 1945–1949. München: Oldenbourg; 2013. pp. 1053–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  218. 218.
    Böhm B, Hacke G, editors. Fundamentale Gebote der Sittlichkeit: Der “Euthanasie“-Prozess vor dem Landgericht Dresden 1947. Dresden: Sandstein Verlag; 2008.Google Scholar
  219. 219.
    Dencker F. Strafverfolgung der Euthanasie-Täter nach 1945. Z Juristische Zeitgesch. 2006;7:119.Google Scholar
  220. 220.
    Hohendorf G. The Sewering Affair. Korot. 2007/2008, published 2009. 19:83–104.Google Scholar
  221. 221.
    Hoppe JD, Vilmar K. Hans Joachim Sewering † – Gestalter im Dienst der Ärzteschaft. Dtsch Arztebl. 2010;107:A1409.Google Scholar
  222. 222.
    Hohendorf G, Fangerau H, Wahrig B. Kein Hinweis auf die Rolle im Nationalsozialismus (letter to the editor). Dtsch Arztebl. 2010;107:A1520.Google Scholar
  223. 223.
    Kater MH. The Sewering scandal of 1993 and the German medical establishment. In: Berg M, Cocks G, editors. Medicine and modernity – public health and medical care in nineteenth- and twentieth-century Germany. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1997. pp. 213–34.Google Scholar
  224. 224.
    White LW. The Nazi doctors and the medical community, honor or censure? The case of Hans Sewering. J Med Humanit. 1996;17:119–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  225. 225.
    Craig WR. Top German Doctor Admits SS Past. NY Times. Jan 16, 1993.Google Scholar
  226. 226.
    Leaning J. German Doctors and their Secrets. NY Times. Feb 2, 1993.Google Scholar
  227. 227.
    Anonymous. Entmündigung zur Herde – Die ärztlichen Standesgremien nach dem Zweiten Weltkrieg. Spiegel. 1978;21:77–88.Google Scholar
  228. 228.
    Kater MH. Doctors under Hitler. Chapel Hill NC, London: The University of North Carolina Press; 1989.Google Scholar
  229. 229.
    Kochen M. Ehemaliger SS-Mann künftiger Präsident des Weltärztebundes? ZFA (Stuttgart). 1993;69(1):8.Google Scholar
  230. 230.
    Seidelman WE. ‘Requiescat sine pace’: recollections and reflections on the World Medical Association, the case of Prof. Dr. Hans Joachim Sewering and the murder of Babette Fröwis. In: Roelcke V, Topp S, Lepicard E, editors. Silence, scapegoats, self-reflection: the shadow of Nazi medical crimes on medicine and bioethics. Göttingen: V&R unipress; 2014. pp. 281–300.Google Scholar
  231. 231.
    BÄK. Sewering Ziel einer Verleumdungsaktion. Dtsch Arztebl. 1993;90:C113.Google Scholar
  232. 232.
    Kohl HH. Sewering wird nicht Präsident. Frankfurter Rundschau. Jan 25, 1993.Google Scholar
  233. 233.
    Scarlettar R. Motives and actions are misrepresented (Letter to the editor). Dtsch Arztebl. 1993;90:B–550.Google Scholar
  234. 234.
    Anonymous. Professor Sewering’s resignation from WMA President-Elect. World Med J. 1993;39:22–3.Google Scholar
  235. 235.
    Vilmar K. Statement by the President of the German Medical Association on the occasion of the 135th Council Session of the World Medical Association on the waiver by Prof. Dr. Dr. h. c. Hans Joachim Sewering of the office of ‘President-Elect’ of the World Medical Association. World Med J. 1993;39:22–3.Google Scholar
  236. 236.
    HL. Die Delegierten begrüßen Sewerings Rückzieher. Deutsche Ärztezeitung. May 10, 1993:8.Google Scholar
  237. 237.
    Jachertz N. Sewering – Schlußstrich. Dtsch Ärztebl. 1993;90:B1124–5.Google Scholar
  238. 238.
    Franzblau M. Nazi medical crimes unpunished 50 years later. Dermatopathology. 1996;2:83–6.Google Scholar
  239. 239.
    Krischer M. Kinderhaus – Leben und Ermordung des Mädchens Edith Hecht. München: DVA; 2006.Google Scholar
  240. 240.
    Anonymous, SZ-Gespräch mit Professor Hans Joachim Sewering zu Euthanasie-Vorwürfen aus der Ärzteschaft – “Ich habe keinen Grund, mich zu verstecken.” Süddeutsche Zeitung – Dachauer SZ. 22 Jan 1993.Google Scholar
  241. 241.
    Jachertz N. Sewering – Ende einer Karriere: Weshalb der designierte Präsident des Weltärztebundes sein Amt nicht antrat und was 1943 in Schönbrunn passierte. Dtsch Ärzteblatt. 1993;90:B189–90.Google Scholar
  242. 242.
    Soyer T. “Die Schwestern ahnten, was mit diesen Leuten passiert” – Interview mit Generaloberin Benigna und Domkapitular Anneser über die “Euthanasie”-Opfer aus Schönbrunn während der Jahre 1940 bis 1945. Süddeutsche Zeitung, local issue Dachauer SZ. Jan 25/26, 1997;14–5.Google Scholar
  243. 243.
    Soyer T. Sewering verzichtet auf Ehrenamt – Katholischer Orden bezweifelt Darstellung des Mediziners. Süddeutsche Zeitung. Jan 23/24, 1993.Google Scholar
  244. 244.
    Burleigh M. Death and deliverance: ‘euthanasia’ in Germany c. 1900–1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1994.Google Scholar
  245. 245.
    Klee E. “Euthanasie” im NS-Staat – Die “Vernichtung lebensunwerten Lebens”. Frankfurt/M.: Fischer; 1983.Google Scholar
  246. 246.
    Schmuhl HW. Rassenhygiene, Nationalsozialismus, Euthanasie – Von der Verhütung zur Vernichtung ‘lebensunwerten Lebens’, 1890–1945. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht; 1987.Google Scholar
  247. 247.
    Faulstich H. Hungersterben in der Psychiatrie 1914–1949 – Mit einer Topographie der NS-Psychiatrie. Freiburg: Lambertus; 1998.Google Scholar
  248. 248.
    Rotzoll M, Hohendorf G, Fuchs P, et al., editors. Die nationalsozialistische “Euthanasie”-Aktion “T4” und ihre Opfer – Geschichte und ethische Konsequenzen für die Gegenwart. Paderborn, München: Schönigh; 2010.Google Scholar
  249. 249.
    Hohendorf G. Euthanasie im Nationalsozialismus – Historischer Kontext und Handlungsspielräume der Akteure. In: Sirl MB Sr., Pfister P, editors. Die Assoziationsanstalt Schönbrunn. Regensburg: Schnell & Steiner; 2011. pp. 53–82.Google Scholar
  250. 250.
    Strous R. Hitler’s psychiatrists: healers and researchers turned executioners and its relevance today. Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2006;14:30–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  251. 251.
    Hohendorf G. “Death as a release from suffering” – the history and ethics of assisted dying in Germany since the end of the 19th century. Neurol Psychiatry Brain Res. 2016;22:56–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  252. 252.
    Schmidt G. Selektion in der Heilanstalt 1939–1945. Stuttgart: Evangelisches Verlagswerk; 1965.Google Scholar
  253. 253.
    Richarz B. Heilen, Pflegen, Töten: Zur Alltagsgeschichte einer Heil- und Pflegeanstalt bis zum Ende des Nationalsozialismus. Göttingen: Verl. für Med. Psychologie im Verl. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht; 1987. pp. 177–88.Google Scholar
  254. 254.
    Kipfelsperger T. Medizinhistorische Erkenntnisse aus den Krankenakten von Schönbrunn. In: Sirl MB Sr., Pfister P, editors. Die Assoziationsanstalt Schönbrunn. Regensburg: Schnell & Steiner; 2011. pp. 119–40.Google Scholar
  255. 255.
    Mitscherlich A, Mitscherlich M. Die Unfähigkeit zu trauern – Grundlagen kollektiven Verhaltens. München: Piper; 1967.Google Scholar
  256. 256.
    Weindling P. Nazi medicine and the Nuremberg trials. From medical war crimes to informed consent. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  257. 257.
    Bonah C, Schmaltz F. From witness to indictee: Eugen Haagen and his court hearings from the Nuremberg medical trial (1946–47) to the Struthof medical trials (1952–54). In: Weindling P, editor. From clinic to concentration camp: reassessing Nazi medical and racial research, 1933–1945. Abingdon: Routledge; 2017. pp. 293–313.Google Scholar
  258. 258.
    Bonah C, Schmaltz F. The Struthof medical trials 1952–1954. Prosecution and judgement of Nazi physicians Otto Bickenbach and Eugen Haagen at military tribunals in France. 2018. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  259. 259.
    Bonah C, Schmaltz F. From Nuremberg to Helsinki: The preparation of the Declaration of Helsinki in the light of the prosecution of medical war crimes at the Struthof Medical Trials, France 1952–1954. In: Schmidt U, Frewer A, editors. Human research ethics and the Helsinki Declaration. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2019. pp. 293–315.Google Scholar
  260. 260.
    Toledano R. Les Expériences médicales du Professeur Eugen Haagen de la Reichsuniversität Strassburg: Faits, contexte et procès d’un médecin national-socialiste. Strasbourg: MD Thesis University of Strasbourg; 2010.Google Scholar
  261. 261.
    Mitscherlich A, Mielke F. Das Diktat der Menschenverachtung. Eine Dokumentation. Heidelberg: Verlag Lambert Schneider; 1947.Google Scholar
  262. 262.
    Meeting held in FIAT Conference Room at Hoechst on 15 May 1946 to consider evidence bearing on the commission of war crimes by German scientists, TNA London, FO 1031/74. The National Archive (TNA), London.Google Scholar
  263. 263.
    Minutes of Meeting to Discuss War Crimes of Medical Nature executed in Germany under the Nazi regime on 31 July 1946 in the Pasteur Institute, Paris, The National Archives London, WO 390/471. In: Dörner K, Ebbinghaus A, Linne K, Roth KH, Weindling P, editors. Der Nürnberger Ärzteprozeß 1946/47. Wortprotokolle, Anklage- und Verteidigungsmaterial, Quellen zum Umfeld. München: Saur; 2000, doc. 40, fiche 8/00505-00507; Commission scientifique internationale pour l’investigation des crimes de guerre de nature médicale, 16 and 17 October 1946, Archives de Institut Pasteur, Fonds Lépine. In: Ibid, doc. 41, fiche 8/00509-00520.Google Scholar
  264. 264.
    Lepicard E. The Nuremberg Medical Trial and its reception in France and Israel, 1947–1952: a comparative perspective. In: Roelcke V, Topp S, Lepicard E, editors. Silence, scapegoats, self-reflection. The shadow of Nazi medical crimes on medicine and Bioethics. Göttingen: V&R unipress; 2014. pp. 47–85.Google Scholar
  265. 265.
    Noyer F. Le docteur Paul Cibrie (1881–1965) et l’Association Medicale Mondiale. Strasbourg: MD Thesis University of Strasbourg; 2016.Google Scholar
  266. 266.
    Archives of the World Medical Assiociation, Geneva (WMA Archives), 1947_1_GA_1, WMA Agenda of the First Annual Meeting of the General Assembly, September 17, 1947, Motions 27–29.Google Scholar
  267. 267.
    WMA Minutes of the First Annual Meeting of the General Assembly, September 17–20, 1947, Resolution 98 War Crimes and Resolution 102 War Crimes.Google Scholar
  268. 268.
    WMA Archives, 1948_150_CS_2, WMA War Crimes and Medicine. The German Betrayal and a Re-Statement of the Ethics of Medicine (Draft Memorandum), C4, 9 pages.Google Scholar
  269. 269.
    WMA Archives, 1948_151_CS_3, Letter to the members of Council, 1948 “War crimes and Medicine”. WMA Archives, 1948_151_CS_3, WMA Committees.Google Scholar
  270. 270.
    WMA Archives, 1949_7_GA_3, WMA Preliminary report submitted. Medical Ethics, G.A.3/49 C, 4 pages.Google Scholar
  271. 271.
    Archives WMA, 1951_12_GA_5, A propos d’un code de droit international médical. Dr. P. Cibrie, 16 April 1951, 8.12.51, 5 pages.Google Scholar
  272. 272.
    Voncken J. La médicine devant la guerre. Ce que devrait être un Code de Droit International Médical. Presse médicale. 1950;58:1422–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  273. 273.
    Archives WMA, 1952_17_GA_6, Procès Verbal de la Cinquième Assemblée Générale, Stockholm, September 16–20, 1951, p. 12.Google Scholar
  274. 274.
    Anonymous. Conclusions de l’Académie à propos de l’expérimentation sur l’homme. Bull Acad Natl Med 1952 ; 136 (33–34): 562–63.Google Scholar
  275. 275.
    Tribunal Militaire Permanent Metz: Notes d’audiences du 16.12.–23.12.1952, Dépot Central d’archives de la justice militaire (DCAJM), Le Blanc, Tribunal Permanent des Forces Armées Lyon, TPFA Lyon, Jugement 202/2, Info 457.Google Scholar
  276. 276.
    WMA Archives, 1954_30_GA_8, Supplementary Report of the Medical Ethics Committee. Human Experimentation by Dr. P. Cibrie, June 17, 1954, 2 pages.Google Scholar
  277. 277.
    Shimkin MB. The problem of experimentation on human beings. Res Work Point View Sci. 1953;117(3035):205–7.Google Scholar
  278. 278.
    Archives WMA, 1960_58_GA_14, Report of the Medical Ethics Committee at the XIVth General Assembly West Berlin, Germany, September 15–22, 1960 by Dr. Hugh Clegg, 17.2/60.Google Scholar
  279. 279.
    Satkiewicz P. Nie poczuwam się do żadnej winy. Zeznania esesmanów z załogi KL Auschwitz w procesie przed Najwyższym Trybunałem Narodowym w Krakowie (24 listopad – 16 grudnia 1947). Oświęcim: PMAB; 2016.Google Scholar
  280. 280.
    Cyprian T, Sawicki J, editors. Siedem procesów przed Najwyższym Trybunałem Narodowym. Poznań: Instytut Zachodni; 1962.Google Scholar
  281. 281.
    Lorska D. Wspomnienia z Bloku 10. Dr Hans Muench. Przegl Lek Oświęcim. 1966;6(1):105–7.Google Scholar
  282. 282.
    Lifton RJ. The Nazi doctors. Medical killing and the psychology of genocide. New York: Basic Books; 1986.Google Scholar
  283. 283.
    Sterkowicz S. Zbrodnie hitlerowskiej medycyny. Warszawa: Bellona; 1990.Google Scholar
  284. 284.
    Sterkowicz S. Lekarze – mordercy spod znaku swastyki. Toruń: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek; 1999.Google Scholar
  285. 285.
    Sterkowicz S. Nieludzka medycyna – lekarze w służbie nazizmu. Warszawa: Medyk; 2007.Google Scholar
  286. 286.
    Lang HJ. Die Frauen von Block 10. Medizinische Versuche in Auschwitz. Hamburg: Hoffmann & Campe; 2011.Google Scholar
  287. 287.
    Weindling P. Victims and survivors of Nazi human experiments: science and suffering in the Holocaust. London: Bloomsbury; 2014.Google Scholar
  288. 288.
    Posner GL. Ware J. Mengele. Polowanie na anioła śmierci. Kraków: Universitas; 2000. orig. title: Mengele. The complete story.Google Scholar
  289. 289.
    Klee E. Auschwitz. Medycyna III Rzeszy i jej ofiary. Kraków: Universitas; 2001.Google Scholar
  290. 290.
    Muench H. Głód I czas przeżycia w obozie oświęcimskim. Med Rev Auschwitz. 1967;7(1):71–88.Google Scholar
  291. 291.
    Auschwitz w oczach SS. Rudolf Hoess, Pery Broad, Johann Paul Kremer. Oświęcim: PMAB 2012 [orig. title: Auschwitz in den Augen der SS. Rudolf Hoess, Pery Broad, Johann Paul Kremer].Google Scholar
  292. 292.
    Sehn J. Sprawa oświęcimskiego lekarza SS J.P. Kremera. Przegl Lek Oświęcim. 1962;2(1):49–61.Google Scholar
  293. 293.
    Wóycicka Z. Przerwana żałoba. Polskie spory wokół pamięci nazistowskich obozów koncentracyjnych i zagłady 1944–1950. Warszawa: Trio; 2009.Google Scholar
  294. 294.
    Mikulski J. Medycyna hitlerowska w służbie III Rzeszy. Warszawa: PWN; 1981.Google Scholar
  295. 295.
    Fedorowicz T. Uwagi o rewirach i funkcyjnych obozowych. Przegl Lek Oświęcim. 1969;9(1):148–53.Google Scholar
  296. 296.
    Werner S, Zittle C, Schmaltz F, editors. Ludwik Fleck. Style myślowe i fakty. Artykuły i świadectwa. Warszawa: PAN 2007. Chapter 3, Fleck L. W sprawie doświadczeń na ludziach; p. 298–302 [first published: Polski Tygodnik Lekarski. 1948;3(35):1052–4]Google Scholar
  297. 297.
    Nasierowski T, Herczyńska G, Myszka DM, editors. Zagłada chorych psychicznie. Pamięć i historia. Warszawa: Eneteia; 2012. pp. 249–56. Part 4, chapter 2, Wnuk R. II wojna światowa w pamięci historycznej Polaków.Google Scholar
  298. 298.
    Jewish Medical Association of Palestine. Motion to the World Medical Association (1947). With an Introduction by Etienne Lepicard. Roelcke V, Topp S, Lepicard E, editors. Silence, scapegoats, self-reflection. The shadow of Nazi medical crimes on Medicine and bioethics. Göttingen: V&R unipress; 2014. p. 315–26.Google Scholar
  299. 299.
    Baruk H. Les problèmes nouveaux de l’éthique médicale: À propos du Deuxième Congrès Mondial des Médecins Juifs (Jérusalem, Août, 1952). Presse méd. 1952;60(72):1544–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  300. 300.
    Baruk H. Mémoires d’un neuropsychiatre. 2nd ed. Paris: Téqui; 2000.Google Scholar
  301. 301.
    Pichot P. Éloge de Henri Baruk (1897–1999). Bull Acad Natl Med. 2000;184(7):1353–8.Google Scholar
  302. 302.
    Dvorjetski M. Bein ha-betarim (Hb, lit. “among the pieces”). Jerusalem: Kiryat-sefer; 1956.Google Scholar
  303. 303.
    Krieger M. The Hebrew Medical Union at the meeting of the WMA in Paris. Mikhtav le-haver. 1947;172:1535–7.Google Scholar
  304. 304.
    Zalashik R. Nazi medical atrocities and the Israeli medical discourse from the 1940s to the 1990s. In: Roelcke V, Topp S, Lepicard E, editors. Silence, scapegoats, self-reflection. The shadow of Nazi medical crimes on medicine and bioethics. Göttingen: V&R unipress; 2014. pp. 195–210.Google Scholar
  305. 305.
    Lepicard E. Trauma, memory, and euthanasia at the NMT, 1946–1947. In: Sarat A, Davidovitch N, Alberstein M, editors. Trauma and memory. Reading, healing and making law. Stanford: Stanford University Press; 2009. pp. 204–24.Google Scholar
  306. 306.
    Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunal under Control Council Law No. 10. Vols. I-II. Washington, D.C.: Superintendent of Documents, US Government Printing Office; 1950.Google Scholar
  307. 307.
    Pasternak A. Inhuman research, medical experiments in German concentration camps. Budapest: Akademiai Kiado; 2006.Google Scholar
  308. 308.
    Dvorjetski M. Europa lelo yeladim (Hb, lit. “Europe without children”). Yad Vashem; 1959.Google Scholar
  309. 309.
    Baruk H. La défense de la vie et le caractère sacré de la médecine à propos de l’expérimentation médicale criminelle. La Presse médicale. 1948;56(45):551–2.Google Scholar
  310. 310.
    Baruk H. La question de ‘l’expérimentation chez l’homme’ en médicine: Essai thérapeutique licite et expérimentation illicite. La semaine des hôpitaux de Paris. 1954;30(31): 1962–6.Google Scholar
  311. 311.
    Deniker P. Eloge de Jean Delay (1907–1987). Bull Acad Natl Med. 1988;172(4):557–66.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  312. 312.
    Shorter E, Healy D. Shock therapy: a history of electroconvulsive treatment in mental illness. Piscataway: Rutgers University Press; 2007.Google Scholar
  313. 313.
    Goren Sh. [Hb, lit. “Is it permitted to volunteer for an experiment in which the effect of a new treatment is tested?,” Torah and Medicine, Halakhic Studies on Medical Topics]. Tel Aviv: Hidra rabah Press; 2011. p. 288.Google Scholar
  314. 314.
    Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of 4 November 1950, Council of Europe, ETS No. 5.Google Scholar
  315. 315.
    The Belmont Report, Washington D.C. 1978.Google Scholar
  316. 316.
    Beauchamp T, Childress J. Principles of biomedical ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009.Google Scholar
  317. 317.
    Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine: Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine, Oviedo, 4 April 1997, Council of Europe, CETS No 164.Google Scholar
  318. 318.
    Additional Protocol to the Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine concerning Biomedical Research, Strasbourg, 25 January 2005, CETS No 195.Google Scholar
  319. 319.
    Recommendation CM/Rec(2016)6 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on research on biological materials of human origin, adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 11 May 2016, Council of Europe, 2016.Google Scholar
  320. 320.
    Guide for research ethics committees members, Council of Europe, 2010.Google Scholar
  321. 321.
    Annas GJ, Grodin MA. Introduction. In: Annas GJ, Grodin MA, editors. The Nazi doctors and the Nuremberg Code. Human rights in human experimentation. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1992.Google Scholar
  322. 322.
    CIOMS. International ethical guidelines for health-related research involving humans. Geneva: Council for International Organization of Medical Sciences; 2016.Google Scholar
  323. 323.
    Roelcke V, Maio G, editors. Twentieth century ethics of human subjects research. Historical perspectives on values, practices, and regulations. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag; 2004. Part 3: BCG Vaccination, the Lübeck Scandal, and the ‘Reichsrichtlinien’.Google Scholar
  324. 324.
    Reichsministerium des Innern aufgrund von Vorschlägen des Reichsgesundheitsrates der geistlichen und der Unterrichtsangelegenheiten. Richtlinien für neuartige Heilbehandlung und für die Vornahme wissenschaftlicher Versuche am Menschen. Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift. 20 März 1931: 509. English translation: German Guidelines on Human Experimentation. In: Reich WT, editor. Encyclopedia of Bioethics. Revised edition. Vol 5: Appendix. New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan; 1995. pp. 2762–3.Google Scholar
  325. 325.
    Pappworth MH. Human guinea pigs: experimentation on man. London: Routledge & K. Paul; 1967.Google Scholar
  326. 326.
    Patrão Neves M. Respect for human vulnerability and personal integrity. In: ten Have HAMJ, Jean MS, editors. The UNESCO universal declaration on bioethics and human rights. Background, principles and application. Paris: UNESCO Publishing; 2009.Google Scholar
  327. 327.
    De Campos TC. The global health crisis. Ethical responsibilities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  328. 328.
    Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. General comment No. 14: The right to the highest attainable standard of health. New York: United Nations, Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. 2000. http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=E%2fC.12%2f2000%2f4&Lang=en . Accessed 1 July 2017. Google Scholar
  329. 329.
    National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. The Belmont report. Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. 1979. https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/belmont-report/index.html#xinform . Accessed 1 July 2017. Google Scholar
  330. 330.
    International Bioethics Committee of UNESCO. The principle of respect for human vulnerability and personal integrity. Paris: UNESCO; 2013.Google Scholar
  331. 331.
    International Bioethics Committee of UNESCO. Report of the IBC on the principle of the sharing of benefits. 2015. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0023/002332/233230E.pdf . Accessed 2 July 2017. Google Scholar
  332. 332.
    Kant I. Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten. In: Königlich Preußische Akademie der Wissenschaften, editor. Kant’s gesammelte Schriften. Vol. IV. Berlin: Verlag von Georg Reimer; 1911.Google Scholar
  333. 333.
    Schöne-Seifert. Grundlagen der Medizinethik. Stuttgart: Kröner; 2007.Google Scholar
  334. 334.
    Brandt AM. Racism and research: the case of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study. Hastings Center Report. 1978. pp. 21–9.Google Scholar
  335. 335.
  336. 336.
  337. 337.
    http://www.ich.org/home.html [accessed 16 April 2018]
  338. 338.
    Druml C, Svolba G, Singer EA, Bonkovsky FO, Bauer P. Twenty years of the ethics committee at the medical faculty of the University of Vienna. An interim report. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 1999;111(24):1019–26.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  339. 339.
    http://www.ethikkommissionen.at [accessed 16 April 2018]
  340. 340.
    https://ierm.univie.ac.at/ . Accessed 30 May 2018.
  341. 341.
    http://www.nek-cne.ch/de/startseite [accessed 16 April 2018]
  342. 342.
    http://www.ethikrat.org [accessed 16 April 2018]
  343. 343.
  344. 344.
  345. 345.
  346. 346.
    Druml C. Bioethics internationally and in Austria. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2016;128(7–8):229–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  347. 347.
    Druml C. The UNESCO International Bioethics Committee and the network of ethical advisory bodies in Europe: an interactive relationship. In: Global bioethics: the Impact of the UNESCO International Bioethics Committee. Cham: Springer; 2016. pp. 137–44.Google Scholar
  348. 348.
    https://www.wma.net [accessed 16 April 2018]
  349. 349.
    Druml C, Singer E. Consent in emergency care research. Lancet. 2011;378(9785):26–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  350. 350.
    Horton R. Vioxx, the implosion of Merck, and aftershocks at the FDA. Lancet. 2004;364(9450):1995–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  351. 351.
    Krumholz HM, et al. What have we learnt from Vioxx. BMJ. 2007;334(7585):120.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  352. 352.
    De Angelis C, Drazen JM, Frizelle FA, et al. Clinical trial registration: a statement from the international committee of medical journal editors. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1250–1.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  353. 353.
  354. 354.
    Grodin MA, Annas GJ. Legacies of Nuremberg. JAMA. 1996;276(20):1682–3.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1996.03540200068035 . PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  355. 355.
    International Military Tribunal. Trials of war criminals before the Nuremberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10. Washington, D.C. 1950. https://www.loc.gov/rr/frd/Military_Law/NTs_war-criminals.html . Accessed 17 Sept 2018. Google Scholar
  356. 356.
    The World Medical Association. WMA Declaration of Helsinki – Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects [ https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects , accessed 16 April 2018]
  357. 357.
    Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences. International ethical guidelines for biomedical research involving human. 2016. https://cioms.ch/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/WEB-CIOMS-EthicalGuidelines.pdf . Accessed 29 Sept 2017. Google Scholar
  358. 358.
    United Nations. International covenant on civil and political rights. United Nations Treaty Ser, 999:171. 1966. https://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=IND&mtdsg_no=IV-4&chapter=4&clang=_en . Accessed 19 Sept 2017. Google Scholar
  359. 359.
    OAU. African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights. CAB/LEG/67/3 rev. 5, 21 I.L.M. 58 (1982) 1981; p. 18.Google Scholar
  360. 360.
    Ndebele P, Mwaluko G, Kruger M, et al. History of research ethics review in Africa. In: Kruger M, Ndebele P, Horn L, editors. Research ethics in Africa. Stellenbosch: SUN PRESS; 2014. pp. 3–10.Google Scholar
  361. 361.
    Resnik DB. The ethics of HIV research in developing nations. Bioethics. 1998;12(4):286–306.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  362. 362.
    Kirigia JM, Wambebe C, Baba-Moussa A. Status of national research bioethics committees in the WHO African region. Bmc Med Ethics. 2005;6(10).  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7292%2802%2900349-1 .
  363. 363.
    Milford C, Wassenaar D, Slack C. Resources and needs of research ethics commmittees in Africa: preparations for HIV Vaccine trials. Ethics Hum Res. 2006;28(2):1–9.Google Scholar
  364. 364.
    Nyika A, Kilama W, Chilengi R, et al. Composition, training needs and independence of ethics review committees across Africa: are the gate-keepers rising to the emerging challenges? J Med Ethics. 2009;35(3):189 LP-193. http://jme.bmj.com/content/35/3/189.abstract . CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  365. 365.
    Nyika A, Kilama W, Tangwa GB, et al. Capacity building of ethics review committees across Africa based on the results of a comprehensive needs assessment survey. Dev World Bioeth. 2009;9(3):149–56.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  366. 366.
    WHO AFRO. Status of reviews, authorizations and oversight for clinical trials in WHO African region, Report No.: AFR/RC67/14. 2017. http://www.afro.who.int/about-us/governance/sessions/sixty-seventh-session-who-regional-committee-africa . Accessed 16 Apr 2018. Google Scholar
  367. 367.
    EDCTP. EDCTP1 Portfolio. 2017. http://www.edctp.org/projects-2/edctp-portfolio . Accessed 16 Apr 2018. Google Scholar
  368. 368.
    Kruger M, Ndebele P, Horn L, editors. Research ethics in Africa: a resource for research ethics committees. Stellenbosch: SUN PRESS; 2014.Google Scholar
  369. 369.
    Mokgatla B, Ijsselmuiden C, Wassenaar D, et al. Mapping research ethics committees in Africa: evidence of the growth of ethics review of health research in Africa. Dev World Bioeth. 2017:1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1111/dewb.12146 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  370. 370.
    Sprumont D, Adebamowo C, Ateudjieu J, et al. Training and resources in research ethics evaluation. 2009. https://elearning.trree.org . Accessed 23 Sept 2017. Google Scholar
  371. 371.
    Chilengi R, Nyika A, Tangwa GB, et al. Role of e-learning in teaching health research ethics and good clinical practice in Africa and beyond. Bioeth Educ. 2013;22(1):110–9.Google Scholar
  372. 372.
    Pan African Clinical Trials Registry. [ http://www.pactr.org , accessed 9 Sept 2017]
  373. 373.
    Ijsselmuiden C, Marais D, Wassenaar D, et al. Mapping African ethical review committee activity onto capacity need: the MARC initiative and HRWeb’s interactive database of RECs in Africa. Dev World Bioeth. 2012;12(2):74–86. http://bmcmedethics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1472-6939-9-6 . PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  374. 374.
    COHRED. RHInnOLabs. [ http://www.rhinnolabs.com , accessed 23 Sept 2018]
  375. 375.
    Mokgatla B, Bahati P, Jsselmuiden CI. Enhancing the efficiency and quality of African research ethics review processes – through an automated review platform. J AIDS Clin Res. 2017;8(2):8–10. https://www.omicsonline.org/open-access/enhancing-the-efficiency-and-quality-of-african-research-ethics-reviewprocesses--through-an-automated-review-platform-2155-6113-1000658.php?aid=85231 , accessed 16 April 2018. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  376. 376.
    Waddell R, Bukini D, Aboud M, et al. Enhanced REC collaborative review through video-conferencing. S Afr J Bioethics Law. 2016;9(2):84–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  377. 377.
    EDCTP. Annual report 2016. 2017. http://www.edctp.org/publication/edctp-annual-report-2016 . Accessed 16 Apr 2018. Google Scholar
  378. 378.
    TRUST. Project deliverables and tools. 2018. http://trust-project.eu/ . Accessed 20 May 2018.
  379. 379.
    COHRED. http://frcweb.cohred.org . Accessed 20 May 2018
  380. 380.
    Miiro GM, Oukem-Boyer OOM, Sarr O, Rahmani M, et al. EDCTP regional networks of excellence: initial merits for planned clinical trials in Africa. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:258. http://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2458-12-531 . PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  381. 381.
    South African San Institute. San code of ethics [Internet]. Kimberley; 2017. http://trust-project.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/San-Code-of-RESEARCH-Ethics-Booklet-final.pdf . Accessed 20 May 2018
  382. 382.
    Behrens KG. Towards an indigenous African bioethics. South Afr J Bioeth Law. 2013;6(1):32–5.Google Scholar
  383. 383.
    Andoh CT. Bioethics and the challenges to its growth in Africa. Open J Philos. 2011;1(2):67–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  384. 384.
    Macklin R. The universality of the Nuremberg Code. In: Annas G, Grodin M, editors. The Nazi doctors and the Nuremberg Code: human rights in human experimentation. New York: Oxford of University Press; 2005. pp. 240–57.Google Scholar
  385. 385.
    Jonsen A, Siegler M, Winslade W. Clinical ethics: a practical approach to ethical decisions. In: Clinical medicine. 8th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2015.Google Scholar
  386. 386.
    Zhai X, Qiu R. Public health ethics. Beijing: Chinese Press of Social Science; 2006.Google Scholar
  387. 387.
    Qiu R. The minutes on the first national symposium on ethical and legal issues in limiting and controlling procreation. Chin Health Law. 1993;5:44–6.Google Scholar
  388. 388.
    Qiu R. Does eugenic law exist in China? In: Qiu R, editor. Bioethics: Asian perspectives – a quest for moral diversity. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2004. pp. 185–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  389. 389.
    He Z, editor. An introduction to medical ethics. Nanjing: Jiangsu Science and Technology Press; 1984. pp. 142–3.Google Scholar
  390. 390.
    He L, et al., editor. Modern medical ethics. Hangzhou: Zhejiang Education Press; 1989. pp. 139–46.Google Scholar
  391. 391.
    Wu X, et al., editor. Modern ethics of clinical medicine. Tianjin: Tianjin Peoples’ Press; 1990. pp. 354–7.Google Scholar
  392. 392.
    Wu X, et al., editor. Medical morality: theory and practice. Tianjin: Tianjin Peoples’ Press; 1990. pp. 733–41.Google Scholar
  393. 393.
    Chen M, et al., editor. Health law. Shanghai: Shanghai Medical University Press; 1999. pp. 200–5.Google Scholar
  394. 394.
    Wu S. Medical ethics. Guangzhou: Guangdong High Education Press; 2013. pp. 190–1.Google Scholar
  395. 395.
    Zhang Y. Medical ethics. Vol. 2. Beijing: Military Medical Science Press; 2013.Google Scholar
  396. 396.
    Guo N, Liu Y. A course on medical ethics cases. Vol. 126. Beijing: People’s Military Medicine Press; 2013.Google Scholar
  397. 397.
    Liu Y, et al. The theory and practice of medical ethics. Shijiazhuang: Hebei People’s Press; 2014. p. 114.Google Scholar
  398. 398.
    Wang C, Zhang J. Medical Ethics. Beijing: People’s Health Press; 2015. pp. 154–6, 174–7.Google Scholar
  399. 399.
    Qiu R, Zhang D. The humanist enlightenment of Nuremberg Code to reproductive ethics. Health Newspaper. 2016.Google Scholar
  400. 400.
    Qiu R, Liang L. The claim of euthanasia being obligatory violates the principle of medical ethics. Health Newspaper. 2016.Google Scholar
  401. 401.
    Myser D, et al. Bioethics is the love for life. Chin Med Ethics. 2008;21(1):6–9.Google Scholar
  402. 402.
    Wang C. Is bioethics the love for life. Chin Med Ethics. 2008;21(5):9.Google Scholar
  403. 403.
    Hu L. Examine common morality – on “bioethics being the love for life”. Chin Med Ethics. 2008;21(5):10–1.Google Scholar
  404. 404.
    Zhu W. Remarks on “bioethics being the love for life. Chin Med Ethics. 2008;21(5):12–3.Google Scholar
  405. 405.
    Zhang X. Some opinion on Myser’s thesis. Chin Med Ethics. 2008;21(5):13–4.Google Scholar
  406. 406.
    Mao X. It is questionable to claim bioethics is the love for life. Chin Med Ethics. 2008;21(5):14–5.Google Scholar
  407. 407.
    Liu M, Yu N. Bioethics cannot be reduced to the love for life. Chin Med Ethics. 2008;21(5):15.Google Scholar
  408. 408.
    Munson R. Intervention and reflection of basic issues in medical ethics. 8th ed. Belmont: Thomson Higher Education; 2008. pp. 755–6. Cited from Ross WD. The Right and the Good, Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1930.Google Scholar
  409. 409.
    Qiu R. Promoting responsible research and enabling scientific research to serve people, address at the Avicenna scientific ethics prize-awarding ceremony at the headquarters of UNESCO. Chin Med Ethics. 2010;23(2):3–6.Google Scholar
  410. 410.
    Qiu R. The path of bioethics in China for 30 years. Chin Med Ethics. 2013;25(1):3–6.Google Scholar
  411. 411.
    Qiu R. Bioethics in China. In: Jennings B, editor. Encyclopedia of bioethics. Farmington Hills, Michigan: Cengage Learning; 2014. pp. 548–67.Google Scholar
  412. 412.
    Qiu R. Understanding bioethics. Chin Med Ethics. 2015;28(3):297–302.Google Scholar
  413. 413.
    Hochhuth R. Die Berliner Antigone. Erzählungen und Gedichte. Originally published in 1963. Stuttgart: Reclam Universal-Bibliothek; 2011.Google Scholar
  414. 414.
    Nelson A. Red Orchestra. New York: Random House; 2009.Google Scholar
  415. 415.
    Oleschinski B. Der “Anatom der Gynäkologen”: Hermann Stieve und seine Erkenntnisse über die Todesangst und weiblichen Zyklus. In: Kahrs H, Meyer A, Esch MG, editors. Modelle für ein deutsches Europa – Ökonomie und Herrschaft im Grosswirtschaftsraum. Berlin: Rotbuch; 1992. pp. 211–8.Google Scholar
  416. 416.
    Gollwitzer H, Kuhn K, Reinhold S, editors. Du hast mich heimgesucht in der Nacht. Abschiedsbriefe und Aufzeichnungen des Widerstandes 1933–1945. 8th ed. Gütersloh: Gütersloher Verlagshaus; 1994. 1. Auflage 1951.Google Scholar
  417. 417.
    Orth B. Gestapo im OP: Bericht der Krankenhausärztin Charlotte Pommer. Berlin: Lukas; 2013.Google Scholar
  418. 418.
    Winkelmann A, Schagen U. Hermann Stieve’s clinical-anatomical research on executed women during the “Third Reich”. Clin Anat. 2009;22(2):163–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  419. 419.
    Hildebrandt S. The women on Stieve’s list: victims of National Socialism whose bodies were used for anatomical research. Clin Anat. 2013;26:3–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  420. 420.
    Hildebrandt S, Bargmann W, von Hayek H. Careers in anatomy continuing through German National Socialism to postwar leadership. Ann Anat. 2013;195:283–95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  421. 421.
    Hayek H. Die Läppchen und Septa interlobaria der menschlichen Lunge. Z Anat Entwicklungsgesch. 1940;110(3):405–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  422. 422.
    Hayek H. Die menschliche Lunge. Berlin: Springer; 1953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  423. 423.
    Hildebrandt S. The anatomy of murder: ethical transgressions and anatomical science during the Third Reich. New York: Berghahn Books; 2016.Google Scholar
  424. 424.
    Mühlberger K. Enthebungen an der medizinischen Fakultät 1938–1945. Professoren und Dozenten. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 1998;110(4–5):115–20.Google Scholar
  425. 425.
    Jones DW. The history of Eduard Pernkopf’s Topographische Anatomie des Menschen. J Biocommun. 1988;15(2):2–12.Google Scholar
  426. 426.
    Israel HA, Seidelman W. Nazi origins of an anatomy text: the Pernkopf Atlas. J Am Med Assoc. 1996;276(20):1633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  427. 427.
    Malina P, Spann G. Das Senatsprojekt der Universität Wien “Untersuchungen zur Anatomischen Wissenschaft in Wien 1938–1945”. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 1999;111(18):743–53.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  428. 428.
    Hildebrandt S. Current status of identification of victims of the National Socialist regime whose bodies were used for anatomical purposes. Clin Anat. 2013;27:514–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  429. 429.
    Hildebrandt S. Capital punishment and anatomy: history and ethics of an ongoing association. Clin Anat. 2008;21:5–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  430. 430.
    Schönhagen B. Das Gräberfeld X auf dem Tübinger Stadtfriedhof. Die verdrängte “Normalität” nationalsozialistischer Vernichtungspolitik. In: Peiffer J, editor. Menschenverachtung und Opportunismus. Tübingen: Attempto-Verlag. Zur Medizin im Dritten Reich; 1992. pp. 69–92.Google Scholar
  431. 431.
    Noack T, Heyll U. Der Streit der Fakultäten. Die medizinische Verwertung der Leichen Hingerichteter im Nationalsozialismus. In: Vögele J, Fangerau H, Noack T, editors. Geschichte der Medizin – Geschichte in der Medizin. Hamburg: Literatur Verlag; 2006. pp. 133–42.Google Scholar
  432. 432.
    Lang HJ. August Hirt and “extraordinary opportunities for cadaver delivery” to anatomical institutes in National Socialism: a murderous change in paradigm. Ann Anat. 2013;195:373–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  433. 433.
    Hildebrandt S. Anatomie im Nationalsozialismus: Stufen einer ethischen Entgrenzung. Medizinhist J. 2013;48(2):153–85.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  434. 434.
    Lang HJ. Die Namen der Nummern: Wie es gelang, die 86 Opfer eines NS-Verbrechens zu identifizieren. Frankfurt am Main: S. Fischer; 2007.Google Scholar
  435. 435.
  436. 436.
    Weikart R. Darwinism and death: devaluing human life in Germany 1859–1920. J Hist Ideas. 2002;63(2):323–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  437. 437.
    Nietzsche F. Beyond good and evil, transl. Kaufmann W. New York: Vintage Books; 1966.Google Scholar
  438. 438.
    Kofman S. Metaphoric architectures. In: Rickels L, editor. Looking after Nietzsche. Albany: State University of New York Press; 1990. pp. 89–112.Google Scholar
  439. 439.
    Nietzsche F. Thus spake Zarathustra. Common T, translator. New York: Modern Library; n.d. [ https://archive.org/stream/thusspokezarathu00nietuoft#page/74/mode/2up ] (accessed 9 June 2017).
  440. 440.
    Battin MP. Assisted suicide: can we learn from Germany? Hastings Cent Rep. 1992;22(2):44–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  441. 441.
    Eaglestone R. The Holocaust and the postmodern. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  442. 442.
    Rothberg M. Traumatic realism: the demands of Holocaust representation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press; 2000.Google Scholar
  443. 443.
    Galles AA. Artist’s statement [for Fourteen Stations]; n.d. [ http://www.ariegalles.com/pdf/Fourteen-Stations-Artist-Statement-Extended.pdf , accessed 18 Dec 2016]
  444. 444.
    Alpert N, Erony S, Galles AA, Kaminiarz V, Komar V, Liberman R, Menz M, Urbonas J, Weinstein A. Mastering death: artistic perspectives: artists and curator’s statements. Vienna: Josephinum; 2017.Google Scholar
  445. 445.
    Felman S. The return of the voice: Claude Lanzmann’s Shoah. Chapter 7. In: Felman S, Laub D, editors. Testimony: crises of witnessing in literature, psychoanalysis, and history. New York: Routledge; 1992. pp. 204–83.Google Scholar
  446. 446.
    Weinstein A. After Adorno: the essayistic impulse in Holocaust-related art [Ph.D. thesis]. New York: Institute of Fine Arts, New York University; 2006.Google Scholar
  447. 447.
    Weinstein A. Art after Auschwitz and the necessity of a postmodern modernism. In: Rosenberg A, Watson JR, Linke D, editors. Contemporary portrayals of Auschwitz and genocide: philosophical challenges. Amherst: Humanity Books; 2000. pp. 151–67.Google Scholar
  448. 448.
    Weinstein A. The healing power of the artist? In: Weinstein A, editor. Vitaly Komar: three-day weekend. New York: The Cooper Union for the Advancement of Science and Art, Humanities Gallery; 2005. pp. 20–5.Google Scholar
  449. 449.
    Weinstein A. Irony and mystery: Vitaly Komar’s three-day weekend. Boulevard. 2006;21(2,3):116–22.Google Scholar
  450. 450.
    Halberstadt A. I was reborn. Vilnius diary. New York: Box Turtle Press; 2014. pp. 55–7.Google Scholar
  451. 451.
    Spiegelman A. Maus I: my father bleeds history. New York: Pantheon; 1986.Google Scholar
  452. 452.
    Aviv R. The death treatment: when should people with a non-terminal illness be helped to die? New Yorker. 2015 June 22; 56–65. http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2015/06/22/the-death-treatment . Accessed 3 Jan 2017. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ethics, Collections and History of MedicineMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
  2. 2.Ethics, Collections and History of Medicine of the Medical University of ViennaUNESCO Chair on Bioethics of the Medical University of ViennaViennaAustria
  3. 3.School of History, Philosophy and CultureOxford Brookes UniversityOxfordUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations