Summary
Elderly and women have been often under-represented in randomised clinical trials testing the effect of treatments on cardiovascular diseases even though these diseases highly affect both of them.
Compared to their younger counterparts elderly have a higher incidence of disease-related morbidities, take more medicines and account for more adverse drug-related events. Similarly women present several differences in pathophysiology, clinical manifestations and outcomes in comparison to their male counterparts. For these reasons the results of randomised clinical trials obtained in younger men cannot be simply translated in elderly and women and the conduction of research and clinical trials in these patient populations is a key aspect to acquire evidence-based knowledge in the understanding and management of their conditions and treatment.
Although the under-representation of elderly and women has been discussed for several years and several international guidelines or recommendation have been published to suggest how to improve the recruitment of these two populations, their recruitment is still insufficient. In particular, frail elderly and those with co-morbidities are not included questioning the external validity and the safety of most treatments.
Aim of this review is to critically analyse how current recommendations for treatments of cardiovascular disease are not adequately devised for elderly and women.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services: Chronic conditions among Medicare Beneficiaries. 2011 [cited 2012 May 4]. Available from https://www.cms.gov/TheChartSeries/Downloads/ ChartbookFinal.pdf.
References
Neugarten B. Middle age and aging. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press; 1968.
Appelman Y, van Rijn BB, Ten Haaf ME, Boersma E, Peters SA. Sex differences in cardiovascular risk factors and disease prevention. Atherosclerosis. 2015;241(1):211–8.
Vitale C, Mendelsohn ME, Rosano GM. Gender differences in the cardiovascular effect of sex hormones. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2009;6(8):532–42.
Healy B. The Yentl syndrome. N Engl J Med. 1991;325(4):274–6.
Rosano GM, Lewis B, Agewall S, Wassmann S, Vitale C, Schmidt H, et al. Gender differences in the effect of cardiovascular drugs: a position document of the Working Group on Pharmacology and Drug Therapy of the ESC. Eur Heart J. 2015;36(40):2677–80.
Knickman JR, Snel EK. The 2030 problem: caring for aging baby boomers. Health Serv Res. 2002;37(4):849–84.
Mangoni AA. Cardiovascular drug therapy in elderly patients: specific age-related pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and therapeutic considerations. Drugs Aging. 2005;22(11):913–41.
Guyatt GH, Haynes RB, Jaeschke RZ, Cook DJ, Green L, Naylor CD, et al. Users’ Guides to the Medical Literature: XXV. Evidence-based medicine: principles for applying the Users’ Guides to patient care. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA. 2000;284(10):1290–6.
Britton A, McKee M, Black N, McPherson K, Sanderson C, Bain C. Threats to applicability of randomised trials: exclusions and selective participation. J Health Serv Res Policy. 1999;4(2):112–21.
Furberg C. To whom do the research findings apply? Heart. 2002;87(6):570–4.
Tonkin AM. Evaluation of large scale clinical trials and their application to usual practice. Heart. 2000;84(6):679–84.
Bartlett C, Doyal L, Ebrahim S, Davey P, Bachmann M, Egger M, Dieppe P. The causes and effects of socio-demographic exclusions from clinical trials. Health Technol Assess. 2005;9(38):iii.
Doyal L. Sex, gender, and health: the need for a new approach. BMJ. 2001;323(7320):1061–3.
Franconi F, Rosano G, Campesi I. Need for gender-specific pre-analytical testing: the dark side of the moon in laboratory testing. Int J Cardiol. 2015;179:514–35.
Li G, Cheng G, Wu J, Zhou X, Liu P, Sun C. Drug-induced long QT syndrome in women. Adv Ther. 2013;30(9):793–802.
Sedlak T, Shufelt C, Iribarren C, Merz CN. Sex hormones and the QT interval: a review. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2012;21(9):933–41.
Maas AH, van der Schouw YT, Regitz-Zagrosek V, Swahn E, Appelman YE, Pasterkamp G, et al. Red alert for women’s heart: the urgent need for more research and knowledge on cardiovascular disease in women: proceedings of the workshop held in Brussels on gender differences in cardiovascular disease, 29 September 2010. Eur Heart J. 2011;32(11):1362–8.
Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study Group. Randomised trial of cholesterol lowering in 4444 patients with coronary heart disease: the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S). Lancet. 1994;344(8934):1383–9.
Azad N, Kathiravelu A, Minoosepeher S, Hebert P, Fergusson D. Gender differences in the etiology of heart failure: A systematic review. J Geriatr Cardiol. 2011;8(1):15–23.
Hsich EM, Pina IL. Heart failure in women: a need for prospective data. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54(6):491–8.
Cherubini A, Del Signore S, Ouslander J, Semla T, Michel J. Fighting against age discrimination in clinical trials. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010;58(9):1791–6.
Heiat A, Gross CP, Krumholz HM. Representation of the elderly, women, and minorities in heart failure clinical trials. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162(15):1682–8.
Serra V, Watson J, Sinclair D, Kneale D. Living beyond 100: a report on centenarians. London: International Longevity Centre; 2011.
Butler RN. Age-ism: another form of bigotry. Gerontologist. 1969;9(4):243–6.
Bugental DB, Hehman JA. Ageism: a review of research and policy implications. Soc Issues Policy Rev. 2007;1(1):173–216.
Fried LP, Ferrucci L, Darer J, Williamson JD, Anderson G. Untangling the concepts of disability, frailty, and comorbidity: implications for improbe targeting and care. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2004;59(3):255–63.
Möller-Leimkühler AM. Gender differences in cardiovascular disease and comorbid depression. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2007;9(1):71–83.
Bressler R, Bahl JJ. Principles of drug therapy for the elderly patient. Mayo Clin Proc. 2003;78(12):1564–77.
Turnheim K. When drug therapy gets old: pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in the elderly. Exp Gerontol. 2003;38(8):843–53.
Nair BR. Evidence based medicine for older people: available, accessible, acceptable, adaptable? Aust J Ageing. 2002;21:58–60.
Hayden M, Pignone M, Phillips C, Mulrow C. Aspirin for the primary prevention of cardiovascular events: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2002;2(136):161–7.
Rehman HU. Under-representation of the elderly in clinical trials. Eur J Intern Med. 2005;16(6):385–6.
Cerreta F, Eichler HG, Rasi G. Drug policy for an aging population – the European Medicines Agency’s geriatric medicines strategy. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(21):1972–4.
Piepoli MF, Hoes AW, Agewall S, Albus C, Brotons C, Catapano AL, et al. European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: The Sixth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (constituted by representatives of 10 societies and by invited experts): Developed with the special contribution of the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation (EACPR). Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2016. doi:10.1177/2047487316653709.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
C. Vitale, G. Rosano, and M. Fini declare that they have no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vitale, C., Rosano, G. & Fini, M. Are elderly and women under-represented in cardiovascular clinical trials? Implication for treatment. Wien Klin Wochenschr 128 (Suppl 7), 433–438 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-016-1082-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-016-1082-x