Skip to main content
Log in

How Can the Synergies Between the Pillars of the Knowledge Square be Optimised? A Knowledge Spiral Approach in the Context of EURECA-PRO

Wie können die Synergien zwischen den Säulen des Wissensquadrats optimiert werden? Ein Ansatz der Wissensspirale im Kontext von EURECA-PRO

  • Originalarbeit
  • Published:
BHM Berg- und Hüttenmännische Monatshefte Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This contribution uses Nonaka’s knowledge spiral concept to analyse the activation of the knowledge square as conceived and implemented in Work Package #4 (WP4) of the EURECA-PRO 2.0 European University Alliance, focusing on SDG12, Responsible Consumption and Production. It presents actions fostering research, innovation, transformative services to society, and training, and analyses the potential for synergy between these four pillars based on the four phases of Nonaka’s SECI model (Socialisation, Externalisation, Combination, Internalisation). It shows the need to move from the static concept of the knowledge square to the dynamic concept of the knowledge spiral and outlines recommendations for steering WP4.

Zusammenfassung

In diesem Beitrag wird das Konzept der Wissensspirale von Nonaka verwendet, um die Aktivierung des Knowledge Square zu analysieren, das im Rahmen des Arbeitspakets Nr. 4 (WP4) der Europäischen Hochschulallianz EURECA-PRO 2.0 mit Schwerpunkt auf SDG 12, verantwortungsvoller Konsum und Produktion, konzipiert und implementiert wurde. Sie stellt Maßnahmen zur Förderung von Forschung, Innovation, transformativen Dienstleistungen für die Gesellschaft und Ausbildung vor und analysiert das Synergiepotenzial zwischen diesen vier Säulen auf der Grundlage der vier Phasen des SECI-Modells von Nonaka (Socialisation, Externalisation, Combination, Internalisation). Er zeigt die Notwendigkeit auf, vom statischen Konzept des Wissensquadrats zum dynamischen Konzept der Wissensspirale überzugehen, und skizziert Empfehlungen für die Steuerung von WP4.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. European Council, 2018, Council conclusions of 28 June 2018, official document, p.9

  2. European Commission, 2020, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on Making a European Area of Education a Reality by 2025of 30 September 2020, official document. P.14

  3. Nonaka, I.: The Knowledge creating company. Harv. Bus. Rev. 6(8), 96–104 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Nonaka, I., Takeuchi, H.: The knowledge creating. New. York, vol. 304. (1995)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Nonaka, I., Toyama, R.: The knowledge-creating theory revisited: knowledge creation as a synthesizing process. Knowl. Manag. Res. Pract. 1(1), 2–10 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Nonaka, L., Takeuchi, H., & Umemoto, K. (1996). A theory of organizational knowledge creation. International Journal of Technology Management, 11(7–8), 833–845.

  7. Polanyi, M., The Tacit Dimension, London, Routledge & Kegan Paul (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nonaka, I.: A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organ. Sci. 5(1), 14–37 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research was conducted in accordance with the research agenda of the European University on Responsible Consumption and Production (EURECA-PRO). EURECA-PRO is supported by the European Union through different project funding sources. EURECA-PRO phase I 2020–2023 (No 101004049) and phase II 2023–2027 (No 101124439) is co-funded by the Erasmus+ Programme of the European Union. The Research and Innovation dimension of EURECA-PRO has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme under grant agreement No 101035798.

EURECA-PRO is also supported at a national level by: the Federal Ministry of Education, Science and Research and the Austrian Academic Exchange Service OeAD (Austria); the Federal Ministry of Education and Research and the German Academic Exchange Service DAAD (Germany); the Ministry of Education (Greece); the Ministry of Education and Science (Poland), the Ministry of Education (Romania), the Ministry of the Presidency Relations with the Courts and Democratic Memory and the Strategic Subsidy Plan 2021–2023 of the Ministry of Universities (Spain), and the Flemish Government, Department Economy, Science and Innovation (Belgium).

The European Commission support for the production of this publication does not constitute an endorsement of the contents which reflects the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein.

The French Ministry of Higher Education and Research has also lent its support and must be acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benoît Grasser.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Grasser, B., Tombre, K. How Can the Synergies Between the Pillars of the Knowledge Square be Optimised? A Knowledge Spiral Approach in the Context of EURECA-PRO. Berg Huettenmaenn Monatsh 169, 77–80 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00501-024-01433-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00501-024-01433-z

Keywords

Schlüsselwörter

Navigation