Skip to main content
Log in

Lqr-based PID controller with variable load tuned with data-driven methods for double inverted pendulum

  • Data Analytics and Machine Learning
  • Published:
Soft Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Modern controller design is increasingly based on data-driven control methods. PID controllers are still used primarily in the industry, because they are Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR). The LQR provides an efficient way to tune the parameters of a PID controller. The LQR has the disadvantage of requiring accurate models of the system, as well as reducing a high-order system to a second-order model. First, we explore the new horizons of control theory in the form of the state-space model for high nonlinear systems. Second, the Lagrangian method establishes the new mathematical model of the two-stage linear inverted pendulum system. In addition, real-time LQR parameters are calculated under variable load. This method has been demonstrated to be highly applicable and accurate through simulations and experiments using the Double Inverted Pendulum model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, upon reasonable request.

References

  • Ahmad S, Ali A (2021) Unified Disturbance-Estimation-Based Control and Equivalence With IMC and PID: Case Study on a DC-DC Boost Converter. IEEE Trans Indus Electro 68(6):5122–5132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aslam MS (2020) Co-design method for \(H_{\infty }\) control of quantized T-S fuzzy system over the networked system. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 39(1):771–788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aslam MS, Qaisar I (2023) Sensor networks with distributed event-triggered scheme for T-S fuzzy system with dissipativity analysis. European Journal of Control 71:100800

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Aslam MS, Qaisar I, Saleem MA (2020) Quantized Event-triggered feedback control under fuzzy system with time-varying delay and Actuator fault. Nonlinear Analysis: Hybrid Systems 35:100823

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Aslam MS, Li Q, Hou J (2021) Fault detection for asynchronous T-S fuzzy networked Markov jump systems with new event-triggered scheme. IET Control Theory Appl 15(11):1461–1473

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Aslam MS, Zhenhua M, Ullah R, Li Y, Sheng A, Majid A (2022) Stability and admissibility analysis of T-S descriptive systems and its applications. Soft Computing 26(15):7159–7166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baciu A, Lazar C, Caruntu CF (2021) Iterative Feedback Tuning of Model–Free Controllers, \(25^{th}\) International Conference on System Theory, Control and Computing (ICSTCC), pp: 467–472 https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSTCC52150.2021.9607213

  • Bilal H, Yin B, Aslam MS, Anjum Z, Rohra A, Wang Y (2023) A practical study of active disturbance rejection control for rotary flexible joint robot manipulator. Soft Computing 17:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilal H, Yin B, Kumar A, Ali M, Zhang J, Yao J (2023) Jerk-bounded trajectory planning for rotary flexible joint manipulator: an experimental approach. Soft Computing 27(7):4029–4039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • da Silva RWP, Eckhard D (2019) Extension of the Correlation–based Tuning Method for Load Disturbance Rejection, IEEE \(58^{th}\) Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), pp: 8386–8391 https://doi.org/10.1109/CDC40024.2019.9029360

  • Joglekar A, Krovi V, Brudnak M, Smereka JM (2022) Hybrid Reinforcement Learning based controller for autonomous navigation, IEEE \(95^{th}\) Vehicular Technology Conference: (VTC2022-Spring), pp: 1–6, https://doi.org/10.1109/VTC2022-Spring54318.2022.9861014

  • Kozáková A, Veselý V, Kučera V (2019) Robust decentralized controller design based on equivalent subsystems, Automatica, vol. 107, pp: 29–35

  • Srivastava S, Misra A, Thakur S, Pandit V (2016) An optimal PID controller via LQR for standard second order plus time delay systems. ISA Trans 60:244–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun H, Liu Y, Li F, Niu X (2019) Distributed LQR Optimal Protocol for Leader-Following Consensus. IEEE Trans Cybern 49(9):3532–3546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vlahakis EE, Dritsas LD, Halikias GD (2019) Distributed LQR design for identical dynamically coupled systems: Application to load frequency control of multi–area power grid, 2019 IEEE \(58^{th}\) Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), https://doi.org/10.1109/CDC40024.2019.9028865, pp: 4471–4476

  • Ziegler JG, Nichols NB (1942) Optimum settings for automatic controllers. Trans ASME 64:759–768

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Big Data Analytic Center of United Arab Emirates University under grant code 12R135.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Hayajneh.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

No conflict of interest has been declared by the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aslam, M.S., Bilal, H. & Hayajneh, M. Lqr-based PID controller with variable load tuned with data-driven methods for double inverted pendulum. Soft Comput 28, 325–338 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-023-09442-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-023-09442-9

Keywords

Navigation