Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Cyclic storage approach for conjunctive operation of surface and groundwater systems (Case study: ZarrinehRoud catchment area)

  • Optimization
  • Published:
Soft Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this research, the problem of optimal conjunctive operation of surface and groundwater systems is investigated by proposing a cyclic storage approach. This problem is solved here using mathematical programming and some efficient Meta heuristic algorithms. For this purpose, the mathematical model of this system is defined and first solved by the nonlinear programming (NLP) method. In addition, the performance of the artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm, genetic algorithm (GA), gravitational search algorithm (GSA) and, particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithms are also studied to solve this problem. Here, two case studies, meaning a hypothetical benchmark system and conjunctive use of Buchan dam reservoir and Miandoab aquifer located in the catchment area of Urmia Lake (ZarrinehRoud catchment area) as a real problem, are considered to study the performance of proposed methods. In other words, for the hypothetical benchmark system, the results show that the optimal operating cost and related computational time are equal to 5.2428 Billion Rials and 5400 s, respectively, obtained by using the NLP method. In addition, in comparison with the result of the NLP method, the operation costs increased by 26.36%, 26.1%, 44.91% and, 21.28% using ABC, GA, GSA and, PSO algorithms, respectively. However, the computational time is extremely decreased in comparison with the related value of the NLP method using these algorithms for a particular case. In other words, for the real benchmark system, the results show that the optimal operating cost and related computational time are equal to 139.0145 Billion Rials and 259,200 s, respectively, obtained by using the NLP method. In addition, in comparison with the result of the NLP method, the operation costs increased by 43.74%, 32.32%, and 50.57% using ABC, GA and, PSO algorithms, respectively. However, by using this algorithm, the computational time is extremely decreased in comparison with the related value of the NLP method for a particular case. Furthermore, in both case studies, the water demands are fully stratified using the proposed methods. Therefore, the obtained results show the efficiency and effectivity of the proposed methods to solve this complex optimization problem considering a cyclic storage approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Afshar A, Leila Ostadrahimi L, Ardeshir A, Alimohammadi S (2008) Lumped approach to a multi-period–multi-reservoir cyclic storage system optimization. Water Resour Manag 22:1741–1760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad F, Shahid M, Alam M, Ashraf Z, Sajid M, Kotecha K, Dhiman G (2022) Levelized multiple workflow allocation strategy under precedence constraints with task merging in IaaS cloud environment. IEEE Access 10:92809–92827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alimohammadi S, Afshar A, Mariño MA (2009) Cyclic storage systems optimization: Semidistributed parameter approach. Am Water Works Assoc 101(2):90–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-jawad JY, Alsaffar HM, Bertarm D, Kalin RM (2019) A comprehensive optimum integrated water resources management approach for multidisciplinary water resources management problems. J Environ Manag 239:211–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barlow PM, Dickerman DC (2001) Numerical Simulation and Conjunctive Management Models of the Hunt–Annaquatucket Pettaquamscutt Stream-Aquifer System, Rhode Island, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston

  • Başagaoglu H, Mariño MA (1999) Joint management of surface and ground water supplies. Ground Water 37(2):214–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bredehoeft JD, Young RA (1970) Ground water a simulation approach. Water Resour Res 6(1):3–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buras N (1963) Conjunctive operation of dams and aquifers. Hydraul Div 89(6):111–131

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee I (2021) Artificial intelligence and patentability: review and discussions. Int J Mod Res 1:15–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhry MT, Hall WA, Albertson ML (1974) Optimal conjunctive use model for Indus Basin. Hydraul Div 100(5):667–687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhiman G, Kaur A (2019) STOA: a bio-inspired based optimization algorithm for industrial engineering problems. Eng Appl Artif Intell 82:148–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhiman G, Kumar V (2017) Spotted hyena optimizer: a novel bio-inspired based metaheuristic technique for engineering applications. Adv Eng Softw 114:48–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhiman G, Kumar V (2018) Emperor penguin optimizer: a bio-inspired algorithm for engineering problems. Knowl-Based Syst 159:20–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eberhart R, Kennedy J (1995) A new optimizer using particle swarm theory. In: MHS'95. Proceedings of the Sixth Int. Symp. on Micro Machine and Human Science. Nagoya, Japan, pp 39–43

  • Ejaz MS, Peralta RC (1995) Maximizimg conjunctive use of surface and ground water under surface water quality constraints. Adv Water Resour 18(2):67–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu ZH, Zhao HJ, Wang H, Lu WT, Wang J, Guo HC (2017) Integrated planning for regional development planning and water resources management under uncertainty: a case study of Xining, China. J Hydrol 554:623–634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta VK, Shukla SK, Rawat RS (2022) Crime tracking system and people’s safety in India using machine learning approaches. Int J Mod Res 2(1):1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Hantush M, Marino M (1989) Chance-constrained model for management of stream-aquifer system. Water Resour Plan Manag 115(3):259–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland JH (1975) Adaptation in natural and artificial systems. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Jahanpour MA, Afshar A, Alimdhammadi S (2013) Optimum management of cyclic storage systems: a simulation-optimization approach. J Am Water Works Assoc 105(11):69–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karaboga D, Basturk B (2007) A powerful and efficient algorithm for numerical function optimization: artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm. J Global Optim 39:459–471

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Karamouz M, Moridi A, Fayyazi H (2008) Dealing with conflict over water quality and quantity allocation: a case study. Sci Iran 15(1):34–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaur S, Awasthi LK, Sangal AL, Dhiman G (2020) Tunicate Swarm Algorithm: a new bio-inspired based metaheuristic paradigm for global optimization. Eng Appl Artif Intell 90:103541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar R, Dhiman G (2021) A comparative study of fuzzy optimization through fuzzy number. Int J Mod Res 1:1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Latif M, Douglas James L (1991) Conjunctive water use to control waterlogging and salinization. J Water Resour Plan Manag 117(6):611–628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lettenmaier DP, Burges SJ (1982) Cyclic storage: a preliminary analysis. Ground Water 20(3):278–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Z, Quan J, Li XY, Wu XC, Wu HW, Li YT, Li GY (2016) Establishing a model of conjunctive regulation of surface water and groundwater in the arid regions. Agric Water Manag 174:30–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsukawa J, Finney BA, Willis R (1992) Conjunctive-use planning in Mad River Basin, California. J Water Resour Plan Manag 118(2):115–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald MG, Harbaugh AW (1986) A modular three dimensional finite difference groundwater flow model. Hydrol U.s. Geolog Surv 88(3–4):387–389

    Google Scholar 

  • Milan SG, Roozbahani A, Banihabib ME (2018) Fuzzy optimization model and fuzzy inference system for conjunctive use of surface and groundwater resources. J Hydrol 566:421–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moeini R, Soltani-Nezhad M, Daei M (2017) Constrained gravitational search algorithm for large scale reservoir operation optimization problem. Eng Appl Artif Intell 62:222–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naveena S, Malathy S, Saranya D, Kumar DR (2015) An improved artificial bee colony (IABC) algorithm for numerical function optimization. Int J Appl Inform Commun Eng 1:13–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Nieswand G, Granstorm M (1971) A chance-constrained approach to the conjunctive use of surface waters and ground waters. Water Resour Plan Manag 7(6):1425–1436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nishikawa T (1998) Water resources optimization model for Santa Barbara, California. Water Resour Plan Manag 124(5):252–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onta PR, Gupta AD, Harboe R (1992) Multistep planning model for conjunctive use of surface–groundwater resources. Water Resour Plan Manag 117(6):662–678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peralta R, Cantiller RR, Terry J (1995) Optimal large-scale conjunctive water-use planning: case study. Water Resour Plan Manag 121(6):471–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peralta RC, Forghani A, Fayad H (2014) Multiobjective genetic algorithm conjunctive use optimization for production, cost, and energy with dynamic return flow. J Hydrol 511:776–785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pérez-Uresti SI, Ponce-Ortega JM, Jiménez-Gutiérrez A (2019) A multi-objective optimization approach for sustainable water management for places with over-exploited water resources. Comput Chem Eng 121(2):158–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Philbrick CR, Kitanidis PK (1998) Optimal conjunctive-use operations and plans’. Water Resour Res 34(5):1307–1316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramesh H, Mahesha A (2009) Conjunctive use in India’s Varada River Basin. Am Water Works Assoc 101(11):74–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rashedi E, Nezamabadi-Pour H, Saryazdi S (2009) GSA: a gravitational search algorithm. Inf Sci 179:2232–2248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichard EG (1995) Groundwater-surface water management with stochastic surface water supplies: a simulation optimization approach. Water Resour Res 31(11):2845–2865

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rezaei F, Safavi HR, Mirchi A, Madani K (2017) f-MOPSO: An alternative multi-objective PSO algorithm for conjunctive water use management. J Hydro-Environ Res 14:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rushton KR, Tomlinson LM (1981) Operating policies for a surface/ground water system. J Am Water Resour Assoc 17(3):406–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Safavi HR, Enteshari S (2016) Conjunctive use of surface and ground water resources using the ant system optimization. Agric Water Manag 173:23–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma T, Nair R, Gomathi S (2022) Breast cancer image classification using transfer learning and convolutional neural network. Int J Mod Res 2(1):8–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Shukla SK, Gupta VK, Joshi K, Gupta A, Singh MK (2022) Self-aware execution environment model (SAE2) for the performance improvement of multicore systems. Int J Mod Res 2(1):17–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Singamaneni KK, Dhiman G, Juneja S, Muhammad G, AlQahtani SA, Zaki J (2022) A novel QKD approach to enhance IIOT privacy and computational knacks. Sensors 22(18):6741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh A (2014) Conjunctive use of water resources for sustainable irrigated agriculture. J Hydrol 519:1688–1697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Syaukat Y, Fox GC (2004) Conjunctive surface and ground water management in the Jakarta region, Indonesia. J Am Water Resour Assoc 40(1):241–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaishnav PK, Sharma S, Sharma P (2021) Analytical review analysis for screening COVID-19. Int J Mod Res 1:22–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang C, Mortazavi B, Liang WK, Sun NZ, Yeh WWG (1995) Model development for conjunctive use study of the San Jacinto basin, California. Water Resour Assoc 31(2):227–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang CX, Li YP, Zhuang XW (2018) Conjunctive water management under multiple uncertainties: a centroid-based type-2 fuzzy-probabilistic programming approach. Eng Appl Artif Intell 72:437–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wrachien DDE, Fasso CA (2002) Conjunctive use of surface and groundwater: overview and perspective’. Irrig Drain Eng 51:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu X, Zheng Y, Wu B, Tian Y, Han F, Zheng C (2015) Optimizing conjunctive use of surface water and groundwater for irrigation to address human-nature water conflicts: a surrogate modeling approach. Agric Water Manag 163:380–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan J, Smith K (1994) Simulation of integrated surface water and ground water systems—model formulation. Water Resour Assoc 30(5):879–890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yousefi M, Banihabib ME, Soltani J, Rozzbahani A (2018) Multi-objective particle swarm optimization model for conjunctive use of treated wastewater and groundwater. Agric Water Manag 208:224–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not for-profit sector.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Islamic Republic of Iran

    Ramtin Moeini & Kourosh Sarhadi

Authors
  1. Ramtin Moeini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kourosh Sarhadi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ramtin Moeini.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Both authors declare that he and she have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moeini, R., Sarhadi, K. Cyclic storage approach for conjunctive operation of surface and groundwater systems (Case study: ZarrinehRoud catchment area). Soft Comput 28, 1989–2014 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-023-09166-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-023-09166-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation