Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sustainability assessment of supply chains by a novel robust two-stage network DEA model: a case study in the transport industry

  • Mathematical methods in data science
  • Published:
Soft Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The transport industry is one of the main contributors to environmental pollution. Assessing the efficiency of this industry helps organizations to enhance their awareness of performance and develop managerial strategies. The need for sustainable development in the transportation industry requires efficiency analysis. Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a popular approach for efficiency evaluation. Traditional DEA assumes that the dataset should be crisp. However, in real-world problems, there might be imprecise data. On the other hand, the network DEA (NDEA) measures the efficiency of multistage processes. The NDEA models deal with the internal structure of decision-making units (DMUs). This study offers a novel analysis and contribution to the knowledge of efficiency evaluation by (1) proposing a novel robust two-stage NDEA (RTNDEA) model to evaluate the sustainability of supply chains and (2) dealing with undesirable outputs and uncertain conditions for efficiency analysis. The proposed model can fully rank DMUs. To demonstrate the applicability of the proposed approach, the sustainability of intercity passenger transportation is assessed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Enquiries about data availability should be directed to the authors.

Notes

  1. http://www.amar.org.ir

  2. http://rmto.ir/en

References

  • Ahi P, Searcy C (2013) A comparative literature analysis of definitions for green and sustainable supply chain management. J Clean Prod 52:329–341

    Google Scholar 

  • Avkiran NK (2009) Opening the black box of efficiency analysis: an illustration with UAE banks. Omega 37:930–941

    Google Scholar 

  • Azadi M, Shabani A, Khodakarami M, Farzipoor Saen R (2014) Planning in feasible region by two-stage target-setting DEA methods: an application in green supply chain management of public transportation service providers. Transp Res Part E Logist Transp 70:324–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Badiezadeh T, Farzipoor Saen R, Samavati T (2018) Assessing sustainability of supply chains by double frontier network DEA: a big data approach. Comput Oper Res 98:284–290

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bai C, Sarkis J (2010) Integrating sustainability into supplier selection with grey system and rough set methodologies. Int J Prod Econ 124(1):252–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Behzadianfar M, Eydi A, Shahrokhi M (2022) A sustainable closed loop supply chain design problem in intuitionistic fuzzy environment for dairy products. Soft Comput 26:1417–1435

    Google Scholar 

  • Beltrán-Esteve M, Picazo-Tadeo A (2015) Assessing environmental performance trends in the transport industry: eco-innovation or catching-up? Energy Econ 51:570–580

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Tal A, Nemirovski A (2000) Robust solutions of linear programming problems contaminated with uncertain data. Math Program 88(3):411–424

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bertsimas D, Sim M (2003) Robust discrete optimization and network flows. Math Program Ser 98:49–71

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bian Y, Liang N, Xu H (2015) Efficiency evaluation of Chinese regional industrial systems with undesirable factors using a two stage slacks based measure approach. J Clean Prod 87:348–356

    Google Scholar 

  • Boudaghi E, Farzipoor Saen R (2018) Developing a novel model of data envelopment analysis–discriminant analysis for predicting group membership of suppliers in sustainable supply chain. Comput Oper Res 89:348–359

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cainelli G, De Marchi V, Grandinetti R (2015) Does the development of environmental innovation require different resources? Evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms. J Clean Prod 94:211–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter CR, Rogers DS (2008) A framework of sustainable supply chain management: moving towards new theory. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 38(5):360–387

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Oper Res 2(6):429–444

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Z, Kourtzidis S, Tzeremes P, Tzeremes N (2022) A robust network DEA model for sustainability assessment: an application to Chinese provinces. Oper Res 22:235–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrgott M, Holder A, Nohadani O (2018) Uncertain data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res 268(1):231–242

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • El-Ghaoui L, Lebret H (1997) Robust solutions to least-square problems to uncertain data matrices. SIAM J Matrix Anal Appl 18:1035–1064

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • El-Ghaoui L, Oustry F, Lebret H (1998) Robust solutions to uncertain semi-definite programs. SIAM J Optim 9:33–52

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Environmental Protection Department, HKSAR (2004) Air pollutant and greenhouse gas emission inventory (1990–2003). https://www.epd.gov.hk/epd/english/environmentinhk/air/data/emission_inve.html. Accessed Jan 2019

  • Färe R, Grosskopf S (1996) Productivity and intermediate products: a frontier approach. Econ Lett 50(1):65–70

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Färe R, Grosskopf S (2000) Network DEA. Socio-Econ Plan Sci 4(1):35–49

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Farzipoor Saen R (2005) Developing a nondiscretionary model of slacks-based measure in data envelopment analysis. Appl Math Comput 169(2):1440–1447

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Farzipoor Saen R (2009) A mathematical model for selecting third-party reverse logistics providers. Int J Procure Manag 2(2):180–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Fathi A, Farzipoor Saen R (2018) A novel bidirectional network data envelopment analysis model for evaluating sustainability of distributive supply chains of transport companies. J Clean Prod 184:696–708

    Google Scholar 

  • Fathi A, Farzipoor Saen R (2021) Assessing sustainability of supply chains by fuzzy Malmquist network data envelopment analysis: incorporating double frontier and common set of weights. Appl Soft Comput 113(Part A):e107923

  • Fathollah Bayati M, Sadjadi SJ (2017) “Robust network data envelopment analysis approach to evaluate the efficiency of regional electricity power networks under uncertainty. PLoS ONE 12(9):e0184103

    Google Scholar 

  • Florida R (1996) Lean and Green: the move to environmentally conscious manufacturing. Calif Manag Rev 39(1):80–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabrel V, Lacroix M, Murat C, Remli N (2014) Robust location transportation problems under uncertain demands. Discrete Appl Math 164(1):100–111

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Galal NM, Abdul Moneim AF (2016) Developing sustainable supply chains in developing countries. Procedia CIRP 48:419–424

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodarzi M, Makvandi P, Farzipoor Saen R, Sagheb MD (2017) What are causes of cash flow bullwhip effect in centralized and decentralized supply chains? Appl Math Model 44:640–654

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard DW (2014) How to measure anything: finding the value of “intangibles” in business, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • International Energy Agency (2011) Emissions from fuel combustion highlights. Cancún Mexico

  • Izadikhah M, Farzipoor Saen R (2016) A new preference voting method for sustainable location planning using geographic information system and data envelopment analysis. J Clean Prod 137:1347–1367

    Google Scholar 

  • Izadikhah M, Farzipoor Saen R (2017) Assessing sustainability of supply chains by chance-constrained two-stage DEA model in the presence of undesirable factors. Comput Oper Res 100:343–367

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Izadikhah M, Farzipoor Saen R (2020) Ranking sustainable suppliers by context-dependent data envelopment analysis. Ann Oper Res 293(2):607–637

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Izadikhah M, Azadi E, Azadi M, Farzipoor Saen R (2020) Developing a new chance constrained NDEA model to measure performance of sustainable supply chains. Ann Oper Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03765-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ji X, Wu J, Zhu Q (2016) Eco-design of transportation in sustainable supply chain management: a DEA-like method. Transp Res Part D 48:451–459

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalantary M, Farzipoor Saen R (2019) Assessing sustainability of supply chains: an inverse network dynamic DEA model. Comput Ind Eng 135:1224–1238

    Google Scholar 

  • Kao C, Hwang SN (2008) Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: an application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan price of robustness. Eur J Oper Res 185:418–429

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kappelman AC, Sinha AK (2021) Optimal control in dynamic food supply chains using big data. Comput Oper Res 126:105117

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Karimi M, Karimi B (2017) Linear and conic scalarizations for obtaining properly efficient solutions in multiobjective optimization. Math Sci 11(4):319–325

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kazemi Matin R, Azadi M, Farzipoor Saen R (2022) Measuring the sustainability and resilience of blood supply chains. Decis Support Syst 113629 (in press)

  • Khodakarami M, Shabani A, Farzipoor Saen R, Azadi M (2015) Developing distinctive two-stage data envelopment analysis models: an application in evaluating the sustainability of supply chain management. Measurement 70:62–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiani Mavi N, Kiani Mavi R (2019) Energy and environmental efficiency of OECD countries in the context of the circular economy: common weight analysis for Malmquist productivity index. J Environ Manag 247:651–661

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiani Mavi R, Farzipoor Saen R, Goh M (2019a) Joint analysis of eco-efficiency and eco-innovation with common weights in two-stage network DEA: a big data approach. Technol Forecast Soc Change 144:553–562

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiani Mavi R, Fathi A, Farzipoor Saen R, Kiani Mavi N (2019b) Eco-innovation in transportation industry: a double frontier common weights analysis with ideal point method for Malmquist productivity index. Resour Conserv Recycl 147:39–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Yu B (2019) Peaking CO2 emissions for China’s urban passenger transport sector. Energy Policy 133:e110913

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang L, Yang F, Cook WD, Zhu J (2006) DEA models for supply chain efficiency evaluation. Ann Oper Res 145(1):35–49

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Liu P, Zhang FJ (2022) Pricing strategies of dual-channel green supply chain considering big data information inputs. Soft Comput 26:2981–2999

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Ding F, Lall V (2000) Using data envelopment analysis to compare suppliers for supplier selection and performance improvement. Int J Supply Chain Manag 5(3):143–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu JS, Lu LYY, Lu W, Lin BJY (2013) A survey of DEA applications. Omega 41(5):893–902

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu JS, Lu LY, Lu WM (2016) Research fronts in data envelopment analysis. Omega 58:33–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Lozano S (2015) Slacks based inefficiency approach for general networks with bad outputs: an application to the banking sector. Omega 60:73–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu CC (2015) Robust data envelopment analysis approaches for evaluating algorithmic performance. Comput Ind Eng 81(1):78–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Maghbouli M, Amirteimoori A, Kordrostami S (2014) Two-stage network structures with undesirable outputs: a DEA based approach. Measurement 48:109–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahdiloo M, Jafarzadeh AH, Farzipoor Saen R, Tatham P, Fisher R (2016) A multiple criteria approach to two-stage data envelopment analysis. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ 46:317–327

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahmassani HS (1984) Uncertainty in transportation systems evaluation: issues and approaches. Transp Plan Technol 9:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirhedayatian SM, Azadi M, Farzipoor Saen R (2014) A novel network data envelopment analysis model for evaluating green supply chain management. Int J Prod Econ 147(Part B):544–554

  • Momeni E, Hosseinzadeh Lotfi F, Farzipoor Saen R, Najafi E (2019) Centralized DEA-based reallocation of emission permits under cap and trade regulation. J Clean Prod 234:306–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Omrani H (2013) Common weights data envelopment analysis with uncertain data: a robust optimization approach. Comput Ind Eng 66(4):1163–1170

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Rashidi K, Farzipoor Saen R (2015) Measuring eco-efficiency based on green indicators and potentials in energy saving and undesirable output abatement. Energy Econ 50(1):18–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Rassafi AA, Vaziri M (2005) Application of data envelopment analysis in identifying milestones for passenger and freight transportation sustainability. Scientia Iranica 12(4):426–436

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez J, Wiengarten F (2017) The role of process innovativeness in the development of environmental innovativeness capability. J Clean Prod 142:2423–2434

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadjadi SJ, Omrani H (2008) Data envelopment analysis with uncertain data: an application for Iranian electricity distribution companies. Energy Policy 36(11):4247–4254

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadjadi SJ, Omrani H (2010) A bootstrapped robust data envelopment analysis model for efficiency estimating of telecommunication companies in Iran. Telecommun Policy 34(4):221–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadjadi SJ, Omrani H, Abdollahzadeh S, Alinaghian M, Mohammadi H (2011) A robust super-efficiency data envelopment analysis model for ranking of provincial gas companies in Iran. Expert Syst Appl 38(9):10875–10881

    Google Scholar 

  • Salahi M, Torabi N, Amiri A (2016) An optimistic robust optimization approach to common set of weights in DEA. Measurement 93:67–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Salloum G, Tekli J (2022) Automated and personalized meal plan generation and relevance scoring using a multi-factor adaptation of the transportation problem. Soft Comput 26:2561–2585

    Google Scholar 

  • Settey T, Gnap J (2020) Comparison of price and emission levels of air passenger transport and international bus transport in the Slovak Republic. Transp Res Procedia 44:129–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Shabanpour H, Yousefi S, Farzipoor Saen R (2017) Future planning for benchmarking and ranking sustainable suppliers using goal programming and robust double frontiers DEA. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ 50:129–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Shabanpour H, Fathi A, Yousefi S, Farzipoor Saen R (2019) Ranking sustainable suppliers using congestion approach of data envelopment analysis. J Clean Prod 240:118–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma R, Kamble SS, Gunasekaran A, Kumar V, Kumar A (2020) A systematic literature review on machine learning applications for sustainable agriculture supply chain performance. Comput Oper Res 119:e104926

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Shokouhi AH, Hatami-Marbini A, Tavana M, Saati SA (2010) Robust optimization approach for imprecise data envelopment analysis. Comput Ind Eng 59(3):387–397

    Google Scholar 

  • Shokri Kahi V, Yousefi S, Shabanpour H, Farzipoor Saen R (2017) How to evaluate sustainability of supply chains? A dynamic network DEA approach. Ind Manag Data Syst 117(9):1866–1889

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh SP, Song M, Sharma RRK, Fisher RF, Amit RK, Farzipoor Saen R (2020) Preface: sustainable operations in manufacturing enterprise. Ann Oper Res 290:1–4

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Singh AP, Yadav SP, Singh KS (2022) A multi-objective optimization approach for DEA models in a fuzzy environment. Soft Comput 26:2901–2912

    Google Scholar 

  • Soyster AL (1973) Convex programming with set-inclusive constraints and applications to inexact linear programming. Oper Res 21(5):1154–1157

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sueyoshi T (2013) A comparative study among fossil fuel power plants in PJM and California ISO by DEA environmental assessment. Energy Econ 40:130–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Sueyoshi T, Wang D (2014) Sustainability development for supply chain management in U.S. petroleum industry by DEA environmental assessment. Energy Econ 46:360–374

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajbakhsh A, Hassini E (2015) A data envelopment analysis approach to evaluate sustainability in supply chain networks. J Clean Prod 105:74–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Tavassoli M, Farzipoor Saen R (2019) Predicting group membership of sustainable suppliers via data envelopment analysis and discriminant analysis. Sustain Prod Consum 18:41–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Tavassoli M, Faramarzi GR, Farzipoor Saen R (2014) Efficiency and effectiveness in airline performance using a SBM-NDEA model in the presence of shared input. J Air Transp Manag 34:146–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Tavassoli M, Farzipoor Saen R, Zanjirani M (2020) Assessing sustainability of suppliers: a novel stochastic-fuzzy DEA model. Sustain Prod Consump 21:78–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Tavassoli M, Fathi A, Farzipoor Saen R (2021a) Developing a new super-efficiency DEA model in the presence of both zero data and stochastic data: a case study in the Iranian airline industry. Benchmarking 28(1):42–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Tavassoli M, Fathi A, Farzipoor Saen R (2021b) Assessing the sustainable supply chains of tomato paste by fuzzy double frontier network DEA model. Ann Oper Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-021-04139-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang K, Wei F (2010) Robust data envelopment analysis based MCDM with the consideration of uncertain data. J Syst Eng Electron 21(6):981–989

    Google Scholar 

  • WCED (1978) Our common future. World commission on environment and development 1978. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Wen L, Xu L, Wang R (2013) Sustainable supplier evaluation based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets group decision methods. J Inf Comput Sci 10(10):3209–3220

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong WP, Jaruphongsa W, Lee LH (2008) Supply chain performance measurement system: a Monte Carlo DEA-based approach. Int J Ind Syst Eng 3(2):162–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu HJ, Dunn SC (1995) Environmentally responsible logistics systems. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 25(2):20–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu J, Zhu Q, Chu J, Liang L (2015) Two stage network structures with undesirable intermediate outputs reused: a DEA based approach. Comput Econ 46:455–477

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan G, Ni Y, Yang X (2021) Pricing and recovery in a dual-channel closed-loop supply chain under uncertain environment. Soft Comput 25:13679–13694

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan X, Yang X, Zhang P, Zhang Z (2022) A new stock loan problem based on the mean-reverting equation in an uncertain environment. Soft Comput 26:2741–2750

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeh Q (1996) The application of data envelopment analysis in conjunction with financial ratios for bank performance evaluation. J Oper Res Soc 47(8):980–988

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Yildizbasi A, Arioz Y (2022) Green supplier selection in new era for sustainability: a novel method for integrating big data analytics and a hybrid fuzzy multi-criteria decision making. Soft Comput 26:253–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Yousefi S, Shabanpour H, Farzipoor Saen R (2015) Selecting the best supply chain by goal programming and network data envelopment analysis. RAIRO Oper Res 49(3):601–617

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Yousefi S, Shabanpour H, Fisher RF, Saen R (2016) Evaluating and ranking sustainable suppliers by robust dynamic data envelopment analysis. Measurement 83:72–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Yousefi S, Soltani R, Farzipoor Saen R, Pishvaee MS (2017) A robust fuzzy possibilistic programming for a new network GP-DEA model to evaluate sustainable supply chains. J Clean Prod 166:537–549

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu MM, Lin ETJ (2008) Efficiency and effectiveness in railway performance using a multi-activity network DEA model. Omega 36(6):1005–1017

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu Y, Huang J, Shao Y (2019) The sustainability performance of Chinese banks: a new network data envelopment analysis approach and panel regression. Sustainability 11(6):1–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhong K, Li C, Wang Q (2021a) Evaluation of bank innovation efficiency with data envelopment analysis: from the perspective of uncovering the black box between input and output. Mathematics 9:e3318

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhong KY, Wang YF, Pei JM, Tang SM, Han ZL (2021b) Super efficiency SBM-DEA and neural network for performance evaluation. Inf Process Manag 58(6):e102728

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou H, Hu H (2017) Sustainability evaluation of railways in China using a two-stage network DEA model with undesirable outputs and shared resources. Sustainability 9(1):1–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou G, Chung W, Zhang Y (2014) Measuring energy efficiency performance of China’s transport sector: a data envelopment analysis approach. Expert Syst Appl 41(2):709–722

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu J (2004) Imprecise DEA via standard linear DEA models with a revisit to a Korean mobile telecommunication company. Oper Res 52(2):323–329

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu L, Lu B (2022) Product quality control strategy of dual distribution channel structure in three-echelon supply chain. Soft Comput 26:829–840

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to appreciate the constructive comments of two anonymous Reviewers.

Funding

The authors have not disclosed any funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Management, UAE Branch, Islamic Azad University, Dubai, United Arab Emirates

    Amirali Fathi

  2. Department of Mathematics, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran

    Balal Karimi

  3. Department of Operations Management and Business Statistics, College of Economics and Political Science, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman

    Reza Farzipoor Saen

Authors
  1. Amirali Fathi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Balal Karimi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Reza Farzipoor Saen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Reza Farzipoor Saen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have not disclosed any competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fathi, A., Karimi, B. & Saen, R.F. Sustainability assessment of supply chains by a novel robust two-stage network DEA model: a case study in the transport industry. Soft Comput 26, 6101–6118 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-022-07013-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-022-07013-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation