Abstract
EEG signals offer qualitative insights during brain disorder analysis and help in the brief assessment of brain diseases. However, EEG signal acquisition is susceptible to noise of various kinds and renders the analysis phase difficult and ill-posed. Hence, an appropriate technique is necessary to reduce the impairment effect caused by the noise on analysis. Wavelet thresholding is one of the most widely used techniques to recover the EEG signals from the noise. However, all the variants of wavelet thresholding algorithms suffer from pseudo-Gibbs phenomenon leading to ringing effect. Wave atom is a novel multiscale–multidirectional transformation technique. However, this wavelet thresholding produces pseudo-Gibbs phenomena, which are visual distortions and oscillations in the area of signal processing. The widely appreciated wave atom transformation too fails from artifacts around the sharp edges. The proposed shift-based cycle spinning technique of wave atom transformation model estimates the thresholding parameter, in an unbiased manner, from the data and de-noises the signal in a translation-invariant manner. De-noising studies on the OpenNeuro EEG dataset indicate the usefulness of the suggested technique. The results are analysed based on the performance measurements SNR and MSE that establish an advantage of shift-based cycle spinning model in getting better results.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Biswas U, Hasan KR, Sana B, Md. Maniruzzaman (2015) De-noising ECG signal using different wavelet families and comparison with other techniques, IEEE
Boutella L, Serir A (2013) Fingerprint orientation map based on wave atoms transform. J Image Graph 1(3):129–133
Candes EJ, Demanet L (2005) The curvelet representation of wave propagators is optimally sparse. Comm Pure Appl Math 58(11):1472–1528
Candes EJ, Donoho DL (2004) New tight frames of curvelets and optimal representation of objects with piecewise–C2 singularities. Comm Pure Appl Math 57(2):219–266
Candes E, Demanet L, Donoho D, Ying L (2006) Fast discrete curvelet transforms. SIAM Multiscale Model Simul 5(3):861–899
Coifman RR, Donoho DL (1995) Translation-invariant de-noising. In: Antoniadis A, Oppenheim G (eds) Wavelets and statistics Springer lecture notes in statistics, vol 103. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 125–150
Demanet L, Ying LX (2007) Wave atoms and sparsity of oscillatory patterns. Appl Comput Harmon Anal 23(3):368–387
Eddine KS, Hassene S (2017) Image de-noising using wave atom transform. In: IEEE international conference on systems, signals & devices(SSD)
Fletcher Ak, Goyal VK, Ramchandran K (2002) Wavelet de-noising by recursive cycle spinning. In: IEEE international conference on image processing (ICIP)
John P, Mahesh TY, Sebastian B (2017) ECG signal de-noising, optimization and classification by wave atom transform. In: IEEE international conference on intelligent computing, instrumentation and control technologies (ICICICT)
JIAO Shu-qing (2019) Image de-noising based on wave atoms. In: IEEE international conference on computational intelligence and security, 2019
Kolaczyk E (1994) Wavelet methods for the inversion of certain homogeneous linear operators in the presence of noisy data, Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University
M Misiti, Y Misiti, G Oppenheim, JM Poggi (2015) Wavelet toolbox user’s guide
Plonka G, Ma J (2008) Nonlinear regularized reaction-diffusion filters for de-noising of images with textures. IEEE Trans Image Process 17:1283–1294
Raghava M, Agarwal A, Rao CR (2016) A scalable spatial anisotropic interpolation approach for object removal from images using elastic net regularization, MIWAI 2016, Thailand, LNCS, Vol. 10053, pp. 126–140
Rodriguez-Hernandez MA (2016) Shift selection influence in partial cycle spinning de-noising of biomedical signals. Biomed Signal Process Control 26(2016):64–68
Sahraeian SME, Marvasti F (2007) An improved image de-noising technique using cycle spinning. In: 2007 IEEE international conference on telecommunications and Malaysia international conference on communications pp. 686-690. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTMICC.2007.4448574
Sahraeian SME, Marvasti F, Sadati N (2007) Wavelet image de-noising based on improved thresholding neural network and cycle spinning. In: 2007 IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech and signal processing-ICASSP '07, 2007, pp. I-585-I-588. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP.2007.365975
Salisbury et al (2021) https://openneuro.org/datasets/ds003947/versions/1.0.0
Sharma J, Verma N (2016) ECG signal de-noising techniques: a review. Int J Eng Res Gen Sci vol. 4(1)
Shruthi S, Satheesh Kumar KG (2017) Constrained least squares filtering followed by de-noising of decomposed images using wave atom and wavelet transform”, science direct pp. 526–532
Villemoes L (2002) Wavelet packets with uniform time-frequency localization. Comptes-Rendus Mathematique 335–10:793–796
Zhang WQ, Song YM, Feng JQ (2014) A new image de-noising method based on wave atoms and cycle spinning. J Softw 9(1):216–221
Funding
No Funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All of the authors participated equally and have read and approved the final version of the paper.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
There are no conflicts of interest declared by the authors.
Ethical approval
Any of the authors' investigations with human participants or animals are not included in this article.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rao, M.P., Reddy, E.S. De-noising of EEG signals with shift-based cycle spinning on wave atoms. Soft Comput 26, 3237–3245 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-021-06708-y
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-021-06708-y