Skip to main content

Analysis of radar technology identification model for potential geologic hazard based on convolutional neural network and Harris Hawks optimization algorithm

Soft Computing volume 27, pages 3493–3507 (2023)Cite this article

Abstract

To ensure the proper adoption of new technologies in identifying the potential geologic hazard on tourist routes, convolutional neural network (CNN) is applied in the radar image geologic hazard information extraction. A scientific and practical geologic hazard radar identification model is built based on identification of CNN image and calculation of big data algorithm, which can effectively improve the geologic hazard identification accuracy. Through experiments, the geologic hazard radar image data are verified, and the practicality of radar image intelligent identification under CNN and big data is also verified. The results show that the images of different resolution sizes all play a significant role in identification of geologic hazard performed by CNN. However, there are differences in the performance of different CNN models. With the continuous increase in training samples, the identification accuracy of various network models is also improved. Through radar image test, the identification capability of CNN model is the best, the highest precision is 93.61%, and the geologic hazard recall rate is 98.27%. Apriori algorithm is proposed for data processing, and the running speed and efficiency of identification models are improved, with favorable identification effect in variable data sets. To sum up, this research can provide theoretical ideas and practical value for the development of potential geologic hazard identification on tourist routes.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

References

  • Akter S, Wamba SF (2019) Big data and disaster management: a systematic review and agenda for future research. Ann Oper Res 283(1):939–959

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Amerta IMS (2017) The role of tourism stakeholders at Jasri tourism village development, Karangasem regency. Int J Soc Sci Human 1(2):20–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Bai E, Guo W, Tan Y (2019) Negative externalities of high-intensity mining and disaster prevention technology in China. Bull Eng Geol Env 78(7):5219–5235

    Google Scholar 

  • Becken S, Khazai B (2017) Resilience, tourism and disasters. Butler RW (ed) Tourism and Resilience.CAB International: Boston, pp 96–102.

  • Bui DT, Tsangaratos P, Nguyen VT et al (2020) Comparing the prediction performance of a deep learning neural Network model with conventional machine learning models in landslide susceptibility assessment. CATENA 188:104426–104431

    Google Scholar 

  • Can R, Kocaman S, Gokceoglu C (2019) A convolutional neural network architecture for auto-detection of landslide photographs to assess citizen science and volunteered geographic information data quality. ISPRS Int J Geo Inf 8(7):300–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang P, Grinband J, Weinberg B, Bardis M, Khy M, Cadena G, Su M-Y, Cha S, Filippi C, Bota D (2018) Deep-learning convolutional neural networks accurately classify genetic mutations in gliomas. Am J Neuroradiol 39(7):1201–1207

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen G P, Zhao J S, Yuan L, Ke Z J, Gu M, Wang T (2017) Implementation of a geological disaster monitoring and early warning system based on multi-source spatial data: a case study of deqin county, Yunnan Province. Nat Haz Earth Syst Sci Discuss, pp 1–15

  • Chen M, Liu Q, Huang S, Dang C (2020b) Environmental cost control system of manufacturing enterprises using artificial intelligence based on value chain of circular economy. Enterprise Inf Syst.

  • Chen Y, Hu S, Mao H et al (2020a) Application of the best evacuation model of deep learning in the design of public structures. Image vis Comput 102:103975–103986

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng S, Li W (2020) Spatial case revision in case-based reasoning for risk assessment of geological disasters. Geomat Nat Haz Risk 11(1):1052–1074

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Sawy A, Hazem E B, Loey M (2016In) CNN for handwritten arabic digits recognition based on LeNet-5. In: International conference on advanced intelligent systems and informatics. Springer, Berlin, pp 566−575

  • Essa FA, Abd Elaziz M, Elsheikh AH (2020) An enhanced productivity prediction model of active solar still using artificial neural network and Harris Hawks optimizer. Appl Therm Eng 170:115020–115026

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan R, Wang L, Yan J et al (2020) Deep learning-based named entity recognition and knowledge graph construction for geological hazards. ISPRS Int J Geo Inf 9(1):15–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming K, Abad J, Booth L, Schueller L, Baills A, Scolobig A, Petrovic B, Zuccaro G, Leone MF (2020) The use of serious games in engaging stakeholders for disaster risk reduction, management and climate change adaption information elicitation. Int J Disast Risk Reduc 49:101669–101676

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao X, Cai J (2017) Optimization analysis of urban function regional planning based on big data and GIS technology. Tech Bull 55(11):344–351

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo WY, Tan YL, Zhao TB, Liu XM, Gu QH, Hu SC (2016) Compression creep characteristics and creep model establishment of gangue. Geotech Geol Eng 34(4):1193–1198

    Google Scholar 

  • He F, Liu H, Liu C, et al (2021) Analysis of radar technology identification model for potential geologic hazard based on convolutional neural network and big data, pp 124–131

  • Heidari AA, Mirjalili S, Faris H et al (2019) Harris hawks optimization: algorithm and applications. Futur Gener Comput Syst 97:849–872

    Google Scholar 

  • Horita FEA, de Albuquerque JP, Marchezini V et al (2017) Bridging the gap between decision-making and emerging big data sources: an application of a model-based framework to disaster management in Brazil. Decis Support Syst 97:12–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Ke H, Chen D, Li X, Tang Y, Shah T, Ranjan R (2018) Towards brain big data classification: epileptic EEG identification with a lightweight VGGNet on global MIC. IEEE Access 6:14722–14733

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan RU, Zhang X, Kumar R (2019) Analysis of ResNet and GoogleNet models for malware detection. J Comput Virol Hack Tech 15(1):29–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan A, Gupta S, Gupta SK (2020) Multi-hazard disaster studies: Monitoring, detection, recovery, and management, based on emerging technologies and optimal techniques. Int J Disast Risk Reduc, pp 101642–101653

  • Jiang W, Rao P, Cao R, Tang Z, Chen K (2017) Comparative evaluation of geological disaster susceptibility using multi-regression methods and spatial accuracy validation. J Geog Sci 27(4):439–462

    Google Scholar 

  • Li S, Wu J, Xu Z, Li L (2017) Unascertained measure model of water and mud inrush risk evaluation in karst tunnels and its engineering application. KSCE J Civ Eng 21(4):1170–1182

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Wu L (2016) Geological disaster recognition on optical remote sensing images using deep learning. Procedia Comput Sci 91:566–575

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu B, Zhang Y, He D, Li Y (2018) Identification of apple leaf diseases based on deep convolutional neural networks. Symmetry 10(1):11–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu S, Lu Z, Zhang YD (2019) Pathological brain detection based on AlexNet and transfer learning. J Comput Sci 30:41–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Luna JM, Padillo F, Pechenizkiy M et al (2017) Apriori versions based on mapreduce for mining frequent patterns on big data. IEEE Trans Cyber 48(10):2851–2865

    Google Scholar 

  • Ngo PTT, Panahi M, Khosravi K et al (2021) Evaluation of deep learning algorithms for national scale landslide susceptibility mapping of Iran. Geosci Front 12(2):505–519

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlova I, Makarigakis A, Depret T et al (2017) Global overview of the geological hazard exposure and disaster risk awareness at world heritage sites. J Cult Herit 28:151–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Qin L, Feng S, Zhu H (2018) Research on the technological architectural design of geological hazard monitoring and rescue-after-disaster system based on cloud computing and Internet of things. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manage 9(3):684–695

    Google Scholar 

  • Sang X, Xue L, Ran X et al (2020) Intelligent High-Resolution Geological Mapping Based on SLIC-CNN. ISPRS Int J Geo Inf 9(2):99–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Sameen MI, Pradhan B, Lee S (2020) Application of convolutional neural networks featuring Bayesian optimization for landslide susceptibility assessment. CATENA 186:104249–104253

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen C, Lin H, Fan X, Chu Y, Yang Z, Wang J, Zhang S (2019a) Biomedical event trigger detection with convolutional highway neural network and extreme learning machine. Appl Soft Comput 84:105661–105669

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen C-W, Min C, Wang C-C (2019b) Analyzing the trend of O2O commerce by bilingual text mining on social media. Comput Hum Behav 101:474–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.09.031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh S, Garg R, Mishra P (2018) Performance optimization of mapreduce-based apriori algorithm on Hadoop cluster. Comput Electr Eng 67:348–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Targ S, Almeida D, Lyman K (2016). Resnet in resnet: generalizing residual architectures. arXiv preprint: arXiv:160308029, pp 1–7.

  • Ullo SL, Mohan A, Sebastianelli A et al (2021) A New Mask R-CNN-Based Method for Improved Landslide Detection. IEEE J Selected Top Appl Earth Observ Remote Sens 14:3799–3810

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang P, Zhang H, Patel VM (2017) SAR image despeckling using a convolutional neural network. IEEE Signal Process Lett 24(12):1763–1767

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Wang L, Xu J et al (2021) Information needs mining of COVID-19 in chinese online health communities. Big Data Res 24:100193–100201

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilhelm B, Ballesteros Cánovas JA, Macdonald N et al (2019) Interpreting historical, botanical, and geological evidence to aid preparations for future floods. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Water 6(1):e1318–e1321

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu Y, Lin Y, Zhou Z, et al (2018) Seismic-net: a deep densely connected neural network to detect seismic events. arXiv preprint: arXiv:1802.02241, pp 1124–1132

  • Wu C, Li X, Chen W, Li X (2020) A review of geological applications of high-spatial-resolution remote sensing data. J Circuits Syst Comput 29(06):2030006–2030012

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiao L, Zhang Y, Peng G (2018) Landslide susceptibility assessment using integrated deep learning algorithm along the China–Nepal highway. Sensors 18(12):4436–4441

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu X, Peng S, Yang F (2018) Development of a ground penetrating radar system for large-depth disaster detection in coal mine. J Appl Geophys 158:41–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu Y, Qiu X, Yang X, Lu X, Chen G (2020) Disaster risk management models for rural relocation communities of mountainous southwestern China under the stress of geological disasters. Int J Disast Risk Reduction, pp 101697–101676

  • Yan X, Chen M, Chen M-Y (2019) Coupling and coordination development of australian energy, economy, and ecological environment systems from 2007 to 2016. Sustainability 11:6568

    Google Scholar 

  • Yousri D, Allam D, Eteiba MB (2020) Optimal photovoltaic array reconfiguration for alleviating the partial shading influence based on a modified harris hawks optimizer. Energy Convers Manage 206:112470–112475

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Wang G, Li M et al (2018) Automated classification analysis of geological structures based on images data and deep learning model. Appl Sci 8(12):2493–2501

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Y, Wang H, Xu F, Jin YQ (2016) Polarimetric SAR image classification using deep convolutional neural networks. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett 13(12):1935–1939

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu K, Xu P, Cao C et al (2021) Preliminary identification of geological hazards from songpinggou to feihong in mao county along the minjiang river using SBAS-InSAR technique integrated multiple spatial analysis methods. Sustainability 13(3):1017–1022

    Google Scholar 

  • Zin TA, Lwin KK, Sekimoto Y (2018) Estimation of originating-destination trips in Yangon by using big data source. J Disaster Res 13(1):6–13

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

1. This work was supported by Supported by SiChuan key research and development plan “geological hazard identification technologies of mountain tourist line based on big data”(No. 2020YFS0354). 2. This work was supported by Supported by Scientific Research Fund Project of Yunnan Provincial Department of Education “Earthquake relief asymmetric information game dynamics model in complicated landforms” (No. 2020J0381).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Yunnan University of Finance and Economics, Kunming, 650221, People’s Republic of China

    Feng He, Chunxue Liu & Guangjing Bao

  2. School of Tourism, Leshan Normal University, Leshan, 614000, People’s Republic of China

    Hongjiang Liu

Authors
  1. Feng He
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hongjiang Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Chunxue Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Guangjing Bao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors listed have made a substantial, direct and intellectual contribution to the work, and approved it for publication.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hongjiang Liu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Communicated by Mu-Yen Chen.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

He, F., Liu, H., Liu, C. et al. Analysis of radar technology identification model for potential geologic hazard based on convolutional neural network and Harris Hawks optimization algorithm. Soft Comput 27, 3493–3507 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-021-06206-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-021-06206-1

Keywords

  • Big data analysis
  • CNN
  • Apriori algorithm
  • Geological hazard
  • Radar identification technique