Abstract
Pavement is an important part of a road structure. Selection of road pavement type is one of the important challenges of decision making by highway administrators. The life-cycle cost analysis is one of the common tools to select the pavement type which considers economic criteria such as costs of construction, maintenance and rehabilitation, and user costs; however, noneconomic criteria are neglected. The inadequate selection of road pavement type tends to increase the pavement life-cycle cost and impacts both environmental and social parameters. In this study, a three-step hybrid model is proposed to solve this problem. Initially, the causal relationships of main criteria affecting the pavement type selection are determined using decision making trial and evaluation laboratory. Then, the weight and importance of criteria and sub-criteria are determined using fuzzy analytic network process. Finally, the ranking of pavement alternatives is carried out using a fuzzy technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution. A real case study consisting of five different types of pavements including hot mix asphalt, stone mastic asphalt, jointed plain concrete pavement, roller compacted concrete pavement with hot mix asphalt overlay and continuous reinforced concrete pavement is used to show the validity of the proposed model.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adrian C, Abdullah R, Atan R, Jusoh YY (2018) Conceptual model development of big data analytics implementation assessment effect on decision-making. IJIMAI 5(1):101–106
Babashamsi P, Yusoff NIM, Ceylan H, Nor NGM, Jenatabadi HS (2016) Evaluation of pavement life cycle cost analysis: review and analysis. Int J Pavement Res Technol 9(4):241–254
Bagga P, Joshi A, Hans R (2017) QoS based web service selection and multi-criteria decision making methods. Int J Interact Multimed Artif Intell 5(4):113–121
Behzadian M, Otaghsara SK, Yazdani M, Ignatius J (2012) A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications. Expert Syst Appl 39(17):13051–13069
Büyüközkan G, Çifçi G (2012) A novel hybrid MCDM approach based on fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS to evaluate green suppliers. Expert Syst Appl 39(3):3000–3011
Chakraborty S, Zavadskas EK, Antucheviciene J (2015) Applications of waspas method as a multi-criteria decision-making tool. Econ Comput Econ Cybern Stud Res 49(1):5–22
Chan A, Keoleian G, Gabler E (2008) Evaluation of life-cycle cost analysis practices used by the Michigan Department of Transportation. J Transp Eng 134(6):236–245
Chen CT (2000) Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets Syst 114(1):1–9
Cueva-Fernandez G, Espada JP, García-Díaz V, Crespo RG, Garcia-Fernandez N (2016) Fuzzy system to adapt web voice interfaces dynamically in a vehicle sensor tracking application definition. Soft Comput 20(8):3321–3334
Ebrahimnejad A, Verdegay JL (2018) A new approach for solving fully intuitionistic fuzzy transportation problems. Fuzzy Optim Decis Mak 17(4):447–474
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration) (2002) Life-Cycle Cost Analysis Primer.US department of transportation. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/asset/lcca/010621.pdf
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration) (2010) Life-cycle cost analysis. RealCost user manual. V. 2.5. Office of Asset Management
Gabus A, Fontela E (1972) World problems, an invitation to further thought within the framework of DEMATEL. Battelle Geneva Research Center, Geneva
Hallin JP, Sadasivam SJ, Mallela DK, Hein MI, Darter HL (2011) Guide for pavement-type selection. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
Hasnain M, Thaheem MJ, Ullah F (2018) Best value contractor selection in road construction projects: ANP-based decision support system. Int J Civ Eng 16(6):695–714
Heravi G, Esmaeeli AN (2013) Fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making approach for pavement project evaluation using life-cycle cost/performance analysis. J Infrastruct Syst 20(2):1–7
Hsieh TY, Lu ST, Tzeng GH (2004) Fuzzy MCDM approach for planning and design tenders selection in public office buildings. Int J Project Manage 22(7):573–584
Hwang CL, Yoon K (1981) Multiple attribute decision making methods and applications. Springer, Berlin
Jato-Espino D, Castillo-Lopez E, Rodriguez-Hernandez J, Canteras-Jordana JC (2014a) A review of application of multi-criteria decision making methods in construction. Autom Constr 45:151–162
Jato-Espino D, Rodriguez-Hernandez J, Andrés-Valeri VC, Ballester-Muñoz F (2014b) A fuzzy stochastic multi-criteria model for the selection of urban pervious pavements. Expert Syst Appl 41(15):6807–6817
Jato-Espino D, Indacoechea-Vega I, Gáspár L, Castro-Fresno D (2018) Decision support model for the selection of asphalt wearing courses in highly trafficked roads. Soft Comput 22:1–15
Kucukvar M, Gumus S, Egilmez G, Tatari O (2014) Ranking the sustainability performance of pavements: an intuitionistic fuzzy decision making method. Autom Constr 40:33–43
Lin CJ, Wu WW (2008) A causal analytical method for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Expert Syst Appl 34(1):205–213
Lin CL, Shih YH, Tzeng GH, Yu HC (2016) A service selection model for digital music service platforms using a hybrid MCDM approach. Appl Soft Comput 48:385–403
Liu R, Smartz BW, Descheneaux B (2015) LCCA and environmental LCA for highway pavement selection in Colorado. Int J Sustain Eng 8(2):102–110
MacDonald D (2005) Pavement type selection protocol. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C.
Morente-Molinera JA, Kou G, González-Crespo R, Corchado JM, Herrera-Viedma E (2017) Solving multi-criteria group decision making problems under environments with a high number of alternatives using fuzzy ontologies and multi-granular linguistic modelling methods. Knowl Based Syst 137:54–64
Officials Transportation (1993) AASHTO guide for design of pavement structures, vol 1. AASHTO, Washington, D.C.
Ponz-Tienda JL, Pellicer E, Yepes V (2012) Complete fuzzy scheduling and fuzzy earned value management in construction projects. J Zhejiang Univ Sci A 13(1):56–68
Saaty TL (1996) Decision making with feedback: the analytical network process. RWS Publications, Pittsburg
Saaty TL, Vargas LG (1998) Diagnosis with dependent symptoms: Bayes theorem and the analytic hierarchy process. Oper Res 46(4):491–502
Sabaei D, Erkoyuncu J, Roy R (2015) A review of multi-criteria decision making methods for enhanced maintenance delivery. Proc CIRP 37:30–35
Salem OM, Deshpande AS, Genaidy A, Geara TG (2013) User costs in pavement construction and rehabilitation alternative evaluation. Struct Infrastruct Eng 9(3):285–294
Santos J, Ferreira A (2013) Life-cycle cost analysis system for pavement management at project level. Int J Pavement Eng 14(1):71–84
Shen F, Xu J, Xu Z (2015) An automatic ranking approach for multi-criteria group decision making under intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Optim Decis Mak 14(3):311–334
Silva F, Analide C, Novais P (2014) Assessing road traffic expression. IJIMAI 3(1):20–27
Uygun Ö, Kaçamak H, Kahraman ÜA (2015) An integrated DEMATEL and Fuzzy ANP techniques for evaluation and selection of outsourcing provider for a telecommunication company. Comput Ind Eng 86:137–146
Wang Y, Ma XL, Wang YH, Mao HJ, Zhang Y (2012) Location optimization of multiple distribution centers under fuzzy environment. J Zhejiang Univ Sci A 13(10):782–798
Yang HW, Chang KF (2012) Combining means-end chain and fuzzy ANP to explore customers’ decision process in selecting bundles. Int J Inf Manage 32(4):381–395
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Communicated by V. Loia.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pasha, A., Mansourian, A. & Ravanshadnia, M. A hybrid fuzzy multi-attribute decision making model to select road pavement type. Soft Comput 24, 16135–16148 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-04928-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-04928-2