Skip to main content
Log in

A hybrid fuzzy multi-attribute decision making model to select road pavement type

  • Methodologies and Application
  • Published:
Soft Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pavement is an important part of a road structure. Selection of road pavement type is one of the important challenges of decision making by highway administrators. The life-cycle cost analysis is one of the common tools to select the pavement type which considers economic criteria such as costs of construction, maintenance and rehabilitation, and user costs; however, noneconomic criteria are neglected. The inadequate selection of road pavement type tends to increase the pavement life-cycle cost and impacts both environmental and social parameters. In this study, a three-step hybrid model is proposed to solve this problem. Initially, the causal relationships of main criteria affecting the pavement type selection are determined using decision making trial and evaluation laboratory. Then, the weight and importance of criteria and sub-criteria are determined using fuzzy analytic network process. Finally, the ranking of pavement alternatives is carried out using a fuzzy technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution. A real case study consisting of five different types of pavements including hot mix asphalt, stone mastic asphalt, jointed plain concrete pavement, roller compacted concrete pavement with hot mix asphalt overlay and continuous reinforced concrete pavement is used to show the validity of the proposed model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adrian C, Abdullah R, Atan R, Jusoh YY (2018) Conceptual model development of big data analytics implementation assessment effect on decision-making. IJIMAI 5(1):101–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babashamsi P, Yusoff NIM, Ceylan H, Nor NGM, Jenatabadi HS (2016) Evaluation of pavement life cycle cost analysis: review and analysis. Int J Pavement Res Technol 9(4):241–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagga P, Joshi A, Hans R (2017) QoS based web service selection and multi-criteria decision making methods. Int J Interact Multimed Artif Intell 5(4):113–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Behzadian M, Otaghsara SK, Yazdani M, Ignatius J (2012) A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications. Expert Syst Appl 39(17):13051–13069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Büyüközkan G, Çifçi G (2012) A novel hybrid MCDM approach based on fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS to evaluate green suppliers. Expert Syst Appl 39(3):3000–3011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborty S, Zavadskas EK, Antucheviciene J (2015) Applications of waspas method as a multi-criteria decision-making tool. Econ Comput Econ Cybern Stud Res 49(1):5–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan A, Keoleian G, Gabler E (2008) Evaluation of life-cycle cost analysis practices used by the Michigan Department of Transportation. J Transp Eng 134(6):236–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen CT (2000) Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets Syst 114(1):1–9

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cueva-Fernandez G, Espada JP, García-Díaz V, Crespo RG, Garcia-Fernandez N (2016) Fuzzy system to adapt web voice interfaces dynamically in a vehicle sensor tracking application definition. Soft Comput 20(8):3321–3334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebrahimnejad A, Verdegay JL (2018) A new approach for solving fully intuitionistic fuzzy transportation problems. Fuzzy Optim Decis Mak 17(4):447–474

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • FHWA (Federal Highway Administration) (2002) Life-Cycle Cost Analysis Primer.US department of transportation. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/asset/lcca/010621.pdf

  • FHWA (Federal Highway Administration) (2010) Life-cycle cost analysis. RealCost user manual. V. 2.5. Office of Asset Management

  • Gabus A, Fontela E (1972) World problems, an invitation to further thought within the framework of DEMATEL. Battelle Geneva Research Center, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallin JP, Sadasivam SJ, Mallela DK, Hein MI, Darter HL (2011) Guide for pavement-type selection. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasnain M, Thaheem MJ, Ullah F (2018) Best value contractor selection in road construction projects: ANP-based decision support system. Int J Civ Eng 16(6):695–714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heravi G, Esmaeeli AN (2013) Fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making approach for pavement project evaluation using life-cycle cost/performance analysis. J Infrastruct Syst 20(2):1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh TY, Lu ST, Tzeng GH (2004) Fuzzy MCDM approach for planning and design tenders selection in public office buildings. Int J Project Manage 22(7):573–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang CL, Yoon K (1981) Multiple attribute decision making methods and applications. Springer, Berlin

  • Jato-Espino D, Castillo-Lopez E, Rodriguez-Hernandez J, Canteras-Jordana JC (2014a) A review of application of multi-criteria decision making methods in construction. Autom Constr 45:151–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jato-Espino D, Rodriguez-Hernandez J, Andrés-Valeri VC, Ballester-Muñoz F (2014b) A fuzzy stochastic multi-criteria model for the selection of urban pervious pavements. Expert Syst Appl 41(15):6807–6817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jato-Espino D, Indacoechea-Vega I, Gáspár L, Castro-Fresno D (2018) Decision support model for the selection of asphalt wearing courses in highly trafficked roads. Soft Comput 22:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kucukvar M, Gumus S, Egilmez G, Tatari O (2014) Ranking the sustainability performance of pavements: an intuitionistic fuzzy decision making method. Autom Constr 40:33–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin CJ, Wu WW (2008) A causal analytical method for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Expert Syst Appl 34(1):205–213

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lin CL, Shih YH, Tzeng GH, Yu HC (2016) A service selection model for digital music service platforms using a hybrid MCDM approach. Appl Soft Comput 48:385–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu R, Smartz BW, Descheneaux B (2015) LCCA and environmental LCA for highway pavement selection in Colorado. Int J Sustain Eng 8(2):102–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald D (2005) Pavement type selection protocol. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morente-Molinera JA, Kou G, González-Crespo R, Corchado JM, Herrera-Viedma E (2017) Solving multi-criteria group decision making problems under environments with a high number of alternatives using fuzzy ontologies and multi-granular linguistic modelling methods. Knowl Based Syst 137:54–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Officials Transportation (1993) AASHTO guide for design of pavement structures, vol 1. AASHTO, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponz-Tienda JL, Pellicer E, Yepes V (2012) Complete fuzzy scheduling and fuzzy earned value management in construction projects. J Zhejiang Univ Sci A 13(1):56–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1996) Decision making with feedback: the analytical network process. RWS Publications, Pittsburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL, Vargas LG (1998) Diagnosis with dependent symptoms: Bayes theorem and the analytic hierarchy process. Oper Res 46(4):491–502

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sabaei D, Erkoyuncu J, Roy R (2015) A review of multi-criteria decision making methods for enhanced maintenance delivery. Proc CIRP 37:30–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salem OM, Deshpande AS, Genaidy A, Geara TG (2013) User costs in pavement construction and rehabilitation alternative evaluation. Struct Infrastruct Eng 9(3):285–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos J, Ferreira A (2013) Life-cycle cost analysis system for pavement management at project level. Int J Pavement Eng 14(1):71–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen F, Xu J, Xu Z (2015) An automatic ranking approach for multi-criteria group decision making under intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Optim Decis Mak 14(3):311–334

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Silva F, Analide C, Novais P (2014) Assessing road traffic expression. IJIMAI 3(1):20–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uygun Ö, Kaçamak H, Kahraman ÜA (2015) An integrated DEMATEL and Fuzzy ANP techniques for evaluation and selection of outsourcing provider for a telecommunication company. Comput Ind Eng 86:137–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Ma XL, Wang YH, Mao HJ, Zhang Y (2012) Location optimization of multiple distribution centers under fuzzy environment. J Zhejiang Univ Sci A 13(10):782–798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang HW, Chang KF (2012) Combining means-end chain and fuzzy ANP to explore customers’ decision process in selecting bundles. Int J Inf Manage 32(4):381–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmad Mansourian.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Communicated by V. Loia.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pasha, A., Mansourian, A. & Ravanshadnia, M. A hybrid fuzzy multi-attribute decision making model to select road pavement type. Soft Comput 24, 16135–16148 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-04928-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-04928-2

Keywords

Navigation