Currently, globalization process significantly impacts not only technological, economical, but also social, political and cultural fields. Ongoing social, economic and political processes demonstrate their impacts, and countries are governed by different regimes and government forms. From this standpoint, there is a need for qualified, competent staff for operation of the regimes and governments. In the article researches, which criteria or factors must be taken into account for selection of competent candidates that are suitable for relevant positions during the election process in contrast to traditional voting. Criteria for candidates’ selection include adoption of democratic principles, age, education, government agency experience, professional competence, global culture and value acknowledgement, influence in voting area, leadership skills, activity in social media, etc. In the article implemented multi-criteria evaluation approach for candidate selection. Candidates are ranked based on criteria selected using modified fuzzy TOPSIS and triangular fuzzy numbers ranking methods and different aggregation operators. Candidates are ranked by applying both methods in a numeral experiment, and obtained results are compared. Proposed fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model allows determining a compromise solution in candidate selection.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Afshari AR, Nikolić M, Akbari Z (2017) Personnel selection using group fuzzy AHP and SAW methods. J Eng Manag Compet 7(1):3–10
Akyar E, Akyar H, Duzce SA (2012) A new method for ranking triangular fuzzy numbers. Int J Uncertain Fuzz 20(5):729–740
Alguliyev RM, Yusifov FF (2016a) E-government formation challenges and solution perspectives. In: Kadry S et al (eds) E-systems for the 21st century: concept, developments, and applications, vol 1. Apple Academic Press, exclusive distributor by CRC press. Taylor and Francis group, Waretown, New Jersey, USA, pp 171–196
Alguliyev RM, Yusifov FF (2016b) Challenges of transformation from e-government to e-democracy. 14th international conference on e-Society. Algarve, Portugal, pp 217–220
Alguliyev RM, Aliguliyev RM, Mahmudova RM (2015) Multicriteria personnel selection by the modified fuzzy VIKOR method. Sci World J. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/612767
Alguliyev RM, Aliguliyev RM, Mahmudova RM (2016) A Fuzzy TOPSIS+worst-case model for personnel evaluation using information culture criteria. Int J Oper Res Inf Syst 7(4):38–66
Aliguliyev R (2009) Performance evaluation of density-based clustering methods. Inform Sciences 179:3583–3602
Awad M, Leiss EL (2016) The evolution of voting: analysis of conventional and electronic voting systems. Int J Appl Eng 11(12):7888–7896
Borissova D (2018) A group decision making model considering experts competency: an application in personnel selection. CR Acad Bulg Sci 71(11):1520–1527
Bormann N-C, Golder M (2013) Democratic electoral systems around the world, 1946–2011. Elect Stud 32:360–369
Boulmakoul A, Laarabi MH, Sacile R, Garbolino E (2013) Ranking triangular fuzzy numbers using fuzzy set inclusion index. In: Masulli F, Pasi G, Yager R (eds) Fuzzy logic and applications, WILF 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8256. Springer, Cham
Capaldo G, Zollo G (2001) Applying fuzzy logic to personnel assessment: a case study. Omega 29(6):585–597
Chang Y-H, Yeh C-H, Chang Y-W (2013) A new method selection approach for fuzzy group multicriteria decision making. Appl Soft Comput 13(4):2179–2187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2012.12.009
Dursun M, Karsak EE (2010) A fuzzy MCDM approach for personnel selection. Expert Syst Appl 37:4324–4330
Emerson P (2016) From majority rule to inclusive politics. Springer, ISBN 978-3-319-23500-4
Farmani M, Jafari A (2016) A comparative approach to study the electoral systems of selected countries. Int J Humanit Cult Stud 2(4):1913–1924
Gibson JP, Krimmer R et al (2016) A review of E-voting: the past, present and future. Ann Telecommun 71(7–8):279–286
Grofman B (2016) Perspectives on the comparative study of electoral systems. Annu Rev Polit Sci 19:523–540. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-020614-092344
Gungor Z, Serhadlioglu G, Kesen SE (2009) A fuzzy AHP approach to personnel selection problem. Appl Soft Comput 9:641–646
Hajjari T (2015) Fuzzy risk analysis based on ranking of fuzzy numbers via new magnitude method. Iran J Fuzzy Syst 12(3):17–29
Kabak M, Burrnaoglu S, Kazancoglu Y (2012) A fuzzy hybrid MCDM approach for professional selection. Expert Syst Appl 39:3516–3525
Karabasevic D, Stanujkic D, Urosevic S, Maksimovic M (2015) Selection of candidates in the mining industry based on the application of the SWARA and the MULTIMOORA methods. Acta Montan Slovaca 20(2):116–124
Karabasevica D, Stanujkic D, Urosevic S (2015) The MCDM model for personnel selection based on SWARA and ARAS methods. Manag J Sustain Bus Manag Sol Emerg Econ 77:43–52
Kazana H, Özçelik S, Hobikoğlu EH (2015) Election of deputy candidates for nomination with AHP-Promethee methods. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 195:603–613
Kelemenis A, Askounis D (2010) A new TOPSIS-based multi-criteria approach to personnel selection. Expert Syst Appl 37:4999–5008
Khorami M, Ehsani R (2015) Application of multi criteria decision making approaches for personnel selection problem: a survey. Int J Eng Res Appl 5(5):14–29
Kumar S (2011) Analysis of electronic voting system in various countries. Int J Comput Sci Eng 3(5):1825–1830
Lin Sh (2010) Rank aggregation methods. WIREs Comp Stats 2:555–570
Mardani A, Jusoh A, Nor KMD, Khalifah Z, Zakwan N, Valipour A (2015) Multiple criteria decision-making techniques and their applications—a review of the literature from 2000 to 2014. Econ Res-Ekon Istraz 28(1):516–571
Menocal AR (2011) Why electoral systems matter: an analysis of their incentives and effects on key areas of governance. Overseas Development Institute. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org. Accessed 31 Oct 2019
Meserve SA, Palani S, Pemstein D (2017) Measuring candidate selection mechanisms in European elections: comparing formal party rules to candidate survey responses, pp 1–28 www.danpemstein.com. Accessed 31 Oct 2019
Moser RG, Scheiner E (2004) Mixed electoral systems and electoral system effects: controlled comparison and crossnational analysis. Elect Stud 23:575–599
Musial-Karg M (2014) The use of e-voting as a new tool of e-participation in modern democracies. http://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/pp/-article/viewFile/2101/2091. Accessed 30 Oct 2019
Nguyen T-L (2017) Methods in ranking fuzzy numbers: a unified index and comparative reviews. Complexity, Hindawi Pub. vol 2017, 13 p. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/3083745
Pennings P, Hazan RY (2001) Democratizing candidate selection: causes and consequences. Party Polit 7(3):267–275
Pilet J-B, Van Haute E, Kelbel C (2015) Candidate selection procedures for the European elections. European Parliament’s Committee on Constitutional Affairs, http://www.europarl.europa.eu/studies. Accessed 31 Oct 2019
Powell GB (2000) Elections as instruments of democracy: majoritarian and proportional visions. Yale University Press, New Haven, p 312
Rouyendegh BD, Erkan TE (2013) An application of the fuzzy ELECTRE method for academic staff selection. Hum Factor Ergon Manuf 23(2):107–115
Royes GF, Bastos RC (2001a) Fuzzy MCDM in election prediction. IEEE Int Conf Syst Man Cybern 5:3258–3263
Royes GF, Bastos RC (2001b) Political analysis using fuzzy MCDM. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 11(1–2):53–64
Shahandashti SF (2016) Electoral systems used around the world. In: Hao F, Ryan PYA (eds) Real-world electronic voting: design, analysis and deployment (series in security). CRC Press, Privacy and Trust)
Siavelis PM, Morgenstern S (2008) Candidate recruitment and selection in Latin America: a framework for analysis. Lat Am Polit Soc 50(4):27–58
Stanujkic D, Djordjevic B, Djordjevic M (2013) Comparative analysis of some prominent MCDM methods: a case of ranking Serbian banks. Serb J Manag 8(2):213–241
Tuan NA (2017) Personnel evaluation and selection using a generalized fuzzy multi-criteria decision making. Int J Soft Comput 12(4):263–269
Turskis Z, Zavadskas EK (2011) Multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) methods in economics: an overview. Technol Econ Dev Econ 2:397–427
Vassil K, Solvak M, Vinkel P et al (2016) The diffusion of internet voting. Usage patterns of internet voting in Estonia between 2005 and 2015. Gov Inform Q 33:453–459
Wang K-H, Mondal SK, Chan K, Xie X (2017) A review of contemporary E-voting: requirements, technology, systems and usability. Data Sci Pattern Recognit 1(1):31–47
Zavadskas EK, Turskis Z, Kildienė S (2014) State of art surveys of overviews on MCDM/MADM methods. Technol Econ Dev Econ 20(1):165–179
Zionts S (1979) MCDM-if not a roman numeral, then what? Manag Sci 9(4):94–101
The authors received no specific funding for this work.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Communicated by V. Loia.
About this article
Cite this article
Alguliyev, R., Aliguliyev, R. & Yusifov, F. Modified fuzzy TOPSIS + TFNs ranking model for candidate selection using the qualifying criteria. Soft Comput 24, 681–695 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-019-04521-2
- Election systems
- Candidate selection
- Fuzzy MCDM
- Ranking triangular fuzzy numbers
- Positional ranking