Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Urban hazmat transportation with multi-factor

  • Focus
  • Published:
Soft Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, an urban hazmat transportation problem considering multiple factors that tangle with real-world applications (i.e., weather conditions, traffic conditions, population density, time window, link closure and half link closure) is investigated. Based on multiple depot capacitated vehicle routing problem, we provide a multi-level programming formulation for urban hazmat transportation. To obtain the Pareto optimal solution, an improved biogeography-based optimization (improved BBO) algorithm is designed, comparing with the original BBO and genetic algorithm, with both simulated numerical examples and a real-world case study, demonstrating the effectiveness of the proposed approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. U.S. Department of Transportation. See at: https://www.transportation.gov.

  2. Electronic map of China petroleum and chemical corporation Beijing oil products company. See at: http://wap.bjoil.com/portal/map.jsp.

  3. Beijing traffic management bureau. See at: http://cgs.bjjtgl.gov.cn/roadpublish/Map/trafficOutNew1.jsp.

  4. Beijing meteorological service. See at: http://www.bjmb.gov.cn.

References

  • Abkowitz M, Cheng PDM (1988) Developing a risk/cost framework for routing truck movements of hazardous materials. Accid Anal Prev 20(1):39–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akgün V, Parekh A, Batta R, Rump CM (2007) Routing of a hazmat truck in the presence of weather systems. Comput Oper Res 34(5):1351–1373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Androutsopoulos KN, Zografos KG (2012) A bi-objective time-dependent vehicle routing and scheduling problem for hazardous materials distribution. EURO J Transp Logist 1(1–2):157–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Assadipour G, Ke GY, Verma M (2015) Planning and managing intermodal transportation of hazardous materials with capacity selection and congestion. Transp Res Part E Logist Transp Rev 76:45–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batta R, Chiu SS (1988) Optimal obnoxious paths on a network: transportation of hazardous materials. Oper Res 36(1):84–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Branston D (1976) Link capacity functions: a review. Transp Res 10(4):223–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bronfman A, Marianov V, Paredes-Belmar G, Lüer-Villagra A (2015) The maximin HAZMAT routing problem. Eur J Oper Res 241(1):15–27

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bronfman A, Marianov V, Paredes-Belmar G, Lüer-Villagra A (2016) The maxisum and maximin-maxisum HAZMAT routing problems. Transp Res Part E Logist Transp Rev 93:316–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bula GA, Prodhon C, Gonzalez FA, Afsar HM, Velasco N (2017) Variable neighborhood search to solve the vehicle routing problem for hazardous materials transportation. J Hazard Mater 324:472–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carotenuto P, Giordani S, Ricciardelli S (2007) Finding minimum and equitable risk routes for hazmat shipments. Comput Oper Res 34(5):1304–1327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke G, Wright JW (1964) Scheduling of vehicles from a central depot to a number of delivery points. Oper Res 12(4):568–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Jong H (2002) Modeling and simulation of genetic regulatory systems: a literature review. J Comput Biol 9(1):67–103

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Du J, Yu L, Li X (2016) Fuzzy multi-objective chance-constrained programming model for hazardous materials transportation. Int J Gen Syst 45(3):286–310

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Du J, Li X, Yu L, Dan R, Zhou J (2017) Multi-depot vehicle routing problem for hazardous materials transportation: a fuzzy bilevel programming. Inf Sci 399:201–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elbeltagi E, Hegazy T, Grierson D (2005) Comparison among five evolutionary-based optimization algorithms. Adv Eng Inform 19(1):43–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erkut E, Verter V (1998) Modeling of transport risk for hazardous materials. Oper Res 46(5):625–642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erkut E, Tjandra SA, Verter V (2007) Hazardous materials transportation. Handb Oper Res Manag Sci 14:539–621

    Google Scholar 

  • Esfandeh T, Kwon C, Batta R (2016) Regulating hazardous materials transportation by dual toll pricing. Transp Res Part B Methodol 83:20–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan T, Chiang WC, Russell R (2015) Modeling urban hazmat transportation with road closure consideration. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ 35:104–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filipec M, Skrlec D, Krajcar S (1997) Darwin meets computers: new approach to multiple depot capacitated vehicle routing problem. In: IEEE International conference on systems, man, and cybernetics, pp 421–426

  • Filipec M, Skrlec D, Krajcar S (2000) Genetic algorithm approach for multiple depot capacitated vehicle routing problem solving with heuristic improvements. Int J Model Simul 20(4):320–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassan R, Cohanim B, De Weck O, Venter G (2005) A comparison of particle swarm optimization and the genetic algorithm. In: 46th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics and materials conference

  • Kang Y, Batta R, Kwon C (2014) Value-at-risk model for hazardous material transportation. Ann Oper Res 222(1):361–387

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Karkazis J, Boffey TB (1995) Optimal location of routes for vehicles transporting hazardous materials. Eur J Oper Res 86(2):201–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • List G, Mirchandani P (1991) An integrated network/planar multiobjective model for routing and siting for hazardous materials and wastes. Transp Sci 25(2):146–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lozano A, Munoz A, Antun JP, Granados F, Guarneros L (2010) Analysis of hazmat transportation accidents in congested urban areas, based on actual accidents in Mexico. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 2(3):6053–6064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma H, Simon D, Fei M, Xie Z (2013) Variations of biogeography-based optimization and Markov analysis. Inf Sci 220:492–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meng Q, Lee DH, Cheu RL (2005) Multiobjective vehicle routing and scheduling problem with time window constraints in hazardous material transportation. J Transp Eng 131(9):699–707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirjalili S, Mirjalili SM, Lewis A (2014) Let a biogeography-based optimizer train your multi-layer perceptron. Inf Sci 269:188–209

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Patel MH, Horowitz AJ (1994) Optimal routing of hazardous materials considering risk of spill. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 28(2):119–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhananga R, Taniguchi E, Yamada T, Qureshi AG (2014) Bi-objective decision support system for routing and scheduling of hazardous materials. Socio Econ Plan Sci 48(2):135–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Satterthwaite SP (1976) An assessment of seasonal and weather effects on the frequency of road accidents in California. Accid Anal Prev 8(2):87–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon D (2008a) Biogeography-based optimization. IEEE Trans Evolut Comput 12(6):702–713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon D (2008b) The Matlab code of biogeography-based optimization. http://academic.csuohio.edu/simond/bbo/. Accessed 8 May 2009

  • Toumazis I, Kwon C (2015) Worst-case conditional value-at-risk minimization for hazardous materials transportation. Transp Sci 50(4):1174–1187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toumazis I, Kwon C, Batta R (eds) (2013) Value-at-risk and conditional value-at-risk minimization for hazardous materials routing. In: Handbook of OR/MS models in hazardous materials transportation. Springer, pp 127–154

  • Wang J, Kang Y, Kwon C, Batta R (2012) Dual toll pricing for hazardous materials transport with linear delay. Netw Spat Econ 12(1):147–165

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Zhu J, Ma F, Li C, Cai Y, Yang Z (2016) Bayesian network-based risk assessment for hazmat transportation on the Middle Route of the South-to-North Water Transfer Project in China. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 30(3):841–857

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by grants from National Natural Science Foundation of China of No. 71722007, and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. XK1802-5).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiang Li.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and animal rights

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal participants performed by the author.

Additional information

Communicated by X. Li.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Du, J., Li, X., Li, L. et al. Urban hazmat transportation with multi-factor. Soft Comput 24, 6307–6328 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-019-03956-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-019-03956-x

Keywords

Navigation