Abstract
In this paper, an urban hazmat transportation problem considering multiple factors that tangle with real-world applications (i.e., weather conditions, traffic conditions, population density, time window, link closure and half link closure) is investigated. Based on multiple depot capacitated vehicle routing problem, we provide a multi-level programming formulation for urban hazmat transportation. To obtain the Pareto optimal solution, an improved biogeography-based optimization (improved BBO) algorithm is designed, comparing with the original BBO and genetic algorithm, with both simulated numerical examples and a real-world case study, demonstrating the effectiveness of the proposed approach.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
U.S. Department of Transportation. See at: https://www.transportation.gov.
Electronic map of China petroleum and chemical corporation Beijing oil products company. See at: http://wap.bjoil.com/portal/map.jsp.
Beijing traffic management bureau. See at: http://cgs.bjjtgl.gov.cn/roadpublish/Map/trafficOutNew1.jsp.
Beijing meteorological service. See at: http://www.bjmb.gov.cn.
References
Abkowitz M, Cheng PDM (1988) Developing a risk/cost framework for routing truck movements of hazardous materials. Accid Anal Prev 20(1):39–51
Akgün V, Parekh A, Batta R, Rump CM (2007) Routing of a hazmat truck in the presence of weather systems. Comput Oper Res 34(5):1351–1373
Androutsopoulos KN, Zografos KG (2012) A bi-objective time-dependent vehicle routing and scheduling problem for hazardous materials distribution. EURO J Transp Logist 1(1–2):157–183
Assadipour G, Ke GY, Verma M (2015) Planning and managing intermodal transportation of hazardous materials with capacity selection and congestion. Transp Res Part E Logist Transp Rev 76:45–57
Batta R, Chiu SS (1988) Optimal obnoxious paths on a network: transportation of hazardous materials. Oper Res 36(1):84–92
Branston D (1976) Link capacity functions: a review. Transp Res 10(4):223–236
Bronfman A, Marianov V, Paredes-Belmar G, Lüer-Villagra A (2015) The maximin HAZMAT routing problem. Eur J Oper Res 241(1):15–27
Bronfman A, Marianov V, Paredes-Belmar G, Lüer-Villagra A (2016) The maxisum and maximin-maxisum HAZMAT routing problems. Transp Res Part E Logist Transp Rev 93:316–333
Bula GA, Prodhon C, Gonzalez FA, Afsar HM, Velasco N (2017) Variable neighborhood search to solve the vehicle routing problem for hazardous materials transportation. J Hazard Mater 324:472–480
Carotenuto P, Giordani S, Ricciardelli S (2007) Finding minimum and equitable risk routes for hazmat shipments. Comput Oper Res 34(5):1304–1327
Clarke G, Wright JW (1964) Scheduling of vehicles from a central depot to a number of delivery points. Oper Res 12(4):568–581
De Jong H (2002) Modeling and simulation of genetic regulatory systems: a literature review. J Comput Biol 9(1):67–103
Du J, Yu L, Li X (2016) Fuzzy multi-objective chance-constrained programming model for hazardous materials transportation. Int J Gen Syst 45(3):286–310
Du J, Li X, Yu L, Dan R, Zhou J (2017) Multi-depot vehicle routing problem for hazardous materials transportation: a fuzzy bilevel programming. Inf Sci 399:201–218
Elbeltagi E, Hegazy T, Grierson D (2005) Comparison among five evolutionary-based optimization algorithms. Adv Eng Inform 19(1):43–53
Erkut E, Verter V (1998) Modeling of transport risk for hazardous materials. Oper Res 46(5):625–642
Erkut E, Tjandra SA, Verter V (2007) Hazardous materials transportation. Handb Oper Res Manag Sci 14:539–621
Esfandeh T, Kwon C, Batta R (2016) Regulating hazardous materials transportation by dual toll pricing. Transp Res Part B Methodol 83:20–35
Fan T, Chiang WC, Russell R (2015) Modeling urban hazmat transportation with road closure consideration. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ 35:104–115
Filipec M, Skrlec D, Krajcar S (1997) Darwin meets computers: new approach to multiple depot capacitated vehicle routing problem. In: IEEE International conference on systems, man, and cybernetics, pp 421–426
Filipec M, Skrlec D, Krajcar S (2000) Genetic algorithm approach for multiple depot capacitated vehicle routing problem solving with heuristic improvements. Int J Model Simul 20(4):320–328
Hassan R, Cohanim B, De Weck O, Venter G (2005) A comparison of particle swarm optimization and the genetic algorithm. In: 46th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics and materials conference
Kang Y, Batta R, Kwon C (2014) Value-at-risk model for hazardous material transportation. Ann Oper Res 222(1):361–387
Karkazis J, Boffey TB (1995) Optimal location of routes for vehicles transporting hazardous materials. Eur J Oper Res 86(2):201–215
List G, Mirchandani P (1991) An integrated network/planar multiobjective model for routing and siting for hazardous materials and wastes. Transp Sci 25(2):146–156
Lozano A, Munoz A, Antun JP, Granados F, Guarneros L (2010) Analysis of hazmat transportation accidents in congested urban areas, based on actual accidents in Mexico. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 2(3):6053–6064
Ma H, Simon D, Fei M, Xie Z (2013) Variations of biogeography-based optimization and Markov analysis. Inf Sci 220:492–506
Meng Q, Lee DH, Cheu RL (2005) Multiobjective vehicle routing and scheduling problem with time window constraints in hazardous material transportation. J Transp Eng 131(9):699–707
Mirjalili S, Mirjalili SM, Lewis A (2014) Let a biogeography-based optimizer train your multi-layer perceptron. Inf Sci 269:188–209
Patel MH, Horowitz AJ (1994) Optimal routing of hazardous materials considering risk of spill. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 28(2):119–132
Pradhananga R, Taniguchi E, Yamada T, Qureshi AG (2014) Bi-objective decision support system for routing and scheduling of hazardous materials. Socio Econ Plan Sci 48(2):135–148
Satterthwaite SP (1976) An assessment of seasonal and weather effects on the frequency of road accidents in California. Accid Anal Prev 8(2):87–96
Simon D (2008a) Biogeography-based optimization. IEEE Trans Evolut Comput 12(6):702–713
Simon D (2008b) The Matlab code of biogeography-based optimization. http://academic.csuohio.edu/simond/bbo/. Accessed 8 May 2009
Toumazis I, Kwon C (2015) Worst-case conditional value-at-risk minimization for hazardous materials transportation. Transp Sci 50(4):1174–1187
Toumazis I, Kwon C, Batta R (eds) (2013) Value-at-risk and conditional value-at-risk minimization for hazardous materials routing. In: Handbook of OR/MS models in hazardous materials transportation. Springer, pp 127–154
Wang J, Kang Y, Kwon C, Batta R (2012) Dual toll pricing for hazardous materials transport with linear delay. Netw Spat Econ 12(1):147–165
Wang X, Zhu J, Ma F, Li C, Cai Y, Yang Z (2016) Bayesian network-based risk assessment for hazmat transportation on the Middle Route of the South-to-North Water Transfer Project in China. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 30(3):841–857
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by grants from National Natural Science Foundation of China of No. 71722007, and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. XK1802-5).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Human and animal rights
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal participants performed by the author.
Additional information
Communicated by X. Li.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Du, J., Li, X., Li, L. et al. Urban hazmat transportation with multi-factor. Soft Comput 24, 6307–6328 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-019-03956-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-019-03956-x