Skip to main content
Log in

Uncertain revised regression analysis with responses of logarithmic, square root and reciprocal transformations

  • Focus
  • Published:
Soft Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Regression models are often called for to quantify relationships between the explanatory variables and the response variable. Mathematically, data should be collected and recorded as their true values, which turns out to be unrealistic for the real world. In this paper, we introduce uncertain variables to characterize such imprecise data, apply the most useful logarithmic, square root or reciprocal transformation to alleviate possible nonlinearity problems and estimate the disturbance terms for the obtained uncertain regression models, followed by confidence interval estimations and point predictions. For each type of models being proposed, namely the uncertain revised regression models, uncertain revised asymptotic regression models and uncertain revised Michaelis–Menten kinetics regression models, we give a numerical example, respectively, to illustrate our approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Casals MR, Gil MA, Gil P (1986a) On the use of Zadeh’s probabilistic definition for testing statistical hypotheses from fuzzy information. Fuzzy Sets Syst 20:175–190

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Casals MR, Gil MA, Gil P (1986b) The fuzzy decision problem: an approach to the problem of testing statistical hypotheses with fuzzy information. Eur J Oper Res 27:371–382

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Corral N, Gil MA (1984) The minimum inaccuracy fuzzy estimation: an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. Stochastica 8:63–81

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Corral N, Gil MA (1988) A note on interval estimation with fuzzy data. Fuzzy Sets Syst 28:209–215

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond P (1988) Fuzzy least squares. Inf Sci 46:141–157

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Edgeworth FY (1887) On observations relating to several quantities. Hermathena 6:279–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Edgeworth FY (1888) On a new method of reducing observations relating to several quantities. Philos Mag 25:184–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher RA (1925) Statistical methods for research workers. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gauss CF (1809) Theory of the motion of the heavenly bodies moving about the sun in conic sections. Sumtibus Frid Perthes, Hamburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Galton F (1885) Regression towards mediocrity in hereditary stature. J Anthropol Inst 15:246–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Legendre AM (1805) New methods for the determination of the orbits of comets. Firmin Didot, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu B (2007) Uncertainty theory, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Liu B (2009) Some research problems in uncertainty theory. J Uncertain Syst 3:3–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu B (2010) Uncertainty theory: a branch of mathematics for modeling human uncertainty. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Liu B (2012) Why is there a need for uncertainty theory. J Uncertain Syst 6:3–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu B (2015) Uncertainty theory, 4th edn. Springer, Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lio W, Liu B (2018a) Residual and confidence interval for uncertain regression model with imprecise observations. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 35:2573–2583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lio W, Liu B (2018b) Uncertain data envelopment analysis with imprecisely observed inputs and outputs. Fuzzy Optim Decis Mak 17:357–373

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Nejad ZM, Ghaffari-Hadigheh A (2018) A novel DEA model based on uncertainty theory. Ann Oper Res 264:367–389

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Neyman J, Pearson ES (1933) On the problem of the most efficient tests of statistical hypotheses. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Engi Sci 231:289–337

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Neyman J (1937) Outline of a theory of statistical estimation based on the classical theory of probability. Philos Trans R Soc A 236:333–380

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sakawa M, Yano H (1992) Multiobjective fuzzy linear regression analysis for fuzzy input-output data. Fuzzy Sets Syst 63:191–206

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Student (1908) The probable error of a mean. Biometrika 6:1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka H, Uejima S, Asai K (1982) Linear regression analysis with fuzzy model. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 12:903–907

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wen ML, Zhang QY, Kang R, Yang Y (2017) Some new ranking criteria in data envelopment analysis under uncertain environment. Comput Ind Eng 110:498–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilks SS (1938) The large-sample distribution of the likelihood ratio for testing composite hypotheses. Ann Math Stat 9:60–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yule GU (1897) On the theory of correlation. J R Stat Soc 60:812–854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao K (2017) Uncertain statistical inference models with imprecise observations. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 26:409–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao K, Liu B (2018) Uncertain regression analysis: an approach for imprecise observations. Soft Comput 22:5579–5582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang XF, Liu B (2018) Uncertain time series analysis with imprecise observations. Fuzzy Optim Decis Mak. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10700-018-9298-z

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Yang XF, Gao J, Ni Y (2018) Resolution principle in uncertain random environment. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 26:1578–1588

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province, No.1708085QA14.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liang Fang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by the author.

Additional information

Communicated by Y. Ni.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fang, L., Hong, Y. Uncertain revised regression analysis with responses of logarithmic, square root and reciprocal transformations. Soft Comput 24, 2655–2670 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-019-03821-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-019-03821-x

Keywords

Navigation