Existing infrastructure is aging, while the demands are growing for a better infrastructure system in response to the high standards of safety, health, population growth, and environmental protection. Bridges are subjected to severe deterioration agents such as variable traffic loading, deferred maintenance, cycles of freeze and thaw. The development of Bridge Management Systems (BMSs) has become a fundamental imperative nowadays due to the huge variance between the need for maintenance actions and the available funds to perform such actions. Condition assessment is regarded as one of the most critical and vital components of BMSs. Ground penetrating radar (GPR) is one of the nondestructive techniques that are used to evaluate the condition of bridge decks which are subjected to the rebar corrosion. There is a major issue associated with the GPR which is the absence of a scale for the amplitude values. The objective of the proposed model is to compute standardized amplitude thresholds for corrosion maps. The proposed model considers eight un-supervised clustering algorithms to obtain the thresholds. The proposed model incorporates a multi-objective optimization-based methodology that employs three evolutionary optimization algorithms to calculate the optimum thresholds which are: (1) genetic algorithm, (2) particle swarm optimization algorithm, and (3) shuffled frog-leaping algorithm. Five multi-criteria decision-making techniques are used to provide a ranking for the solutions. Finally, group decision-making is performed to aggregate the results and obtain a consensus and compromise solution. The standardized thresholds obtained from the proposed methodology are: − 16.7619, − 8.8161, and − 2.9744 dB.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
AASHTO Highways Subcommittee on Bridges and Structures (2011) The manual for bridge evaluation, 2nd edn. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC
Akyene T (2012) Cell phone evaluation base on entropy and TOPSIS. Interdiscip J Res Bus 1(12):9–15
Baltar AM, Fontane DG (2008) Use of multiobjective particle swarm optimization in water resources management. J Water Resour Plan Manag 134(3):257–265
Barnes CL, Trottier J-F, Forgeron D (2008) Improved concrete bridge deck evaluation using GPR by accounting for signal depth-amplitude effects. NDT&E Int 41(6):427–433
Caldas LG, Norford LK (2002) A design optimization tool based on a genetic algorithm. Autom Constr 11(2):173–184
Cristóbal SJR (2011) Multi-criteria decision-making in the selection of a renewable energy project in Spain: the VIKOR method. Renew Energy 36(2):498–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2010.07.031
Czepiel E (1995) Bridge management systems literature review and search. Northwestern University, Evanston
Davies DL, Bouldin DW (1979) A cluster separation measure. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 1(2):224–227
Dinh K, Zayed T (2016) GPR-based fuzzy model for bridge deck corrosiveness index. J Perform Constr Facil 30(4):1–14
Dobbs R, Pohl H, Lin D-Y, Mischke J, Garemo N, Hexter J, Matzinger S, Palter R, Nanavatty R (2013) Infrastructure productivity: how to save $1 trillion a year. Mckinsey Global Institute, Canada
Dragisa S, Bojan D, Mira D (2013) Comparative analysis of some prominent MCDM methods: a case of ranking Serbian banks. Serb J Manag 8(2):213–241
Dunn JC (1974) Well-separated clusters and optimal fuzzy partitions. J Cybern 4(1):95–104
Elbeltagi E, Hegazy T, Grierson D (2005) Comparison among five evolutionary-based optimization algorithms. Adv Eng Inform 19(1):43–53
Felio G (2016) Canadian infrastructure report card. Canadian Construction Association, Canadian Public Works Association, Canadian Society for Civil Engineering, and Federation of Canadian Municipalities, Canada
Fornell C (1983) Issues in the application of covariance structure analysis: a comment. J Consum Res 9(4):443–448
Fu G, Kapelan Z, Reed P (2012) Reducing the complexity of multi-objective water distribution system optimization through global sensitivity analysis. J Water Resour Plan Manag 138(3):196–207
Garg R, Mittal S (2014) Optimization by genetic algorithm. Int J Adv Res Comput Sci Softw Eng 4:3–5
Golden Software LLC (2014) Surfer12 software. http://www.goldensoftware.com/products/surfer. Accessed 05 June 2016
Grant T, Urszula C, Reershemius G, Pollard D, Hayes S, Plappert G (2017) Quantitative research methods for linguists: a questions and answers approach for students. Taylor & Francis, Routledge
Heidari E, Movaghar A (2011) An efficient method based on genetic algorithm to solve sensor network optimization problem. Int J Appl Graph Theory Wirel Ad hoc Netw Sens Netw 3(1):18–33
Ishibuchi H, Hiroyuki M, Yuki T, Yusuke N (2014) Difficulties in specifying reference points to calculate the inverted generational distance for many-objective optimization problems. In: 2014 IEEE symposium on computational intelligence in multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM), Florida, United States of America, pp 1–14
Keskin GA (2015) Using integrated fuzzy DEMATEL and Fuzzy C: means algorithm for supplier evaluation and selection. Int J Prod Res 53(12):3586–3602
KNIME Company (2016) KNIME 3.3.1 software. https://www.knime.org/. Accessed 06 Aug 2016
Kühn M, Severin T, Salzwedel H (2013) Variable mutation rate at genetic algorithms: introduction of chromosome fitness in connection with multi-chromosome representation. Int J Comput Appl 72:31–38
Kumar DN, Reddy MJ (2007) Multipurpose reservoir operation using particle swarm optimization. J Water Resour Plan Manag 133(3):192–201
Kuo Y, Yang T, Huang GW (2008) The use of grey relational analysis In solving multiple attribute decision-making problems. Comput Ind Eng 55(1):80–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2007.12.002
Mackenzie H (2013) Canada’s infrastructure gap: where it came from and why it will cost so much to close. Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, Ottawa
Martino N, Maser K, Birken R, Wang M (2016) Quantifying bridge deck corrosion using ground penetrating radar. Res Nondestr Eval 27(2):112–124
Mashwani KN, Salhi A (2016) Multiobjective evolutionary algorithm based on multimethod with dynamic resources allocation. Appl Soft Comput 39:292–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2015.08.059
MathWorks (2013) Matlab R2013a software. https://www.mathworks.com/. Accessed 06 Sept 2014
Mirza S (2007) Danger ahead: the coming collapse of canada’s municipal infrastructure. Federation of Canadian Municipalities, Ottawa
Mulliner E, Smallbone K, Maliene V (2013) An assessment of sustainable housing affordability using a multiple criteria decision making method. Omega 41(2):270–279
Nebro AJ, Durillo JJ, Coello CAC (2013) Analysis of leader selection strategies in a multi-objective particle swarm optimizer. In: 2013 IEEE congress on evolutionary computation, Cancún, pp 3153–3160
Orouji H, Mahmoudi N, Pazoki M, Biswas A (2016) Shuffled frog-leaping algorithm for optimal design of open channels. J Irrig Drain Eng 142(10):06016008
Pourbahman Z, Hamzeh A (2015) A fuzzy based approach for fitness approximation in multi-objective evolutionary algorithms. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 29:2111–2131
RapidMiner Inc (2016) RapidMiner 7.5 software. https://rapidminer.com/products/studio/. Accessed 06 Aug 2016
Riquelme N, Lucken C, Baran B (2015) Performance metrics in multi-objective optimization. In: 2015 XLI Latin American Computing Conference (CLEI), Peru, pp 1–11
Sahani R, Bhuyan PK (2014) Pedestrian level of service criteria for urban off-street facilities in mid-sized cities. Transport 32(2):221–232
Sawant KB (2015) Efficient determination of clusters in K-mean algorithm using neighborhood distance. Int J Emerg Eng Res Technol 3(1):22–27
Shami A (2015) Ground penetrating radar-based deterioration assessment of bridge decks. M.Sc thesis, Concordia University
Statistics Canada (2009a) Age of public infrastructure: a provincial perspective. http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/11-621-m/11-621-m2008067-eng.htm. Accessed 20 Dec 2016
Statistics Canada (2009b) Average age of public infrastructure by province and type of infrastructure, 2007. http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/11-621-m/2008067/tables/5002061-eng.htm#archived. Accessed 20 Dec 2016
Statistics Canada (2014) From roads to rinks: government spending on infrastructure in Canada, 1961 to 2005. http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/11-010-x/00907/10332-eng.htm. Accessed 20 Dec 2016
Venkatesan T, Sanavullah MY (2013) SFLA approach to solve PBUC problem with emission limitation. Electr Power Energy Syst 46:1–9
Wang L, Fang C (2011) An effective shuffled frog-leaping algorithm for multi-mode resource-constrained project scheduling problem. Inf Sci 181(20):4804–4822
Yang I (2007) Using elitist particle swarm optimization to facilitate bicriterion time-cost trade-off analysis. J Constr Eng Manag 133(7):498–505
Zhang H, Li H (2010) Multi-objective particle swarm optimization for construction time-cost tradeoff problems. Constr Manag Econ 28(1):75–88
This project was funded by the Academy of Scientific Research and Technology (ASRT), Egypt, JESOR-Development Program—Project ID: 40.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
The article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Communicated by V. Loia.
About this article
Cite this article
Mohammed Abdelkader, E., Marzouk, M. & Zayed, T. An optimization-based methodology for the definition of amplitude thresholds of the ground penetrating radar. Soft Comput 23, 12063–12086 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-019-03764-3
- Bridge Management System
- Ground penetrating radar
- Nondestructive techniques
- Amplitude thresholds
- Evolutionary optimization algorithms
- Multi-criteria decision-making