Advertisement

Soft Computing

, Volume 22, Issue 16, pp 5535–5545 | Cite as

Project portfolio selection based on synergy degree of composite system

  • LiBiao Bai
  • Hongliang Chen
  • Qi Gao
  • Wei Luo
Focus
  • 94 Downloads

Abstract

A synergistic perspective to selecting the right project portfolio is the key to realizing strategic organizational objectives. Based on the theory of the composite system, this paper identifies the factors that affect the science of project portfolio selection (PPS) and investigates the synergistic relationship among the organizational strategic objective subsystem, the project portfolio subsystem and the environment subsystem, which collectively constitute the composite system of project portfolio selection. Utilizing the concept of order parameters, an order parameter system is built for each subsystem to reflect the synergistic relationships in the composite system of PPS. The PPS model is constructed based on the degree of synergy in the composite system by describing the order degree of the subsystem and the synergy degree of the composite system, which helps to quantify the synergistic relationships among these subsystems. The effectiveness and feasibility of the proposed model are demonstrated and validated by a case study.

Keywords

Project portfolio selection Composite system Order parameter Order degree Synergy degree 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work is sponsored by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51708039), Ministry of Education Humanities and Social Sciences Fund (No. 17XJC630001), Soft Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province (No. 2017KRM123), Social Science Planning Fund of Shaanxi Province (No. 2017S028), Social Science Planning Fund of Xi’an (Nos. 17J173, 18Z49) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Nos. 300102238620, 300102238303). The authors also thank the managers who participated in this study for giving of their time and sharing their experiences.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. An HG (2007) Research on the theory frame and method of project portfolio selection. Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’anGoogle Scholar
  2. Bai LB, Bai SJ, Shi Victor (2017) Synergetic degree of project portfolio configuration based on the theory of entropy. Sci Technol Manag Res 37(7):164–171Google Scholar
  3. Buys AJ, Stander MJ (2012) Linking projects to business strategy through project portfolio management. S Afr J Ind Eng 21(1):59–68Google Scholar
  4. Calvo C, Ivorra C, Liern V (2016) Fuzzy portfolio selection with non-financial goals: exploring the efficient frontier. Ann Oper Res 245(1–2):31–46MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Cao L, Zijun QI, Wang L (2016) Research on the coupling synergy between urbanization and the development of construction industry in Tianjin. Constr Econ 37(11):87–91Google Scholar
  6. Chi GT, Cao TT, Zhang K (2012) Construction of the evaluation index system of human comprehensive development based on correlation-principal component analysis. Syst Eng Theory Pract 32(1):111–119Google Scholar
  7. Davis AJ, Murray HW, Handman E (2004) Drugs against leishmaniasis: a synergy of technology and partnerships. Trends Parasitol 20(2):73–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Draft RL, Sormunen J, Parks D (1988) Chief executive scanning, environmental characteristics, and company performance: an empirical study. Strateg Manag J 9(2):123–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fang WW (2002) Construction and function of evaluation system of real estate investment environment. J Nanjing Univ Aeronaut Astronaut 4(4):43–46Google Scholar
  10. Feng JQ, Zhang Z (2009) Research on multi-projects synergistic management. China’s High-tech Enterp 1:167–169Google Scholar
  11. Frizelle Mccarthy IP, Rakotobejoel T, Frizelle G (2000) Complex systems theory: implications and promises for manufacturing organisations. Int J Manuf Technol Manag 2(7):559–579Google Scholar
  12. Gao P, Liu Y, Li X, Wang Y (2015) Unraveling the technological innovation pattern of China’s aerospace: synergy innovation. Chin Manag Stud 9(4):501–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gu JF, Zhu CJ, Hao ZC (2011) Application of principal component analysis in water quality evaluation by SPSS software. Adv Mater Res 403–408:3277–3280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gunawardana HMRSS, Wanninayake WMCB (2012) Principal component analysis with SPSS. Arxiv Preprint Arxiv 11(22):261–262Google Scholar
  15. Haken H (1983) Synergetics an introduction, 3rd edn. Springer, Berlin, pp 10–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Harry M (1952) Portfolio selection. J Finance 7(1):77–91Google Scholar
  17. Ke-Xin BI, Sun DH (2010) Empirical study on synergy development between product innovation and process innovation in manufacturing enterprises based on coordination measurement model with respect to composite system. China Soft Sci 46(9):156–163Google Scholar
  18. Ke-Xin BI, Ming-Ye AI, Bai-Zhou LI (2007) The classification study on analysis models and approaches of synergy development between product innovation and process innovation. Chin J Manag Sci 47(4):138–148Google Scholar
  19. Khan MFF, Sakamura K (2012) Toward a synergy among discretionary, role-based and context-aware access control models in healthcare information technology. In: Internet securityGoogle Scholar
  20. Le XJ, She LZ (2011) Innovation research on collaborative management mode of large scale cluster project. J Eng Manag 25(1):56–60Google Scholar
  21. Leung SO (2011) A comparison of psychometric properties and normality in 4-, 5-, 6-, and 11-point Likert scales. J Soc Serv Res 37(4):412–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Li XB, Ge HY (2009) Research on the adaptability to internal and external environment of enterprise based on AHP. J Reform Strategy 25(8):159–162Google Scholar
  23. Li XM, Wei HJ, Guo XL et al (2014) Study of bi-objective project portfolio selection model based on the divisibility. Chin J Manag Sci 22:154–157Google Scholar
  24. Liu Y, Liu YK (2016) Distributionally robust fuzzy project portfolio optimization problem with interactive returns. Appl Soft Comput 56:655–668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nie JK, Wei HA (2015) An attempt on science and technology synergy innovation mechanism in universities—a case study of Hubei universities. Technol Innov Manag 36(2):103–115Google Scholar
  26. Oosthuizen C, Grobbelaar SS, Bam W (2016) Exploring the link between PPM implementation and company success in achieving strategic goals: an empirical framework. S Afr J Ind Eng 27(3):238–250Google Scholar
  27. Perez F, Gomez T (2016) Multiobjective project portfolio selection with Fuzzy constraints. Ann Oper Res 245(1–2):7–29MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. Qiu YR, Yuan L (2004) New method for evaluating venture capital portfolio. Sci Technol Prog Countermeas 5:37–39Google Scholar
  29. Rabbani M, Moghaddam RT, Jolai F, Ghorbani HR (2016) A comprehensive model for R and D project portfolio selection with zero-one linear goal-programming. J Appl Phys 99(8):706–709Google Scholar
  30. Razi FF, Shariat SH (2017) A hybrid grey based artificial neural network and C&R tree for project portfolio selection. Benchmark Int J 24(3):651–665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Shi B, Wang H, Qi L (2011) A hybrid genetic algorithm for scheduling and selecting a project portfolio. Foundations of intelligent systems. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  32. Song HY, Guo YT, Bai SJ (2013) Research on project portfolio allocation based on strategic orientation. Res Sci Technol Manag 16:186–189Google Scholar
  33. Sun ZH (2005) Research on enterprise project portfolio management and portfolio evaluation. Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’anGoogle Scholar
  34. Wang HQ, Yu-Lian XU (2012) A measure model for synergy degree between Sci-tech innovation and Sci-tech finance and its application. China Soft Sci 6:129–138Google Scholar
  35. Wang LB, Hong J, Zhao DT et al (2014) Energy degree of China’s High-tech industrial innovation system. Syst Eng 32(3):1–7Google Scholar
  36. Wang XB, Bai SJ, Bai LB (2015a) Strategic closeness for aerospace project portfolio allocation based on synergetic theory. Space Environ Eng 32(2):217–223Google Scholar
  37. Wang XB, Bai SJ, Bai LB (2015b) Strategic closeness for aerospace project portfolio allocation based on synergistic theory. Space Environ Eng 32(2):217–223Google Scholar
  38. Wu J (2016) Study on synergy mechanism of regional archival information resources co-construction and sharing. Arch Manag 3(220):32–34Google Scholar
  39. Wu Y, Xu C, Ke Y et al (2018) An intuitionistic fuzzy multi-criteria framework for large-scale rooftop PV project portfolio selection: case study in Zhejiang, China. Energy 143:295–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Yang Q, Shi Q (2016) The Standard for portfolio management, 3rd edn. Project Management Association, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  41. Zhang L, Ng CM, Li JF, Pfister DM (2010) Synergy between scientific advancement and technological innovation illustrated by a mechanism-based model characterizing sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibition. J Clin Pharmacol 50(9):113–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zhang ZH, Wang Y, Wang HL (2014) Research on multi-projects synergistic mechanism exploration and application. Proj Manag Technol 12(8):114–118Google Scholar
  43. Zhu H (2007) Analysis of interaction between enterprise and enterprise environment. J Wuhan Univ 60(2):235–240Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Economics and ManagementChang’an UniversityXi’anChina
  2. 2.School of ManagementNorthwestern Polytechnical UniversityXi’anChina
  3. 3.School of Civil EngineeringChang’an UniversityXi’anChina

Personalised recommendations