Advertisement

Soft Computing

, Volume 22, Issue 15, pp 4921–4934 | Cite as

Interval type-2 fuzzy c-control charts using likelihood and reduction methods

  • Hatice Ercan-Teksen
  • Ahmet Sermet Anagün
Focus

Abstract

Control charts, used in many areas, are important for providing information about the status of the product control. Control charts allow us observation of abnormal conditions about a product and/or a process. These situations usually need to be interpreted by an expert. At this point, fuzzy numbers can be beneficial in reducing the differences between experts’ opinions and information loss. This is especially true for qualitative data, and for this reason, fuzzy numbers can be used to transform linguistic expressions into data. Although some recent studies have created control charts with fuzzy sets, most focused on type-1 fuzzy sets. Nevertheless, in real life, it may not always be possible to express these data as type-1 fuzzy sets; it may be more realistic to express some data as type-2 fuzzy sets. The purpose of this study is to create control charts using interval type-2 fuzzy numbers. Interval type-2 fuzzy control charts can be obtained by using different approaches, including defuzzification, centroid, type reduction and likelihood approaches. Comparisons are made between the interval type-2 fuzzy control charts and classical control charts. This study introduces likelihood method as a new approach to generate fuzzy control charts. The significant contribution of this paper to the relevant literature is that interval type-2 fuzzy set methods applied to different areas—such as likelihood, centroid, type reduction—are adapted to c-control charts for the first time.

Keywords

Interval type-2 trapezoidal fuzzy sets Fuzzy control charts c-control charts Nonconformity 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Eskisehir Osmangazi University Bilimsel Arastirmalar Projesi (Scientific Research Project) whose funding is useful for our paper.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. Alaeddini A, Ghanzanfari M, Nayeri MA (2009) A hybrid fuzzy-statistical clustering approach for estimating the time of changes in fixed and variable sampling control charts. Inf Sci 179:1769–1784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Asai K (1995) Fuzzy systems for management. IOS Press, AmsterdamzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Buckley JJ (1985) Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy Sets Syst 29:133–143MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen SM, Lee LW (2010) Fuzzy multiple attributes group-decision making based on the ranking values and the arithmetic operations of interval type-2 fuzzy sets. Expert Syst 37:824–833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cheng CB (2005) Fuzzy process control: construction of control charts with fuzzy numbers. Fuzzy Sets Syst 154:287–303MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Coupland S, John R (2007) Geometric type-1 and type-2 fuzzy logic systems. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 15:3–15CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Ercan-Teksen H, Anagun AS (2017a) Type-2 fuzzy control charts using likelihood and defuzzification methods. Advances in fuzzy logic and technology proceedings of EUSFLAT-2017-10th conference of the European society for fuzzy logic and technology, September 11–15, 2017, Warsaw, PolandGoogle Scholar
  8. Ercan-Teksen H, Anagun AS (2017b) Type-2 fuzzy control charts using ranking methods. In: The 5th international fuzzy systems symposium (FUZZYSS’17) October 14–15, 2017 Ankara, TurkeyGoogle Scholar
  9. Faraz A, Shapiro AF (2010) An application of fuzzy random variables to control charts. Fuzzy Sets Syst 161:2684–2694MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Gülbay M, Kahraman C (2006) Development of fuzzy process control charts and fuzzy unnatural pattern analyses. Comput Stat Data Anal 51:434–451MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. Gülbay M, Kahraman C (2007) An alternative approach to fuzzy control charts: direct fuzzy approach. Inf Sci 177:1463–1480CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Gülbay M, Kahraman C, Ruan D (2004) \(\upalpha \)-cut fuzzy control charts for linguistic data. Int J Intell Syst 19:1173–1196CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. Kahraman C, Öztayşi B, Sarı IU, Turanoğlu E (2014) Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process with interval type-2 fuzzy sets. Knowl Based Syst 59:48–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kanagawa A, Tamaki F, Ohta H (1993) Control charts for process average and variability based on linguistic data. Int J Prod Res 2:913–922CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. Karnik NN, Mendel JM (2001) Centroid of a type-2 fuzzy set. Inf Sci 132:195–220MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. Kaya I, Kahraman C (2011) Process capability analyses based on fuzzy measurements and fuzzy control charts. Expert Syst Appl 38:3172–3184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Laviolette M, Seaman JW, Barrett JD, Woodall WH (1995) A probabilistic and statistical view of fuzzy methods, with discussion. Technometrics 37:249–292CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. Mendel JM (2001) Uncertain rule-based fuzzy logic systems: introduction and new directions. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle RiverzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. Mendel JM, Hagras H, John RI (2009) Standard background material about interval type-2 fuzzy logic systems that can be used by all authors ResearchGate Web. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/239807003_Standard_Background_Material_About_Interval_Type2_Fuzzy_Logic_Systems_That_Can_Be_Used_By_All_Authors. Accessed 4 Nov 2017
  20. Mendel JM, John RIB (2002) Type-2 fuzzy sets made simple. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 10:117–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mendel JM, Liu F (2008) On new quasi-type-2 fuzzy logic systems. In: Proceedings of 2008 international conference on fuzzy systems (FUZZ 2008), WCCI 2008, Hong Kong, China, June 1–6Google Scholar
  22. Mendel JM, Wu H (2007) New results about the centroid of an interval type-2 fuzzy set including the centroid of a fuzzy granule. Inf Sci 177:360–377MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. Montgomery DC (2009) Introduction to statistical quality control. Wiley, HobokenzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. Raz T, Wang JH (1990) Probabilistic and membership approaches in the construction of control charts for linguistic data. Prod Plan Control 1:147–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Senvar O, Kahraman C (2014) Fuzzy process capability indices using Clement’s method for non-normal processes. J Mult Valued Logic Soft Comput 22:95–121zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. Shewhart WA (1931) Economic control of quality of manufactured product. D.Van Nosrrand Inc., PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  27. Shu MH, Wu HC (2011) Fuzzy X and R control charts: fuzzy dominance approach. Comput Ind Eng 613:676–686Google Scholar
  28. Şentürk S, Antuchieviciene J (2017) Interval type-2 fuzzy c-control charts: an application in a food company. Informatica 28:269–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Şentürk S, Erginel N (2009) Development of fuzzy X–R and X–S control charts using \(\upalpha \)-cuts. Inf Sci 179:1542–1551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wang JH, Raz T (1990) On the construction of control charts using linguistic variables. Int J Prod Res 28:477–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Woodall WH, Tsui KL, Tucker GR (1997) A review of statistical and fuzzy quality control charts based on categorical data. In: Lenz HJ, Wilrich PT (eds) Frontiers in statistical quality control. vol 5. Physica, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  32. Wu D, Mendel JM (2009) Enhanced Karnik–Mendel algorithms. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 17:923–934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Zadeh LA (1975) The concept of linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning. Inf Sci 8:338–353MathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Eskisehir Osmangazi UniversityEskisehirTurkey
  2. 2.Izmir University of EconomicsIzmirTurkey

Personalised recommendations